tag + wontfix
thanks
Actually we can't do that, see #557143 and #559970.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Mar/06, Tuco wrote:
Package: zfs-fuse
Version: 2.7.4-1.1+lenny1
Severity: minor
libfuse-dev in Build-Depends seems too strict. INSTALL file says it
can work with FUSE 2.5.x or later. I tried with
On Mar/03, Simon Josefsson wrote:
* Package name: mpdcron
[...]
It would be nice to expand the 'MPD' acronym and/or explain what MPD is.
Excellent idea, will do.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: gmpc
Version: 0.19.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Could we maybe package gmpc's beta versions for experimental ? I
recently built recent libmpd/gmpc/gmpc-plugins, so if you'd like
access to that just ask.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: mpdcron
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ali Polatel a...@exherbo.org
* URL : http://alip.github.com/mpdcron/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2010/02/msg5.html.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (100, 'testing'), (1,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2010/02/msg5.html.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (100, 'testing'), (1,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2010/02/msg5.html.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (100, 'testing'), (1,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2010/02/msg5.html.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (100, 'testing'), (1,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2010/02/msg5.html.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (100, 'testing'), (1,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
--
To
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
RM: jruby1.2 -- ROM; jruby is now in non-free
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (100, 'testing'), (1,
'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
RM: librack-ruby1.9 -- ROM; Superseded by librack-ruby1.9.1
Note: this is only a *binary* package; its old source, librack-ruby,
shouldn't be removed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999, 'stable'), (500,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
RM: libdifflcs-ruby1.9 -- ROM; Superseded by libdifflcs-ruby1.9.1
Note: this is only a *binary* package; its old source, libdifflcs-ruby,
shouldn't be removed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (999,
tag 569947 + moreinfo unreproducible
severity 569947 normal
Hi Jeffrey,
I certainly can't reproduce it here, after putting the 4 lines below in
my org-mode-hook (you're doing that too, as opposed to running it at the
toplevel of your .emacs, right ?): everything went fine with perl-mode.
My own
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/22357
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100216121359.gd7...@frisco.mine.nu
On Feb/16, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
I certainly can't reproduce it here, after putting the 4 lines below in
my org-mode-hook (you're doing that too, as opposed to running it at the
toplevel of your .emacs, right ?): everything went fine with perl-mode.
No. Please enlighten me - as a
Hi Jeffrey,
do you still see this problem with recent versions of org-mode ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 563028 - wontfix
reopen 563028
thanks
On Jan/10, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
Java5 is non-free in Lenny http://packages.debian.org/lenny/sun-java5-jre
Java5 is still.
oh sure, but we never fix bugs for stable, hence my statement that there
is *currently* no java 5 SDK in Debian.
I hope the
Hi Carl,
are you still working on packaging petit ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 563028 - pending
tag 563028 + wontfix
severity 563028 wishlist
thanks
There is no Java5 SDK that I can find left in the archive: sun-java5 was
removed a while ago, openjdk never had a version 5 in debian, and gcj
could never quite build jruby, so this will have to remain like this.
Cheers,
Version: 2.0.4+cvs20081105-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 557143 + confirmed
reassign 557143 fuse
retitle 557143 fuse should use a symbols file
severity 557143 serious
thanks
Hi,
fuse using 'dh_makeshlibs -s -V libfuse2 (= 2.6)' in tis debian/rules
files, and not having a symbols file, is causing problems for packages
depending on it: for instance,
tag 556944 + confirmed pending
thanks
Hi Riku,
I will simply make zfs-fuse Arch:any, and wait for the corresponding
FTBFS, if any. The current arch limitations have apparently been fixed a
while ago.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Nov/18, Riku Voipio wrote:
Package: zfs-fuse
Version:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: libsexp-processor-ruby
Version : 3.0.3
Upstream Author : Ryan Davis (Copyright (c) 2001-2007 Ryan Davis, Zen Spider
Software)
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/parsetree
Package: lintian
Version: 2.2.17
Severity: wishlist
Could we please have /usr/bin/rackup1.[89] added to the list of valid
interpreters ?
