Russ Allbery:
> Bill Allombert writes:
>
>> This is one of the reasons I do not attend DebConf anymore. We are an
>> online organization. Consultation should happen online. Metting are nice
>> but they should not be used to vet consensus and ignore absentees.
>
>> So I
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> If you have specific wording suggestions that you believe would bring
>> this Policy requirement closer in line with what we're already doing in
>> the project (and which has gotten us
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > But as a technical document, it is lacking practical recommendation
> > for maintainers how to make sure their package build reproducibly
>
> The practical recommendations for
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:14:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> If you have specific wording suggestions that you believe would bring this
> Policy requirement closer in line with what we're already doing in the
> project (and which has gotten us to 94% reproducible already), please make
> them.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Bill Allombert wrote:
> But as a technical document, it is lacking practical recommendation
> for maintainers how to make sure their package build reproducibly
The practical recommendations for maintainers are encoded separately, as
they're evolving. See
Bill Allombert writes:
> This is one of the reasons I do not attend DebConf anymore. We are an
> online organization. Consultation should happen online. Metting are nice
> but they should not be used to vet consensus and ignore absentees.
> So I object to Adrian being
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:30:23AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> As Policy Editor (a delegated position), based on my read of project
> consensus including in-person verification of that consensus at DebConf
> 17, I am formally declaring that I believe this change has consensus
> despite your
Just to be completely, 100% clear: I will not be responding further to
this line of argument in this bug. If you disagree with my decision as a
project delegate, I've spelled out your possible next steps under Debian's
governance process.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:30:23AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>...
> This text is a formalization and simplification of existing practice that
> we worked out in conjuction with the reproducible builds team and that
> strikes a balance between attempting to enumerate all the causes of
>
Adrian Bunk writes:
> I hereby oppose the addition of this to policy.
> It is not true that this would be "Debian's precisification" of
> reproducible builds.
> The definition does not match any past, present or future practice in
> Debian.
> Including the people who want this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 03:34:35PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>...
> diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst
> index 127b125..6e32870 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst
> @@ -661,6 +661,28 @@
11 matches
Mail list logo