On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:29:38 +0100 Jonas Koelker wrote:
> I (think I) want to see how many times the messages I care about are
> repeated. This means I can't ignore "last line repeated $n times"
> messages (obviously). But since those can also occur after messages
> that are ignored, I can't
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 03:14:20 +0200 Sebastian Steinhuber
wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> to drop (slightly boring) messages from the package rrdcached of the
> form:
> Oct 15 22:59:29 dds rrdcached[12045]: flushing old values
>
> I added a file named ignore.d.server/rrdcached, containing the line:
>
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:06:58 +0200 martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Alex Prinsier [2007.09.14.1344
> +0200]:
> > Please copy over the filters from cyrus-imapd-2.2. I'm running
> > logcheck on a loghost, which doesn't run cyrus itself. There might
> > be a better alternative to copying the
Closing this bug from 2010 (14 years ago!) -- the then-maintainer
found that most of the suggestions were either already present or
should not actually be added, for various reasons.
A requested was made to resubmit as more independent bugs - if that
was done, we dont need this bug, and if not
package: logcheck-database
# think it's reasonable to add rkhunter rules - although the ones in
this bug need updates
severity 511483 normal
tags 511481 - wontfix
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:28:54 +1000 Nemo wrote:
> > ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+
> > transmission-daemon\[[[:digit:]]+\]: Saved
> > "/var/lib/transmission-daemon/info/.*" \(bencode.c:1651\)$
> > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ transmission-daemon\[[0-9]+\]: .* DHT
> > announce
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:28:11 +0100 Richard Lewis
wrote:
> > The pattern for rsyslogd can be improved. Please add the following
> > line:
> >
> > imuxsock: Acquired UNIX socket '/run/systemd/journal/syslog' \(fd 3\) from
> > systemd. \[v8.2206.0\]
> >
>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:27:57 -0700 Russ Allbery wrote:
> chrysn writes:
> touch /etc/default/locale will also make these go away with no behavior
> changes. In my experience, it happens on systems upgraded from older
> versions of Debian but not with new installs. I think this is more a
> bug
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:24:31 -0400
=?iso-8859-1?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgQnJp6HJl?= wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:21:51AM +0100, Jan Evert van Grootheest wrote:
> > Package: logcheck-database
> > Version: 1.2.68
> >
> > It has now started to spam the logs with lots of
> > Jan 2 09:22:57 sisko
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:29:03 +0200 Hannes von Haugwitz
wrote:
> > ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ rsyslogd: \[origin
> > software="rsyslogd" swVersion="3.18.6" x-pid="[[:digit:]]+"
> > x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com"\] restart$
>
> Daemon restart messages are willingly not included in
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024, 00:12 Thorsten Glaser, wrote:
> P: openjdk-8-doc: debian-changelog-line-too-short CVEs
> [usr/share/doc/openjdk-8-doc/changelog.Debian.gz:4]
>
> The changelog in question is:
>
> * New upstream release
> * CVEs
> - CVE-2024-21011
> - CVE-2024-21085
> -
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, 23:18 Santiago Vila, wrote:
> El 18/4/24 a las 22:17, Richard Lewis escribió:
> >>> '^[a-zA-Z0-9_][a-zA-Z0-9._-]*\.sh$'
> >>
> >> Hi. I confirm that this is appropriate for what we distribute:
> >
> > What about local sc
> >'^[a-zA-Z0-9_][a-zA-Z0-9._-]*\.sh$'
>
> Hi. I confirm that this is appropriate for what we distribute:
What about local scripts added by users (which this change might
prevent loading): perhaps a NEWS.Debian entry would suffice?
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, 19:00 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, <
jo...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> Quoting Francesco Poli (wintermute) (2024-04-11 00:13:51)
> >
> > sbuild --dist unstable --purge-build=never --purge-deps=never
> --chroot-mode=autopkgtest --autopkgtest-virt-server=qemu
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:37:41 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:40:05 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer
> wrote:
> > Package: systemd
> > Version: 255~rc2-1
> > Because of #1056135 I was downgradin systemd/udev packages to 254.5-1.