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (501, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'),
tag 550540 + upstream
thanks
Hi Jeffrey,
before I can properly report the bug to org-mode's upstream, can you
please give a self-contained, yet detailed enough, example of what
you're actually trying to do (expected behavior vs. actual one) ? Please
also make sure you're using the latest version
On Oct/20, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I surely understand that emacs-snapshot is not an official package and you owe
nothing to it :-) Still, it would be nice if a solution which makes everybody
happy can be found, also considering that emacs-snapshot, AFAIK, has quite a
lot of users.
At
wikipediafs doesn't have any serious bug, and works just fine all
around. The sole lack of maintainership isn't in my opinion enough to
remove the package from the Debian archive.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Oct/15, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: wikipediafs
Version: 0.3-5
Severity: normal
On Oct/13, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
I was using the package shipped with Jaunty, but the latest from
squeeze has the same problem. 6.31a-1 is uninstallable on Jaunty
because of the dpkg dependency.
How do you mean ? org-mode simply depends on emacs... Could you build it
from source and install
Hi Christophe,
do you still see that bug with the latest version ? Also, you haven't
replied to my latest inquiry for more information...
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
. Ctr+Left Mouse make
it accessible.
C.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Christophe,
do you still see that bug with the latest version ? Also, you haven't
replied to my latest inquiry for more information...
Cheers,
--Seb
reassign 527977 jruby1.2
thanks
On Oct/12, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
jruby1.1 has been removed now. Can this bug be closed now or does it
also apply to jruby1.3 (and should be reassigned)?
it unfortunately also applies to the both jruby1.2 and jruby (1.3, for
which I moved away from the one
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: libinnate-ruby
Version : 2009.07
Upstream Author : Michael Fellinger m.fellin...@gmail.com, Tadahiko Uehara
kik...@gmail.com, Pistos gitsomegrace.5.pis...@geoshell.com, Ryan Grove
r
tag 550540 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jeffrey,
I don't see 6.14-1 in either stable, testing or unstable: what
distribution are you using ? Could you possibly upgrade to a more recent
version and see if the problem persists ?
Cheers,
--Seb
On Oct/11, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
Package: org-mode
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
IN upstream's development tree, sequel_core has been merged with
sequel, so libsequel-core-ruby is obsolete.
Cheers,
--SD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Dmitry,
looking into it some more today, libsequel-core-ruby is obsolete: the
upstream code has been merged into libsequel-ruby, which is also in
Debian. I'd recommend trying that package instead, as I've asked for the
removal of libsequel-core-ruby from the Debian archive.
Cheers,
--Seb
On
Package: python-codespeak-lib
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: normal
If I don't manually install python-pkg-resources, py.test is
non-functional:
~ # py.test
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/py.test, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
Package: python-codespeak-lib
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: normal
python-codespeak-lib depends specifically on python2.4, but it works
just fine with python2.5. Some sort of python-support trickery I
assume...
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT
retitle 548734 ITP: jruby -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby
thanks
* Package name: jruby
Moving away from having one jruby package per version.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
retitle 549027 Cannot install with emacs-snapshot in lenny
tag 549027 wontfix
severity 549027 normal
thanks
Hi,
emacs-snapshot is not an official debian package, so there is not much I
can do about that: unless you disagree, I will simply close this bug.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Sep/30, Abrahán
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: jruby1.3
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri-license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
With jruby1.3 scheduled to enter the archive soon (ITP #548734),
jruby1.1 is now obsolete.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (501, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (499,
Package: libspring-2.5-java
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible for libspring-2.5-java to Build-Depend on
jruby1.2 instead of jruby1.1 ? jruby1.3 is about to enter the archive,
so I've asked for the removal of jruby1.1 (Bug #548735).
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
severity 544506 normal
tag 544506 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Christophe,
what version of emacs are you using ? What is the error you're getting ?
