Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:02:22 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#297665: fixed in sablevm-classlib 1.11.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 14:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.text.DecimalFormatSymbols.setCurrency
(DecimalFormatSymbols.java:397)
at java.text.DecimalFormatSymbols.DecimalFormatSymbols
(DecimalFormatSymbols.java:151)
at
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:46:20 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libgnomedb: FTBFS: Errors processing docs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-pt-br
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
building the package mozilla-thunderbird-locale-pt-br in a clean build
environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:36:04 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300426: linphone: FTBFS: disallowed characters (:) in
documentation sources (sgml)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:43:04 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gmime2: FTBFS: failed to make docs.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 03:02:22 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300388: fixed in sablevm-classlib 1.11.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:32:28AM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 14:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.text.DecimalFormatSymbols.setCurrency
(DecimalFormatSymbols.java:397)
at
I knew that
indeed I was waiting for libppd to be compiled, and then upload
a new gpr
anyway, congratulation on your keen eye!
how did you notice the problem? do you use libppd ?
a.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 05:55:55PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: libppd
Severity: serious
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote:
linphone shouldn't FTBFS with newer gtk-doc-tools
I confirm linphone now builds fine.
Regards,
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 300492 grave
Bug#300492: libsem should FTBFS on irrelevant architectures
Severity set to `grave'.
merge 300492 298815
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which
is also in package libc6-dev
Bug#300492:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 298815 libsem
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which
is also in package libc6-dev
Bug reassigned from package `libsem-dev' to `libsem'.
merge 298815 300492
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:02:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300390: fixed in libdb2-ruby 0.5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
2.2.5 is there...
It should be packaged because for know there are some problems with
aspell dependances in sarge
Regards,
--
Jean-Yves LENHOF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 10:15 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
how did you notice the problem? do you use libppd ?
Running a build regression test. See also
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/
Thanks for the quick answer.
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:02:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300423: fixed in gpr 0.9deb-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:02:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300458: fixed in libdb4.1-ruby 0.5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen #299651
Bug#299651: ippl postinst stalls upgrade.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: elinks
Followup-For: Bug #296976
#296976 is marked as serious against elinks. However, it seems to me
that it's just the sgml2x package not using the right option when
calling elinks.
Should this really prevent elinks 0.10.2-2 from getting into sarge?
Cheers,
Hugo
--
Hugo Haas -
ah!
now I properly understand what you mean
at 1st, I thought that the change from
/usr/include/ to /usr/include/libppd/
was an upstream choice
instead it was due to my fiddling with src/Makefile.am
(that was not working OK)
I have corrected this fact in 0.10-4
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
E'
Package: gal
Version: 0.24-1.4
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package gal in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
test -d stampdir/patches || mkdir -p stampdir/patches
Applying patch
Package: rsbac-admin
Version: 1.2.2-15
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package rsbac-admin in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking for
Package: libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev
Version: 2.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
When trying to build the bakery-2.3 pacakge, I get the following
error:
creating libbakery-2.3.la
/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libhowl.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libhowl.la' is not a valid libtool
Turbo:
Which ones and 'what?'. If I'm not misstaken, this was discussed YEARS ago
(can even remember the year) and the conclusions was that the fonts was
ok...
If this has been discussed already, it would make sense to provide a
pointer to or a summary of the discussion in debian/copyright.
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:17:07 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300183: fixed in ippl 1.4.14-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:17:07 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299651: fixed in ippl 1.4.14-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hugo Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Sun, Mar 20, 2005:
Package: elinks
Followup-For: Bug #296976
#296976 is marked as serious against elinks. However, it seems to me
that it's just the sgml2x package not using the right option when
calling elinks.
