Frank Küster wrote:
[policy]
This implies, IMHO, that the basic TeX packages should not install their
files into TEXMFMAIN. If we think that these files should not be
possibly shadowed, we should change the wording of the policy.
ACK. I have mean while looked at the files installed by
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 20:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
[GFDL, OpenPub, ...]
I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to
contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once
we know about a DFSG-free documentation license, in other words,
hopefully
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 07:13 -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
Now that tetex-bin has been upgraded to 3.0-13, I cannot reproduce the
problem.
TeX and friends use kpselib to search for files via 'ls-R' database
files. The TeX system did not find the installed files (eg, cmr10.tfm).
This sounds as if
Hi,
I haven't read the full bug report yet. So only a few general comments.
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 12:35 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've checked, tetex-base, and it provides map files in
/usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/
and has files under
/etc/texmf/updmap.d/
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Normally we forward these kind of request to upstream first oder
(Thomas Esser). He normally refuses to include packages, not
available on CTAN. So, two tasks for you:
1. Cause the author to upload the package to CTAN
And if it is on CTAN, it will probably make its
Frank Küster wrote:
Why not simply extend this behavior to not include lines for fonts that
have this how-to-generate-slanted feature, or instead to keep only the
information for the base font?
I thought updmap supports the different slanting syntax of different
drivers, but this seems not to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 18:12 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Another question is that: what should be changed? url.sty? or the
font itself, i.e. a lowered tilde (for a better consistency with
what Unicode gives as an example[*] -- and better look)?
[*]
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 18:02 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
In etch you will be able to
use texlive instead of teTeX, which does include it. But I'm not aware
of any backports for sarge currently.
Vincent uses testing, so installing the appropriate texlive package from
experimental in addition
[taking out the AMS, I don't think they are interested in this discussion]
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I think the amsrefs package in teTeX 3.0 is up to date:
[...]
However, in addition, there seem to be some older files in teTeX, too.
Maybe we should
Hi Norbert, hi everybody,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:00 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Die, 25 Apr 2006, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Package: texlive-lang-greek
Version: 2005-2
Severity: minor
Where did you get this version from? Do you use the files on the tug
server?
Yes, I am using
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 14:14 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:00 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Yup, this seems to be the problem. I guess because there is a link
/usr/share/texmf-texlive/doc - /usr/share/doc/texlive/
missing.
Which package does provide
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 18:46 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
This setup is probably the best we can do. I'm only unsure about the
names for the directories. Why not /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc and
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc?
No problem with that. I modeled the directory names after the one
already
Florent Rougon wrote:
Philippe Preux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, there's a mismatch: in this file (actually,
/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/youpla/complete/ot1cmr.fd) , I read :
\DeclareFontShape{OT1}{cmr}{m}{sc}%
{- cmsc10}{}
What do you think of that?
It looks like the
File: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/dvips/ibygrk/ibycus4.map
Package: texlive-lang-greek
Version: 2005-1
Severity: normal
Looking at /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/dvips/ibygrk/ibycus4.map,
this is not a map file but a TeX and Metafont input file. There is a
version in the TeX input
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 23:50 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
BTW, in principle texlive-lang-greek works with tetex 3 packages, too.
the only problem is:
$ kpsewhere x.mf
/usr/share/texmf-tetex/metafont/misc/x.mf
/usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/source/public/levy/x.mf
where
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 00:29 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hmm, you mean allowing the installation of texlive-lang-german together
with tetex3, but add a README that if you use the levy fonts, you should
either copy x.mf from the texmf-texlive to /usr/share/texmf of
Package: xpdf-reader
Version: 3.00-13.5
Severity: normal
Viewing the attached PDF file with xpdf, the black background on the
left side of the header and footer is missing. Hence, the white text
written there is unreadable. In addition, on the first page the shadow
below the title is missing.
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
This seems to have been broken by a recent security update because it
works correctly in 3.00-13 which was originally released with sarge.
Grrr, that's bad.
It works correctly in 3.01 which is in testing and unstable. If you can
upgrade you will find this is already
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:49 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
[~] ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libpng12.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb7ee9000)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7ed5000)
libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7eae000)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:26 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:44:05PM +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
I will try if I can backport the Etch packages to Sarge. Do you know if
anybody has tried that before? Unfortunately, there are no xpdf packages
at backports.org.
