Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-29 Thread Vasudev Kamath
source > --commit > > .hg_archival.txt is no longer in sprop tarball, so it should be removed from > the repository, too. Ah yes! I forgot to delete it will do it tonight -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-28 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted copyright to its original format and modified create_orig_source to refer dl.suckless.org. Changes are back in the git Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-28 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 19:27 Sun 28 Oct , Vasudev Kamath wrote: > On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-28, 10:45: > > >>>>I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific > > >>>>revision of prop (currently ecfe2752

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-28 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-28, 10:45: > >>>>I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific > >>>>revision of prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip. > >>>>That would make the scrip

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 16:09 Thu 25 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-25, 11:54: > >>Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for > >>sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too? > >> > >>I'd prefer if create_get_orig source down

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
elog as new dmenu fixes it. And I updated the Standards-version to 3.9.4 When I run bhlc on build log of new package I get this http://sprunge.us/CiYR But as far as I know this should be automatically introduced when using compat level 9 with debhelper >= 9 right? Or am I missing somethin

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-16 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 23:28 Mon 15 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-15, 20:13: > >Now understood the issue correctly. I was using pdebuild and I > >don't know how it started considering 38-2 as the orig tarball! > >Well now I used the git-buildpackage and it looks f

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ppy about it). Could you remove the > extra newline? Well I guess I introduced it while patching from my already finished work! Let me fix it tonight -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 19:08 Mon 15 Oct , intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (15 Oct 2012 03:43:55 GMT) : > >> * git checkout master && git merge -s ours squeeze > > > Well I don't really think I can merge it back to master! > > I think you should re

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 14:53 Sun 14 Oct , intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;) > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) : > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >> New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me &

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 22:28 Sun 14 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-14, 16:09: > >>W: suckless-tools source: native-package-with-dash-version > >Yeah I saw these but I think changing the version number will > >cause lot of problem right? > > It's not the

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
752fc98de1894415f041b3c52de782dd408b;hb=HEAD -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:23 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;) > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) : >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 11:45 Sun 14 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-13, 22:10: > >>>>> + Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611) > >>>>"Converted to..." doesn't usually play well with the freeze > >>>>policy.

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-13 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:53 Thu 11 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-11, 22:34: > >>>suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low > >>> > >>>* debian/control: > >>> + Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090) > >>> + Vcs-

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ogether. Let me see Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
hand, has the licence text copied verbatim, but only the > short license name wrong. yes :) So much for doing the work when I was sleepy :(. I will fix it tonight -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 22:10 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 21:55: > >suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * debian/control: > > + Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090) > > + Vcs-* fields now points to repository on co

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
a patch for removing FTBFS on Gnu/hurd but this is fixed in >> new version of dmenu do you think it is good to add this patch [1] > > > Hurd is not a release architecture, so I'm pretty sure Release Team won't be > happy about such a change. OK I won't apply it s

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 11:03 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 09:16: > >>Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for > >>sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too? > > > >Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to De

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-09 Thread Vasudev Kamath
itory still exist and only just renamed. I will prepare this and ping back to you tonight! Just a note is it okay to change Vcs-* field in this version even though its not mentioned in bug report? -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSU

Bug#687806: fonts-taml is not installing all the Tamil fonts as it describes to do

2012-09-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages fonts-taml depends on: ii fonts-lohit-taml 2.5.1-1 fonts-taml recommends no packages. fonts-taml suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Vasu

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 13:16 Fri 31 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-31, 16:40: > >>Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong > >>directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the > >>current directory.” — Policy §4.9) > >H

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
properly). Any way will fix this tonight Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#685611: Setting correct owner for the bug

2012-08-25 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 09:04 Sat 25 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-25, 12:09: > >There is a Source: field in the copyright pointing to the upstream > >website, > > FWIW, copyright file for suckless-tools 38-1 has no such field. Ah yes that source is very old even befo

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-25 Thread Vasudev Kamath
7;s > name/group/umask are not leaked: > > --owner root --group root --mode a+rX Done Warm Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D

Bug#685611: Setting correct owner for the bug

2012-08-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
-- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
; --owner root --group root --mode a+rX Ok I will fix it > Have you seen #685611? Just now noticed it. It went to original maintainer who orphaned thanks for pointing out. I will reply for the bug on the bug itself. Will prepare a new source and ping you again Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-22 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 15:49 Mon 20 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-18, 22:07: > >>get-orig-source: TMPDIR :=$(shell (mktemp --tmpdir -d suckless-tools.)) > >> > >>It looks like a nice hack, but... it will create a temporary > >>directory every tim

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-18 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:46 Thu 16 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-07-30, 21:56: > >>It doesn't look like it's suitable for wheezy, so please make it > >>s/unstable/experimental/. > >Done! When it should be moved to unstable? After wheezy release? >

