Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 335211 libapt-pkg-perl
Bug#335211: apt-src install segfaults
Bug#336083: apt-src: Fails to install a package
Bug reassigned from package `apt-src' to `libapt-pkg-perl'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 228611 + fixed
Bug#228611: ld.so complains when running sam
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
tag 280259 + fixed
Bug#280259: sam: FTBFS on amd64: Illegal use of 'extern int errno;'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 324371 + fixed
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:22:58AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:12:38AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx said
Hi,
Your package is failing to build.
From the log:
Running libtoolize...
ls: libltdl/*: No
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 336557 openoffice.org
Bug#336557: openoffice.org2: Crash when locale set to none en_US, e.g. zh_CN.GBK
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org2' to `openoffice.org'.
severity 336557 grave
Bug#336557: openoffice.org2: Crash when locale set
Package: libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev
Severity: grave
Version: 6.3.2-2
frobnitz:~# apt-get install libgl1-mesa-directfb-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: serious
I have an /etc/fstab with lines of the form:
/dev/hda2 / ext3,ext2 errors=remount-ro 0 1
ie. for filesystem, try ext3 first, if this cannot be done, use ext2.
Recent versions of mount understand this syntax, but
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.6.13+0rc3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: causes an FTBFS for dctc and dcgui
Including linux/sem.h results in the following error on mips and mipsel:
casals.debian.org$ echo '#include linux/sem.h' | cpp /dev/null
In file included from
Package: scim-anthy
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
scim-anthy depends on a version of libanthy0 that is not available.
namakemono:/media# LANG=C apt-get install scim-anthy -t experimental
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: gco
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
0.5.0-3 was uploaded yesterday and fixed that bug.
Regards,
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:32:06 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334319: fixed in ruby-v4l 0.1.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:49:35 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336525: gco - FTBFS: wrong build depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
reopen 334180
reassign 334180 libssl0.9.8
thanks
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:19:44AM +0100, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 19:40 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
So it seems the version in sid already was build with
libssl0.9.8. I guess I didn't upgrade my chroot.
So
Tore Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been promised that these scripts are to be released shortly,
but as long as the status quo is kept, Beneath a Steel Sky should not
be considered a candidate for inclusion in Etch.
I thought that was the tools/skycpt directory that was added to the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 334180
Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs
Bug#336140: dovecot-common: does not start - login process died too early
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 334180 libssl0.9.8
Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd
Package: phpbb2
Tags: security
Severity: grave
A new round of security issues in phpBB has been disclosed.
| After these weaknesses were found and disclosed to the vendor
| nearly 80 days ago, several problems with unitialised variables
| were discovered that allow XSS, SQL injection and even
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:47:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:49:38PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 11:56:36AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to fix the FTBFS on hppa. The only solution
I found is to
* Florian Weimer:
* Kai Hendry:
On 2005-10-26T00:40-0700 Matt Mullenweg wrote:
I need a Wordpress release with the updated Snoopy version 1.2.1. ASAP.
Could you confirm this affects WP? We use an older version of Snoopy
that has been modified, and the only calls to it are hard-coded RSS
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:02:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335931: fixed in chmlib 0.37-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 333677 + fixed
Bug#333677: manpages-ko: korean rpm manpage file conflicts with the new rpm
package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Dominik Kubla wrote:
The created initramfs drops into a shell because /dev/md0 can not be
mounted. This is a regression from version 0.30.
what is your setup?
please send the output of /proc/mdstat?
have you mdadm installed on that box?
what does dpkg -l mdadm show?
--
Package: phpbb2
Version: 2.0.13-6sarge1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
The phpbb project has relased version 2.0.18 of it's software, including
lots of security fixes.
See http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=336756 for details.
The security related
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:19:27 +0530
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in ipsec-tools 0.6.2-2 upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:32:05 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336538: fixed in abakus 0.90-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 315163 + fixed
Bug#315163: evolution-data-server: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Unsatisfiable
Build-Depends on libldap2-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
tag 330013 + fixed
Bug#330013: libedataserver1.2-dev: Still depends on libdb4.1-dev package
Tags
Package: wvstreams
Severity: serious
Version: 4.0.2-4.1
From my build log:
...
i486-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -O2 -fPIC -DPIC -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DISLINUX
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -DDEBUG=0 -O2 -Wall
-I/usr/include/tcl8.3 -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/qt3
Package: linux-headers-2.6.14-1-k7
Version: 2.6.14-1
Followup-For: Bug #336295
On my machine:
# cd /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-1-k7/include/
# ls -ld asm*
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root8 Oct 31 10:03 asm - asm-i386
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 31 10:03 asm-generic
As you can see asm links to
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: grave
yaird fails when /etc/fstab contains a SMB share, such as:
\\mlpc-serv-fs1.eng.cam.ac.uk\homes /srv/mlpc-serv-fs1 smbfs
noauto,user,uid=tbm,gid=tbm,credentials=/etc/samba/private/msm34
Setting up linux-image-2.6.14-1-powerpc (2.6.14-1) ...
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 03:15:32PM -0700, Matt Kraai said
Package: gworkspace
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gworkspace fails to build because it cannot include
GWorkspace/GWProtocol.h:
gcc GWRemote.m -c \
-MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:17:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331569: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:17:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331570: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:17:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330013: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:17:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331571: fixed in evolution-data-server 1.2.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi,
I've just got this bug too. The problem is caused by this line :
etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini
[ iirc, this line comes from the parsing of the
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf. ]
This line is interpreted by the shell as the following two lines :
$ etex
tag 336535 patch
thanks
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:56:03AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
kismet FTBFS on mips/mipsel with a g++-4.0 ICE (which is most probably
the same as in #336463, will add more information there).
See
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 336535 patch
Bug#336535: FTBFS (mips/mipsel): ICE: Floating point exception
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
To at least give someone a start to track down this bug...
I played a bit with objdump today, trying to find out what the hell is
going wrong.
According to gdb, this is what happens when I try to run an application
compiled with the broken binutils:
#0 0x82e0 in ?? ()
(gdb)
I then did
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:32:16 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336319: fixed in spplus 1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:58 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all
the
build
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.36
Severity: serious
Just to have it in the BTS:
dm-mod.ko is no longer in the initramfs, and thus /sbin/evms_activate
fails. A simple manual_add_module dm_mod in the hooks/evms fragment
fixes it (I've tested).
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: ickle
Version: 0.3.2-4
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
The package is uninstallable on unstable because it depends on
libicq2000. It seams in order to fix this bug the only thing that
must be done is to remove the file debian/shlibs.local.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
All affect Sarge.
I've prepared updated packages for sarge. My updated package for sid is
still pending with my sponsor Luk Claes. The updated packages for sarge
are available here:
http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/mantis_sec/
They are not signed since I'm not a
On Mon, October 31, 2005 16:07, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The included patches look fine and correlate to what I extracted from the
interdiff. But where's the fix for CVE-2005-3337 aka mantis bug 5959?
The mantis bug is non-public, but according to the description it's
a cross-site-scripting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 328418 with 332706
Bug#328418: evolution 2.4 uninstalable due to missing packages
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 332706
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:17:05 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333898: fixed in xtux 0.2.030306-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-sv
Severity: grave
Version: 1.0-1
This package has tight versioned dependencies on an older version of
mozilla-thunderbird than is in testing. So it is blocking the new
version, and all of its security fixes, from reaching testing. It is
also uninstallable in
Package: mozilla-locale-fr
Severity: grave
Version: 2:1.7.11-1
This package has tight versioned dependencies on an older version of
mozilla-browser than is in testing. So it is blocking the new
version, and all of its security fixes, from reaching testing. It is
also uninstallable in unstable.
Package: mozilla-locale-it
Severity: grave
Version: 1.7.5-3
This package has tight versioned dependencies on an older version of
mozilla-browser than is in testing. So it is blocking the new
version, and all of its security fixes, from reaching testing. It is
also uninstallable in unstable.
It's
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I did:
$ rm -rf /home/nico/.openoffice*
$ rm -rf /home/nico/.sversionrc
$ oowriter
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 10847 Segmentation fault
$sd_prog/$sd_binary $@
$ ulimit
Package: nagios-plugins
Version: 1.4.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
nagios-plugins failed to build on a sparc buildd, but did build on my
sparc pbuilder.
if sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I.. -I.. -I../lib -I../intl
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:35:44PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
user debian-qa@lists.debian.org
usertag 300675 proposed-removal
thanks
Since these package seems indeed to be uttertly useless these days I
propose to remove it. Please respond within a week if you have any
objections.
block 335434 by 336577
block 335435 by 336577
thanks
Unfortunately, sysconf(_SC_SEM_VALUE_MAX) is currently unimplemented.
We could use semctl(..., SEM_INFO, arg) and inspect arg.__buf-semvmx,
but this is as unportable as SEMVMX -- semun.__buf is Linux-specific
-- and even less elegant -- thanks
reopen 325678
thanks
Hello,
the FTBFS bug is still present in the latest unstable version of svnmailer
(with a slightly different error message complaining about a missing
'debian/svnmailer.conf' instead of 'debian/svnmailer.conf.example').
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, October 31, 2005 16:07, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The included patches look fine and correlate to what I extracted from the
interdiff. But where's the fix for CVE-2005-3337 aka mantis bug 5959?
The mantis bug is non-public, but according to the description
reassign 336358 icc-profiles
severity 336358 minor
thanks
* hungerburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-29 20:12]:
Package: scribus-icc
Version: version from scribus.net
So why do you submit this bug to Debian? We cannot do anything about
a package that is not even in Debian. Please report it to
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.6.13+0rc3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: causes an FTBFS for dctc and dcgui
Including linux/sem.h results in the following error on mips and mipsel:
casals.debian.org$ echo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 335434 by 336577
Bug#335434: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 336577
block 335435 by 336577
Bug#335435: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 336569 grave
Bug#336569: Dovecot with nss_ldap - different uid received form getpwnam
Severity set to `grave'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
tags 336098 help
Bug#336098: saods9: obscured source code
Tags were: confirmed upstream
Tags added: help
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:02:51 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334345: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 325678
Bug#325678: svnmailer: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No
such file or directory
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:02:51 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334345: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:02:51 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334345: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:02:51 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334345: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 02:50 +0300, Radu Spineanu wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
In that case, could fprobe be turned into a dummy package that depends
on fprobe-ng, or are there incompatibilties that make an automatic
upgrade inappropriate?
Would it be ok if when doing the transition i
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Including linux/sem.h results in the following error on mips and mipsel:
[...]
Why are you using this header from userspace? In general it's the
wrong choice.
The only advantage over
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:51:45PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Including linux/sem.h results in the following error on mips and mipsel:
[...]
Why are you using this header from
tags 336577 normal
thanks
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Justification: causes an FTBFS for dctc and dcgui
This is not a sufficient justification for a RC bug against l-k-h.
Note that I explained in my bugs against dctc/dcgui the right fix for
it and did not file a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 336577 normal
Unknown tag/s: normal.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Justification: causes an FTBFS for dctc and dcgui
This is not a sufficient justification for a RC bug against l-k-h.
Note that I explained in my bugs against dctc/dcgui the right fix for
Since this fix is necessary for the big KDE transition to complete
(connected to it via imagemagick) it should be uploaded really soon,
i.e. today or tomorrow would be best. Do you have time to do such an
upload or would it be okay with you to NMU the package for that?
Go ahead and NMU, the
merge 336585 336598
thanks
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 12:45:25PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: yaird
Version: 0.0.11-10
Severity: grave
yaird fails when /etc/fstab contains a SMB share, such as:
\\mlpc-serv-fs1.eng.cam.ac.uk\homes /srv/mlpc-serv-fs1 smbfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 336582 336587
Bug#336582: New round of security issues
Bug#336587: phpbb2: phpbb 2.0.18 released with lots of security fixes
Merged 336582 336587.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
I don't see anything in the bug log tracking this down to a specific binutils
failure.
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmare!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Has this been reported to the libstdc++ list upstream? It doesn't look like
it, and it's certainly their thing.
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: php4
Tags: security
Severity: grave
The Hardened-PHP project has disclosed several security
vulnerabilites:
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_182005.77.html
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_192005.78.html
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_202005.79.html
Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.54-5
Severity: grave
libapr should be compiled using /dev/urandom so that tools like svn
can actually function on servers where there is less entropy available.
