Bug#403877: xemacs21-nomule: dired does not work properly
Package: xemacs21-nomule Version: 21.4.19-2 Severity: normal Dear Bug Team! I just installed Debian Etch on a new Laptop together with the latest XEmacs 21.4.19 nomule. When I opened a directory in dired mode two strange things happens: (1) at the end of the file listing I find a mounstrous string of the form //DIRED// 61 62 111 113 162 174 223 241 290 299 348 353 402 411 460 //469 518 527 576 585 634 648 697 715 764 782 831 849 898 916 965 983 //1032 1050 1099 1117 1166 1175 1224 1229 1278 1289 1338 1343 1392 //1398 1447 1457 1506 1523 1572 1585 1634 1648 1697 1710 1759 1765 //1814 1824 1873 1883 1932 1942 1991 1996 2045 2054 2103 2110 2159 //2170 2219 2225 2274 2290 2339 2354 2403 2421 2470 2485 2534 2549 //2598 2613 2662 2677 2726 2732 2781 2785 2834 2838 2887 2895 2944 //2950 2999 3004 3053 3067 3116 3121 3170 3175 3224 3236 3285 3309 //3358 3379 3428 3432 3481 3504 3553 3564 3613 3625 3674 3684 3733 //3748 3797 3810 3859 3865 3914 3918 3967 3978 4027 4037 4086 4102 //4151 4158 4207 4216 4265 4275 4324 4339 4388 4401 4450 4454 4503 //4510 4559 4562 4611 4616 4665 4673 4722 4732 4781 4790 4839 4849 //4898 4901 4950 4955 5004 5014 5063 5069 5118 5125 5174 5182 //DIRED-OPTIONS// --quoting-style=literal all in one line. I have never seen something before. (2) while this can be considered as a design question (if so quite ugly) however what is more serious is that I can't set any longer symbolic links on marked files (individually it works) I have attached the backtrace thanks I also found the solution (setq dired-use-ls-dired nil) That was default in earlier versions now it is *t* which causes the problems. Please set it to *nil* again Uwe Brauer dired-bug Description: Binary data -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xemacs21-nomule depends on: ii emacsen-common1.4.17 Common facilities for all emacsen ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcompfaceg1 1:1.5.2-4 Compress/decompress images for mai ii libdb33.2.9+dfsg-0.1 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-23 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib ii libice6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-13 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap2 2.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries ii libncurses5 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-01.2.15~beta5-0 PNG library - runtime ii libsm61:1.0.1-3 X11 Session Management library ii libtiff4 3.8.2-6Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 1:1.0.2-4 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 1:1.0.2-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.5-2 X11 pixmap library ii libxt61:1.0.2-2 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii xemacs21-basesupport 2006.05.10-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- compile ii xemacs21-bin 21.4.19-2 highly customizable text editor -- ii xemacs21-support 21.4.19-2 highly customizable text editor -- xemacs21-nomule recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#347610: Any progress?
amaya == amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: amaya retitle 347610 [Witing for submitter] Kernel 2.6.10 and amaya firmware 1.3 don't work in Knoppix thanks Hi Amaya Sorry for the delay. amaya Hi, Uwe amaya Did you make any progress on this issue? Well yes and no. The laptop running knoppix, various kernels 2.6.10, 2.6.13 and 2.6.15 have these problems. I should add that I compiled that kernels myself. I installed on the Laptop I am currently using, directly debian etch and not any longer knoppix, the kernel which is shipped with etch ie 2.6.15-1-486 works fine with that card! amaya Daniel told me that he is working on ipw* this weekend and I would like amaya you to look at bug http://bugs.debian.org/337920 amaya If you upgrade to the latest available kernel version in amaya Debian (linux-image-2.6.18-1-ARCH), and the update ipw2100 amaya to the version Daniel is about to upload, I think this bug amaya should be fixed too. Well honestly the only thing I never did (or dared to do) was to install a debian kernel. I usually take what comes with the installation or compile it myself. Given the fact that the problem seems to be connected with privately compiled kernels, do you still want to be to install the latest debian kernel??? (I presume apt-get install linux-image-2.6.18-1-ARCH and rebooting (I use grub) should be fine?) Regards Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380651: apache2: can't open php files
Package: apache2 Version: 2.0.55-4 Severity: normal Hello I tried to install for example wordpress (either using the debian package or download it by myself). The issue is whenever I should open say the file install.php then in mozilla the following message pops up the file install.php is of type application/x-php (php script) and mozilla does not know what to do about it So it seems that the php4 module is not loaded, but I don't understand why libapache2-mod-php4 and all the php4 package are installed. The php4.load file in /etc/apache2/mods-available contains LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp4.so And this lib exists. So I don't know. Shall I submit any other script? Thanks Uwe Brauer Ps the same happens with apache 1.3 for which I will send a separate report. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-486 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages apache2 depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.55-4 traditional model for Apache2 apache2 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information pgpWfctZyzNEo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#359288: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#359288: acknowledged by developer (Doapt-get-f install)
