Ping? See also bug #699430, http://bugs.debian.org/699430 .
Would you mind if I did an NMU if the debian-installer patches
are accepted?
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Ping? See also bug #699430, http://bugs.debian.org/699430 .
Would you mind if I did an NMU if the debian-installer patches
are accepted?
lvm2 is blocked by d-i right now. As I had to cheat already to not use
t-p-u, I don't
On 01/31/2013 02:11 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Ping? See also bug #699430, http://bugs.debian.org/699430 .
Would you mind if I did an NMU if the debian-installer patches
are accepted?
lvm2 is blocked by d-i right now. As I
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:27:56PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 01/31/2013 02:11 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
lvm2 is blocked by d-i right now. As I had to cheat already to not use
t-p-u, I don't consider this viable for Wheezy.
Wouldn't it be possible to upload a new version to
On 01/31/2013 02:49 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:27:56PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 01/31/2013 02:11 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
lvm2 is blocked by d-i right now. As I had to cheat already to not use
t-p-u, I don't consider this viable for Wheezy.
Wouldn't it
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 01/31/2013 02:49 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:27:56PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
Dataloss is cause for a bug with severity critical.
rm -rf / in a package would be serious data loss and
Hello, I was wondering if you are planning on uploading a new
version of the lvm2 package soon. I filed bug 684712, and I'd
like to see a lvm2 package with that patch included.
Background: I have a set of patches for the debian installer to
make it possible to install wheezy on a Intel Matrix
I submitted the patch to automatically filter disks with ddf and
imsm superblocks to the linux-lvm mailinglist. I got some helpful
comments and a patch review from Alasdair G Kergon. I rewrote
the patch based on the review, sent it to the mailinglist and
submitted it in the lvm2 (actually,
I'm working with upstream to get a cleaned up version of this
patch into lvm2 proper. Please do not apply the patch attached
to this bug report yet, hopefully there will soon be a
backported-from-upstream patch.
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 08/14/2012 11:38 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:25:04PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
This patch makes sure that disks with signatures of one of these
metadata formats are also filtered out. To minimize the chance of
regressions, it only does this if md is
On 13-08-12 12:57 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:25:04PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
This patch makes sure that disks with signatures of one of these
metadata formats are also filtered out. To minimize the chance of
regressions, it only does this if md is actually
On 14-08-12 11:05 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 13-08-12 12:57 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:25:04PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
This patch makes sure that disks with signatures of one of these
metadata formats are also filtered out. To minimize the chance
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:25:04PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
This patch makes sure that disks with signatures of one of these
metadata formats are also filtered out. To minimize the chance of
regressions, it only does this if md is actually running (i.e.
/proc/mdstat is present).
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.95-4
Tags: patch wheezy sid
Severity: important
Currently, lvm automatically filters out mdraid devices. That is a
good thing, otherwise it could accidentally activate volume groups
on disks that are part of a mdraid array.
For quite some time now, the mdraid
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:25:04PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
This patch makes sure that disks with signatures of one of these
metadata formats are also filtered out. To minimize the chance of
regressions, it only does this if md is actually running (i.e.
/proc/mdstat is present).
15 matches
Mail list logo
