Hi,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:43:40PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 01:54:54PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Ok here it goes the initial UTF-8 patch. This patch also:
> >
> > * Change language descriptions (so they are not improperly disp
x- linux-i386 i386
any-any any
I've a added as well a new option (-n normalize) to dpkg-architecture
so Maintainers can use it to get the alias expansions. Try it to see
the results.
regards,
guillem
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.26
Author: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:45:24AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The idea is to introduce architecture aliases, they will only take
> > effect on the source package and will get expanded when building
> > the bi
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:40:03PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:11:26AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I've been thinking on implementing this for a long time. As
> > Robert has presented an implementation to the Architecture
> > hand
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:27:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:57:09PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > That's exactly what my patch tries to do, but extending the
> > recognised normal arches with some aliases that get expaned and
> > n
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:59:48PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:26:35PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Ok, I see a couple of big problems with your implementation.
> >
> > * Currently a real Debian architecture is composed of kernel/system +
&
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On another thread, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Could we automatically define some @linux@ or @any-i386@ variables the
> >> same way sh
Hi,
[ Bug relative to upgrading directfb to 0.9.21, CCing all dirtectfb
reverse depending maintainers ]
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:37:18AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i'm also interested in the new upstream version. i'm working on a
> debian package for my own use. in the next weeks i c
Hi Fabian!
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Marcel Lemke of the unace Team was kind enough to send me the source
> code for unace 2.5 along with an improved license.
Nice work, at least the code is there, but it's not free enough for my
taste.
> Please have a l
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:51:39PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> Attached is a patch that was tested on an Ubuntu system. It allows the
> current sid and dapper (0.7.2-1ubuntu1) sources to build on PowerPC
> with binutils 2.16.1-2ubuntu6, but not with binutils
> 2.16.1cvs2005111
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:45:23PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> The latest binutils in sid is now 2.16.1cvs20051214-1, which should
> also work. It's the version currently in etch that won't, even with
> this patch. Without this patch, both versions mentioned above error
> out. It was
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:40:39PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Package: kdelibs-bin
> Version: 4:3.4.2-3
> I've been having huge trouble doing frame grabbing from my video camera via
> firewire recently. Every ~ 20 seconds a frame got dropped.
> And this all despite running a -ck kernel with
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:32:36PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 08:19:09PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm packaging a new upstrem release, and was checking if lrmi code is
> > built on anything != ia32, and it's not, double checked by bui
severity 347313 wishlist
thanks
Hi dann,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:58:59PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: inetutils
> Version: 2:1.4.3+20051212-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that will cause
> your package to segfault on arch
ns
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: shadow 1:4.0.13-7\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2005-10-22 08:58+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2005-12-28 03:01+02
license as the debconf package.
# Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005.
# Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2005.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: debconf 1.4.66\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 200
Package: qemu
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
AngryPorter:
Your package sucks it does not build on PPC anymore!
ShamefulMaintainers:
Sorry about that, we already know about the problem, it's most
probably the PPC linker script patch that Guillem reverted on
last upload. We'll fi
found 339693 1.9.23-1
tags 339693 wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:34:17PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: svgalib
> Severity: wishlist
Please, when reporting bugs, specify the version number so that the
BTS can use the versioning magic to keep track of when the bugs were
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 06:47:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: svgalib
> Followup-For: Bug #339693
> svgalib_helper has the unknown symbol io_remap_page_range which no
> longer exists in the linux source. So I'll wait until it gets around to
> letting itself get packaged.
Right, I
package openhackware
severity 339870 normal
retitle 339870 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments
merge 339870 322300
thanks
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 01:55:43PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Package: openhackware
> Version: 0.4.1-1
> Severity: serious
> building the package
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
The source package gnumach1 was supposed to be what the gnumach one
has now, and gnumach switch to the cvs HEAD, this has never happened
as HEAD is unmaintained and all development goes to a branch.
So please remove this package from the archive. It also has a
build d
Package: mc
Version: 1:4.6.1-1
Tags: patch
Hi,
The compatibility package unarj is not in sid anymore, and we have the
full free arj package instead. So when trying to list an .arj archive
mc complains that it cannot find unarj, even if arj is installed. Also
there's no Suggests about that.