Thomas == Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Uwe Brauer wrote: Thomas You have a mount-aes package installed but there is no Thomas such package in the Debian archives. Thomas $ apt-cache madison mount-aes Thomas $ well apt-cache search mount-aes mount-aes - Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems. Thomas I don't know where you got it, but its presence is the Thomas reason you are having trouble upgrading initscripts. So I am really confused. Uwe Brauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359288: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#359288: acknowledged by developer (Doapt-get-f install)
Thomas == Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Uwe Brauer wrote: well apt-cache search mount-aes mount-aes - Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems. So I am really confused. Thomas What is the output of apt-cache madison mount-aes? W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/non-US/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_pub_debian-non-US_dists_testing_non-US_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/non-US/contrib Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_pub_debian-non-US_dists_testing_non-US_contrib_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/non-US/non-free Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_pub_debian-non-US_dists_testing_non-US_non-free_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) E: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list So I am confused! I sent you already my sources.list file, I don't encounter anything strange there. Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359288: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#359288: acknowledged by developer (Doapt-get-f install)
Thomas == Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thomas Include stable in your sources.list as well as testing and report Thomas what message apt prints then. No chance: Apt-get update apt-get install initscripts Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: initscripts: Depends: mount (= 2.11x-1) E: Broken packages -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359288: acknowledged by developer (Do apt-get -f install)
Debian == Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian From: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Subject: Do apt-get -f install Debian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:30:59 +0200 Debian Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian This does not reflect a bug in the initscripts package. Well then the message which appears is at least confusing, since it states Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. And broken package Debian You should be able to fix your installation by running: Debianapt-get update Debianapt-get -f install No, that I already tried of course. Debian If that doesn't work, please post your /etc/apt/sources.list and Debian the output of apt-get update and apt-get -f install. I do this below, Thanks Uwe Brauer Output of apt-get -f install install.bug Description: Binary data Output apt-get update update.bug Description: Binary data Copy of Sources.list sources.list Description: Binary data
Bug#359287: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#359287: udev: can'tinstall the pkg, a bug report should be filed)
Debian == Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report Debian #359287: udev: can't install the pkg, a bug report should be filed, Debian which was filed against the udev package. Debian On Mar 27, Uwe Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: udev: Depends: initscripts (= 2.85-16) but it is not going to be installed Debian This is not a bug, if you do not know how to work around Debian this please ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will do, but don't you think that the message which is returned is _confusing_, since it states A bug report *should* be filed Uwe Brauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359288: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#359288: acknowledged by developer (Doapt-get -f install)
Thomas == Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The following packages have unmet dependencies: initscripts: Depends: mount (= 2.11x-1) E: Broken packages Thomas What happens if you upgrade the mount package to a version Thomas = 2.11x-1? Honestly I am little frighten to upgrade that package since it is essential for the system. I thought apt-get would take care of necessary upgrades and if it does not or cannot not than something serious is broken Well then the message which appears is at least confusing, since it states Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. Thomas What is the command that produces this message. Can you Thomas please send a console log that shows it? Thomas -- Thomas Hood Sure it was a simple apt-get install initscripts here is the output --8schnipp-8--- apt-get install initscripts Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: initscripts: Depends: mount (= 2.11x-1) E: Broken packages --8schnapp-8--- Uwe Brauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359288: initscripts: can't install the pgk, bug report should be filed
Package: initscripts Severity: important When I try to install initscripts, I obtain the following message and I am not sure whether to try to install the mount version mentioned below Thanks Uwe Brauer Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: initscripts: Depends: mount (= 2.11x-1) E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359287: udev: can't install the pkg, a bug report should be filed
Package: udev Severity: important Hi I try to install udev, on debian testing (2.6.13) kernel and obtain: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: udev: Depends: initscripts (= 2.85-16) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages I cannot install initscripts, for which I send a separate bug report. Thanks Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347596: cdrecord: Problem with new 2.6.10 kernel (version0.98alpha 15)
Ivan == Ivan Baldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ivan El 12/01/06 12:35, Uwe Brauer escribió: IvanPlease, verify /etc/modules to see if there is any reference to Ivan ide-scsi. Ivanlsmod does show ide-scsi loaded? And is ide-cd loaded? IvanAnyway, even if ide-scsi is still being loaded, try to use cdrecord Ivan with the dev=/dev/hdX option, for example cdrecord dev=/dev/hdX -data Ivan someimage.iso. If you use XCDRoast, please add the device manually and Ivan enter /dev/hdX as the device. IvanTell us if it works then. IvanThank you. Hello Thanks for your answer, it did not work, first! But then I realized what happened: Knoppix has linked /dev/cdrom to /dev/sd0 and moreover has a boot option which I used as well: --8schnipp-8--- append=ramdisk_size=10 resume2=swap:/dev/hda7 lang=de apm=power-off hda=scsi hdb=scsi hdc=scsi hdd=scsi hde=scsi hdf=scsi hdg=scsi hdh=scsi nomce --8schnapp-8--- That of course makes it perfectly understandable that the module ide-scsi is always loaded. (I understand the reasons for Knoppix to chose that append option). When I rebooted without that option and used xcdroast it worked! However I got the following error and I would like to have anybody comment on it: The ATAPI mode on a device can cause great delays in all X-CD-Roast operations, because communication with it takes much more time. Using a CD writer in that mode is not recommended - please use always SCSI emulation here The other question which I still did not resolve, why does the Knoppix 2.4.27 and 2.6.9 kernels work happily with the scsi emulation!!! Anyway strictly speaking the BUG is resolved. Thanks Uwe Brauer
Bug#347610: ipw2100-source: problem with firmware makes driver unusable
Sebastian == Sebastian Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sebastian Thanks for your report Uwe. Sebastian However the whole ipw2100 stuff is a bit messy right Sebastian now because since 2.6.13 Sebastian ipw2100 and ieee80211 are part of the kernel images and Sebastian the different versions of ipw2100 and ieee80211 are Sebastian largely incompatible. I just wanted to let you know that I tried out the 2.6.15 kernel (which includes that driver). Same problem I have manually to remove the relevant modules and insert them again, than the card works. I definitely will contact the intel maintainer about it. Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347596: cdrecord: Problem with new 2.6.10 kernel (version 0.98alpha 15)
Steve == Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve That's a _very_ old version of cdrecord - the version that shipped in Steve sarge was 4:2.01+01a01-2. The first thing I'd try is to upgrade to Steve that version! Ok I updated that version. Below you find the version numbers after the upgrade. However the problem persists. I attach again the output, which is very similar but not identical one difference is --8schnipp-8--- Error: Cannot gain SYS_RAWIO capability.Is cdrecord installed SUID root? Cdrecord-Clone 2.01.01a03 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2005 Joerg Schilling --8schnapp-8--- Another observation comes from the dmesg: --8schnipp-8--- ide-scsi is deprecated for cd burning! Use ide-cd and give dev=/dev/hdX as device scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices Vendor: TEAC Model: DW-225Rev: 2.2A Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 24x/24x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 --8schnapp-8--- Regards Uwe Brauer cdrecord.out2 Description: Binary data Package: cdrecord Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4 Severity: important -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages cdrecord depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcap1 1:1.10-14 support for getting/setting POSIX. ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev -- debconf information: cdrecord/MAKEDEV: true cdrecord/MAKEDEVNEW: true cdrecord/do_it_yourself: * cdrecord/SUID_bit: true
Bug#347596: cdrecord: Problem with new 2.6.10 kernel (version 0.98alpha 15)
Steve == Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another observation comes from the dmesg: --8schnipp-8--- ide-scsi is deprecated for cd burning! Use ide-cd and give dev=/dev/hdX as device scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices Vendor: TEAC Model: DW-225 Rev: 2.2A Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02 sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 24x/24x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 --8schnapp-8--- Steve The suggestion about using ide-cd rather than ide-scsi may Steve also help - ide-scsi is deprecated in the kernel and may go Steve away soon. ide-cd and dev=/dev/hdc works fine for me. Ok, now how shall I do that, modprobe ide-cd loads that module I looked in the cdrecord manual and in the cdrecord.conf but did not find any reference to that options. Of course I can't just rmmod ide-scsi, that will lead to a collapse of my system. Another possibility would be to recompile the kernel which I have to do anyhow. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI=n Sorry for that elementary question. Uwe Brauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347610: ipw2100-source: problem with firmware makes driver unusable
Sebastian == Sebastian Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sebastian Thanks for your report Uwe. Sebastian Due to my notebook being at ASUS for repairs, I am not Sebastian able to do anything about it right now. Sebastian However the whole ipw2100 stuff is a bit messy right Sebastian now because since 2.6.13 Sebastian ipw2100 and ieee80211 are part of the kernel images and Sebastian the different versions of ipw2100 and ieee80211 are Sebastian largely incompatible. Sebastian There are several other bugreports open regarding that Sebastian problem, and I did not find a sensible solution for that Sebastian yet. Well I sort of did for the moment (using still 2.6.10) when everything is compiled and installed and I reboot, the problem occurs as I described. However when I remove the relevant moduls. And then reload them everything is fine! #!/bin/sh rmmod ipw2100 rmmod ieee80211 rmmod firmware_class modprobe firmware_class modprobe ieee80211 modprobe ipw2100 I thought the problem is caused by /etc/modules-2.6.10 but now it does not matter how the modules are put in that list. I have to remove and insert them manually after rebooting. Strange Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347596: cdrecord: Problem with new 2.6.10 kernel (version 0.98alpha 15)
