Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?

2008-06-16 Thread Hilmar Preusse
reassign 472810 ftp.debian.org retitle 472810 RoM: please remove source package tetex-base from the archive stop On 26.03.08 Daniel Schepler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Severity: normal I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package

Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?

2008-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 13.04.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while

Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?

2008-05-01 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13.04.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package.

Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?

2008-04-13 Thread Frank Küster
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Severity: normal I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while

Bug#472810: tetex-base: Should this source package be removed?

2008-03-26 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-5 Severity: normal I just noticed that there is still a tetex-base source package in sid, and that it is the only source package providing the tetex-doc binary package. With texlive uploaded quite a while ago, I was wondering whether this was an