Should this really prevent elinks 0.10.2-2
Package: hunit
Version: 1.0-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package hunit in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the
Jonas Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Sun, Mar 20, 2005:
Hugo Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Sun, Mar 20, 2005:
Package: elinks
Followup-For: Bug #296976
#296976 is marked as serious against elinks. However, it seems to me
that it's just the sgml2x package not using the right option when
Package: libgnumail-java
Version: 1.0-3.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libgnumail-java in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
fi ; \
done ; \
fi
Package: muine
Version: 0.6.3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As of the last dist-upgrade, I can't seem to start muine. An error
window appears that contains the message
| An error occurred:
|
| Failed to initialize the audio backend:
| Could not find the volume
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:47:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#296130: fixed in libdc0 0.3.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: libruby1.8
Version: 1.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace libruby1.8 1.8.2-2 (using .../libruby1.8_1.8.2-3_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement libruby1.8 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libruby1.8_1.8.2-3_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:07:03PM -0500, David I. Lehn wrote:
* Christian Henz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-17T07:42:41-0500]:
After upgrading the gstreamer lib/plugins, amarok
ate all available memory (top showed 688MB Virt. before it
starved). At that point I had listened to some local
Package: glabels
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build in some arches. From the buildd logs:
make install-data-hook
make[5]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/glabels-2.0.2/data/mime'
/usr/bin/update-mime-database
hi again,
sorry for the delay, but the bug triggers only when the remote peer
disconnects me - and it does it only once a day.
Marco d'Itri wrote:
reassign 299875 kernel
retitle 299875 CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
tag 299875 patch security
yes, it really looks like a pppd
Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on various arches because the
libical directory is using a very old version of libtool (1.3.4).
Please update that to the latest version.
It's also trying to make a shared
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:32:11 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300113: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 300556 glabels: FTBFS: Fails to install during packaging.
Bug#300556: glabels
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:47:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299481: fixed in apt-build 0.11.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: libgnumail-java
Version: 1.0-3.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package libgnumail-java in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:03:05 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300543: libruby1.8: missing replaces/conflicts on rubyunit
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Okay. Do I correctly understand that kernel patch + downgrade solves
your problem?
And, if you have *just* the kernel patch, /usr/sbin/pppd hangs, but
doesn't crash the system?
Thanks,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello
On 2005-03-20 sean finney wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:33:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
sean finney wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:39:10AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
Wasn't it the one where a privilege granted to table_name also
grants rights on tableXname,
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.6.6-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
make-kpkg gives the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc'
sed -e s!\$KVERS!2.6.8!g; s!\$KSRC!/usr/src/linux!; s!\$KARCH!i386!; [EMAIL
PROTECTED];
By expicitly making the fourth argument of
DefineParameters in /usr/include/arpack++/arlsnsym.h (line
144, IIRC) as an address(by preceding it with a ) made
the compiler happy. Here is the relevant portion I have in
this file now which compiles okay:
//**
templateclass
On Mar 20, Christian Kujau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- pppd tries to re-establish the connection, says Starting link in the
logfile [1] and then just hangs.
Weird. Maybe you hit something like #298657 and the other similar bugs.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 300587 sarge
Bug#300587: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 299922 + security confirmed
Bug#299922: mailscanner: lock/pid file location violates fhs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security, confirmed
End of message, stopping
Justin Pryzby wrote:
Okay. Do I correctly understand that kernel patch + downgrade solves
your problem?
i don't even have to patch the kernel. i tried with 2.6.11-rc5-bk2, same
thing. but (only!) downgrading ppp_2.4.2 (current is ppp_2.4.3) did the trick.
And, if you have *just* the kernel
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:17:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299857: fixed in luxman 0.41-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:17:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#192189: fixed in luxman 0.41-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I don't seem to be able to replicate this bug on sarge, with gjdoc
0.6.1-14 and junit 3.8.1.1-2. I wonder if the sarge tag Steve Langasek
added is actually appropriate. If not, the bug should be possible to
close, since it is fixed in sid already.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 03:15:24PM +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.5.28-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Sylvain,
thank you for your work to package mldonkey-server. downloads.ini is created
with permissions
Hi,
It seems that #294604 can be closed, and #298173 can be tag =
sarge,woody,security. Correct?