Package: cdrecord Version: 4:2.0+a38-1 Severity: important Hello I have installed Knoppix 3.7 which comes with a 2.4.27 and a 2.6.9 pre compiled kernel. With both kernels I have no problem using xcdroast. Meanwhile I upgraded the system to sarge (with some packages from sid I confess), save the kernel. However when I compiled a new 2.6.10 kernel xcdroast/cdrecord can't write any longer to the CD. (I have attached the error output below). The main error message is: cdrecord: No such device or address. Cannot send SCSI cmd via ioctl I even compiled the 2.6.10 kernel with the config-2.6.9 from Knoppix, but it did not help. In fact lsmod gives different results so I suspect that some module is missing, but which? (I hesitate to attach the output of lsmod.) Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer cdrecord.out Description: Binary data -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages cdrecord depends on: ii debconf 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev -- debconf information: cdrecord/MAKEDEV: true cdrecord/MAKEDEVNEW: true cdrecord/do_it_yourself: * cdrecord/SUID_bit: true
Bug#347610: ipw2100-source: problem with firmware makes driver unusable
Package: ipw2100-source Version: 1.1.3-1 Severity: important Hello, I am not sure, whether I should contact the ipw2000 maintainer directly, if so I apologise for the following bug report. First I installed Knoppix 3.7 which ships a 2.6.9 and 2.4.27 kernel, that system has the ipw2100 driver installed, which corresponds to the 1.2 version of firmware. I recently tried to compile and install a 2.6.10 kernel and so installed the corresponding kernel header and the ipw2100-source package which corresponds in my understanding to the 1.3 version of firmware. So I installed the relevant fw files. However when booted the new kernel the wireless card was no longer recognised. The strange thing is that the relevant moduls seems to be loaded. ipw2100 150756 0 firmware_class 10368 1 ipw2100 evdev 9600 0 ieee80211 45544 1 ipw2100 ieee80211_crypt 6404 2 ipw2100,ieee80211 ieee1394 110644 0 But when reading dmesg I found mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice ieee80211_crypt: registered algorithm 'NULL' ieee80211: 802.11 data/management/control stack, 1.1.6 ieee80211: Copyright (C) 2004-2005 Intel Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipw2100: no version for ieee80211_get_crypto_ops found: kernel tainted. ipw2100: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Driver, 1.1.3 ipw2100: Copyright(c) 2003-2005 Intel Corporation ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKF] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:02.0[A] - GSI 11 (level, low) - IRQ 11 ipw2100: Detected Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Connection ipw2100: eth0: Firmware 'ipw2100-1.3.fw' not available or load failed. ipw2100: eth0: ipw2100_get_firmware failed: -2 ipw2100: eth0: Failed to power on the adapter. ipw2100: eth0: Failed to start the firmware. ipw2100Error calling register_netdev. ipw2100: probe of :02:02.0 failed with error -5 But ipw2100-1.3.fw is in /usr/lib/hotplug/firmware (Together with version 1.2 of) Do I miss some init script, I even used the 2.6.9 config script of knoppix for the kernel and recompiled, it did not work. The knoppix kernel produces the following dmesg: hw_random hardware driver 1.0.0 loaded ieee80211_crypt: registered algorithm 'NULL' ieee80211: loading with WEP enabled. ipw2100: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 2100 Network Driver, 0.51 ipw2100: Copyright(c) 2003-2004 Intel Corporation ipw2100: 02:02.0: Detected at mem: 0xD020-0xD0200FFF - e0569000, irq: 11 eth0: Using hotplug firmware load. eth0: Bound to 02:02.0 Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver - version 2.3.43-k1 Copyright (c) 2004 Intel Corporation Any help would be appreciated. Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages ipw2100-source depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii debhelper 4.2.24 helper programs for debian/rules ii ieee80211-source 1.1.6-2Source for the 802.11 (wireless) n ii module-assistant 0.10.2 tool to make module package creati -- debconf information: * ipw2100/firmware_note: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347610: ipw2100-source: problem with firmware makes driver unusable
amaya == amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: amaya Hi Uwe! Hi Amaya, amaya As far as I understand this issue, the 2.6.x kernels ship an amaya older version of the ipw2000 modules. I am not sure I understand. I thought that the kernels do not ship any module! I have to complile it myself, so basically it is a m-a build i-source m-a build ipw2200-source Or do you mean that the kernel headers, of that 2.6.10 versions are too old? amaya You are trying to build 2.6.10, and I think you would be amaya better off with a more recent version, like 2.6.15. Although amaya I have failed to load newer firmware versions with this one amaya too. So you too have problems, I definitely contact the ipw2100 maintainer, but a quick look in his FAQ does not provide anything new, all the modules are loaded, the kernel seems to be compiled with the necessary parameters, strange strange amaya Good luck and keep us updated on your achievements :) I will Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347610: ipw2100-source: problem with firmware makes driver unusable
amaya == amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: amaya Uwe Brauer wrote: I am not sure I understand. I thought that the kernels do not ship any module! I have to complile it myself, so basically it is a amaya Sorry, I got carried away, the situation I describe only amaya applies to kernels newer that 2.6.12. Are you sure, I just checked 2.6.13 and in the tree I cannot find any ipw module? I also greped for ipw2100 or ipw2200 without success Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343083: xemacs21: Could you add 21.5.x?