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-08/0818.shtml
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
close 336629 2:1.7.12-1
thanks
Joey Hess a écrit :
Package: mozilla-locale-fr
Severity: grave
Version: 2:1.7.11-1
This package has tight versioned dependencies on an older version of
The tight versioned dependencies are necessary because using a different
version of the locales than the main
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 336629 2:1.7.12-1
Bug#336629: overly tight versioned dependencies on mozilla
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2:1.7.12-1, send any further explanations to
Joey Hess [EMAIL
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#317404: fixed in evolver 2.26-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Arnaud Patard (Rtp) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just got this bug too. The problem is caused by this line :
etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.ini
No, at least not in the original bug report: On Piem's system, there
was an old conffile for jadetex which tried
Can this bug be reproduced with upstream gcc-4_0-branch as of date 20051023,
which is what Debian's gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 is based on?
If so, it should be reported upstream; upstream has several people who often
run automated binary regression searches and should be able to identify the
commit
: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20051031-1209
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: php5
Tags: security
Severity: grave
The Hardened-PHP project has disclosed several security
vulnerabilites:
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_182005.77.html
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_192005.78.html
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_202005.79.html
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Clavier said:
Cesar Mendoza wrote:
I use exim4 with mailman. Mailman requires pipes in the /etc/aliases to
work properly. One of the things that you can set on the exim
configuration file is what user and group to run the piped programs.
yes, but width
Has anyone considered, wild though this may sound, forwarding this to upstream
Bugzilla? http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/.
There's not a single m68k bug in upstream's Bugzilla, yet m68k bugs keep being
reported to Debian.
--
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Insert famous quote here]
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:32:21PM +0100, Matej Vela wrote:
Since Daniel Jacobowitz's reply hasn't reached the BTS either, here's
what he said:
In general, most of these headers are not intended or supported for
userspace use; so the correct thing to do is either to use the POSIX
On Oct 29, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send complete log.
Here it is. I can reproduce the bug even with a script like:
while read m; do
/sbin/modprobe.real $m
done LIST
(Each command was logged to different files which have been sorted by
PID and reassembled.)
=[
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:12:36PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: wvstreams
Severity: serious
Version: 4.0.2-4.1
This is a known issue that is fixed in upstream CVS.
I'm waiting for XPLC 0.3.13 to be released before we make a WvStreams
release.
--
Simon Law
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought that was the tools/skycpt directory that was added to the
ScummVM CVS repository on October 14. Though I haven't actually tried
to build the file from it.
Oh, indeed. I wasn't aware of the tools/ directory within the main
ScummVM tarball - I only checked the
Package: xmltex
Severity: grave
Version: 1.9-10
Tags: sid
Hello,
It seems to me that xmltex is uninstallable in sid right now, or am I
missign something?
$ sudo apt-get install xmltex
:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xmltex: Depends: tetex-bin (= 1.0.7+20011202-5.1)
tags 327780 + patch
thanks
Hi,
With a little help from my friends (on IRC)...
I've identified the cause of this bug to be part of revision 1.74 of
bfd/elf32-m68k.c in the binutils source. I confirmed that it works by
producing a cross-binutils on my (powerpc) laptop from the binutils
source
This one time, at band camp, Stanislav Meduna said:
This is a more general problem - I am seeing the same behaviour
with courier-imap-ssl
Oct 22 09:07:39 firewall imapd-ssl: couriertls:
/etc/courier/gw.meduna.org.pem:
error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared
On Monday 31 October 2005 11:42, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Dominik Kubla wrote:
The created initramfs drops into a shell because /dev/md0 can not be
mounted. This is a regression from version 0.30.
what is your setup?
please send the output of /proc/mdstat?
# cat
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 12:06 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
| After these weaknesses were found and disclosed to the vendor
| nearly 80 days ago, several problems with unitialised variables
| were discovered that allow XSS, SQL injection and even remote
| execution of arbitrary PHP code, when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:19:56 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is actually the same as #336585:
The fs_freq and fs_passno fields in /etc/fstab are optional
Yes. Thanks, Mattia.
The attached patch should fix this issue. Looks like
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
merge 336585 336598
thanks
doh! failed because of severity. I'll let kernel mainteiners decide on
that then.
sorry for the noise
--
mattia
:wq!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:09:35PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:19:56 +0100
Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is actually the same as #336585:
The fs_freq and fs_passno fields in /etc/fstab are optional
* Florian Weimer:
http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_182005.77.html
This appears to be a variant of CVE-2002-1954, although public
information is scarce at this stage. See the discussion on
full-disclosure and various other places.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 327780 + patch
Bug#327780: current binutils are utterly useless on m68k
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:07:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