> > While apt was still running, this causes the
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, 13:03 Michael Biebl, wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:01:05 +0000 Richard Lewis
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, 10:15 Ralf Schlatterbeck, wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 02:52:33PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
&g
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, 10:15 Ralf Schlatterbeck, wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 02:52:33PM +0100, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to mention:
> > There is an upstream (rsyslog) bug-report at
> > https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/issues/5332
>
> Upstream has decided that it is not a
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 at 17:30, Franck Richter wrote:
> Currently chkrootkit-daily send me emails even if I ignore all false
> positives using chkrootkit.ignore.
> Because chkrootkit outputs empty lines that cannot be excluded via
> chkrootkit.ignore.
I havn't checked this, but: i think you
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 00:06:23 +0100 =?UTF-8?B?UHJldcOfZSwgSGlsbWFy?=
wrote:
> On 02.12.2023 08:30, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> > Quoting Hilmar Preusse (2023-12-01 23:10:36)
>
> Hi,
>
> >> I run sbuild as following:
> >>
> >> sbuild --no-run-lintian --arch-all --dist=sid *.dsc -d
>
control: close -1
thanks
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, 08:39 Stefano Callegari,
wrote:
>
>
> > The logs lines there are, but after the header I see many blank lines: I
> > use mutt in a full screen console (more than 50 lines) and I need to
> press
> > page down for 16 times before reach the first line
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 19:03, Stefano Callegari
wrote:
> Il Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 11:31:18PM +0000, Richard Lewis scrisse:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 16:06, Stefano Callegari
> > wrote:
> >
> > > from few days the email from cron are empty, there is only the heade
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 16:06, Stefano Callegari
wrote:
> from few days the email from cron are empty, there is only the header.txt.
> /etc/logcheck <-bash> # su -s /bin/bash -c "/usr/sbin/logcheck -l
> /var/log/syslog" logcheck
>
> the email has the log lines. Without the -l option, still
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:05:29 +1300 Vladimir Petko
wrote:
> As of today there are more test failures:
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> debian/test-out/eval/checks/documentation/manual/manpage-errors-from-man/generic.t
>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, 04:41 Jörg Frings-Fürst, wrote:
> Hello Francois,
>
> I did not search for Vulnerabilities. However, I am of the opinion that
> using
> rkhunter in its current form is equivalent to using a 6 year old virus
> scanner
> and therefore involves an increased security risk.
>
i
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, 22:15 Hilmar Preusse, wrote:
>
> 2023-12-01T09:36:52.230653+01:00 haka2 schroot[3182]: [unstable-
> amd64-sbuild-327cf8c2-30d1-4469-aa7b-9bc3653dbc45 chroot] (root->root)
> Running
> command: "perl -e #012use strict;#012
>use warnings;#012use POSIX;#012
>
>
Package: release-notes
tags: trixie
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes
Per https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/11/msg5.html
mips64el is marked as out-of-sync and may not release with trixie.
If so, we will need something in release-notes about architectures
being removed.
Or maybe both
On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 01:11:00 + Chris Knadle
wrote:
> I was investigating this orphaned package in relation to it being a dependency
> for Logcheck, and unfortunately the inactive maintainer is also the upstream
> author of mime-construct which was last updated 2010-06-23. That can be seen
>
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:01:43 +0200 Philipp Huebner
wrote:
> FWIW, I can reproduce and thus confirm this.
This issue - that the error code is 2 when --show-overrides is used and 0
otherwise is also reproduced in
:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Чт 19 окт 2023 @ 22:42 Richard Lewis :
>
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 09:00, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> >> Вс 15 окт 2023 @ 19:37 Richard Lewis :
> >> > On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:44:27 -0300 David Bremner
> >> > wrote:
> &
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 09:00, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Вс 15 окт 2023 @ 19:37 Richard Lewis :
> > On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:44:27 -0300 David Bremner wrote:
> >> Lev Lamberov writes:
> > I also see this bug in bookwork: dh-make-elpa doesnt work at all
> > unless D
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 19:44:27 -0300 David Bremner wrote:
> Lev Lamberov writes:
>
> yes I did cd (just did again to double check). I don't have DEBFULLNAME
> set, maybe that makes a difference.
I also see this bug in bookwork: dh-make-elpa doesnt work at all
unless DEBFULLNAME (and maybe
Thanks - i really like the idea to checking whether results are from
Debian packages as that is the first thing a user will want to know. I
doubt upstream would include such a patch, but debian has already made
huge changes to the output.