I
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 23:56 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Package: lmodern
Version: 0.99.3-2
Severity: important
Thanks for the report.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/doc/math$ xdvi short
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600
ec-lmr12
xdvi uses the map file
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:23 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
xdvi uses the map file ps2pk.map. Let's see what map files there are on
your computer and whether or not they contain the right entry. Please
send us the output of
egrep ec-lmr12 $(kpsewhere ps2pk.map)
In addition, the output
Hi Rogério,
Rogério Brito wrote:
Ok, here is the output with the version of lmodern (0.92-7) that is
currently in testing (etch):
Ah, I had forgotten that lmodern 0.99.3 hasn't migrated to testing yet.
And you reported the bug against 0.99.3-2 on a testing system. ;-) That
changes a few
I just realized that I had forgotten to send this to the appropriate bug
in the BTS.
cheerio
ralf
- Forwarded message from Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#353474: tetex-bin: Fails to install
To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Hi Norbert, hi all,
Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At
that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would
have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion is in #345604. After the
unexpected outcome of the GR, I am not sure if we should
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 13:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At
that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would
have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:00 -0600, Keith Hellman wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: important
[...]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
I am not sure if this is related, however, tetex-bin in
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 15:12 +0200, Loren Weith wrote:
Yes that's true and I wondered the same thing, however I got the same
message with the fedora version that displayed it correctly. The fact
that the magnifier shows the text seems to point strongly at there being a
bug. Also, the
Frank Küster wrote:
Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody seen Francesco's messages on the mailing list? I only get
Frank's replies. Francesco's messages are in the BTS, though.
But we still need to decide whether we should change updmap to use
TMPDIR instead of TMP, or in
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody seen Francesco's messages on the mailing list? I only get
Frank's replies. Francesco's messages are in the BTS, though.
Could it be that lists.debian.org
Francesco Potorti` wrote:
BTW, we had problems in the past with bug reports not reaching the list.
IIRC large message size due to included debugging information was one
of the things these messages had in common.
The last one of those messages, apart from being large, contained a very
long
Frank Küster wrote:
Loren Weith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Another message that did not make it to the list. :-(
Two things in xdvi.1.log:
@@ -1 +1 @@
G_depth: 16
+--- G_depth: 24
(don't think that matters)
-drawbegin at 177,391: sending ` currentpoint currentpoint
or
(interactively) with 'V'. Result: Text is shown when anti-aliasing is
disabled. Text is not shown when anti-aliasing is enabled. You can cycle
through this by hitting 'V'. My Debian machine is at home, but I suspect
it is the same there ...
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 18:08 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
And here some documents with (possibly) problematic license:
pdftex-a.pdf
GFDL, = v1.2, no Invariant Sections, Front- or Back-Cover Texts
fontinstallationguide.pdf
GFDL, = v1.2, no Invariant Sections, Front- or Back-Cover Texts
Source can
Package: pdftex
Version: 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Why 'experimental'? pdfTeX version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2, which is part of
teTeX 3.0 has been in unstable for quite some time now. Actually, in a
few days it will go to testing.
When invoking
What to do if the bug reporter doesn't use a valid address:
,
| The following address(es) failed:
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [66.249.93.114]:
| 550 5.7.1 No such user k2si2573571ugf
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 18:08 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
And here some documents with (possibly) problematic license:
l2kurz.pdf:
GFDL, = v1.2, no Invariant Sections, Front- or Back-Cover Texts
:-(
cheerio
ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 19:36 +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
debiandoc-sgml does no longer build Debian FAQ.
$ latex /tmp/error.tex
This is e-TeX, Version 3.14159-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
That's teTeX 2.0. :-(
entering extended mode
(/tmp/error.tex
LaTeX2e 2001/06/01
Babel v3.7h and hyphenation
Frank Küster wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-12sarge13
Severity: normal
actually, lots of them.
Is that really a problem? I had the impression that the files in
TEXMFMAIN are related to the actual binaries (sort of like upstream has
it). I don't think that it is possible to achieve
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 20:20 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
,[ *Messages* ]
| Loading info...done
| if: Autoloading failed to define function Info-find-file
`
,[ C-h f Info-find-file RET ]
| Info-find-file is a compiled Lisp function
- Forwarded message from Heiko Oberdiek [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Heiko Oberdiek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hyperref handles some characters incorrectly when unicode
bookmarks are used
To: Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL
Adam Szojda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: texlive-base-bin
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello.
