Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Riku Voipio
Package: scheme2c Version: 1993.3.15.2-1 Severity: serious fails to build on all buildd's: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstablep=scheme2c On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:39:51AM +, Debian/armel Build Daemon wrote: # Add here commands to clean up after the build

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand. That was generated by building on an alpha, which is not a supported architecture. $ egrep '(Source|Package|Arch)' debian/control Source: scheme2c Package: scheme2c Architecture: i386 amd64 Package: scheme2c-doc

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 fails to build on all buildd's: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstablep=scheme2c Just Looked at the i386 log. It appears that the autobuilder is attempting to build the binary-indep package without first satisfying the

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Riku Voipio
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: I don't understand. That was generated by building on an alpha, which is not a supported architecture. $ egrep '(Source|Package|Arch)' debian/control Source: scheme2c Package: scheme2c Architecture: i386 amd64

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 17:36:44 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: fails to build on all buildd's: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstablep=scheme2c Just Looked at the i386 log. It appears that the autobuilder is attempting to build the binary-indep package

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
buildds use debian/rules build, and your debian/rules has build depend on build-indep. So you either need to move the build-depends-indep to regular build-deps, or make sure that debian/rules build doesn't need them. Wait a second! (a) My debian/rules is a standard debhelper default in this

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 20:11:24 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: (a) My debian/rules is a standard debhelper default in this regard. (b) Debian policy section 7.7 says: The `Build-Depends-Indep' and `Build-Conflicts-Indep' fields must be satisfied when any of the following

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
This is ridiculous. If the buildds do debian/rules binary they should first install both build-depends and build-depend-indep. As your own arguments show, this would cost very little since few packages actually have build-depend-indep. But those that do, in anticipation of a world in which

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 22:34:47 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: This is ridiculous. If the buildds do debian/rules binary they They don't. They use 'clean', 'build' and 'binary-arch'. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

2008-08-10 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Sorry; I meant build-arch. But the point stands: if you know that you're building everything, both -arch and -indep, why not just pull in the -indep build dependencies and actually solve the problem? --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL