Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?
reassign 472810 ftp.debian.org retitle 472810 RoM: please remove source package tetex-base from the archive stop On 26.03.08 Daniel Schepler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Severity: normal I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether we should request the removal of the source package. I guess you're right. I reassign the bug to ftp.debian.org. The bugs for the binary package tetex-base are displayed on http://bugs.debian.org/src:texlive-base We'll care about the bugs sitting on tetex-doc later, i.e. closing them or reassigning them to the packages of TL. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?
On 13.04.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether we should request the removal of the source package. I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before - I'm just finding this bugreport while I'm trying to reduce my mail backlog after vacation. But anyway, it would be nice if tetex-base could go. However, Hilmar is still working on checking tetex-doc's bugs. Well, I guess the packages itself can go away anyway. We can go through the bugs of tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-doc, tetex-extra, tetex-doc-nonfree *after* the packages have been removed and either close them them or re-assign them to the TL packages. Yes, this is on my list, but (guess what) has not the highest priority. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13.04.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether we should request the removal of the source package. I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before - I'm just finding this bugreport while I'm trying to reduce my mail backlog after vacation. But anyway, it would be nice if tetex-base could go. However, Hilmar is still working on checking tetex-doc's bugs. Well, I guess the packages itself can go away anyway. We can go through the bugs of tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-doc, tetex-extra, ACK tetex-doc-nonfree That's a separate source package, anyway - and AFAIR it contains material for beamer/pgf, too. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Severity: normal I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether we should request the removal of the source package. I'm not sure whether this has been discussed before - I'm just finding this bugreport while I'm trying to reduce my mail backlog after vacation. But anyway, it would be nice if tetex-base could go. However, Hilmar is still working on checking tetex-doc's bugs. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?
Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Severity: normal I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while ago, I was wondering whether this was an oversight, and whether we should request the removal of the source package. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