There is no concept of 'INFO' or 'lowering' of messages in
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 20:27, Michael Biebl wrote:
> It turns out that `PrivateTmp=yes` breaks the logcheck autopkgtest.
i think the test tells rsyslog to write to /tmp and then calls
logcheck on the output outside the unit. But the PrivateTmp=true means
rsyslog is actually writing to
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, 04:09 Kevin Otte, wrote:
> I wrote a patch to address #1026379 that I feel would be appropriate
> here too. As I noted there, using tput for detection basically means
> having ncurses-bin as a Recommends, so we may want a better way of doing
> this detection.
>
is it more
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:19:38 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 23:35:27 -0300, David da Silva Polverari wrote:
> > When using https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi, I notice that whenever
> > the Forwarded field contains anything other than "no", "not-needed",
> > "yes" or an URL,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 06:00 Francois Marier, wrote:
> On 2023-09-13 at 14:15:53, Moritz Mühlenhoff (j...@inutil.org) wrote:
> > https://gist.github.com/MatheuZSecurity/16ef0219db8f85f49f945a25d5eb42d7
>
> My summary of this is: it's possible to figure out what files/ports/etc.
> rkhunter is
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 19:54:26 +0200 Santiago Vila wrote:
> In preinst, do something like this:
>
> if upgrading-from-previous-version-whatever-is-coded
>if [ ! -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ]; then
> touch /etc/logcheck.header.was.removed.txt
>fi
> fi
>
> Then in postinst, do something
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, 20:57 Nicholas D Steeves, wrote:
> Richard Lewis wrote:
> > David Bremner wrote:
> > > Richard Lewis writes:
> > > > David Bremner wrote:
>
>
> > What happens in the 'apt upgrade' is:
> >
> > the old emacsen-common
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 12:51, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On a Debian system with ansible and chkrootkit installed,
> chkrootkit warns that ansible has possibly the Adore Worm.
> WARNING: Possible Adore Worm installed:
>
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ansible_collections/cyberark/conjur/dev/start.sh
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, 13:15 Santiago Vila, wrote:
>
> On a Debian 11 system where logcheck is installed, removing
> /etc/logcheck/header.txt and then upgrading to Debian 12
> makes such file to reappear again.
>
>
>
thanks - i agree this is a bug and a patch to fix it would be great :)
In the
Holger Wansing writes:
> Justin B Rye wrote (Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:04:09
> +0100):
>> Holger Wansing wrote:
>> > Thorsten Glaser :
>> >> Could this information (valid unit sufficēs) be added to the dialogue
>> >> where the size is entered? Screen space should suffice.
>> [...]
>> > CC'ing
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 01:11:49 +0100 Andrei Coada
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> This is getting pretty annoying, a 9 years old inconvenience, especially
> now that Debian 12 does not even have a syslog service installed by
default.
> Fail2ban fails to start right after its installation.
did you read the
control: tags -1 + patch
thanks
On Sun, 6 Aug 2023 at 17:15, Richard Lewis
wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:41:24 +0100 Richard Lewis
> wrote:
>
> > giving two arguments including one that is not a package shows there is a
> > syntax error somewhere around line 378:
> &
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:37:15 +0100 Richard Lewis
wrote:
> When loading nokogiri, with 'ruby -w' i get a warning
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/3.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.13.10/lib/nokogiri/version/info.rb:85:
> warning: possibly useless use of a variable in voi
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:41:24 +0100 Richard Lewis
wrote:
> giving two arguments including one that is not a package shows there is a
> syntax error somewhere around line 378:
>
> $ apt-show-versions apt whatever
> apt:amd64/bullseye 2.2.4 uptodate
> Use of uniniti
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:15:45 +0200 Benoit Friry wrote:
> I did migrate "all in /usr" with usrmerge package.
> After the migration, all my files are in /usr, and there are links from
> /lib to /usr/lib, /bin to /usr/bin and /sbin to /usr/sbin.
>
> lin001w reports files found through links in root
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 12:20, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>
> Andreas, thanks for the report, and Richard, thanks for your work as
> well. I think the changes look good, and if there's no other concerns
> I'll merge the salsa MR, and upload a new version to unstable. Once
> that's done, I'll also
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, 11:35 David Bremner, wrote:
> Richard Lewis writes:
> > On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, 12:34 David Bremner, wrote:
> >
>
> As far as the actual bug with failing to clean up, I ran
>
> % systemd-nspawn --machine bullseye /usr/lib/dh-elpa/helper
Holger Wansing writes:
> Richard Lewis wrote (Sun, 30 Jul 2023
> 11:10:10 +0100):
>> in [0] the '#' is meant to indicate 'run this as root', but the rst has
>> '.. code-block:: shell' so the commands are being formatted as a
>> comment.