Package: xemacs21 Version: 21.4.17-2 Severity: wishlist Hello Is there a slight chance that you could replace 21.4.x in SID by 21.5.x and leave 21.4.x in Sarge? Or if you consider 21.5.x as too buggy to open an experimental branch for 21.5.x? Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xemacs21 depends on: ii xemacs21-mule 21.4.17-2 highly customizable text editor -- ii xemacs21-nomule 21.4.17-2 highly customizable text editor -- -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331315: xemacs21-nomule: pls change --package-path for the config
Package: xemacs21-nomule Version: 21.4.17-2 Severity: normal Hello I would like to comment on the actual configure which is '--package-path=~/.xemacs:~/.xemacs/packages:~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages::/usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages:/usr/share/xemacs21/site-packages' after discussing that issue on xemacs-beta I would like to ask you to change this config and put site-packages before xemacs-packages, that is: '--package-path=~/.xemacs:~/.xemacs/packages:~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages:/usr/share/xemacs21/site-packages:/usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages:' Best regards Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xemacs21-nomule depends on: ii emacsen-common1.4.15 Common facilities for all emacsen. ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcompfaceg1 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii libdb33.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-19 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libtiff4 3.7.2-3Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X pixmap library ii libxt64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xemacs21-basesupport 2005.07.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- compile ii xemacs21-bin 21.4.17-2 highly customizable text editor -- ii xemacs21-support 21.4.17-2 highly customizable text editor -- ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317116: libmyodbc: odbcinst.ini in /etc is generated, with wrong syn
Package: libmyodbc Version: 3.51.09-1 Severity: normal Hi Steve a couple of days ago I sent you an email concerning a connection problem in a different PC. Now I found the culprit. For reasons unknown to me during the installation either of libmyodbc or unixodbc the following odbcinst.ini file is copied into /etc. --8schnipp-8--- [MySQL] Description = ODBC Driver for MySQL Driver = /usr/lib/libodbc.so Setup = /usr/lib/libodbcmyS.so FileUsage = 1 CPTimeout = CPReuse = --8schnapp-8--- However this file is just wrong, the correct one is for example shipped in /usr/share/libmyodbc --8schnipp-8--- [MySQL] Description = MySQL driver Driver = /usr/lib/odbc/libmyodbc.so Setup = /usr/lib/odbc/libodbcmyS.so CPTimeout = CPReuse = --8schnapp-8--- So I don't know whom to blame but I think this is an important issue. Uwe -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libmyodbc depends on: ii debconf 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmysqlclient124.0.24-10mysql database client library ii odbcinst1 2.2.4-11 Support library and helper program ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * libmyodbc/addtoodbc: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312483: libmyodbc: Tables cannot be edited with Openoffice.
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] Steve Right, this does seem to be trivially reproducible in Steve sarge. It looks like there's been a change in OpenOffice Steve that triggered it, rather than a regression in libmyodbc Steve itself; even installing the woody version of libmyodbc Steve doesn't get me read/write table access with the sarge Steve version of OOo. Your are talking about using the macro, no? [snip] Sorry, what I meant, I could *NOT* install 2.50 from oldstable the command apt-get install -t oldstable libmyodb installed version 3.51.09 sorry for the typo. Steve # apt-get install libmyodbc=2.50.39-3 Thanks for that one. Steve works for me. It appears that the Release file for woody still says Steve stable instead of oldstable, so selecting by release doesn't work Steve currently. [snip] Steve And downgrading to anything earlier than 3.51.09 would also break Steve compatibility with MySQL server 4.1. Ok I was afraid of that, I could try the MySQL server which would work for the 2.50 driver though, but maybe this would not work neither (maybe I should start to use pinning.) Now it turns out that I have a serious connection problem. The latest upgrade of mysql which I downloaded yesterday, does not allow anonymous connection anymore. So right now I can't do any testing anymore on the Laptop with the most recent Debian version. I would highly appreciate if you could just tell me about my .odbc setting, which I obviously have to change. I am asking you this since I am in a state of desperation (strictly speaking that question is a little off topic). In recent years I followed the instructions found in www.unixodbc.org/doc/OOoMySQL.pdf so I used the following .odbc.ini (in my home dir) and --8schnipp-8--- [MySQL-test] Description = MySQL database test Driver = MySQL Server = localhost user = oub Database = test Port = 3306 Socket = Option = Stmt = --8schnapp-8--- ocbcinst.ini files in /etc --8schnipp-8--- Description = MySQL driver Driver = /usr/lib/odbc/libmyodbc.so Setup = /usr/lib/odbc/libodbcmyS.so FileUsage = 1 --8schnapp-8--- Now debian overwrites the file in /etc by --8schnipp-8--- [MySQL] Description = MySQL driver Driver = /usr/lib/odbc/libmyodbc.so Setup = /usr/lib/odbc/libodbcmyS.so CPTimeout = CPReuse = FileUsage = 1 --8schnapp-8--- - anonymous connection is now disabled, does this mean I have to set in my odbc.ini user = oub? - is the name conflict of [MySQL] in odbcinst.ini and [MySQL-test] a problem. I changed [MySQL-test] to [MySQL] in my .odbc.ini file but still I get the message: [ISQL]ERROR: Could not SQLConnect What can I do now? Thanks Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312483: libmyodbc: Tables cannot be edited with Openoffice.
