Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions. Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:30:43 +0900 Well, it was a news, which could have been included in 3.0-2 NEWS.Debian. To be more precise, removeal

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-13 Thread Frank Küster
Atsuhito Kohda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where is that texk mailing list and texlive list archives that keeps on popping up? URL? I'm not so familiar with texlive but perhaps http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/ (or you can start from http://www.tug.org/texlive/) I tried to find information

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-12 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions. Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:44:30 +0900 1. I don't understand why it has to be removed; it's an interface that has been used, and not documented

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:21:29PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: Please provide a 'initex' that prints out a warning that it is being deprecated for etch. This would break the fundamental initex feature as documented in its manual. I can understand that you've been considerinig initex

Bug#338046: Bug#338608: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

2005-11-12 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, 1. I don't understand why it has to be removed; it's an interface that has been used, and not documented as deprecated anywhere. I'm not usre that one can say initex _has to_ be removed but at least it is reasonable to remove it in teTeX3.0 as I already explained. Further,