>
> Yes, there are differen
Holger Wansing writes:
> Tests were successful, the results can be found on
> https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/release-notes_sphinx/www.debian.org/,
> in the exact same structure as they would appear on the Debian
> website.
nice - it looks like it's come on a long way from the previous
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, 12:33 Thomas Parmelan,
wrote:
> Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023 à 23:32, d'après
>
>
> > (or stop using rsyslog entirely).
>
> I quite like my old habits wrt to /var/log/* :p
>
> But I now understand that all that is logged via rsyslog comes from
> systemd-journald anyway, so
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, 10:15 phep, wrote:
>
> the -L option does not overrules anymore the default
> logfiles list as stated in the manpage, it now extends it.
>
true - we should perhaps clarify the documentation to make this clearer
> We are impacted here since in addition to logcheck standard
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, 12:34 David Bremner, wrote:
> Richard Lewis writes:
>
> > I suspect a plain chroot isnt 'enough', i had success with
> systemd-nspawn:
> >
> > ln -s /tmp/bullseye/ /var/lib/machines
> >
> > # im sure there is a better way than these tw
On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, 11:19 David Bremner, wrote:
> Richard Lewis writes:
>
> > I suspect a plain chroot isnt 'enough', i had success with
> systemd-nspawn:
> >
>
> Not sure what you mean here. The reproducer using chroot you posted
> works fine for me, it's
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 at 15:48, james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com
wrote:
> The systemd chkrootkit.timer has this line:
>
> OnBootSec=30min
>
> Which means it runs 30 minutes after a reboot. I tend to upgrade my servers
> in the early morning, which means it's still running when people start
I suspect a plain chroot isnt 'enough', i had success with systemd-nspawn:
ln -s /tmp/bullseye/ /var/lib/machines
# im sure there is a better way than these two lines
cp /etc/passwd bullseye/etc/passwd
cp /etc/shadow bullseye/etc/shadow
systemd-nspawn --ephemeral --boot --machine bullseye
#
An attempt to reproduce - partially successful, maybe reveals deeper issues!
su -
mkdir /tmp/bullseye
cd /tmp/bullseye
debootstrap bullseye . https://deb.debian.org/debian
chroot . apt install emacs elpa-helpful
sed -i s/bullseye/bookworm/ ./etc/apt/sources.list
chroot . apt update
chroot . apt
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 23:39, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> retitle 1030394 dh-elpa: elpa-csv-mode 1.20 not cleaned up
important to note that it's not just this one package, but many elpa
packages (but not all) which were either upgraded or purged as part of
the upgrade: I get the same set of
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 at 09:57, Thomas Parmelan wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 20 juillet 2023 à 21:43, d'après
> Richard Lewis :
> With the default configuration and without my patch I get this in the
> report, which is really not easy to read because of the huge difference
> in ti
i wonder if a missing python3-systemd is the only reason for this bug:
fail2ban + sshd works fine with backend=auto for me, and i have recommends
installed.
So rather than changing the default 'backend', debian should just promote
python3-systemd to 'depends'.
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, 07:03 Jeremy
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:15:25 +0200 Thomas Parmelan
wrote:
Some interesting ideas in here - i think i am missing something though:
> The systemd journal is checked by default, in addition to rsyslog files,
> starting with logcheck version 1.4.1. But the format of timestamps are
> different by
Package: ruby-nokogiri
Version: 1.13.10+dfsg-2+b1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com
Dear Maintainer,
When loading nokogiri, with 'ruby -w' i get a warning
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/3.1.0/gems/nokogiri-1.13.10/lib/nokogiri/version/info.rb:85:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:39:46 +0530 Avinash Sonawane
wrote:
> As per SUS Utility syntax guideline 5[0], command-line utility should
allow
> multiple arguments to be grouped behind single `-` delimiter.