Cheers,
--Seb
On Sep/01, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Package: org-mode
Version: 6.29c+1-3
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below
Hi,
I just submitted a bug against destar on berlios.de. Here's the summary:
Summary:
Security problems (CVE-2008-6538 and CVE-2008-6539)
Original Submission:
destar 0.2.2 is vulnerable to both CVE-2008-6538 and CVE-2008-6538:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
This package has been abandonned upstream.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable'),
(1, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Upstream has changed this to a dependency only library, and I don't
have time to package the many gemes this now requires.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'),
Package: python-codespeak-lib
Version: 0.9.1-3
Severity: wishlist
A new 1.0 version is available from http://pypi.python.org/pypi/py/.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: minbif
Version : 1.0alpha~git20090813
Upstream Author : Romain Bignong rom...@peerfuse.org
* URL : http://symlink.me/projects/show/minbif
* License : GPL
Programming
The upstream author name is Romain Bignon; sorry for my poor typing
skills...
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A better long description would be:
Minbif is an IRC gateway to IM networks which provides the following features:
* Minbif uses a library which abstracts all IM calls, and has several
plugins to support a lot of IM protocols (IRC included!).
* Only IRC commands are used to command
Package: vim-scripts
Severity: wishlist
It's used to list, edit and publish articles on a wordpress blog, and
is available at http://symlink.me/wiki/blogit.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
On Aug/10, Ben Finney wrote:
The documentation for ‘org-mode’ is distributed under a non-free
license [0], according to ‘debian/copyright’:
org-mode's documentation:
=
Copyright (C) 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation
org-mode's
On Aug/10, Ben Finney wrote:
The above file doesn't seem to be part of the distribution of
org-mode. We should best rely on a grant of license given within the
work itself, rather than an independently-changeable document at a
URL.
Probably the best way to do that is to include the above
On Aug/10, Ben Finney wrote:
Just so that I understand: You're saying that the copy of the manual
distributed in Debian *is* licensed to recipients under GPLv3? In
which case, we need clear text granting that license, especially if
there is some chance of dispute in the community over whether
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Per #539927, python-libgmail is currently broken and won't be fixed by
upstream, hence this removal request.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
python-libgmail is to be removed, and gmailfs depends on it; also
upstream has clearly indicated they do not plan on maintaining it any
longer.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500,
Thank you guys for the quick responses; I've officially asked for
python-libgmail's and gmailfs' removal from the Debian archive, with a
little pinch to the heart as they were my first official Debian packages
ever :)
It's been a pleasure working with all you guys, so don't hesitate to ask
if
tag 539849 + wontfix
severity 539849 wishlist
tag 539847 + wontfix
severity 539847 wishlist
thanks
Let's keep them open if you really insist on it, but I won't fix them;
if you feel like providing a patch, though, feel free to do so and I'll
integrate it.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Jul/15, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
* Proper build-depend on openjdk-6-jdk, java6-sdk (Closes: #534071).
I haven't looked at the source you uploaded, but what you need is:
openjdk-6-jdk | java-6-jdk
ok, now I'm getting confused: in your previous email you said sbuild
didn't support OR'ed
I'm seeing this one: when I startx with my USB keyboard plugged in,
everything is fine and both the PS2 keyboard and the USB one honor my
xmodmpa settings; after I unplug and replug the USB keyboard, it reverts
to using a vanilla mapping, and my xmodmpa settings then only work on
the PS2 keyboard.
found 527872 3.3.1-1
thanks
I'm still seeing this problem on sid, using 3.3.1-1: /etc/init.d/dbus
restart kills awesome.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
So, this is now different exception, which I can't seem to be able to
reproduce on sid. What java version are you using ?
Here, paros runs fine with both openjdk's and Sun's java6:
~ # /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java -Duser.dir=$HOME/.paros -cp
On Jun/09, John O Laoi wrote:
The first one worked i.e., I got no error - just the prompt back.
working would be paros starting up. Check the return code with echo
$? after you get the prompt back.