Attac
severity 339870 normal
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:01:39PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> # The package doesn't build on the Architecture (all) it it declared for
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > building the package openhackware in a clean sid build environment
>
Package: libocc0-dev
Version: 2.8-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
While doing the second C++ lib transition you forgot to rename the
dependency on libocc0c2 to libocc0c2a in libocc0-dev, making openc++
uninstallable.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:42:01PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> Here a patch to add the static libraries to the -dev packages.
There was no need to send this patch, I wrote it already. ;)
The problem on last upload was that it broke when enabling static
libraries, so I postponed it for l
Hi,
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:17:28PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Splashy is a replacment in user land for the kernel graphic boot
> embellishments.
> We use directfb though an issue arises : directfb is in /usr
> which some user have in a separate partition not available until
> half the
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:16:46AM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: gpm
> Version: 1.19.6-20
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The Vietnamese translation for debconf: gpm
Thanks! this is the first Vietnamese translation I get on any of the
packages I (co-)maintain! =)
I've fi
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:47:52AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Osamu Aoki]
> > I was successful compiling 1.20.1 into deb packages under sid with few
> > chenges. (Please not I am not claiming successful packaging)
>
> Thanks, I'll take a look at your work. We're basically waiting o
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:43:05PM -0300, Rodrigo Tadeu Claro wrote:
> Package: gpm
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Please consider using the attached gpm Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR)
> debconf template translation. It was properly checked against errors using
> the msgfmt utility
Hi Santiago,
Can you reproduce #35970 with the latest gnumach packages?
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:15:37AM -0400, A Costa wrote:
> Package: arj
> Version: 3.10.21-3
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
> Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man1/arjdisp.1.gz', see attached '.diff'.
You could have filed only one bug report for both minor typo errors.
But anyway thanks for
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:05:34AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The idea is to introduce architecture aliases, they will only take
> [...]
>
> > I've a added as well a new option (-n normalize) to dpkg-archi
Package: viewcvs
Version: 0.9.2+cvs.1.0.dev.2004.07.28-1.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
This trivial patch inserts a line so the log info and the file
content are separated and thus cannot be confused.
regards,
guillem
diff -Naur viewcvs-0.9.2+cvs.1.0.dev.2004.07.28.orig/templates/markup.e
tags 293950 pending
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:40:27AM +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> Package: gnumach
> Version: 20040915.dfsg.1-1
> I installed a Hurd system yesterday on my laptop, and everything went
> smoothly appart from a lack of support for my ethernet card, based on
> a natsemi
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:51:41PM +, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Package: ppmd
> Version: 9.1-10
> Severity: wishlist
> I do "aptitude install ppmd"; I glance at "man ppmd":
>
> SYNTAX
> ppmd [switches]
>
> but when I try "ppmd e testfile", of course I get a "command not
> found" -
n-Date: 2005-06-17 18:47+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2005-06-23 00:30+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Catalan \n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-
Hi Kurt,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:52:14PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Are you interested in taking over posixtestsuite? If you're not,
> I might take it.
We were going to adopt it under the wings of the GNU/k*BSD team,
if you are interested in co-maint with us, I suppose that would
be fine.
I
Hi,
I'm just CCing Matthias Klose because I'm unsure if this is a problem
in gcc-4.0.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:29:25PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: arj
> Version: 3.10.21-4
> Severity: serious
>
> arj fails to build from source with the following error message:
>
> > ./linux-gnu/en/rs/
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:04:51PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: inetutils
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> When building 'inetutils' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
> I get the following error:
Sorry for the delay, somehow the mainteinance of inetutils sliped from
our hands. I'll be u
package ppmd
found 178840 9.1-12
found 186873 9.1-12
thanks
Those bugs are not fixed with the latest upload. Alpha and IA64 still
have runtime problems.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 291939 patch
retitle 291939 [ARCH] Add support for Architecture aliases/wildcards
thanks
Hi Scott,
I've finally had the time to finish this patch. I've polished the
initial version I showed you at Debconf, moved the read_{cpu,os}table
functions to controllib.pl, thus eliminating the need to
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Don't the testing scripts already keep it out due to the gnumach bugs,
> without needing to file this fake bug?
>
> At least reading:
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnumach
> seems to indicated they will.
fd(4)
> cmd(40081272){00} arg(7fff7bf8) on /dev/sda
>
> The vanilla upstream package works fine.