TeXLive can't be installed on debian/unstable because texlive-common is
missing:
Thanks for the report. texlive-common is part of texlive-base, which had
been
Samuel Thibault wrote:
When pasting ligatures, they are developped, which is fine for non-UTF-8
environment. But when a UTF-8 transfer is possible, maybe they should rather
be transmitted as such? For instance,
http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/ligature.dvi
[...]
Locale: [EMAIL
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 21:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 14 mai 2006 à 20:27 +0200, Ralf Stubner a écrit :
Let's look at LMTypewriter10:
~$ fc-match LMTypewriter10
lmtcsc10.pfb: LMTypewriter10 CapsRegular
~$ fc-match LMTypewriter10:Regular
lmtcsc10.pfb
Christophe Garion wrote:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 3.0-18
Severity: important
Thank you for the report. I am not sure that 'important' is the right
severity, though.
I have a problem with the listings package. Unfortunately, the bug is
very difficult to reproduce, but maybe it is
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:18 +0200, Christophe Garion wrote:
The problem is due to the babel package and the : appearing in the
\label{} definitions. A similar bug is reported here in the LaTeX bugs
database:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 13:31 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:18 +0200, Christophe Garion wrote:
The problem is due to the babel package and the : appearing in the
\label{} definitions. A similar bug is reported here in the LaTeX bugs
database:
http://www.latex
merge 373868 372715
thanks
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 17:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I start texdoctk from the Debian help menu (help | TeXdoctk).
Click on Fundamentals/General References.
Click on User's guide and the view button.
A popup window says ERROR
usrguide.dvi not found,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 17:15 +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote:
fakeroot debian/rules binary
quilt push -a
File series fully applied, ends at patch patch-tmp
make: *** [stampdir/patch-stamp] Error 2
I suggest adding || test $$? = 2
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 17:09 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
, tetex-bin/changelog_3.0-17
| * Add support for nonexitant TEXMFVAR to texk/kpathsea/mktexnam
| (approved upstream). First step for a new font caching. [ralf]
`
This means that we can apply the patch to tex-common, and
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 19:19 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is not urgent to upload ne wtexlive binararies with this
patch as it fails only in som estrange circumstances. Next upload will
fix it automatically.
Or did I miss something?
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 21:03 +0200, Ralf Angeli wrote:
* Frank Küster (2006-06-29) writes:
While editing a LaTeX file, C-c ? calls TeX-doc which in many cases
brings up the info file about LaTeX. With Debian sarge's emacs-21.4a,
this does not work. The message in the info buffer is
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 17:51 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Okay, I worked along Ralf's older mail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2006/05/msg00531.html
. add appropriate mktex.cnf in /u/s/texmf/web2c (or /e/texmf/web2c?)
Done, in /u/s/texmf/.
Great! A minor suggestion, which
Package: cm-super
Version: 0.3.3-3
Severity: normal
According to /usr/share/doc/cm-super/README.gz, there should be 434
fonts in the cm-super collection. Each of them is referenced in the map
files
$ wc -l /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/cm-super/cm-super-*
435
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 20:56 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
Please read on in the same file, the next paragraph after mentioning the
434 fonts states:
Note that a small number of (fortunately, rarely used) fonts are not
included yet because of the bugs in EC font drivers
Florent Rougon wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fine. Should the patch go to patch-tmp or patch-xdvi-370505 (or
something else, patch-src?!). BTW, README.patches is out-of-date:
,[ README.patches ]
| 5. patch-tmp
|
| - currently none
`
but:
% ls -l
Hi,
at least in the X.org CVS, the license of Adobe Utopia has been added.
See README and COPYING in
http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/xorg/font/adobe-utopia-type1/
The license looks non-free to me, but now Adobe Utopia could be added to
this package again.
cheerio
ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 20:57 +0100, Pedro Celestino Reis Rodrigues wrote:
Package: tetex
Version: tetex-base
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
Using portuguese accents in latex input files, frequently, produces
failure to hyphenize the accented words and results on oversized line
lenghts on
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 00:26 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:
XeTeX extends the TeX typesetting system (and macro packages such as
LaTeX and ConTeXt) to have native support for the Unicode character set,
including complex Asian scripts, and for
Ralf Stubner wrote:
I for one don't understand why
floatrow explicitly loads caption3. IMO it would be better to load
caption with a suitable date as additonal argument.
Actually the current version does just that:
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/floatrow/floatrow.dtx
Norbert Preining wrote:
Next revision of the package will recommend texlive-latex-recommended
(but then, who installs latex-extra without latex-recommended? Most
things wont work..)