This is a valid request and would be reasonably straightforward for someone
to implement. The
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:27:26 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> chkrootkit reports this:
>
> Searching for Linux.Xor.DDoS ...INFECTED:
> Possible Malicious Linux.Xor.DDoS installed
> /tmp/lynx-2.9.0dev.10/configure
>
fwiw i'd appreciate a NEWS.Debian entry as well, it's too easy to miss
messages from postinst - much better to have it somewhere people can read
at their convenience (and apt-list-changes send the NEWS by email) than
scrolling by - i imagine unattended-upgrades doesnt even show people those
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:07:30 +0100 Richard Lewis <
richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> i've only ever run stable, i get the following list
>
> Warning (comp): Cannot look-up eln file as no source file was found for
> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/helpful-0.18/helpful
i've only ever run stable, i get the following list
Warning (comp): Cannot look-up eln file as no source file was found for
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/helpful-0.18/helpful.elc Warning (comp):
Cannot look-up eln file as no source file was found for
After upgrading to bookworm, encfs segfaults for me when trying to
open encrypted directories created a long time ago.
The solution in
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1405656/encfs-segfault-in-version-22-04
worked, which is to edit /etc/ssl/opensslf.conf and add
[openssl_init]
providers =
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logcheck/-/merge_requests/18 now has
the patch for this
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 21:36, Richard Lewis
wrote:
>
> I think you might be missing one md5sum - I found 4 versions in the git repos
>
> #
> for x in $(git log debian/h
I think you might be missing one md5sum - I found 4 versions in the git repos
#
for x in $(git log debian/header.txt | awk '/commit/{print $2}'); do
git show $x:debian/header.txt | md5sum ; done
d9206d89f2f8d85d346a23da90459862 -
a32fc12d69628d96756fd3af3f8b3ecd -
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023, 22:01 Andreas Beckmann, wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
>
> On 27/06/2023 19.21, Richard Lewis wrote:
> > header.txt has not been modified since 2015.
>
> I've found three versions (with sightly different spelling):
> * lenny
> * squeeze, wheezy,
header.txt has not been modified since 2015.
it is a simple yext file that is installed with debian/logcheck.install
the only change is that it used to be installed into /usr/share but got
moved to /etc to be a conffile in 2021. This didnt trigger any piuparts
issues and there was no change to
package: release-notes
I am sure i must be missing something, but i couldnt see anywhere in
the release notes does it explain what the sources.list for security
updates should be.
i was expecting this to be mentioned in one of
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023, 15:09 Ludovic Rousseau, wrote:
>
> It looks like journalctl now displays the month using the configured
> locale.
>
> Compare:
> # journalctl -t smartd -S "Jun 25 10:00:00"
> juin 25 11:09:27 zotac smartd[548]: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], SMART Usage
> Attribu>
> juin 25
ill reply later, with a proper patch (or MR if i can find the right place
on salsa) but in the meantime, the NEWS.Debian in the logcheck-database
package has details of how to support both formats in case people find this
an issue
On Mon, 8 May 2023 12:13:40 +0100 Richard Lewis
wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 11:40:44 +0100 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>
> > netcat-openbsd 1.218-5 adds support for abstract sockets (on Linux),
Suggested words at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/172
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:48:07 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 30-09-2021 22:59, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Thanks. I am not sure whether it fits in "Items not limited to the
> > upgrade process" or under "Obsolescence and deprecation", but how
> > about:
>
> I think the second one makes more sense.
>
>
>
On Fri, 06 Jan 2023 10:52:31 +0100 "Andrej Shadura" wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, at 21:32, наб wrote:
> > Please for the love of god add this to the NEWS.
> > I /guarantee/ people are using '[^0-9]' to mean "not 0-9",
> > and similar constructs, even if they are well-versed in the shell
On Sat, 20 May 2023 15:21:49 +0100 Justin B Rye
wrote:
> Perhaps the angle the Release Notes should be taking on this is to
> announce what's going to happen for dist-upgrades to trixie/forkie.
> When do we stop producing official Release Notes?
That was my aim too. Think people would welcome
On Mon, 8 May 2023 13:42:26 +0100 Richard Lewis
wrote:
> By searching the internet, and reading the previous version, I think i
> understood the following
...
MR submitted here:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/170
On Thu, 18 May 2023 22:39:11 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> I worked on this recently, and I have something like a prototype ready.