# /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/java -Duser.dir=$HOME/.paros -cp
reassign 532194 openjdk-6-jre
found 532194 6b14-1.5~pre1-5
fixed 532194 6b16-2
thanks
On Jun/09, John O Laoi wrote:
Sebastian,
I don't know why, but now the first command has launched Paros,
running as normal user.
because as I pointed out, root didn't have ~/.paros, whereas your user
has
tag + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi John,
after installing a package, I often run something like dpkg -L package
| grep /bin/ to figure out what binaries are provided to me by said
package.
In our case, to use paros, I simply run /usr/bin/paros; this is all you
should have to do. If that's
Ah, my mistake; I wasn't planning on asking for jruby1.1 removal just
yet, so I'll backport the change to that too.
--Seb
On Jun/08, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Sebastien,
I had logged this bug against jruby1.1. Can you please fix it there too?
Or are you planning to ask for removal of jruby1.1
tag 531662 + confirmed
thanks
I'll do #2 and change the runtime dependency, but as I recall jruby not
building with gcj, I don't think I'll integrate #1.
Cheers,
--Seb
On Jun/03, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Subject: jruby1.1: Please merge packaging changes from Ubuntu if possible
Package: jruby1.1
tag 529787 unreproducible
thanks
They both come from the same source package, so you can rest assured
they both have the same version number, namely 3.0.0-1:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libsequel-ruby.html
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libsequel-ruby
Cheers,
--Seb
On
tag 527977 confirmed
thanks
On May/09, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
Package: jruby1.1
Version: 1.1.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package includes the following files:
/usr/lib/jruby1.1/lib/bsf.jar
/usr/lib/jruby1.1/lib/jruby.jar
Package: rapidsvn
Version: 0.9.6
Severity: wishlist
Version 0.9.8 seems to be available upstream.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable'),
(1, 'unstable')
On Apr/22, Ben Finney wrote:
Since the package fails to install properly while ‘emacs21’ is also
installed
is this actually the case ? I believe the following code in
emacsen-install does takes care of it:
case ${FLAVOR} in
emacs) exit 0 ;; # generic emacs package
emacs21) exit 0 ;;
tag 524951 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Apr/22, Ben Finney wrote:
is this actually the case ?
Yes. While that remains true this bug is not resolved.
I believe the following code in emacsen-install does takes care of
it:
Perhaps; I don't know what the solution is. If this
On Apr/22, Ben Finney wrote:
Ah, that was the crucial missing part. The latest release I was aware
of was yesterday's release of 6.26a-1.
Not exactly missing, as the email you answered when reopening this bug
earlier on was precisely the Closed by 6.26a-3 (generated by my upload
of this
On Apr/22, Ben Finney wrote:
The changelog entry didn't give me any hint that this bug was
addressed in any way except “upstream says wontfix”. I don't want to
nag, but a better changelog entry would have led the reader to expect
the changed behaviour you describe.
Anyway, no hard feeling,
Hi Ben,
6.25e is indeed broken upstream, and 6.26a (already in sid) fixes that,
but I suspect this is something else, possibly related to emacs21 (I
don't have it installed on my system, and 6.25e installed fine). Could
you try 6.26a and let me know if that fixes it ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To
retitle 524951 Does not install with emacs21
thanks
On Apr/21, Ben Finney wrote:
package org-mode
found 524951 6.26a-1
thanks
On 21-Apr-2009, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
6.25e is indeed broken upstream, and 6.26a (already in sid) fixes that,
but I suspect this is something else, possibly
tag 524655 + confirmed upstream patch pending
thanks
Hi Csaba,
forwarding you a bug report mentioning that the size=0 API is not
honored in python-fuse. The attached patch fixes it (it comes from this
more detailed bug report [0]), and looks OK to me; would you consider
including in your
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: god
Version : 0.7.12
Upstream Author : Tom Preston-Werner t...@rubyisawesome.com
* URL : http://god.rubyforge.org
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
rename 523001 [checks/scripts] Add jruby to the list of valid interpreters
thanks
Because of http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3554, jruby1.2 will
ship with #!/usr/bin/env jruby shebang lines, and not jruby1.2 ones.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
jruby1.2 will be uploaded to unstable shortly (see corresponding ITP
#522996[0]), so jruby1.0 is not needed anymore.