BTW: I noticed a strange version numbering in the experimental
packages. Is this intentional? It seems to me that people who had
installed the experimental versions would have to actively force
Please, please! send your reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to me, or
at least not only to me!
Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster a écrit :
Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster a écrit :
Jean-Jacques,
[snip]
Byte compile file:
Sorry, I don't understand your bug report.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 07:24:20PM +0100, Artur Grniak wrote:
I am getting errors 101 and 2 resulting in system reboot when trying to
101 is network unreachable, 2 means no such file. Neither one should
be a possible return value for a memory check for
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:32:16 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300556: fixed in glabels 2.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 294604 - sid
thanks
Hi Justin,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:56:47 -0500
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that #294604 can be closed, and #298173 can be tag =
sarge,woody,security. Correct?
Yep, seems so. Also the #294807 can be closed. Thanks for reminding ;)
BTW: I
severity 300240 serious
thanks
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:13:01AM -0600, ctl (jetscreamer) wrote:
Unpacking qalc (from .../archives/qalc_0.7.2-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qalc_0.7.2-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/qalc', which is also
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:53:28 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298173: RC bugs for sylpheed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: strace
Version: 4.5.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
strace 4.5.9-1 doesn't build on ia64 and alpha:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -Ilinux/alpha -I../linux/alpha -Ilinux
-I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT file.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/file.Tpo -c -o file.o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 298967 -1
Bug#298967: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font
Bug 298967 cloned as bug 300605.
reassign -1 bglibs
Bug#300605: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font
Bug reassigned from package `bglibs-doc' to `bglibs'.
retitle -1 bglibs: NMU is not for
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005, Christian Henz wrote:
Rhythmbox does not seem to suffer from the memory problem, but I could
not really tell if it was actually using gst or xine for streaming...
(since amarok/xine works too). I could not get Muine to run.
Rhythmbox uses GStreamer, if you
clone 298967 -1
reassign -1 bglibs
retitle -1 bglibs: NMU is not for sarge
close 298967
quit
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:18:17AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote:
Hi Micah, while I appreciate your efforts, this NMU unfortunately was
unnecessary, the current bglibs packages in sarge are fine.
I
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:25:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#294003: fixed in lasso 0.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:25:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#294003: fixed in lasso 0.6.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Argh. I build all my packages in pbuilder myself before uploading, but I
didn't try to redirect the output...
Thanks for noticing, I'm on it.
Mt.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 02:11:12PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: po4a
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package po4a
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
After definig a new filter, I pressed CTRL+A to mark all messages in Inbox,
then I pressed CTRL+J to apply a filter manually.
After that the Kmail window got white, nothing was going anymore. The
programm
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:03:07 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300240: fixed in qalculate 0.7.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:48:33 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299155: fixed in libnss-mysql 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: muine
Version: 0.6.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #300541
I am experiencing the same problem. It appears that I can't even downgrade
easily because the version in testing is the same as in unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: hat
Version: 2.02-11
Severity: serious
Hi,
When trying to build hat, I get the following error:
hmake -hc=ghc6 -package lang -d
/usr/src/hat-2.02/debian/build-tools/targets/ix86-Linux/obj/hattrans -I.
-I../compiler98 HatTrans
hmake is not installed/configured for ix86-Linux.
See
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 298173 - sid
Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is
released
Tags were: pending woody sid sarge security
Tags removed: sid
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 298173 - pending
Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now 1.0.3 is
released
Tags were: pending woody sarge security
Tags removed: pending
End of message,
Package: bittorrent
Version: 3.4.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Bittorrent 4.0 is out, 3.4 is garbage in comparison.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3
Package: php4-snmp
Version: 4:4.3.10-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
We noticed this happening every sunday during the daily logrotate but
were not able to pin it down until now. When apache gets send a SIGHUP
to reload the logfiles it segfaults due to trying to
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 22:01 +0200, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
Package: muine
Version: 0.6.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #300541
I am experiencing the same problem. It appears that I can't even downgrade
easily because the version in testing is the same as in unstable.
