Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-30 Thread Martín Ferrari
On Nov 30, 2007 11:04 AM, Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:38:13PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: I am for renaming (plus a transitional package). So am I, the existence of MIME/Tools.pm tips the scales for me. FWIW, I think it makes sense to rename both the source

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-30 Thread Niko Tyni
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:38:13PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: I am for renaming (plus a transitional package). So am I, the existence of MIME/Tools.pm tips the scales for me. FWIW, I think it makes sense to rename both the source and the binary package in the same go. After bugging

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-30 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Julian Mehnle, Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:34:38AM + |=- Niko Tyni wrote: I'm still not sure if it's worth it to rename, though. Gregor Herrmann wrote: Considering the arguments with versioned dependencies I'm inclined to propose to stick with the current name. Cost: This would

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-29 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:15:28PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote: (Sorry for the delay.) Package: libmime-perl Version: 5.417-1 Severity: wishlist The CPAN package is named MIME-tools, so following the unofficial naming convention for Debian Perl packages, the Debian package should probably

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-29 Thread Niko Tyni
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:27:47PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: There is actually no real primary module in the MIME-Tools distribution, and I suppose 'libmime-perl' (which dates back to 1997) can be seen as an approximation. Hm, I only now realized that there really *is* a MIME::Tools module,

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-29 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:58:37 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: Since it also contains the primary documentation, I suppose it could be viewed as the primary module, and the name of the binary package should indeed be libmime-tools-perl. I'm still not sure if it's worth it to rename, though.

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2007-11-29 Thread Julian Mehnle
Niko Tyni wrote: I'm still not sure if it's worth it to rename, though. Gregor Herrmann wrote: Considering the arguments with versioned dependencies I'm inclined to propose to stick with the current name. Cost: This would be a one-time action, and we can easily supply a dummy libmime-perl

Bug#297765: Package should be named libmime-tools-perl, not libmime-perl

2005-03-02 Thread Julian Mehnle
Package: libmime-perl Version: 5.417-1 Severity: wishlist The CPAN package is named MIME-tools, so following the unofficial naming convention for Debian Perl packages, the Debian package should probably really be named libmime-tools-perl. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a