> It can be found (as html) at
> https://people.debian.org/~holgerw/release-notes_sphinx/
I hope the below doesn't come across as negative - it;s not meant to
be:
On Thu, 18 May 2023, 00:57 Al Ma, wrote:
>
> In the man page for bash we see the line,
>
> “-- A -- signals the end of options and disables further option
> processing. Any arguments after the -- are treated as filenames and
> arguments. An argument of - is equivalent to --.”
>
I suggest the
On Thu, 18 May 2023, 04:45 Paul Wise, wrote:
> Thanks for the info and thoughts.
>
> The idea would do something like your second suggestion; run logcheck
> on apt logs separately, but within Debian instead of just on my system.
> Perhaps we could also distribute the ignore regexes across
I'm sorry, but i read the bug and i am not entirely sure i understood what
the request for logcheck is! but if you want to use logcheck to scan apt
logs this is already possible.
You just need to add the name of the log to a file in the logfiles.d
directory. Your script using sed could be then be
i cant be the only one who has seen many references to "polkit" but
never managed to understand what it does - or whether i was using it
as part of gnome etc - so this was helpful!
By searching the internet, and reading the previous version, I think i
understood the following
On Sun, 20 Mar 2022 11:40:44 +0100 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> netcat-openbsd 1.218-5 adds support for abstract sockets (on Linux),
> which is a breaking change with possible security implications:
> https://sources.debian.org/src/netcat-openbsd/1.218-5/debian/NEWS/ .
> elbrus suggested to mention
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 23:59:16 + Richard Lewis
wrote:
> I think leaving the logcheck user behind on purge is actually best
> practice because it may still own files (eg in /etc/logcheck if that
> was stored in a version control system).
This thread reminded me of this logcheck b
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:24:29 -0400 Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> The release notes, in sections 4.2.2 and 4.8, actually suggest *three*
> *different* ways of finding what are essential orphaned packages:
>
> aptitude search '~o'
> aptitude search '?narrow(?installed, ?not(?origin(Debian)))'
>
On Wed, 3 May 2023 21:52:47 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 01-05-2023 16:26, Richard Lewis wrote:
> > I dont think the 'errata' page above is in the release-notes repository (?)
>
> That's correct, but that's also why the original reporter filed t
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:52:54 + Colin Watson wrote:
> There's now
> https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-team/openssh/-/merge_requests/21 for this,
> but as noted there I have documentation concerns about simply removing
> this. Copying my comments from there:
> At a bare minimum, this needs an
On Tue, 31 May 2022 16:13:27 +0100 Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Tue 31 May 2022 at 14:58:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:26:39PM +0200, David Prévot wrote:
> > > The [errata] advises one to use
> > >
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security
package: release-notes
# disk space
tags 992345 + patch
# usrmerge
tags 992116 + patch
# both patches are in salsa MRs
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:28:12 -0400 Olek Wojnar wrote:
> If possible, please include the following in section 2.2 (What's new in the
> distribution?) of the release notes for the following architectures:
> amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x, ppc64, riscv64
Is this perhaps an old bug that should be
control: tags -1 + patch
(In case of duplication, just wanted to ensure the BTS had a link to
this MR (which covers this and the other bug about usrmerge):
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/155
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:19:53 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Gevers wrote (Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:10:16 +0200):
> >
> > + If you depend on a screen reader and want to upgrade to ,
> > we suggest
> > + that you install a desktop like MATE instead of GNOME.
> >
> > I guess our
control: tags -1 + patch
thanks
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 04:31:45PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> > if no-one else does, i can draft some text that says
> > - ntp is dropped (do we know why?).
>
> I think the main reason is very slow upstream development with a large
>
control: tags + patch
thanks
This one, on free space needed is hopefully addressed by
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/159
control: tags + patch
thanks
Think this is covered by
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/155
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:58:35 +0200 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> according to
> https://linuxnews.de/2021/04/10/debian-11-repositories-aus-3-hand-ohne-apt-key-einbinden/
> Debian 12 supports and requires a safer way to import keys for 3rd
> party repos. If that is the case, I suggest to add this to the
control: clone -1 -2
control: retitle -2 spurious warnings if no sniffers (ifpromisc needs a
proper exit status to fix this)
thanks
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 11:33 Red Omen, wrote:
> Package: chkrootkit
> Version: 0.57-2+b1
> Followup-For: Bug #1033538
>
Thanks - this should be in a separate bug
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
