Package: src:petsc
Severity: wishlist
Hello Christophe,
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:07 +0200, trophime wrote:
> Hi,
> I manage to package pastix for debian (see Debian Science repository).
> Moreover I have rebuild petsc to enable pastix support (see the attached
> debian/rules). To perform test jus
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:35 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: illuminator
> Version: 0.11.0-13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid,
Hello Christian,
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Adam C Powell IV (hazel...@debian.org):
> > Thank you for your notes of March 29 and April 5. I have been unusually
> > busy for an unusually long period of time, and have not been able to
>
Brief update...
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:10 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 21:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:25 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1,
&g
Please binNMU netgen on armhf to link against new OCE libraries.
Thanks,
Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 21:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:25 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1,
> > such as liboce-foundation1 (i.e. upstream version 0.8.0). It seems they
>
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: Anton Gladky ,
debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org
Greetings,
Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1,
such as liboce-foundation1 (i.e. upstream version 0.8.0). It seems they
are blocking the transition to 0.9.1, which i
Dear Christian,
Thank you for your notes of March 29 and April 5. I have been unusually
busy for an unusually long period of time, and have not been able to
spend the time I otherwise would on my Debian packages.
Let me confirm now that I approve of your NMU for fixing elmerfem
debconf l10n issu
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
Apparently petsc, slepc, and their reverse depends will not transition
until binary slepc packages libslepc3.1, libslepc3.1-dev and
libslepc3.1-dbg have been removed for the armel and kfreebsd-*
architectures
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
petsc has built on and off (mostly off) on armel, and there's a new
upstream bug which makes it not work on kfreebsd-*. The presence of old
packages is preventing petsc 3.2 and a bunch of rdeps from migratin
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:31 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > with the following patches the package builds fine.
> >
> >
Hello,
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:45 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> Le 27 février 2012 15:24, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 08:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > [snip]
> > There are a couple of issues in the git repository though. I
> > accidental
tags 660894 pending
thanks
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:54 +, Joe Dalton wrote:
> Package: elmerfem
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
>
> Please include the attached Danish elmerfem translations.
>
> joe@pc:~/over/debian/elmerfem$ msgfmt --statistics -c -v -o /dev/null
> da.poda.po: 3 over
tags 661126 pending
thanks
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 12:01 +0100, Jeroen Schot wrote:
> Package: elmerfem
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Hello,
>
> Attached is the Dutch translation of the elmerfem debconf templates.
> Please include it in your next upload.
Thank you very much, I have
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> Hi,
> with the following patches the package builds fine.
Thanks very much Christophe! This is incredibly helpful.
Roberto, can you take care of applying these patches and uploading, or
do you want me to do an NMU? This is holding up a pretty
Hi Denis,
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 08:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> > Le 26 février 2012 06:29, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > > Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a
> > > ne
Hello,
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> Le 26 février 2012 06:29, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a
> > new upstream or other changes?
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> You can upload, ye
severity 586149 serious
retitle 586149 Conflict between hdf5-tools and libhdf5-mpi-dev prevents several
packages from building
block 661301 by 586149
thanks
Hi again,
Because this causes other packages to FTBFS, it really needs to be an RC
bug.
-Adam
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 00:12 -0500, Adam C
Hello Denis,
Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a
new upstream or other changes?
-Adam
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:04 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> tags 656838 pending
> thanks
>
> Le 22 janvier 2012 04:37, Michael Cree a écrit :
> > Source: oce
> > Version: 0.8.0-
Package: src:med-fichier
Version: 3.0.3-3
Severity: serious
This requires hdf5-tools and libhdf5-mpi-dev to build, but they conflict
because they depend on conflicting HDF5 shared library packages.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulti
Hi,
There's a better way to do this by just having different shared library
file names and sonames for each of the shared library packages. Then
the -dev packages can conflict, while one can install multiple packages
using the different shared libraries simultaneously, not one-at-a-time
as update
2012/2/21 Adam C Powell IV
> tags 660241 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:37 -0600, Edscott Wilson Garcia
> wrote:
> > Package: libhypre-2.4.0
> > Version
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:27 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Trilinos 10.8.5 has been packaged in svn:
>
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-science/packages/trilinos/trunk
>
> Please check if this bug is still present there.
