On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, 6:09 pm Chris Lamb, wrote:
> * DIFFOSCOPE_FAIL_TESTS_ON_MISSING_TOOLS=''
> → Fails; the required version is missing and unlisted.
>
> * DIFFOSCOPE_FAIL_TESTS_ON_MISSING_TOOLS="foo bar"
> → Fails; the required version is missing and unlisted.
>
These shouldn't fai
Hi Mattia,
> > I think we need to add "file" to the DIFFOSCOPE_TESTS_MISSING_TOOLS
> > list in debian/tests/pytest. Mattia, can you confirm?
[…]
> mh, no. I think some logic needs tweaking, as file is definitely
> present (it's an hard dependency of diffoscope), and that test should
> just be
mh, no. I think some logic needs tweaking, as file is definitely present
(it's an hard dependency of diffoscope), and that test should just be
skipped.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:42 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > At the very least, it seems this should be a versioned test de
Steve Langasek wrote:
> At the very least, it seems this should be a versioned test dep on file (>=
> 5.37), but perhaps it should also be a versioned runtime dependency. I
> haven't looked to see what the impact is of the wrong version of 'file' when
> DIFFOSCOPE_TESTS_FAIL_ON_MISSING_TOOLS is no
Package: diffoscope
Version: 117
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failures and runtime failures
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu eoan
Dear maintainers,
diffoscope 117 is not migratable to testing because its autopkgtests are
failing, due to runtime errors co
5 matches
Mail list logo