> This Debian bug is caused by the patch by Guillem Jover: it has
>
> #define BLKGETSIZE64 _IOR(0x12,114,long long)
Hmmm I couldn't recall doing that in my initial patch, I onl
Hey Martin,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:04:25AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #240587: ITP: ufsutils -- utilities for the UFS filesystem,
> which was filed against the wnpp package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the deve
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 07:57:52AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-25 03:48]:
> > > This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
> > > since then moved to unstable.
> >
> > Hm
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 05:54:49PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: gpm
> Version: 1.19.6-19
> Severity: important
>
> Calling /etc/init.d/gpm start once only causes messages to be printed,
> but gpm does not work. Only after /etc/init.d/gpm start is called a
> second time, gpm works
Hi Uwe,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:06:47PM +0200, Uwe Dannowski wrote:
> Package: pistachio-doc
> Version: 0.4+20041228-4
> Severity: minor
>
> The license in /usr/share/doc/pistachio-doc/copyright does not apply to the
> reference manual in /usr/share/doc/pistachio-doc/refman . The appropriate
>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:03:32PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Package name: apt-history
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Vittorio Palmisano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://redclay.altervista.org/archivio/python/apt-history/
> * License : GPL
> De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openhackware
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Jocelyn Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : <http://perso.magic.fr/l_indien/OpenHackWare/>
* License :
Package: wnpp
Owner: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: proll
Version : 18
Upstream Author : Pete A. Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : <http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/>
* License : GPL
Description
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 01:02:59PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 08.10.2005, 16:34 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > With this do you mean coexist with another debian package with the
> > same name, but greater version?
>
> I guess it would be ha
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:22:56PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Package: qemu
> Version: 0.7.2-0.1
> Tags: patch
> Followup-For: Bug #321232
> QEMU 0.7.2 has been available for a while. I've rebased most of the
> Debian package's patches against the new version; I'm attaching the
> re
Hi Dann,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 07:43:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Since this bug has been open for 52 days with a patch, I intend to NMU
> it in 1 week (or sooner, at the maintainer's request).
First of all, thanks for the patch and sorry for not replying. I've
been on holidays the past fe
package directvnc
severity 314976 serious
thanks
Hi Ola,
This package cannot be installed in unstable due to the missing
libdirectfb-0.9-20 package in the archive. Please rebuild with
the latest directfb version.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:09:50PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: qemu
> Version: 0.7.0-4+kbsd
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Attached is a patch to build qemu on GNU/kFreeBSD. It requires to
> update the package to 0.7.2 source first.
No problem, that was in the plan alread
Package: laptop-mode-tools
Version: 1.10-1
Hi,
This packages recommends hdparm, and on my laptop it's not installed,
but then laptop_mode does not check if it's available, and thus I get
a hude amount of lines with errors trying to exec it.
Please make the invokation of hdparm only if it's avail
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:53:02PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> qvm86 support would be more appropriate. qvm86 is a GPL replacement
> for kqemu.
>
> http://www.qvm86.org/
Do not worry I didn't have any intention to support the non-free
one (I think I can speak in name of the other mainta
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:57:31AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> package: unace
> severity: wishlist
>
> Please consider handling the unace binary as 'alternatives',
> allowing it to coexist with proprietary versions (=2.20) of unace,
> which can be downloaded from unofficial repositories.
Package: libflash-mozplugin
Version: 0.4.13-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is breaking builds with libncurses5-dev, at least.
Those builds are unable to resolve from which packages does
/usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 come from as it is an unowned symlink.
This is due to the libflash-mozplugin.pos
Sep 06, 2005 at 06:32:12AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:13:24PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > Package: gpm
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Version: 1.19.6-21
> > > File: /etc/gpm.conf
> > > Justification: maintscript
package openhackware
severity 322300 normal
retitle 322300 openhackware: should not try to build on !powerpc environments
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:22:17AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Package: openhackware
> Version: 0.4.1-1
> Severity: Serious
> I tried to build openhackware on i386
package xfstt
tags 323102 - patch
thanks
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 08:23:33PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: xfstt
> Version: 1.6-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> When building 'xfstt' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/xfstt-1
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.10
Tags: patch
Hi,
The package pistachio installs some elf statically linked files under
/boot/l4/ and lintian spews a warning about that. Attached a patch to
correct this.
