On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:30:28 +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
What I would like to have is a window (like the current Mark
additional required changes window) coming up saying:
- those dependes must be installed (Depends)
- those dependencies should be install (Recommends) with a
toggle-box, on
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Note that I disagree about policy being *extremely* clear about the
importance of Recommends. Policy's definition relies on two relative
terms, strong and unusual. The only precise definition I can deduce
from this is that a
Loïc Minier a écrit :
The choice between the installation or not installation of Recommends
is left ultimately by the Policy in the user's hands, but that doesn't
leave the choice of supporting Recommends: or not at the level of
synaptic. Again, I strongly believe there's no doubt in the
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
synaptic permits removal for uncommon situations, but *should* install
recommendations by default. I still disagree that it's a bug not to do
so though.
You disagree that's it's a bug not to implement the dependencies
described in
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:51:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
synaptic permits removal for uncommon situations, but *should* install
recommendations by default. I still disagree that it's a bug not to do
so though.
You disagree that's it's
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006, Michael Vogt wrote:
Sorry for joining so late, my day job keeps me very busy currently.
Thanks for joining!
Please, the discussion seems to be getting a bit out of hand. Let's
relax a bit :)
I hope I didn't sound too pushy. I feel quite convinced
Loïc Minier a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
synaptic permits removal for uncommon situations, but *should* install
recommendations by default. I still disagree that it's a bug not to do
so though.
You disagree that's it's a bug not to implement
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
could you please clarify exactly which dependency relation is not being
handled correctly by synaptic? I would have guessed a recommendation of
gstreamer0.10-alsa by rhythmbox, but rhythmbox does not recommend
gstreamer0.10-alsa.
Loïc Minier a écrit :
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
could you please clarify exactly which dependency relation is not being
handled correctly by synaptic? I would have guessed a recommendation of
gstreamer0.10-alsa by rhythmbox, but rhythmbox does not recommend
9 matches
Mail list logo