Bug#684173: Please document Surf's behaviour with secured connection

2012-08-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
packages. surf suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E

Bug#683851: surf: please use x-terminal-emulator

2012-08-05 Thread Vasudev Kamath
tags 683851 +pending thanks I've done the required changes and it looks like working. Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408

Bug#683851: surf: please use x-terminal-emulator

2012-08-04 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ly because of fault in st. xterm is mainly used for download purpose so by changing dependency to x-terminal-emulator I may end up making surf useless too! I will first try this and then update the dependency appropriately. Thanks for the report :-) -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-07-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 10:48 Mon 30 Jul , Jakub Wilk wrote: > This is only a very rudimentary review. I don't have time to review > this properly for the time being. Anybody else is welcome to do it > for me. :) Thanks.. Wonder how many more silly stuffs show up on actual review ;-) > > * V

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-07-29 Thread Vasudev Kamath
or. (Closes: #642307,#665884) * Fixed a typo in the wmname manpage * Added some docs [ Vasudev Kamath ] * Imported new version of slock (Closes: #667796) * Imported new version of tabbed * debian/control: + Increased minimum debhelper required to 9 + Bumped Standards-Version

Bug#647090: ITP: suckless-tools -- simple commands for minimalistic window managers

2012-07-22 Thread Vasudev Kamath
malistic window > managers > noowner 647090 > stop > > > The package at mentors is no longer there, and there is no news in the last > six > months. I'm retitling this ITA back to O, so that anyone interested can adopt > the package. > > Regar

Bug#681298: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#681298: Bug#681298: Bug#681298: ITP: font-kalapi -- Kalapi Gujarati Unicode font

2012-07-16 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > >> As I said above it should always been in this way from beginning but I >> don't know why ttf-indic-fonts was created by mixing all fonts >> together during th

Bug#681657: Please consider Adding Open Font License to /usr/share/common-licenses

2012-07-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages base-files depends on: ii gawk [awk] 1:4.0.1+dfsg-2 ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-17 base-files recommends no packages. base-files suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friend

Bug#681655: ITP: fonts-lohit-taml-classical -- Lohit Tamil fonts with additional ligature for Classical Tamil script

2012-07-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vasudev Kamath * Package name: fonts-lohit-taml-classical Version : 2.5.1 Upstream Author : Pravin Satpute * URL : https://fedorahosted.org/lohit * License: OFL Programming Lang: N/A

Bug#681298: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#681298: Bug#681298: ITP: font-kalapi -- Kalapi Gujarati Unicode font

2012-07-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ways prefixed to upstream font name but in some places we missed to rename the directories. Probably a bug can help us keep track of these changes -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net |

Bug#680600: unblock: kiwix/0.9~beta6.8-1

2012-07-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
some more information on rejection reason. Please keep debian-edu mailing list in CC. Kind Regards - Forwarded message from renaud gaudin - Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:22:21 +0200 From: renaud gaudin To: Vasudev Kamath Cc: debian-edu-pkg-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org, me...@dogguy.org Subjec

Bug#680600: unblock: kiwix/0.9~beta6.8-1

2012-07-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kiwix Previously kiwix was an candidate for wheezy and had an unblock request by Freeze-exception. We had a RC bug [1] and we had to upload a new upstream version wit

Bug#679945: Fwd: Bug#679945: kiwix: crashes entire session upon exit

2012-07-02 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ritical side effect. renaud ___ Debian-edu-pkg-team mailing list debian-edu-pkg-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-edu-pkg-team -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#679605: Kiwix base64.h

2012-06-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi, I'm one of the uploader of Kiwix and I just checked the base64.h of both package and they seems to be 2 different files with same name, I'm trying to contact the upstream to see if this file can be renamed in Kiwix. I've not yet contacted heimdal maintainers With Regards --

Bug#677527: wvdial in unsable state

2012-06-16 Thread Vasudev Kamath
be it is related dependent library upgrade With Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#617813: [KIWIX] New Debian packages for Offline Wikipedia

2012-05-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ter branch history with unnecessary commits Please let me know if any help is required from my side. I couldn't do much today as I've office early tomorrow. With Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}

Bug#617813: [KIWIX] New Debian packages for Offline Wikipedia

2012-05-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ot but this work is reusable only thing is I need to reimport the new version of the Kiwix package which I should be able to do tonight. >The current version builds against xulrunner-10.0 as stated in the control >file. That is good news I will try to build it tonight -- Vasudev Kam

Bug#617813: Re: [KIWIX] New Debian packages for Offline Wikipedia

2012-05-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
We have newly a compilation farm generating deb >> files for Wheezy and we want to integrate Kiwix to the Debian >> repository: >> * http://mirror.kiwix.org/bin/nightly/latest/ >> * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617813 >> >> We would be really ha

Bug#667895: lintian: Please Falcon programming language/script interpreter line to lintian

2012-04-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.6 Severity: wishlist We are packaging Falcon programming language (falconpl ITP: #460591) for Debian. This is a scripting kind of language and uses #!/usr/bin/falcon as interpreter line which is not recognized by lintian. Please consider adding it to lintian. Warm Re

Bug#663937: Fwd: [Bug 803563] lohit-telugu-fonts contains glyphs at erraneous code points

2012-03-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
have this range. Please check and let me know if still problem persist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You reported the bug. -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkama

Bug#662924: ttf-freefont: What is Untitled1.ttf?