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:39:15PM +, Uwe Brauer wrote: Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve Can you elaborate on what you mean by format here? If Steve you can give me a sample database schema, I can try to Steve reproduce the problem. I will, right now it seems that the macro does not work any more, so my tables continue to be _not_ editable I tried to install 2.50 from the oldstable release but it did not work. Steve And what problem did 2.50 have? apt-get install -t oldstable libmyodb installed 3.51.06 Steve I don't know what you're saying here; you just said that Steve you installed 2.50 from oldstable, which is the correct Steve version in woody -- I don't see how this commandline could Steve ever have installed 3.51.06 for you. 3.51.06 is no longer Steve in the archive. Sorry, what I meant, I could *NOT* install 2.50 from oldstable the command apt-get install -t oldstable libmyodb installed version 3.51.09 sorry for the typo. Couldn't you move that version to stable, Steve Well, no; first because it doesn't exist anywhere in the Steve archive, and second because the policy for updates to Steve stable releases prohibits it. This bug, if it truly Steve renders MyODBC unusable with the current OOo packages, is Steve irritating, but it doesn't make the package unusable for Steve all purposes. Well and what is about 2.50 to stable then, it is irritation to have *no* working version neither in woody, sarge nor sid. I come back to you as soon as possible, since for me this is a urgent subject. Steve Ok.It's a highpriority for me as well, but Steve unfortunately, if none of the workarounds work, it's Steve probably not fixable for sarge now. It would have been Steve nice if someone had reported this problem in the three Steve months since Steve 3.51.09 was uploaded... Right I read again the bug reports, it seem that the person who solved his problem, compiled the necessary version for himself, I try to contact him. Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312689: mysql-server: mysql -utest does no work any longer
Package: mysql-server Version: 4.0.24-10 Severity: important Hello I have used myslq-server (client) via unixodbc and the Openoffice interface for years. For me to check the installation mysql -utest worked always, in suse and after switching to debian (4.0.22). Now when I upgraded to 4.0.24 the command did not work I got ERROR 1045: Access denied for user: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Using password: NO Which looks pretty much like an security issue. I looked up in the changelog and saw some changes in the scripts in /etc/mysql. However for me it unclear how I have to connect now to the database. Another point: I saw that version 4.0.24 in all, three branches (stable testing unstable) and I fail to see the rationale behind this. If for some reason a version in unstable has a bug I could downgrade to the older version, but now I can't. The only explanation for this policy seems to me a serious security problem. Right now for me the database is frankly useless and therefore any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mysql-server depends on: ii adduser 3.59Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbi-perl 1.45-1 The Perl5 Database Interface by Ti ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-4 GCC support library ii libmysqlclient12 4.0.24-10 mysql database client library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-6 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-1 A simple mail user agent ii mysql-client 4.0.24-10 mysql database client binaries ii mysql-common 4.0.24-10 mysql database common files (e.g. ii passwd 1:4.0.3-30.4Change and administer password and ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc 21.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * mysql-server/skip_networking: false mysql-server/really_downgrade_from_41: false mysql-server/want_chroot: * mysql-server/start_on_boot: false mysql-server/postrm_remove_databases: false * mysql-server/mysql_install_db_notes: mysql-server/nis_warning: mysql-server/mysql_update_hints1: * mysql-server/postrm_remove_database: false mysql-server/fix_privileges_warning: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312483: libmyodbc: Tables cannot be edited with Openoffice.