Thank you, I will do that in the next couple of days.
-Ada
tags 660241 moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:37 -0600, Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote:
> Package: libhypre-2.4.0
> Version: 2.4.0b-7
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hypre works fine with mpich2. Instalation via debian package invariably ties
> it up with openmpi. When target user has a
ease make this change. I'll see if I can get some time to help.
-Adam
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:05 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Thanks, I understand that the full library list is needed for now, but
> would like it to be otherwise.
>
> Would you acc
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:52 +0100, trophime wrote:
> Package: med-fichier
> Version: 3.0.3-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> It will be great to upgrade med to 3.0.4
> as it is required for Salome and latest Code Aster
I just got med-fichier 3.0.4 and tried to build it.
Unfortunately i
Package: src:coinor-ipopt
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
When I try to build this package, it FTBFS in latex while making doxygen
docs:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian)
entering extended mode
(./_formulas.tex
LaTeX2e <2009/09/24>
Babel and hyphenation pattern
Hi again,
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 22:30 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-02-09 22:25, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > One thing though: do you mind if we downgrade the severity temporarily?
> > There's a big transition about to happen [...]
>
> Adjust as you need i
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 00:38 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libelmer-dev
> Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-4
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'squeeze'.
> It in
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:01 +0100, trophime wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 09:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Package: src:deal.ii
> > Version: 7.0.0-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > This needs an upgrade for PETSc/SLEPc 3.2. 7.1.0 is alm
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-3
Severity: serious
This needs an upgrade for PETSc/SLEPc 3.2. 7.1.0 is almost there, but
the version in alioth doesn't quite work with the new SLEPc interface.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulti
Package: src:freecad
Hello,
Due to the slow (or often nonexistent) responsiveness of OpenCASCADE to
user feedback, patches, etc., users created the OpenCASCADE Community
Edition, or OCE. Debian has adopted OCE as its standard OpenCASCADE
implementation, and there is an OCE package now.
Please c
Package: src:netgen
Hello,
Due to the slow (or often nonexistent) responsiveness of OpenCASCADE to
user feedback, patches, etc., users created the OpenCASCADE Community
Edition, or OCE. Debian has adopted OCE as its standard OpenCASCADE
implementation, and there is an OCE package now.
Please ch
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 12:30 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Sylvestre Ledru [120126 09:49]:
>
> > Could you remove salome from Debian ?
>
> Sure, as there are no reverse depends.
>
> > It has many RCs (10).
>
> However, due to the multiple versions in the archive, we could
Hello Christophe,
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 13:26 +0100, Christophe Trophime wrote:
> Source: petsc
> Version: 3.0.0.dfsg-5.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> it will be nice to have shared librairies in the debug package as well (if
> possible)
>
> thanks
At some point I'm considering
reassign 642439 libpetsc3.2
thanks
Sorry, forgot to switch this to 3.2.
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:59 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> tags 642439 pending
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mikael Öhman wrote:
> > Package: libpetsc3.1
> > Version: 3.1.dfsg-1
tags 642439 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mikael Öhman wrote:
> Package: libpetsc3.1
> Version: 3.1.dfsg-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The CHOLMOD package is supposedly excellent, and is already available
> (libcholmod1.7.1) so I see no reason not to include it, at least for
> t
tags 655940 pending
thanks
Hello,
I'd be glad to re-add alpha, sorry I left it out. I just took the
buildd list and omitted arches with intractable problems. I'm sure
there are a couple of other arches I'll need to add as well.
The fix is in alioth. I'll upload when PETSc gets into testing or
tags 656189 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:58 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 janvier 2012 à 08:56 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wro
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Source: petsc
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > It would be nice if you could apply the attached
Hello Sylvestre,
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Source: petsc
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> It would be nice if you could apply the attached patch.
