Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:59:44PM +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
Rhonda, Otto, Gregor, please have a glance at
http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/t-prot/downloads/t-prot-3.3-WIP.tar.gz
and see if I did miss something. Otherwise, a release will follow
sometime around the weekend
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#780779: option merge multiple blank lines to n lines not
configurable as documented
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 20150319104536.3605.13775.report...@piccione.ffm.andrena.de
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:45:36AM +0100, Carsten Otto wrote:
The option -c, documented
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:18:10PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Jochen Striepe wrote:
Yes. Using -c1 works as well at my Debian testing machine. T-prot's
command line processing is all handled by Getopt::Long, so I guess
we're stuck here. I'm sorry.
So from my point of view only the man
Hi again,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:34:22PM +0100, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
-c1 also is expected to work. That's the way Getopt::Long handles
bundling of options and values when using short options. The equal sign
can only be used in the long variant.
Ah, ok. Hm. Well.
I think this
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:58:42PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:38:22 +0100, Jochen Striepe wrote:
That said, it's Getopt::Long that does not behave correctly. -c=1 should
be fine with them AFAICS, so the right thing should be to fix that one.
That's
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 10:36:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
message run through a filter before it's displayed. If you use such a
program
we'd be interested if you could send in your setup.
(Did anybody ever do this?)
Yes, as pointed out in
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:45:34AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
The package description for t-prot has a couple of typos and language
issues. While fixing them I've reshuffled it quite a bit.
Thanks for reviewing. Since the package description is a Debian issue,
I will leave any
Hello,
On 08 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
It is my understanding that -Mmutt should inhibit the exit code for
--max-lines. Since the --max-lines handling changed since 2.8.1 (it
moved out of process_msg(), the return code for overlong messages
will be non-zero even if -Mmutt is
Hi,
On 15 Oct 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le dim 15 octobre 2006 21:25, Jochen Striepe a écrit :
Releasing the hold of course instantly solved the problem. I'm under
the strong impression that apt-listchanges should require an apt
version where libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.11 is already
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.70
Severity: important
Hi,
having had apt (partly accidential) on hold since apt version 0.5.14, for
quite some time apt-listchanges could not load libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.11
on my system and thus failed on program start.
Releasing the hold of course
Hi,
On 21 Jun 2006, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
P.S.: Please ignore Jochen on this, he's just upstream and doesn't
need to share the point of view I have on using it within Debian.
*nods*
It's just that the performance issue is not mentioned explicitely in the
documentation, and thus perhaps
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2006, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
currently the global activation of t-prot in /etc/Muttrc.t-prot uses the
examples/footers directory,
Oops.
however that is not apropriate for
configuration files. t-prot should install all or some of these example
footers into
Hi,
On 21 May 2006, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
I think t-prot shouldn't stop processing after finding the last
signature of a mail. On debian-lists you often get 2 signatures, one
from the OP and the list-signature, however t-prot only hides the
list-signature.
Sorry, but trying several
Hello,
On 20 May 2006, Glyn Kennington wrote:
I think the problem is the following, at /usr/bin/t-prot line 715 after
the t-prot-r1.243-mutt157.diff patch has been applied:
$$lines[$x] !~
/^(?:\e[^\a]+\a)?(?:\Q$mutt_ssloutstart\E)/o)) {
This equates to true if the given line
close 301653
thanks
On 05 Apr 2005, gregor herrmann wrote:
IMO including the patch in sarge would be great because the fix for
the flickering screen is a real improvement in usability.
The patch is included in the freshly uploaded t-prot Debian package,
version 1.99.1+2.0-rc2-0.sarge.1 (sorry
Hello,
On 27 Mar 2005, gregor herrmann wrote:
Some suggestions for improving t-prot.sl:
* Assigning ESC-1 and ESC-0 (for de/activating t-prot filtering in slrn) is
IMO no good idea because slrn often uses these shortcuts as prefix
arguments. I use ESC-6 und ESC-7 because the seem
16 matches
Mail list logo
