tags 554349 + confirmed
thanks
Hello Faheem Mitha all other co-bug-reporters :)
First of all: Thanks for the report!
I have currently no time to dig into it a bit deeper,
(hopefully i can do it tonight or tomorrow)
but my first guess is an overflow of an internal variable:
apt-get update -o
Hi Amaya,
See #548848 et al.
I could not find additional helpful information there.
Try apt-get install -f -o APT::Immediate-Configure=0
See my email to apt bug #548858 for some details about
this option and why it is needed. (note the 5 instead of the 4)
But you should definitely check what
tags 550564 - patch
thanks
Hello Sven,
first of all: Thanks for your bugreport the patch!
I've attached a minimal patch that would add it to the
list. Though I'm unsure if it's ok to add it as Acquire::Translation
because so far there seems to be no sub group for APT::Acquire.
Unfortunately
Hello Vladimir Stavrinov,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 17:16, Vladimir Stavrinov v...@inist.ru wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 06:58:38PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
environment. The resolver is proper configured, all living hosts are
pinging and there are no proxy.
wget don't work too. No
package apt
severity 503481 normal
merge 545294 503481
retitle 545294 [doc] apt.conf isn't clear about either :: or {}
tags 545294 + patch
thanks
Hi Vincent Lefevre Mario Holbe,
On 2009-07-02 at 10:14:39, in #535364 , Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
That's right, but it is referring to either
package apt
reopen 441178
notfixed 441178 0.7.23
found 441178 0.7.23.1
retitle 441178 apt-get source needs deb and deb-src entries to fetch
by --target-release
thanks
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 08:43, Timo Juhani Lindforstimo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:
I'm sorry to say that apt-get -t stable source nano
automatical
Neighter - Neither (and missing sentence dot before).
ACK. Will be fixed. Thanks for the report!
I hope we can find a few more of these bugs with po4a now. :)
(and double spacethere are many of these)
Very strange. They are not in the original man page -
only in the po4a
Hi Nelson A. de Oliveira,
first of all: thanks for your report! :)
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 08:30, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@debian.org wrote:
Is it possible to add an option to send Pragma: no-cache when retrieving
index files and binary packages (like wget's --no-cache), please?
I can't
While it is now commited and this message will maybe redirected to /dev/null
i just want to express that i am unhappy with this patch:
First of all: It has no documentation - this is unfortunately also true for
many other apt features, so this is maybe not a real no-go,
but also the manpage for
tag 534752 patch
thanks
When apt-get or aptitude downloads from more than one server at once,
it ignores Acquire::http::Dl-Limit.
Thanks for reporting the issue!
The problem is luckily only a little typo in apt-pkg/acquire.cc.
As long as a new version with a patch is not uploaded you can add
-o
Hello Nikos Kokkalis,
first of all: thanks for reporting your issue!
(i think many people will see this with the current situation on amd64)
bo...@i0n:~$ apt-cache rdepends wine
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
Aborted
tags 534348 +moreinfo
thanks
Hello Jason A. Spiro,
thanks for report!
Next time please provide as many information as possible in your report.
At least you should include your configuration, your source.list(.d)s
and your preference file (if you have one).
( Maybe you want to try the program
Hi all,
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Santiago Vila wrote:
Thanks, Raphael. This is clearly a problem in apt.
Funny, i think it is a feature and i will try to describe why now. :)
(I want to do it earlier, but i somehow managed to forget it...)
2009/11/2 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net:
I have
bugfix). (I think they have a working mirror file finally…)
The fix should be coming to unstable after the weekend…
Thanks for giving mirror a spin!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
similar to --secrect-keyring which isn't really needed,
but gpg seems to insist on having it around…
The good think is if all -keyring packages switch to dropping files
into trusted.gpg.d
we don't need gpg as we don't need to maintain a single trusted.gpg file…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
§2.5)
And yes, APT never considers required packages as garbage
code is at apt-pkg/depcache.cc in pkgDepCache::Sweep().
I wouldn't consider this a bug in APT and co as its way easier to
break your system than it is useful in helping cleaning up…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
pkgProblemResolver::FixByInstall=0
I said in the bugreport that i fear it will bite back, now it has.