> It disables the search of mpicc as hcp.
> For an unclear reason, it fixes the bug #624671.
> sle
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 08:18 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Just tested a build, it seems to set the link properly, thanks very
> > much. Do you have a timetable for the release of 1.5.x?
>
> 1.5 GA will be released this summ
om/
diff -urN mpich2-1.4.1.orig/debian/changelog mpich2-1.4.1/debian/changelog
--- mpich2-1.4.1.orig/debian/changelog 2011-08-27 03:06:32.0 -0400
+++ mpich2-1.4.1/debian/changelog 2012-01-12 16:56:38.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mpich2 (1.4.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Adam C. Po
Hello Pavan,
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 12:49 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On 01/11/2012 12:26 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > But since we made that switch that switch in early December, MPICH2 has
> > been breaking a number of package builds now which used to w
now. You can always look at "mpicc -show" for any released
> version to figure out what all flags/libs are being set.
>
> -- Pavan
>
> On 01/07/2012 08:19 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > That may be true, but it is a goal of Debian to be able to build the
>
. ScaLAPACK works around this by
explicitly linking to all of the MPICH2 libraries, and its dependencies
(MUMPS, PETSc etc.) inherit this linkage so they don't break.
To test I'll need to log into an s390 or mips test machine at some
point...
-Adam
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 11:54 -08
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 12:05 +0100, Juergen Riegel wrote:
> Hi together,
> I'm, together with Werner, the maintainer of FreeCAD.
> Based on the long history of license struggle with OCTPL I do not think
> they will change the license soon.
> So I decided to go for GPL free for the 0.13 release of F
, this list is libmpich, libmpl and libopa, if you
> are using generic TCP/IP and shared memory support. But if you enable
> other modules, more libraries might be required.
>
> -- Pavan
>
> On 12/29/2011 01:48 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > X-DebBugs-CC: 653...@bugs.deb
tags 652061 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:11 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Christoph Egger , 2011-12-14, 16:01:
> >Your package failed to build on the buildds:
> >
> >checking for dseupd_ in -larpack... yes
> >configure: WARNING: No parallel arpack found.
> >checking for pdneupd_ in -lpar
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 18:26 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: libscotchparmetis-dev
> Severity: wishlist
>
> PETSc cannot use libscotchparmetis-dev for matrix partitioning because
> it is missing the ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual function. Please implement it
> in the inter
Thanks Muammar, it looks like everything worked and it built everywhere,
except s390x which is waiting for a fix to PVM.
I uploaded the new MUMPS, PETSc will go in as soon as MUMPS is ready.
Thanks again!
-Adam
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 20:39 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Source: scalapack
> Fo
Package: libscotchparmetis-dev
Severity: wishlist
PETSc cannot use libscotchparmetis-dev for matrix partitioning because
it is missing the ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual function. Please implement it
in the interface (assuming its functionality is somewhere in Scotch).
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AE
Package: src:slepc
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Upstream is now at version 3.2, which uses PETSc 3.2. My petsc package
is ready and awaiting uploads of scalapack and mumps to fix bugs 653610
and 653032 and you can find it at: http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/petsc/
(it will probably be in the archive by
X-DebBugs-CC: 653...@bugs.debian.org
Package: libmpich2-dev
Version: 1.4.1-1+b1
Greetings,
On mips(el) and s390, the scalapack build fails with:
gfortran -o
/build/buildd-scalapack_1.8.0-8-mipsel-D7TgwK/scalapack-1.8.0/TESTING/xspblas1tst
psblas1tst.o psblastst.o slamch.o pblastst.o PB_Cwarn.
Package: src:scalapack
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi Muammar,
I'm afraid scalapack FTBFS again on three platforms. On all three the
failure mechanism is the same: libmpich2.so is not linked to libmpl.so .