I think one problem is that Sebastian uses texlive-latex-extra together
with teTeX. And actually caption
[Please CC the bug when replying so that other developers are informed,
too. THanks.]
Sebastien Blondeel wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:06:52PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
\usepackage[font=small,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period,
justification=centerlast]
{caption}[2004
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 18:38 -0400, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
In order to install pdftricks.sty, I had to install a package from
unstable: texlive-pdfetex
Actually texlive-pdfetex is also in testing.
Doing so I get:
$ sudo apt-get install -t unstable texlive-pdfetex
...
Selecting
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-18
Severity: important
WHen trying to compile a trivial latex-beamer document (attached), pdflatex
fails
with the following error:
tex: symbol lookup error: pdflatex: undefined symbol:
_ZN6PDFDocC1EP9GooStringS1_S1_
That looks
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 02:19 -0400, mike castleman wrote:
No, the workaround is to install XeTeX (together with the xkeyval
version it is shipping) where every additional software should be
installed: Either in /usr/local (so that xkeyval.sty gets into
Frank Küster wrote:
Atsuhito Kohda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% XeTeX
TEXINPUTS.xelatex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{xelatex,xetex,latex,generic,}//
TEXINPUTS.xetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{xetex,plain,generic,}//
[...]
Please see http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2006/08/msg00066.html
Should xetex
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-17
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/bibtex
bibtex cannot deal with Unicode .bib files. It would be nice if this
were possible, unicode is kind of a
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:25 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
On 8/15/06, Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you remeber which packages you purged? The failure occured when
trying to build the jadetex format. At least now you do not have jadetex
installed (state purged). Did you have
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:20 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fre, 25 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
While that would be good, I think it would be even better if someone
maintains a separate xetex package. xetex has a much faster development
process currently than texlive.
ACK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[there is some personal interest, sisu (sisu-pdf) has come to depend on
the presence of manyfoot.sty, and though there will be little problem
working with texlive, there seems no good reason why the choice of
either tetex or texlive should be precluded for this reason
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:27 +0200, Wolf Wiegand wrote:
I tried to adjust the parameter 'pool size' in /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf. I
modified /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf and ran update-texmf to achieve
this. However, I also had to run 'texconfig init' before the new setting
was used.
The
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:19 +0200, Wolf Wiegand wrote:
I just tried to build the kernel documentation using 'make pdfdocs' in
/usr/src/linux. This failed, showing the error message
TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [pool size=322750].
in /usr/src/linux/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-api.log.
Hi Rogério,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:49 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Unfortunately, it seems that something is weird with both ams{art,book},
when I try to load babel (for writing things in Brazilian Portuguese):
the headers of pages citing the name of the article are prefixed with
whatever
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 22:16 -0400, Loris Bennett wrote:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-17
Severity: critical
Thanks for reporting. Let's limit this to where the actual error occurs:
fmtutil: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=cont-en -progname=context
-translate-file=cp227.tcx
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:37 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:55:53AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hmm, really? I don't understand what you want really but
\usepackage[dvips]{geometry}
wouldn't help you?
Or even just \usepackage{geometry}
Only if you have set
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:46 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Something like, on first installation, or debconf question Should
xdvi/... respect /etc/papersize with an appropriate file in
/etc/libpaper.d in such a case:
Nice. When has /etc/libpaper.d been added? Under what circumstances are
the
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:00 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
I've downloaded the new marvosym package from CTAN and had a look at
it. The most significant change *I* can see is:
130a130
\newcommand\MVRightarrow{\mvchr{58}}
166d165
\def\Rightarrow{\mvchr{58}}
That's great. Thanks Hilmar.
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 00:09 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
\usepackage[utf8]{vietnam}
\usepackage[vietnam]{babel}
If you interchange these two lines, the example compiles. Unfortunately
there is only little documentation on vntex. However,
/usr/share/texmf-tetex/doc/generic/vntex/vntest2.tex
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:36 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under what circumstances are
the files in there executed?
When paperconfig is executed. Not when the libpaper1 package is
installed or upgraded, though (is this a bug?).
I guess we have
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:13 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
The dvipdfm patch does two things. It increases the number of papersizes
known to dvipdfm and it adds support for libpaper. I would vote for
keeping the additional papersizes (maybe even propagating that part
upstream) but removing
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:11 +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
23 2006 ?? 09:57 +0200 Frank Küster ??(-):
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I cannot reproduce the bug here (but maybe because I use
'unstable'?).