I guess we will need a way to tell the resolver that he can't override
certain changes (some parts already know this, but the depcache
doesn't know it…).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
/ if successfully verified (before they are
in partial/).
aptitude has additionally a download option to download a package to
whatever place you are currently in. I don't know if it verifies it,
but i hope so. APT in wheezy onwards has this option, too.
Is that maybe what you want?
Best regards
David
).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 22:20, Uwe Storbeck u...@ibr.ch wrote:
On Mar 26, David Kalnischkies wrote:
I wouldn't consider this a bug in APT and co as its way easier to
break your system than it is useful in helping cleaning up…
apt knows when a package is obsolete and not used anymore. So
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 17:47, Uwe Storbeck u...@ibr.ch wrote:
On Mar 30, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Common pratice is it to place a package in 'oldlibs' section as it
will be grabbed by deborphan then. You can switch the priority, too,
and the description should be changed
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 21:30, Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org wrote:
* David Kalnischkies [2011-03-29 20:03 +0200]:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 18:32, Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org wrote:
please drop apt's dependency on gnupg.
There has already been some discussion in related bugs #387688
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 18:22, Uwe Storbeck u...@ibr.ch wrote:
On Mar 30, David Kalnischkies wrote:
As far as i know its just voluntary, but after all, IANAD{D,M},
so take everything i say with a bit of salt.
I agree with you that it's probably not the best idea to fix this
problem
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:13, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:33:17AM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
I think this is very similar to --secrect-keyring which isn't really needed,
but gpg seems to insist on having it around…
--trustdb-name /dev/null
be
configured - but it is deconfigured currently -, doesn't it?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
test-multiarch-same
Description: Binary data
a binary in /usr/bin and alike. Maybe the deployment
of triggers which doesn't put the activating package(s) into trigger-awaiting
would be useful for those as they are non-mission-critical…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Where does this discussion started off? Pointers anyone?
[0] https
addition in recent times - and a quick look at the debian-diff
doesn't suggest that a patch was applied. Which version do you use?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
a 'testing' suite in which
daily-autobuilds of his trunk are available.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
David Kalnischkies
For reference: Part of syslog mesage with APT and wget fail:
[…]
Apr 7 11:12:13 apt-setup: Schreiben der neuen Quellliste
Apr 7 11:12:13 apt-setup: Quelllisteneinträge für dieses Medium sind:
Apr 7 11:12:13 apt-setup: deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.1a _Squeeze_
if not weeks…
So i tend to think your problem is fixed in unstable.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
which it does so only post-squeeze.
I have added in my branch at that place now a quick-exit
in case of no languages to download (see note above).
So thanks for the report!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
as this message
(in this context) is printed only at a single location in the code…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
test-bug-624122-hash-sum-mismatch
Description: Binary data
in the hope they will know.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
found 624228 0.70~pre1
fixed 624228 0.75
thanks
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 22:29, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-04-26 22:14 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
reassign 624228 synaptic
thanks
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 19:33, Matt Weatherford m...@uw.edu wrote:
Fresh install
regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
would have been installed if the dead end would be a proper
street can be removed from the list of packages to install again instantly.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
and retrieval of information
- apt-cache for querying available information
- apt-cdrom to use removable media as a source for packages
- apt-config as an interface to the configuration settings
- apt-key as an interface to manage authentication keys
Best regards
David Kalnischkies, who runs away
which require only normal user rights.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
'unresolvable.debian.org'
So, for newer versions username and password seems to get removed
from the error message, but it seems to be still confused by the @.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Sorry, i have no https setup currently to test if it would work
if the host wouldn't be unresolvable
the bug, but as it comes up from time to time,
maybe it helps if we leave it open with a big wontfix, as it's not a bug,
but a central feature…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Even if we would want to, we technical doesn't even have a way to
detect a metapackage currently - only guesses
, but try to force the extended
passive mode also which is used (or should) be used for IPv6 with
Acquire::FTP::ForceExtended in contrast to the 'simple' PASV as IPv4…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
to this one.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
about all packages you have installed,
the second stores the records of which packages are autoinstalled.