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:39:15PM +, Uwe Brauer wrote: Steve So, I doubt that downgrading to 3.51.06 would actually help Steve you very much; but if this workaround works for 3.51.06 and Steve not for 3.51.09, then yes, I'm quite disappointed that no Steve one filed a bug against libmyodbc before the release. :/ Hello I just now checked on a Laptop running some not upgraded SID, so ii libmyodbc 3.51.06-1 the MySQL ODBC driver ii odbc-postgresq 07.03.0200-5 ODBC driver for PostgreSQL ii odbcinst1 2.1.1-8Support library and helper program for acces ii unixodbc 2.2.4-11 ODBC tools libraries And ii openoffice.org 1.1.4-3high-quality office productivity suite ii openoffice.org 1.1.4-3OpenOffice.org office suite binary files ii openoffice.org 1.1.4-3+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffice.org The macro mentioned in earlier versions do NOT work. I already wrote the person which the bug list for whom it worked, so I am keen to see his answer. Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312483: libmyodbc: Tables cannot be edited with Openoffice.
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:39:15PM +, Uwe Brauer wrote: Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I tried out now even the beta version of OO (a non official debian version of it to be precise). The macro does not work neither and therefore I cannot access my mysql database via ODBC. Could you please tell me how to install the version from *oldstable* Thanks Uwe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312483: libmyodbc: Tables cannot be edited with Openoffice.
Package: libmyodbc Version: 3.51.09-1 Severity: normal Hello The problem: I use openoffice in order to access the mysql database via the unicodbc driver (I have done this successfully with different versions of Openoffice, mysql and unixodbc). Now in this particular setting I can create tables but I cannot edit them afterwards. According to some people at the openoffice database interface mailing list this is a but of this particular version of libmyodbc. They either recommend a downgrade to 3.51.06or to upgrade to another version. The problem is that stable/testing/unstable all contain the 09 driver, I cannot install the oldstable version. Could you please do something on that, since for me mysql is useless right now. I have seen complains about that on the OO mailing list, but it seems that nobody sent a bug report to debian. Regards Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libmyodbc depends on: ii debconf 1.4.41 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmysqlclient124.0.24-10mysql database client library ii odbcinst1 2.1.1-8 Support library and helper program ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- debconf information: * libmyodbc/addtoodbc: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312483: libmyodbc: Tables cannot be edited with Openoffice.
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve Is this bug related to bug #240634? It has been reported since at least Steve 3.51.06 that there were problems with read/write accesses to Steve MyODBC-connected databases from OOo; that bug includes a Steve link to a workaround. Right, I found out right now. Steve So, I doubt that downgrading to 3.51.06 would actually help Steve you very much; but if this workaround works for 3.51.06 and Steve not for 3.51.09, then yes, I'm quite disappointed that no Steve one filed a bug against libmyodbc before the release. :/ I am not sure that it helps for 3.51.06, but I am sure it does not help for 3.51.09, that is some parts seem to work, I can add entries but the format of these entries are not correct. I tried to install 2.50 from the oldstable release but it did not work. apt-get install -t oldstable libmyodb installed 3.51.06 Couldn't you move that versión to stable, I will try to discuss this subject on the OO mailing list, however most of them point out to the new OO beta release, which however for me is too buggy. I come back to you as soon as possible, since for me this is a urgent subject. Uwe
Bug#312549: openoffice.org: tables in mysql database cannot be edited, via myodbc driver
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.3-9 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** That bug report is connected to bug #240634 concerning mylibodbc, however the workaround with a macro seems not to work. Is a solution to this problem known? Regards Uwe Brauer -- no debconf information -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.25.10Common utilities for spelling dict ii openoffice.org-bin1.1.3-9OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-8+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic ii openoffice.org-l10n-es [openo 1.1.3-9Spanish language package for OpenO ii ttf-opensymbol1.1.3-9The OpenSymbol TrueType font ii xml-core 0.09 XML infrastructure and XML catalog -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308607: xemacs21-nomule: cannot access lispref manual
Package: xemacs21-nomule Version: 21.4.17-1 Severity: normal C-h i m lispref RET does not return the lispref as it should Locate file lispref.info refers to gz file in usr/share/info/xemacs21/ however I think it is a path problem. Since xemacs21.4.17 was configured with --infodir=/usr/share/info/xemacs-21.4.17 there is an inconsistency!!! I gunziped all the files and indeed this did not help. Please compile and install xemacs consistently!!! Uwe Brauer Here is the system information about xemacs Uwe Brauer --8---cut here---start-8--- System Info to help track down your bug: --- uname -a: Linux penell 2.6.10 #1 Fri Feb 4 22:08:22 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux ./configure '--with-sound=none,native' '--with-x11' '--extra-verbose' '--with-site-lisp' '--with-database=berkdb' '--statedir=/var/lib' '--infodir=/usr/share/info/xemacs-21.4.17' '--prefix=/usr' '--dynamic' '--error-checking=none' '--debug=no' '--with-pop' '--with-gpm=no' '--with-file-coding' '--pdump' '--with_menubars=lucid' '--with_scrollbars=lucid' '--with_dialogs=athena' '--docdir=/usr/lib/xemacs-21.4.17/i386-debian-linux/nomule/' '--with-mule=no' '--package-path=~/.xemacs:~/.xemacs/packages:~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages::/usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages:/usr/share/xemacs21/site-packages' 