2012-03-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ease SFD tarball with these scripts. It should be easy to rebuild the package >Could you please explain what exactly you're trying to accomplish? I'm not the maintainer of the ttf-freefonts but I found the bug on the list and since Malayalm was involved I forwarded it to santhos :). --

Bug#662124: RFS: fonts-lato/1.104-1 [ITP] -- sans-serif typeface family font

2012-03-04 Thread Vasudev Kamath
dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-lato/fonts-lato_1.104-1.dsc More information about Lato can be obtained from http://www.latofonts.com Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#662111: Providing a Readable Description

2012-03-03 Thread Vasudev Kamath
his foundry tyPoland, with support from Google. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#662111: ITP: fonts-lato -- sans-serif typeface family font

2012-03-03 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vasudev Kamath * Package name: fonts-lato Version: 1.104 Upstream Author : ��ukasz Dziedzic * URL : http://www.latofonts.com * License: OFL 1.1 Programming Lang: font Description

Bug#661245: fontconfig: [patch] Correct non-latin font names for sans and serif for Indic fonts

2012-02-25 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: fontconfig Version: 2.8.0-3.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Current 65-nonlatin.conf file gives wrong fonts for Sans and Serif also it includes some legacy encoded (non unicode) fonts in it. This patch is sent to upstream[1] but not yet applied there. It would be helpful if this patch

Bug#617813: kiwix ITP: update

2012-02-08 Thread Vasudev Kamath
building fine with Xulrunner > 10). > > Search still does not work, but he promissed to fix it in a while. Thanks for the update. Developer had promised to inform me about this change but they didn't inform me yet. I'll try building it. And update the status

Bug#658385: ITP: fonts-taml-tscu -- TSCu family of non Unicode fonts for Tamil script

2012-02-02 Thread Vasudev Kamath
TSCu family of non Unicode fonts for Tamil script which is widely used in Indian state of TamilNadu. -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#658383: ITP: fonts-taml-tamu -- TAMu family of non Unicode fonts for Tamil script

2012-02-02 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Unicode fonts for the Tamil script which is widely used in the Indian state of TamilNadu. -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#658154: dh-make: Please add dh-make-font script into dh-make package

2012-01-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
make will fail. ..TP \-v, \-\-version Show the version number of program and exit. ..SH COPYRIGHT AND AUTHORS Copyright \(co 2011-2012 Vasudev Kamath 2011-2012 Muneeb Shaikh 2011-2012 Shravan Aras <123.shra...@gmail.com> License GPLv2: GNU GPL version 2 <http://gnu.o

Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Forwarding reply from Zachary - Forwarded message from Zachary Vance - Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:18:07 -0500 From: Zachary Vance To: Vasudev Kamath Subject: Re: Update alternative priority for surf is too high On 28 January 2012 00:53, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > >>I grepped th

Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ty should be bumped instead. >>Thoughts? See also bug #630390. Yes you are right! I'm surprised to see some weird browsers getting higher priority than actually used browsers! And chromium at 40!! So what do you suggest? Shall I reduce the alternative to 30 or leave as is? Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info http://identi.ca/vasudev vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
page ;). Fixed it and added Bug-Debian too. New version is already uploaded to mentors. Thanks for the reviews Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 17:52 Fri 27 Jan , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-01-27, 21:52: > >>> + Reduced the update-alternative priority to 30 as per > >>>request from user to the previous maintainer > >>Hmm. Was there a bug report about that? > >No previou

Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
roblem is with my expectations? > > Thanks for your time! > -Zachary Vance Adding in CC the original reporter so he can put some more information if required. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
-options doesn't belong in the source > package. And if you look carefully, dpkg-source in fact didn't > include it in .debian.tar.gz. Okay I read maint-guide section 5.22 again and now I'm clear this is only for changing the behaviour dpkg-source locally. I'll remove this section from changelog. I'll upload finished package ASAP. Thanks for the review :) Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-25 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ons to undo the patches -- Vasudev Kamath Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:28:03 +0530 If some one can upload the same for me it would be really helpful. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#646474: Unable to reproduce FTBFS

2012-01-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hello, I tried to build surf_0.4.1-4.1 on clean chroot using pbuilder and I could build this package successfully. I'm attaching build log for reference. Please let me know if this bug still exists as I'm planning to do a QA upload for this Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath dpkg-chec

Bug#651768: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#651768: Further Comments : bug for sans-serif not solved yet?