If you don't want to attach them to the bugreport you can also sent
them privately to me, of course.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
' as the only complete
arch…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: I haven't checked why the install itself fails. The Multi-Arch marker is
at least completely ignored by APT for all packages. Could you tell me in
more detail how i need to setup my system to hit this problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
command
if no newer version is installable marks the package as manual installed, too.
So could you please describe more detailed why do you consider it a bug
in APT rather than in aptitude? Exact commands you use for example?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:10, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-02-17 10:47 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:31, Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org wrote:
I've found that with recent versions of apt installed, telling aptitude
that I'd like to upgrade any
.
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com writes:
In that case it would be an aptitude bug as it would call MarkInstall
with FromUser == true for requests which are not directly from the user
and should therefore not be marked as manual.
[...]
So could you please describe more
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/apt-show-versions/apt-show-versions_0.16+nmu1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612765
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
, then it will be the squeeze one
Lennys APT doesn't write Checksums-* entries,
so it can't include the dsc file in them.
Squeezes APT on the other hand does both.
So whatever this bugreport requests
(and i am not sure what is asked for exactly) -
it seems to be unfixable by the APT team.
Best regards
David
are discussing how the
commandline interface will be for specifying which architecture of the
package is meant and as i don't know what the outcome of this discussion is
i hope its relatively reasonable that i haven't implemented it so far. ;)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: I am still
but not provided.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
2011/6/29 Andrey Ponomarenko aponomare...@ispras.ru:
On 06/02/2011 12:39 PM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 15:05, Andrey Ponomarenkoaponomare...@ispras.ru
wrote:
Installing man page apt.8 to /home/andrey/install/apt-0.8.14.1/docs
Error: tag OUTPUT_DIRECTORY: Output
recently learned with MultiArch the hard way that implementing a
spec is as easy as walking on water - so is it frozen already?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
(there Archive is called Suite nowadays).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
packages can be given to
dpkg in one call. So it can happen that dpkg is only called once for a given
apt command even if thousand of packages are touched with it; so please don't
depend on how often dpkg is called by APT)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
or in #debian-apt for help (but prepare for
non-immediate response) - or refer to one of the debian-user lists if you
can't work out how to set it up from the manpages/examples.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] It's kind of pointless to get excited about a kernel.org break-in
if every user
it to increase the validate time - only to decrease it.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: I am not sure (and IANAL), but i think disclaimers like yours at
the end of
the mail aren't very effective from a legal standpoint - beside that
they are pretty
useless in a mail to a public world-readable bugtracker
will be able to…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] This is what is fixed in the GSoC code by Chris, APT can look ahead
what it has to do - and it knows that it can do more than on action at
once, so it can offload cycles to dpkg which is better in breaking them
as it knows which packages doesn't have
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 17:14, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
David Kalnischkies wrote:
Would you be equally willing to unpack lets say bash without a
clear idea then you are able to configure it again [0]? (or X? APT? libc6?)
Yes, I would. Core packages continue to function when
?) did would be good.
Thanks for the report best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
i guessed it has some very
good and obvious reason so i just didn't cared enough to ask back then.
It just doesn't occurred to me that there are people out their who doesn't
upgrade from time to time… (professionally blinkered it seems), thanks!
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Upcoming
alone)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
diff -ru debian-edu-archive-keyring-2010.01.05-bak//debian/control debian-edu-archive-keyring-2010.01.05/debian/control
--- debian-edu-archive-keyring-2010.01.05-bak//debian/control 2011-09-15 11:30:03.106463458 +0200
+++ debian-edu-archive-keyring-2010.01.05
related bug fixed by working hard on
demotivating at least one of the few people who regularly contribute to APT…
Thats a great achievement, given that even the worst kids in my young groups
can't make that happen, so:
Congratulations!
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Don't bother to answer, the buglog
world of de and de2 and these seem to behave fine.
I don't know what happens on the rest of the world (mirror-wise) and
i assume every other normal user has a similar limited view.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
™ as advertised.
(APT picks up languages from these files as otherwise scripts running apt
under LANG=C will cause problems like an incomplete binary cache --
pretty much the same problem for any multi-language system, …)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
as just removing a single package.
So i wouldn't consider fixing this special case worthwhile.
You could still remove it with dpkg - or run 'apt-get update'…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
.