'i386-debian-linux' XEmacs 21.4.17 Jumbo Shrimp configured for `i386-debian-linux'. Compilation / Installation: Source code location: /home/mohura/packages/build-area/xemacs21-21.4.17 Installation prefix: /usr Operating system description file: `s/linux.h' Machine description file: `m/intel386.h' Compiler: gcc -g -O3 -Wall -Wno-switch -Winline -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -Wshadow Compiler version: gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8) Compiler specs file: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/specs Relocating allocator for buffers: no GNU version of malloc: yes - Using Doug Lea's new malloc from the GNU C Library. Need to guess glibc1/2/etc here Window System: Compiling in support for the X window system: - X Windows headers location: /usr/X11R6/include - X Windows libraries location: /usr/X11R6/lib - Handling WM_COMMAND properly. Compiling in support for the Athena widget set: - Athena headers location:X11/Xaw - Athena library to link: Xaw Using Lucid menubars. Using Lucid scrollbars. Using Athena dialog boxes. Using Athena native widgets. TTY: Compiling in support for ncurses. Images: Compiling in support for GIF images (builtin). Compiling in support for XPM images. Compiling in support for PNG images. Compiling in support for JPEG images. Compiling in support for TIFF images. Compiling in support for X-Face message headers. Sound: Compiling in support for sound (native). Databases: Compiling in support for Berkeley database. Compiling in support for LDAP. Internationalization: Compiling in support for file coding. Mail: Compiling in support for POP mail retrieval. Compiling in support for dot-locking mail spool file locking method. Other Features: Inhibiting IPv6 canonicalization at startup. Compiling in support for dynamic shared object modules. Using the new portable dumper. --8---cut here---end---8--- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xemacs21-nomule depends on: ii emacsen-common1.4.15 Common facilities for all emacsen. ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcompfaceg1 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii libdb33.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libtiff4 3.6.1-3Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6
Bug#256834: it seems that the oolatex script is not included (was: Bug#256834 acknowledged by developer (Bug#256834: fixed in tex4ht 20050216.2023-1))
Debian == Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Debian Source: tex4ht Debian Source-Version: 20050216.2023-1 Debian We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the Debian latest version of tex4ht, which is due to be installed in Debian the Debian FTP archive: Debian tex4ht_20050216.2023-1.diff.gz Debian to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20050216.2023-1.diff.gz Debian tex4ht_20050216.2023-1.dsc Debian to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20050216.2023-1.dsc Debian tex4ht_20050216.2023-1_i386.deb Debian to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20050216.2023-1_i386.deb Debian tex4ht_20050216.2023.orig.tar.gz Debian to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20050216.2023.orig.tar.gz Debian A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is Debian attached. Debian Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you Debian have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], Debian and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kapil Hari Debian Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tex4ht Debian package) Debian (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you Debian believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive Debian administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hello I just installed tex4ht form unstable. Although it is based on a recent version of tex4ht, I am wondering why the original scripts like oolatex _are not_ included. This is a question of convenience and I don't see what is the advantage of *not* including them. Thank you very much for your efforts Uwe Brauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256834: tex4ht: interested in providing a patch for the upgrade
Package: tex4ht Version: 20030426-3 Followup-For: Bug #256834 Hello as i -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages tex4ht depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libkpathsea32.0.2-26 path search library for teTeX (run ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295248: tex4ht: interested in providing a patch for the upgrade
Package: tex4ht Version: 20030426-3 Severity: wishlist Followup-For: Bug #256834 Hello as I said in the bug report 256834, it would be good to have an upgrade. I managed to install a recent tex4ht version, however I use alien together with checkinstall to produce a deb file. Could somebody please point me to a documentation how to produce a *real* deb, in order to supply a patch. Thanks Uwe Brauer -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages tex4ht depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libkpathsea32.0.2-26 path search library for teTeX (run ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files -- no debconf information -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages tex4ht depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libkpathsea32.0.2-26 path search library for teTeX (run ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-26 The teTeX binary files -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290908: apt-get selects pgpgpg instead of pgp
Package: pgp Version: 2.6.3a-9 Severity: Important Hi I am on sid and installed the above pgp version. (apt-get install -t stable pgp) (I really need pgp for the keys I have) However I recently installed sid on another machine and tried the same apt-get command, however now: apt-get selected pgpgpg. Of course I could download the source, apply the patch install it myself, I just wounder what did wrong. The sources.list files include the non free branch. Thanks Uwe Brauer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