2012-01-22 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ml http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2011-December/003726.html So I've asked him to provide these patches to Debian maintainers of fontconfig so atleast we can get it resolved in debian. @Santhosh please provide these to debian by raising a bug on fontconfig packages Best Regard

Bug#609728: ttf-malayalam-fonts: Dyuthi3.ttf has a spurious Font Subfamily field

2012-01-05 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ttf-malayalam-fonts Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#652243: Bug is in upstream Makefile

2011-12-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
tag 652243 +upstream tag 652243 +confirmed thanks This is an upstream bug because of use of update-openoffice-dict which is removed from debian we have notified the upstream. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#652186: Tagging

2011-12-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
tag 652186 + upstream tag 652186 + confirmed thanks -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#652186: Bug is in the upstream makefile

2011-12-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619246 Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#651738: [Debian-in-workers] Bug#651738: ITP: fonts-gubbi - TrueType font for Kannada language

2011-12-12 Thread Vasudev Kamath
or Kannada *script* not language...:-) :) that is also true I took this line from the previous ttf-indic-fonts so I'll fix them Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651739: ITP: fonts-navilu - TrueType hand writing font for Kannada language

2011-12-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
forked from Malige truetype font for Kannada language. The issues in Malige are fixed and some rendering feature and Rupee symbols are added. -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#651738: ITP: fonts-gubbi - TrueType font for Kannada language

2011-12-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Kedage truetype font for Kannada language. The issues in Kedage are fixed and some rendering feature and Rupee symbols are added. -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#647090: Status Check

2011-11-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
's current contents, a few of >> the utilities are out of date: >>   [omitted st] >>   lsw-0.1     (now 0.2) >>   dmenu-4.2.1 (now 4.4.1) >> >> dmenu-4.5 is scheduled for a Christmas release. > > I filed two wishlist bugs to remember doing this : &g

Bug#647090: Status Check

2011-11-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi, Is any one interested in adapting this package? If so I would be glad to help them out if any help is needed. If no one is working on this package I'll be happy to adopt this :) Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath -

Bug#617813: Kiwix package status update

2011-11-21 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ebian asap. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#647914: Add Vasudev Kamath as a Debian Maintainer

2011-11-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: debian-maintainers Please add Vasudev Kamath to Debian Maintainers keyring. Jetring changeset attached Thanks -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) Comment: Add Vasudev Kamath as a Debian Maintainer Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:45:12 +0530

Bug#617813: Packaging complete

2011-09-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
x.org/index.php/DebianPackageIssues Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info http://identi.ca/vasudev vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#637808: installation-report: Graphical Installer doesn't work properly on Acer Travelmate 4740Z

2011-08-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: installation-reports Version: 2.45 Severity: normal Tags: wheezy Hello, I had filed a successful installation report for Acer Travelmate [1] I had used text installer for this. But when I tried using the Graphical installer for Xfce4 and graphical installer came up with square boxes, no r

Bug#636990: installation-reports: Successful installation on Acer Travelmate 4740Z

2011-08-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
bian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Vasudev Kamath http://b

Bug#633302: [DRE-maint] Bug#633302: ruby-bcrypt: FTBFS everywhere: [BUG] Segmentation fault

2011-07-16 Thread Vasudev Kamath
because when I was trying to build the package with tests enabled first time it was throwing error complaining bcrypt.h file is not found. This is error was thrown from the file ext/mri/bcrypt_ext.c file. To fix this line was added. Is it building fine without this line? Regards -- Vasudev

Bug#633302: [DRE-maint] Bug#633302: ruby-bcrypt: FTBFS everywhere: [BUG] Segmentation fault

2011-07-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > > > ___ > Pkg-ruby-extras-ma

Bug#623597: ITP: bcrypt-ruby -- OpenBSD's bcrypt() password hashing algorithm.

2011-04-21 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vasudev Kamath * Package name: bcrypt-ruby Version : 2.1.4 Upstream Author : Coda Hale * URL : http://bcrypt-ruby.rubyforge.org * License : BSD Programming Lang: Ruby Description : OpenBSD's bcrypt() pas

Bug#607881: ITP: pypdflib -- Python based PDF rendering library.

2010-12-23 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vasudev Kamath * Package name: pypdflib * Version: 0.1a2   Upstream Author: Santhosh Thottingal * URL: https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/pypdflib * License: LGPL-3+   Programming Lang: Python   Description: pypdflib is a Python based PDF rendering

<    1   2   3   4   5   6