regards,
guillem
diff -Naur lintian-1.23.10/checks/binaries lintian-1.23.10.new/checks/binar
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 11:11:12PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: qemu
> Version: 0.7.0-3
> Severity: serious
> The package is failing to build on all arches. The reason is
> that the .dsc file says:
> Architecture: 1
> While that last line should say:
> Architecture: amd64 i386 powe
package dbs
tags 315374 patch
thanks
Hi,
I'm including a patch for this, yo can find it attached.
regards,
guillem
diff -Naur dbs-0.35/dbs-edit-patch dbs-0.35.new/dbs-edit-patch
--- dbs-0.35/dbs-edit-patch 2004-05-14 01:14:23.0 +0300
+++ dbs-0.35.new/dbs-edit-patch 2005-07-30 18:24:1
Hi,
I've been using dpkg debs with this patch for some time and the only
problem until now has been a stupid error left when I switched from
expanding the aliases via dpkg-architecture to an internal function.
The function was returning a list and split was expecting a scalar.
Fixed in this incre
Package: libfs-dev
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Some header files in this package include external headers from
other packages, but those are not listed in the Dependency field,
thus causing other packages to FTBFS.
X11/fonts/FS.h: #include
X11/fonts/FS.h: #include
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.4
Tags: patch
Hi,
wnpp-list is listing RFHs as RFAs, the initial patch support in the
BTS had that correctly, I suppose it got mangled in the way to the
source. =)
Attached a really trivial patch that fixes this.
regards,
guillem
diff -Naur devscripts-2.9.4.orig
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 19:19:30 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Well this has been removed, and now the linker and the dynamic loader
> both know about /emul/ia32-linux/[usr/]lib, just as they now /lib64 and
> /usr/lib64 on 32-bit platforms.
>
> I guess dpkg-shlibdeps have to know about those p
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.4
Tags: patch
Hi,
As part of the move to armel, dpkg was patched (which should get the
patch merged upstream RSN), and apt needed patching as well to make it
aware of the new arch. This patch solves the problem by moving that
knowledge to dpkg where it belongs. This a
Package: debianutils
Version: 2.17.4
Tags: patch
Hi,
While we were starting the armel port, I found that debianutils would
have problems when cross built, or when built for stuff with a
different ABI, like with the armel triplet arm-linux-gnueabi. Attached
is a patch that should solve this.
rega
Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.11-2.1
Tags: patch
Hi,
This package is using at build time a deprecated dpkg option, which was
removed some time ago. Attached a patch that fixes this.
regards,
guillem
--- debian/rules 2007-01-16 21:11:49.0 +0200
+++ debian/rules 2007-01-16 21:12:45.00
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8c-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The attached patch adds support for armel, which is an arm little
endian variant of our current arm port but using the new EABI, which
may completely replace the arm port in the future.
regards,
guillem
--- Configure 2007-01-1
Hi,
While checking the updated packages I noticed that libtorrent10 Conflicts
and Replaces libtorren9, that's wrong, as both of them should be
co-installable, that's why they have a different package name and
different library filenames. Please fix this before uploading.
thanks,
guillem
--
To
Hi,
At work I wrote some scripts to generate the delta status between two
distros in patch and version comparison forms. And I needed a
uniq-dctrl, which I implemented really cheaply with gawk. This of
course cannot be used as a general purpose tool and should probably
not be included in the packa
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 19:11:12 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Any news on this? Can this patch still enter etch?
I don't think so.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Now that dpkg has lzma support it would be nice to get this small
patch into apt for etch.
regards,
guillem
--- apt-inst/deb/debfile.cc 2006-03-02 16:06:31.0 +0200
+++ apt-inst/deb/debfile.cc 2006-11-03 05:29:03.0
found 401153 20060912-2
thanks
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 19:53:49 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Henriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061204 19:44]:
> > I can confirm that the patch provided by Guillem Jover seems to fix
> > the testcase in the original bug-report for me on
tags 402526 pending
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 23:54:57 +, J S Bygott wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.24
> Severity: minor
> Actually, this is a bug in all versions since 1.4.0.20
>
> The files 'changelog' and 'changelog.Debian' both contain an insane
> timestamp (year 2018 ins
tags 403216 - patch
thanks
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:26:41 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.13.24
> Severity: critical
> File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps
> Tags: patch
Er, there's not patch in here... and I think the proposed fix is
wrong.