The workaround is in the attached patch: if you explicitly link -lmpich
-lmpl it should
Hi Muammar,
Reducing the recipients list as this concerns technical details.
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 20:31 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Source: scalapack
> Followup-For: Bug #652313
>
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a new revision of scalapack, but I have a doubt which is: do
> I have to provide a
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 20:50 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Hi Muammar,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 11:59 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:28, Adam C
tags 653032 patch
tags 653032 pending
block 653032 by 652312
block 653032 by 652313
thanks
This is fixed in alioth and I'll upload it when 652312 and 652313 are
fixed.
-Adam
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 18:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:mumps
> Version: 4.10.0-1
> Sev
tags 652313 patch
thanks
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:23 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
> block 652313 by 652312
> thanks
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec
retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
block 652313 by 652312
thanks
Hi Julien,
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: src:scotch
Severity: wishlist
Bug title says it all.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change
> > rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> > which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults
Hi Francesco,
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 19:30 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:49:10 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yes, but I think freecad should not be released in a stable ve
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 18:15 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi
>
> as we have been asked about this license problem and not yet provided an
> answer:
>
> Either the licensing is changed so that the incompatibility no longer
> is there (by either getting the license changed, or exceptions in the
>
ock -9 by -6
block -9 by -7
block -9 by -8
thanks
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > reopen 651452
> > found 651452 0.11.0-12
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> &
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> reopen 651452
> found 651452 0.11.0-12
> thanks
>
>
> Hi!
>
> * Adam C Powell IV [111214 15:33]:
>
> > Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi.
> > I'
clone 652061 -1
reassign -1 libarpack2-dev
retitle -1 Removed symbols needed by other packages
found -1 3.0.1-1
block 652061 by -1
thanks
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:31 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Hi Sylvestre,
>
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
Hi Sylvestre,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 décembre 2011 à 11:58 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
> > Hi Christoph,
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > Package: src:elmerfem
> &
Package: src:petsc
Severity: wishlist
Subject says it all.
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: src:elmerfem
> Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid wheezy
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hi!
>
> Your package failed to build on the
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
The upstream debug method takes twice as long to build and uses a lot
more disk space than the Debian method of stripping debug symbols into a
separate file.
Please change it to the Debian way.
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Subject says it all.
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:09 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> reopen 651452
> retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam
> (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
> found 651452 0.11.0-8.2
> clone 651452 -1
> retitle -1 illumin
tags 651905 pending
thanks
The fix is in alioth, will build and upload within 12 hours or so.
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:32 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: src:illuminator
> Version: 0.11.0-10
> Severity: serious
>
> The conversion to build-arch and build-indep
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 18:52 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> tags 651105 + pending
> thanks
>
> Adam, can you please upload? Dependencies should be fine now, I
> checked with pbuilder.
It's building now, will upload in 12 hours or so.
Thanks,
Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 5
Package: src:illuminator
Version: 0.11.0-10
Severity: serious
The conversion to build-arch and build-indep targets caused illuminator
to FTBFS, because buildds do "debian/rules build" which triggers
build-indep without installing the Build-Depends-Indep packages.
Temporary workaround: change to "
X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl , Julien
Cristau
Dear Alexander and Julien,
Please accept my apologies for uploading just now without incorporating
yoru recent changes. I had not seen your NMU uploads because they came
via the BTS system to debian-science-maintainers, a very high traffi
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 10:10 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 23:13 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> > On 2011/11/21 D. Barbier wrote:
> > > On 2011/11/21 Adam C Powell IV:
> > >> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
>
Hi Denis,
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 23:13 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/21 D. Barbier wrote:
> > On 2011/11/21 Adam C Powell IV:
> >> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> >>> Thanks Adam for your upload.
> >>
> >> You'r
Hi Denis,
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> Thanks Adam for your upload.
You're welcome, sorry it took so long.
There's a problem with the package copyright, see the attached. I think
this will only require a simple patch to debian/copyright, and can get
to it in a couple o
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 20:19 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/13 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> [...]
> > But can't seem to be able to push my one change:
> >
> > $ git push --all origin
> > Enter passphrase for key '/home/hazelsct/.ssh/id_rsa':
> &g
not...
>
> So, if the license issue is not resolved we will request deletion of
> freecad from unstable?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Anton
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 17:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/13 Adam C Powell IV :
> [...]
> > I know, I used pristine-tar to generate .orig.tar.gz for my build. But
> > as a formality, when sponsoring or otherwise uploading packages, I like
> > to verify that it&
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:18:01 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> > Can we decrease the severity of this bug to return the freecad back to
> > testing?
>
> Why?
> I think the bug is still unfixed and still serious, unfortunately.
>
> > The bug
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 01:40 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/11 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 07:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:57 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> >> > On 2011/11/5 D. Barbier wrote:
>
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 07:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:57 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> > On 2011/11/5 D. Barbier wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Hello again,
> > >
> > > Current master looks good to me, it can IMO be uploaded.
> &g
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:57 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/5 D. Barbier wrote:
> [...]
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Current master looks good to me, it can IMO be uploaded.
> > There is a pristine-tar branch, one can run
> > pristine-tar checkout ../oce_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz
> > to generate upstre
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 16:31 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/2 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:58 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> >> On 2011/11/1 D. Barbier wrote:
> >> > On 2011/11/1 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> &
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:58 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/1 D. Barbier wrote:
> > On 2011/11/1 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> [...]
> >> That's a good question. I could go either way:
> >> 1. tart a brand new repository, since it's a new package with
Hello Denis,
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 18:54 +0100, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/11/1 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> [...]
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I just pushed a db/debian branch into upstream repository
> >> https://github.com/tpaviot/oce/tree/db/debian
> >
Hello Denis et al.,
Apologies for the delay and for generally being out-of-pocket recently.
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 09:56 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2011/10/13 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Le jeudi 13 octobre 2011 à 10:08 +0200, D. Barbier a écrit :
> >> On 2011/10/11 Adam
Package: src:salome
Severity: wishlist
Please package the new upstream version, which should have a lot of the
patches merged.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Package: src:med-fichier
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Greetings,
The "git checkout" in the clean target makes this package FTBFS. What
blithering idiot could have thought that one up? Get rid of it at once!
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
En
Dear Denis,
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 01:20 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:
> Package: src:opencascade
> Version: 6.5.0.dfsg-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> As you know, several community members have launched a fork called
> OpenCascade Community Edition (OCE)
> https://github.com/tpaviot/oce
erfem
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source version 6.1.0.svn.5272.dfsg-1
> > dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by "Adam C. Powell, IV"
> >
> > dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
> > dpkg-source --before-build elmerfem-6.1.0.svn.5272.dfsg
> > dpk
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-2
Severity: serious
For some reason, arch-dependent builds on the buildds are triggering the
build-doc target, but doxygen is not installed because it's in
Build-Depends-Indep but not Build-Depends.
I can't figure out why it's doing this, and can't reproduce it
Package: src:deal.ii
Version: 7.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Version 7.0.0 can now link with ARPACK, and MUMPS linking has been
supported for a while. Please fix the configure/build system to
recognize them in their Debian places and link properly.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B
Package: libtrilinos-dev
Version: 10.4.0.dfsg-1
Severity: important
Greetings,
Between g++ 4.5 and 4.6, cmath has added the std::acosh, std::asinh and
std::atanh functions for floats and doubles, so compiling with
Sacado.hpp, which indirectly includes Sacado_cmath.hpp, fails with
"conflicts with
Hello Andrea,
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:58 +0100, Andrea Palazzi wrote:
> --- Mar 10/5/11, Adam C Powell IV ha scritto:
>
> > Da: Adam C Powell IV
> > Oggetto: Re: ITP: aster -- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software for
> > engineering simulations
> > > > I
1 - 100 of 940 matches
Mail list logo