There is no version of
Package: tuxpaint
Version: 1:0.9.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is no longer building problem. I get the following error:
...Compiling Tux Paint from source...
src/tuxpaint.c:176:2: #error
---
src/tuxpaint.c:177:2: #error If you
* Don Alexander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I can also confirm this occurs for me too using:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050306
Firefox/1.0.1 (Debian package 1.0.1-2)
However I notice the history list has disappeared and also that if I
press any arrow keys
Package: limewire
Version: 3.4.5-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Secunia reports two vulnerabilities in Limewire that allow attackers remote
access to arbitrary files. For full details see
http://secunia.com/advisories/14555
Note: Limewire has been orphaned for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
unmerge 300520
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
Bug is not marked as being merged with any others.
reopen 300520
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h
Package: rails
Version: 0.10.1-6
Severity: grave
The depends line seems to have disappeared from the latest rails:
$apt-cache show rails
Package: rails
Priority: optional
Section: web
Installed-Size: 7248
Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: all
Version: 0.10.1-6
Recommends:
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:03:25 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line dupe
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 300520 sid
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved to /usr/include/pppd/
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
reassign 300520 libppd-dev
Bug#300520: portslave: FTBFS: ppp.h moved
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: lingoteach-ui,lingoteach-lesson,lingoteach-sound
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
retitle 279702 ITA: lingoteach-ui,lingoteach-lesson,lingoteach-sound
Bug#279702: dummy bug to keep the lingoteach packages out of sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 300600 pending
Bug#300600: xsupplicant 1.0.1-3(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: Tries do download stuff
while building
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
tags 300600 sid
Bug#300600: xsupplicant 1.0.1-3(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: Tries do download stuff
while building
Tags were: pending
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
tags 300600 - sid
Bug#300600: xsupplicant 1.0.1-3(unstable/alpha): FTBFS: Tries do download stuff
while building
Tags were: sid pending
Tags removed: sid
End of message, stopping
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:02:22 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300637: fixed in rails 0.10.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:21:21 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#297664: junit: FTBFS: gjdoc errors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 300600 pending
Thanks
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:01:27PM +0100, Falk Hueffner muttered these words:
Package: xsupplicant
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
xsupplicant 1.0.1-3 fails to build on m68k, arm and alpha:
[...]
Working on:
Package: qalculate
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
The new 0.7.2-2 version of qalculate depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0).
However, this version of the library only exists in experimental.
Please rebuilt in a pbuilder or pure unstable environment.
Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Carlos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 300623 wishlist
Bug#300623: bittorrent 4.0 is out
Severity set to `wishlist'.
merge 298814 300623
Bug#298814: bittorrent: New upstream version available
Bug#300623: bittorrent 4.0 is out
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
tags 300662 sid
Bug#300662: qalculate: New version depend on experimental version of library
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
severity 300623 wishlist
merge 298814 300623
thanks
This is NOT a grave bug. I refer you to
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
This bug is at nighest severity a normal bug, and this type is usually
wishlist. It has also been reported as bug #298814.
--
Michael Janssen ---
Tags: sarge sid upstream
H, I think this is the same as http://bugs.debian.org/281628
Though I'm kinda surprised to see it, I thought it had been fixed in
3.3.2... Actually, I haven't seen it lately, even though I haven't
upgraded yet. Also, it never caused any data loss for me.
Cheers,
Package: libapache-mod-php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-9
Followup-For: Bug #299605
It shall be mentioned that it does not occur with every version
of phpmyadmin. Crashes appear with 2.5.6rc2 - the latest 2.6.1-pl3
works
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300632: fixed in tuxpaint 1:0.9.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libapache-mod-php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-9
Followup-For: Bug #299605
I false reported latest phpmyadmin works. It does not and
crashes same way older version used to. need to do some more
chckes as some form-fills 'works' while others causes
segfault
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