> dpkg-shlibdeps sets
>
Package: parchive
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: minor
Hi,
The package description reads:
[...]
supports the 'Reed-Soloman Code' implementation that allows for recovery of
[...]
It should be 'Reed-Soloman Code' -> 'Reed-Solomon Code'.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Tomas,
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 00:49:33 +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.22
> Followup-For: Bug #38334
>
> So is this bug a duplicate of #260696 and could be closed?
Well yes and no, it's a duplicate but probably the other one should
not have been closed, just merged
Hi,
Mattia I'm sorry you got this, after I asked to enable iasl on all
arches to be able to use it in qemu. I started investigating this
last week or so, but didn't file a bug report because I've not come
yet with a complete solution. Below my current analysis anyway, if
I've time I'll try to come
reassign 400372 linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
thanks
Included most of the relevant discussion for the kernel team's benefit.
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 10:19:39 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Guillem Jover a écrit :
> >On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 19:21:34 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Sorry, the report came out without an explanatory text. It follows now:
No problem.
> Below is the log of an FTP connection started from the GUEST (qemu started
> with -net user):
>
> Thu Jan 4 18:10:18 2007 [pid 14469] [ft
forcemerge 179913 405668
thanks
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:42:26 +0200, Siim Põder wrote:
> Package: dkpg
> Version: 1.13.24
> Severity: minor
>
> bsdutils package version is "1:2.12p-4sarge1" but dpkg -l cuts off the
> "1:" part and just shows "2.12p-4sarge1".
This bug has been reported several t
package dpkg-dev
forcemerge 375749 405045
thanks
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:12:07 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 5.0.37.3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: etch
> My Etch Devel-Station produce every time the following error while
> building and it does definitivly not depend
Package: bulmages
Version: 0.5.9+svn20061021+20061210-1
Hi,
Some binary packages from the bulmages source are wrongly using
virtual packages to describe relationships.
libbulmalib0 Provides and Conflicts with libbulmalib, which makes it
uninstallable in parallel with possible different versions
reopen 162348
thanks
On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 11:30:02 +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> Version: 1.13.18
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:36:54AM +0200, Henning Spruth wrote:
> > I'm trying to use dpkg to build and package software for the VR3 Linux PDA.
> > To
> > do so, I need to install the package
Package: libbulmalib0-dev
Version: 0.5.9+svn20061021+20061210-1
Severity: important
Hi,
This package does not contain any header file, which will make life of
possible developers using it a bit hard.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
package libcairo
tags 399868 patch
thanks
Hi Tommi, Dave,
I'm including a new patch which always passes -g (per policy, packages
_should_ include debugging symbols in the build tree), and with the
previous patch this was a regression, changes the deprecated debug
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to noopt, passe
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 22:06:24 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version:
> Severity: minor
> Tags: l10n, patch
>
> The updated Vietnamese translation for the Debian Installer Level 5
> program file: dpkg
>
> This is my reviewed translation for Etch. :)
I'm preparing the next a
tags 107449 - wontfix
merge 393924 107449
thanks
Hi,
> 2006/11/9, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm reopening this bug report and reassigning it to dpkg, as dpkg -l
> > doesn't display epochs, and this is another example of why it should.
> >
> > There is a patch in the BTS which makes d
tags 391183 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:39:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.22
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There should be a possibility to get ahold of the exit code given by
> the binary invoked by start-stop-daemon.
In which conditions would you want that?
Package: angrydd
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: important
Hi,
The package is missing a dependency on python-numeric, which is being
using through the surfarray stuff from python-pygame.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Package: dissy
Version: 3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is a frontend for objdump, readelf and nm, but it does
not depend on binutils. It's lacking dependencies at least also on
python-gtk2. Please check if anything else is missing before
uploading.
thanks,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Package: varnish
Version: 1.0.2-2
Hi,
On purge the package leaves /var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage.bin.
Also the package does not cleanup the temporary files /tmp while using
gcc at runtime.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Package: apf
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
The long package descriptions contain a misplaced dot just before the
Homepage pseudo-field. The dot should be placed in the second column,
not the third.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.13.24
> Architecture: sparc
> Severity: grave
> I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB
> of memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
> If I repl
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 10:20:05 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:34:56AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:39:43 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Package: dpkg
> > > Version: 1.13.22
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
1 - 100 of 4914 matches
Mail list logo
