Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-17 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:06:44AM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:41:40PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: I was talking to my wife, who is the biblatex user in our house, and it seems the dependency on biber is more of a recommendation. Biblatex seems to function OK

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-17 Thread Norbert Preining
On Do, 17 Mär 2011, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: Thus, two options: 1) wait for TL2011, 2) package etoolbox again, conflict with tl, upload a new version of tl without etoolbox, package logreq, upload biblatex 1.3. Or: package etoolbox and put it into /u/s/temxf, thus there will be no file

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-09 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:41:40PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:09:39 +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 05:47:52PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: It seems there are some biblatex styles that require 0.9c or newer, so it would be nice to

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-09 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:30:31AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: On Di, 08 Mär 2011, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: Won't biber be included in TL 2010 ? No, biber was not included in TL 2010 as of the released version. We (TL upstream) are just now in the process of including it. TL 2011 will

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-09 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mi, 09 Mär 2011, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: OR we wait with all of it but I suppose TL2011 will take quite some time, right? Yes. Upstream TL2011 will be released in summer or a bit later, and packaging, well, if I have time to rewrite everything once again. Best wishes Norbert

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:30:40PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:09:39PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: If only it were that easy... :) Newer versions depend on biber which is not available in Debian yet. I'm still figuring out how to proceed best. ---end quoted

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread Danai SAE-HAN
I have been packaging some of the Perl dependencies for Biber. I have created an unstable Debian package for Biber, but it has some conflicts with current Debian packages. My self-imposed deadline to get Biber in Debian/unstable is by the end of March. HTH -- Danai SAE-HAN On 7-mrt.-2011,

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 08.03.11 Danai SAE-HAN (danai.sae...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have created an unstable Debian package for Biber, but it has some conflicts with current Debian packages. Which packages? texlive-* ? H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread Danai SAE-HAN
No, libbtparse*. I contacted the maintainer, but haven't received any reply yet. Anyway, when I overcome the difficulties of packaging C libraries in Debian, I will just superseed the old libbtparse packages. BR -- Danai SAE-HAN On 8-mrt.-2011, at 12:27, Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de wrote:

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 08.03.11 Danai SAE-HAN (danai.sae...@gmail.com) wrote: No, libbtparse*. I contacted the maintainer, but haven't received any reply yet. Well, two changelog entries in the last 6 years, don't suggest that the package is actively maintainde. ;-) H. -- sigmentation fault -- To

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:09:39 +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 05:47:52PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: It seems there are some biblatex styles that require 0.9c or newer, so it would be nice to have a newer biblatex packaged if/when you get time. If only

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-08 Thread Norbert Preining
On Di, 08 Mär 2011, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: Won't biber be included in TL 2010 ? No, biber was not included in TL 2010 as of the released version. We (TL upstream) are just now in the process of including it. TL 2011 will probably include it. That might be true but we're not exactly close to

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-07 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 05:47:52PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: It seems there are some biblatex styles that require 0.9c or newer, so it would be nice to have a newer biblatex packaged if/when you get time. If only it were that easy... :) Newer versions depend on biber which is not available

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-07 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:09:39PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: If only it were that easy... :) Newer versions depend on biber which is not available in Debian yet. I'm still figuring out how to proceed best. ---end quoted text--- Won't biber be included in TL 2010 ? -- ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed

Bug#616596: biblatex: Please package newer upstream release

2011-03-05 Thread David Bremner
Package: biblatex Version: 0.9a-1 Severity: wishlist It seems there are some biblatex styles that require 0.9c or newer, so it would be nice to have a newer biblatex packaged if/when you get time. All the best, David -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)