Maybe (note that
Hi Loris,
please keep the bug-address in the CC list, as long as the bug isn't
closed. Fullquote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 22:09 -0400, Loris Bennett wrote:
Hello Ralf,
Thanks for the reply.
I don't really understand this stuff about ConTeXt (I assume this is
something to do with
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 17:13 +0100, Bruno Gravato wrote:
I think this is related to this bug.
I've found some broken links in /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc/index.html
Thanks for your report. I have the impression that most (all) of these
incorrect links can be fixed by removing the
base
Hi,
I have run into the same problem with C-cC-c no longer working when
using emacs-snapshot. With the help of Romain Francoise I think I have
found the problem. In post.el it says:
(defun post-body-says-attach ()
Check if attach appears in the body.
(post-goto-body)
;; Aargh it's
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your report. I have the impression that most (all) of these
incorrect links can be fixed by removing the
base href=file:///usr/share/texmf/doc/index.html
from the header of this HTML file. One could also change
Ralf Stubner wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your report. I have the impression that most (all) of these
incorrect links can be fixed by removing the
base href=file:///usr/share/texmf/doc/index.html
from the header of this HTML file. One
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 20:49 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploading the current SVN version should fix the issue with broken links.
In other words, I could upload tetex-base as it is. Or is there
anything else that should be done before?
I don't see
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 18:12 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
foo.tex (or foo.sty in most cases) is indeed a library equivalent, but
we are rather discussing whether an additional foo.cfg or foo.whatever
that is loaded by foo.sty is a configuration file or not.
I've come across at least one
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 19:59 -0600, Jeremiah Savage wrote:
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.19
Severity: normal
Thanks for the report. What tetex packages do you have installed, ie,
what is the output of
dpkg -l tetex-* | egrep '^ii'
?
When running lyx-1.4.0 (
Jeremiah Savage wrote:
# debconf-show tex-common
* tex-common/managecache: true
* tex-common/groupname: users
[...]
I tested Lyx again, but still have the same problem. Though, once I have
created a dvi of a file with root, my normal user account is then able to
create the
Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
At least libcairo is wrong; I think that also libfontconfig, libjpeg,
libfreetype, and maybe libX11 and libXrender are wrong, because
I wouldn't be surprised if libjpeg is actually needed, since pdftex is
able to include JPEG files directly into the PDF. But there
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
At least libcairo is wrong; I think that also libfontconfig, libjpeg,
libfreetype, and maybe libX11 and libXrender are wrong, because
I wouldn't be surprised if libjpeg is actually needed, since pdftex
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:31 +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
I tried to print, but got a mostly blank document. All I got
was table lines. Apparently, a font direcotry is off limits for me:
ls -l /var/cache/fonts/pk/esphi/jknappen/ec/ -d
drwxrwsr-t 2 root users 4096 2005-12-07 23:08
Hi Florian
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:28 +, Florian Schanda wrote:
Package: texlive
Version: 2007-13
When installing texlive or anything that depends on it (such as prosper), a
huge amount of documentation and language specific things are installed.
It would be nice to not have to
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 18:46 +, Florian Schanda wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2008 13:32:47 Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 29 Feb 2008, Florian Schanda wrote:
When installing texlive or anything that depends on it (such as prosper),
a huge amount of documentation and language specific
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 16:08 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 20 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean mptopdf (also in package context)? After all, it seems
that even in the modular world of texlive, ConTeXt has to be installed
anyway...
No, I mean:
mpost foo.mp
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 20:21 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
Does that mean that the *only* file needed is supp-pdf.tex and
supp-mis.tex? If they two are enough we could (in 2007 2005 is
finished) put them into texlive-metapost which will put them into
/usr/share/texmf-texlive/...
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:56 +0100, Gábor Braun wrote:
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Version: 2007-13
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Running latex on the minimal input file produces pdf output instead of the
expected dvi.
The problem is with ucshyper.sty, which incorrectly passes
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 16:18 +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2007-13
Severity: normal
Hi,
ccreating a PDF file for the document dselect-beginner from DDP fails
for language sk with the following error:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:48 +0100, Gábor Braun wrote:
Package: lmodern
Version: 1.010x-4
Severity: wishlist
I would appreciate if you would package version 1.106 of Latin Modern fonts.
Do you have any particular reason for this?
Note that that the .otf files have been renamed, as well
301 - 400 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
