On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:11:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > b.) or am I/we miss something else?
>
> I'm talking about
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-July/479571.html
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2017-August/480573.html
ah, those patches!
> submitted
On 10/20/20 10:13 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> first: many thanks for uploading a fixed bash package!
>
> second: the rest of this mail is not about bash anymore, so still mailing the
> bug is kind of wrong. I'm doing it anyway to keep references intact. (Feel
> free to just reply
Hi Matthias,
first: many thanks for uploading a fixed bash package!
second: the rest of this mail is not about bash anymore, so still mailing the
bug is kind of wrong. I'm doing it anyway to keep references intact. (Feel
free to just reply to the r-b-bugs list if you think thats better. or clone
On 10/16/20 12:58 AM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Matthias Klose,
>
Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package
set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS
for over a year now.
>>>
>>> So, there are now only two packages in the Essential
Hi Matthias Klose,
> >> Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package
> >> set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS
> >> for over a year now.
> >
> > So, there are now only two packages in the Essential set that are
> > unreproducible. I plan to
On 10/15/20 6:58 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Bash maintainers,
>
>> Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package
>> set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS
>> for over a year now.
>
> So, there are now only two packages in the Essential set that
Hi Bash maintainers,
> Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package
> set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS
> for over a year now.
So, there are now only two packages in the Essential set that are
unreproducible. I plan to work on the other
Chris Lamb wrote:
> A patch is attached that makes the Bash interpreter build
> reproducibly for me in unstable.
Gentle ping on this?
Bash is one of the few remaining packages in the 'Essential' package
set that remains unreproducible, and this patch has been in the BTS
for over a year now.
Source: bash
Version: 5.0-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: buildpath
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
A patch is attached that makes the Bash interpreter build
reproducibily for me in unstable.
This is
9 matches
Mail list logo