Cheers,
--Seb
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/522996
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy:
tag 523068 + confirmed pending
thanks
Working on it, shouldn't be too long now (cleaning up some
dpatch-related nastiness).
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: jruby1.2
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri-license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: lintian
Version: 1.24.2.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi fellow maintainers,
could you please add jruby1.2 to the list of valid interpreters ? I
will be uploading it to unstable i nthe next couple of days.
Thank you very much, cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
different versions in the archive instead of one, or two at most?
jruby1.0 will indeed be removed shortly from the
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new one on your existing jruby code without removing
the old one, for instance ?
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
still be needed ?
As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons;
backward-compatibility is something many people like to
merge 517939 490053
thanks
Hi Andreas,
I believe this is a duplicate of 490053.
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reopen 513044
retitle 513044 startup script should autoload icicles instead of require'ing it
tag 513044 + confirmed pending
thanks
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:19:47AM +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote:
In the first one too I was going to ask still that it autoload
instead of bringing the whole lot into
tag 512784 + confirmed
thanks
I personally use icicles in emacs in a tty, so disabling it altogether
in that case is not an option, but I will work something out...
Cheers,
--Seb
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:44:21PM +, Toby Speight wrote:
Package: icicles
Version: 22.0+20081227-1
tag 512591 + confirmed pending
thanks
I missed that, but will fix it today; thanks for your report,
--Seb
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:00:42PM +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote:
Package: icicles
Version: 22.0+20081227-1
Severity: normal
Some of the .el files in icicles don't compile on xemacs21 due
.
---BeginMessage---
On 2009-01-05 15:39 +0100, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:31:57AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
When that package is installed, however, it provides
/usr/share/info/emacs-22/org.gz. info(1) deals with it properly,
but emacs' info system then present
reassign 490053 emacs22-common
thanks
After discussing this over a bit on debian-emac...@l.d.o, I'm
tentatively re-assigning this bug to emacs22-common. Feel free to send
it back my way if the suggestion that /usr/share/info should come
before /usr/share/info/emacs22 in info-directory-list is
Hi Gregor,
I really have no clue where this 4.67 version of the org manual is
coming from : no matter what I try here, I never see it: -Q or not,
all I can access from emacs' info mode is the 6.16 version.
Did you maybe manually install an older version of org-mode at some
point, and never
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:29:29PM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
Are you using checksumming?
If not, can you try to enable it and see if that works around your
problem.
I was not using checksumming, but I will turn it on. Hopefully though,
I won't run out of space again anytime soon :)
I am
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: icicles
Version : 22.0+2008-12-27
Upstream Author : Drew Adams drew.ad...@oracle.com
* URL : http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/Icicles
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: org-mode
Version: 6.14-1
Severity: normal
I (the maintainer of org-mode) have been accidentally shipping an
older version of the manual in my past couple of uploads. This will be
fixed in 6.14-2.
Cheers,
--Seb
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
tag 506368 + confirmed pending
thanks
Will do soon; I am unsure this will solve anything regarding
emacs-snapshot, as this is not officially in Debian. If some upstream
change recently made org-mode compatible, then awesome !
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
tag 503404 - confirmed
tag 503404 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I can actually start awesome just fine from the console, using startx
for instance. Only in vncserver do I get the stack trace I posted
above.
This is probably the same as awesome's bug #217[0] although the
original reporter insists it
tag 503404 + confirmed
thanks
I see the same exact behavior too:
~ # DISPLAY=:1 gdb awesome
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and
201 - 300 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