(I leave it as an exercise for the reader to come up with more complicated
regexes to check for the value - for debian this one is already overkill…)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/856489
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
to
whatever your environment defines. I think thats more useful than just
echoing what is written in the config-file or in the manpage.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-626739-show-in-apt-config-dump
Description: Binary data
someone with access to a sparc-box recompile
0.8.15 with gcc-4.6 to verify that it is indeed compiler related?
(by observing that this rebuild would be broken, too)
(Adding d-sparc@d.l.o so they can have a look at that, too)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
version, please?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
it to 660 to keep the information
private without reducing apt-* usability for normal users.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-size-less.png', which is
also in package kdebase-data 4:4.6.5-1
konqueror misses the needed Breaks+Replaces information,
APT can't act according to information it doesn't have,
so reassigning to konqueror (or kde-baseapps in fact).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
this functionality
in libapt as it slowly becomes quiet a bit of code …]
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-680041-apt-mark-holds-correctly.diff
Description: Binary data
?
The backtrace doesn't match with the code as FileFd::Close doesn't have
a gzclose() call itself anymore, but offloads it to FileFdPrivate::CloseDown.
This looks more like 0.9.3 which really had a gzclose call at line 1675.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
.
(The message is a bit confusing, :any doesn't make a lot of sense here
provided that it is the same without :any … or worse: any could mean
we are conflicting only with one arch at random, if you have a second
installed you might be lucky - or not - depending on moon phase)
Best regards
David
.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670401#38
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/ and the buildsystem should use it)
In the longrun we might be better of using tools like 'autoreconf',
but the buildsystem is a bit special...
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
scheme)
This bug is supposed to be fixed in 0.9.5…
(#554387 and his various friends)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
update -o APT::Cache-Start=1
?
Also, ensure that your hardware is not at fault:
Such unreproducible crashes are often the first symptom
of a faulty memory (or other hardware pieces).
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
in the manpage
and just mentioned the change only for the binary as this has an effect
for a user in contrast to the change in the example file or the manpage.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
derivatives,
so that the maximum amount of people benefit from your contribution. :)
(In the meantime i am closing this bugreport - as said,
feel free to reopen it or open a new one after the review.)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
is done simple because i don't
have the energy to discuss the same thing for more than two years.
I really don't know how Steve, Goswin and co could do this -
and even far longer… (yes, i know, the obvious reason is: i am too weak)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Yeap, this no maintainer thing
.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org wrote:
* David Kalnischkies [2012-05-17 14:41 +0200]:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org wrote:
No, dpkg is consistent in it's out-/input as is apt, so no bug.
The out-/input just happens
this,
but continues anyway and in a real run dpkg will complain as
described earlier but continues as well.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-673536-pre-depends-breaks-loop.diff
Description: Binary data
includes the full string being worked on.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
on signing them.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Could we please stop talking to three bugs and two mailinglists?
Especially as [0] suggests it is the wrong list…
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/05/msg00222.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
in the master-bug,
so i will spare the details here. A fixed libapt-pkg4.12 should
be available soon btw.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Yes -dbg package would be nice. Somehow everytime we
could add one for free we are spoiled by discussions about automatic
creation of -debug packages
the years passed by in the meantime. (there properly is some cool
way to automate this a bit more, i just haven't found it yet.)
Thanks already best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: I will not argue about if half-sentences should start upper- or
lowercase, but the translation should
was unfortunately broken. Really misfortune that
pbuilder has network access while the buildds haven't…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
+ * apt-pkg/contrib/mmap.cc:
+- have a dummy SyncToFd around in case of ReadOnly access to a
+ compressed file as we otherwise on Close() do not delete[] the
+ char buffer but munmap() it… (Closes: #673815)
-- David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com Mon, 21 May 2012
15:10:49 +0200
as
with a real status file provided in [0].
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673756#10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
-check, but this check worked only under the
tested upgrade condition - not in new install which is encountered here…
And just for safety: Just checked, in this regard apt/squeeze and
apt/0.9.4 produce the same solution for nagios.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
get it working in situations similar
to this one maybe.
Tip of the day: -f stands for --fix-broken, not for --force
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
201 - 300 of 1103 matches
Mail list logo
