Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-27 Thread Felix Geyer
On 26.08.2015 20:23, Helmut Grohne wrote: Maybe use d-cross@l.d.o for profile questions in general (even when they affect native building)? I believe all profile people are subscribed there. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:16:26PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: It indeed uses filter as Daniel

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Daniel Schepler dschep...@gmail.com wrote: As for cmake - curl, I don't have my notes on the exact cycle I wanted to break, but I think it involved the curl - krb5 Build-Depends. If you have a bootstrap process that can bootstrap krb5 and curl before cmake

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Maybe use d-cross@l.d.o for profile questions in general (even when they affect native building)? I believe all profile people are subscribed there. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:16:26PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: It indeed uses filter as Daniel already pointed out. Yes, please always use

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de wrote: In resolving the cross bootstrap manually, I figured that curl is indeed necessary and it will soon show up on rebootstrap[1]. The currently missing parts are cyrus-sasl2, openldap, libverto and krb5. For cyrus-sasl2 I

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-26 Thread Felix Geyer
Hi, On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 20:29:48 +0200 Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de wrote: The part about Qt 4 looks good. I'm not so sure about using the bundled libraries. Adding a stage1 profile to curl seems like a cleaner solution to me. The problem here is that at this stage of a

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-26 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Daniel Schepler (2015-08-26 19:02:56) On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org wrote: I've added a stage1 build profile to disable building the Qt GUI:

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org wrote: I've added a stage1 build profile to disable building the Qt GUI: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/cmake.git/commit/?h=experimentalid=a8bc51cb82c1ea7b5ba8ba72b39d764d22f5b828 Looks good - just one minor comment:

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2014-08-03 Thread Felix Geyer
Hi, On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:37:32 -0800 Daniel Schepler dschep...@gmail.com wrote: As the subject says: the attached patch allows for bootstrapping cmake without the Qt cmake-gui, as cmake is needed in the Debian bootstrap process significantly earlier than Qt would be available. Also,

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2014-08-03 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Is this already useful to apply? The syntax to conditionally drop build-depends is not yet supported, right? That's true, it won't yet build automatically. But it's still definitely useful to reduce the manual work

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2014-08-03 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Daniel Schepler (2014-08-03 17:02:18) On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org wrote: Is this already useful to apply? The syntax to conditionally drop build-depends is not yet supported, right? That's true, it won't yet build automatically. But it's

Bug#738161: cmake: Patch to bootstrap without Qt

2014-02-08 Thread Daniel Schepler
Source: cmake Version: 2.8.12.1-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch As the subject says: the attached patch allows for bootstrapping cmake without the Qt cmake-gui, as cmake is needed in the Debian bootstrap process significantly earlier than Qt would be available. Also, Debian curl is