On Sun, 10 May 2020 09:12:27 +0100 Phil Armstrong
wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 14:20:42 +0100 Jonathan Kew
wrote:
> > Package: libfontconfig1
> > Version:|2.13.1-4|
> >
> > One of the commits backported in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=95615
Package: libfontconfig1
Version:|2.13.1-4|
One of the commits backported in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956157
to fix fontconfig memory leaks has a bug that introduces a potential
double-free error.
See https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues/237 for
On 28 Mar 2010, at 22:44, Karl Berry wrote:
but I wonder, why use intermediate file for recorder at all? Why not to
open $(jobname).fls in the first place?
Don't want to overwrite the file from a previous run, I suppose.
I also wonder if there are situations where the jobname is not yet
Hi Norbert,
On 11 Jun 2008, at 4:52 am, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
another day another question ...
- Forwarded message from Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Currently it is not possible to include EPS graphics with
\includegraphics. Upstream has a very simple fix in
On 28 May 2008, at 7:47 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 28 Mai 2008, Jonathan Kew wrote:
(unless silenced) and ignoring the tags. I think this will let the
test case work OK (does for me, anyhow).
Did work, big thanks again. I will soon upload updated texlive
packages
to Debian
Hi Norbert,
Very strange. I notice that the report says this ONLY happens with
PDFs generated by OO.org, not from other sources, but it's not clear
to me what's special/different/tricky about the test file provided.
Between the two versions mentioned, 2007.dfsg.1-3+b1 (broken) and
Hi again,
Never mind about testing anything, I know the answer.
The OOo file is tagged PDF (whatever that means), which was not
supported by DVIPDFMx or (hence) xdvipdfmx until very recently. You'd
get a warning about this if running xdvipdfmx without the -q option
that xetex uses by
On 28 May 2008, at 4:40 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
The OOo file is tagged PDF (whatever that means), which was not
supported by DVIPDFMx or (hence) xdvipdfmx until very recently. You'd
get a warning about this if running xdvipdfmx without the -q option
that xetex uses by default.
But it
On 28 May 2008, at 4:40 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 28 Mai 2008, Jonathan Kew wrote:
Never mind about testing anything, I know the answer.
Ah, you are fast ;-)
The OOo file is tagged PDF (whatever that means), which was not
supported by DVIPDFMx or (hence) xdvipdfmx until very
On 22 Apr 2008, at 10:47 am, Harshula wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:26 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
No, I was asking what does that mean for the Debian packages. The
situation is that TL2008 will not make it into lenny. That is for
sure.
I am still undecided, especially due to
On 21 Apr 2008, at 11:55 am, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Norbert Preining
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have the *smallest* doubts let me know...
Adding Harshula to the CC list.
If you are looking for doubtful areas in the patch, check the
following.
On 21 Apr 2008, at 4:51 pm, Harshula wrote:
Norbert Jonathan,
1) Is there a reason to continue statically linking ICU instead of
dynamically linking to libicu (3.8.1) which is maintained by Jay
(CC'd)?
Open Office used to statically link ICU but now dynamically links to
libicu.
XeTeX
On 20 Apr 2008, at 6:38 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear Jonathan,
I know your time is rather limited, and I want to excuse myself for
asking again something from you ... we got a bug report asking for
Sinhala language support in XeTeX, together with a patch.
Please don't apologise - it's a
On 31 Aug 2007, at 7:05 pm, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
here's a bug report we got in the Debian BTS about using inputenc with
XeTeX. The full conversation is at http://bugs.debian.org/434056, but
the first paragraph cited describes the wish quite well. The
problem is
described in
14 matches
Mail list logo
