Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 421838 + patch
Bug#421838: [INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: patch
tags 436314 + patch
Bug#436314: up-imapproxy: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libwrap-dev
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping
Package: polipo
Version: 0.9.12-1
Severity: grave
This should be of interest to the security team. I tried to contact them
in debian.security about a month ago but with no result.
Summary: polipo crashes because of a null-pointer dereference in the
dns-handling code.
Detailed report including
tags 421838 + patch
tags 436314 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my up-imapproxy 1.2.4-10.2 NMU.
diff -u up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog
--- up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog
+++ up-imapproxy-1.2.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424782: fixed in axyl 2.1.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 415355 + patch
Bug#415355: diald: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: patch
tags 422534 + patch
Bug#422534: diald : [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for debconf messages
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added:
tags 415355 + patch
tags 422534 + patch
tags 436307 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my diald 0.99.4-7.3 NMU.
Ana
diff -u diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po
--- diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po
+++ diald-0.99.4/debian/po/de.po
@@ -1,23 +1,15 @@
-#
-#
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#436307: fixed in diald 0.99.4-7.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:47:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#436314: fixed in up-imapproxy 1.2.4-10.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Saturday 25 August 2007 01:19:43 am Dario Minnucci (midget) wrote:
Hi Daniel,
First of all, I didn't see any of your comments to the bug before it was
closed, because you never CC'd me or 425897-submitter...
Very sorry. My fault. :(
With the latest version, the package still failed
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:10:29 +1200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431710: piuparts test: fails to remove: axyl-lucene postrm
error: AXYL_HOME undefined!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:03:52PM -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
I plan to NMU gaim-librvp package to fix this bug. Attached is the patch
to do so.
Go ahead, thanks. Been totally slagged under with work and everytime I try to
detach it gets worse. Sorry if I held up the migration.
--
Devin \
I think that the cause of this bug is the use of BSD pty.
Currently in debian/rules, ttyrec is compiled for BSD standard
(deprecated, I think).
I think following patch should apply for Debian build.
--
--- rules.orig 2007-08-25 16:16:16.0 +0900
+++ rules
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 430632 437859
Bug#430632: ttyrec doesn't work on PowerPC (Out of pty's)
Bug#437859: ttyrec doesn't work at all
Merged 430632 437859.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
tags 439098 + unreproducible
Bug#439098: liblzo-dev: Not coinstallable with liblzo2-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
End of message, stopping processing here.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 12:17 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
Unpacking liblzo-dev (from .../liblzo-dev_1.08-3_ia64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/x/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/cache/apt/archives/liblz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
severity 439418 serious
Bug#439418: syslinux: FTBFS with nasm 0.99.01-0
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: ttt
version: 1.7-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/ttt-1.7'
gcc -O2
Package: traffic-vis
version: 0.34-19
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
cc -DVERSION=\0.34\ -DHAVE_GETOPT_LONG -Wall
Package: siproxd
version: 1:0.5.13-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include
Package: ruby-gnome2
version: 0.16.0-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dh_installdirs -plibvte-ruby1.8
dh_installdocs
Package: sbm
version: 3.7.1-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/sbm-3.7.1/manager'
Package: zsnes
version: 1.510-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/zsnes-1.510/src'
Package: xmakemol
version: 5.15-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -Wall -O2
Package: xbvl
version: 2.2-5.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Package: ssldump
version: 0.9b3-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_LIBM=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1
Package: scummvm
version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/nasm -O1 -f elf -g -o
Package: rggobi
version: 2.1.5-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
gcc-4.2 -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include
Package: tcpslice
version: 1.2a3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
block 432819 by 432338
thanks
The mo file for net-tools is for version 1.51, according to the source.
While the version of net-tools in the archive is 1.60. Shouldn't this
translation be merged in net-tools, and this package be removed?
Yes, I've already updated this translation and submitted
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 432819 by 432338
Bug#432338: net-tools: [INTL:ja] Japanese program translation and updated
net-tools.pot
Bug#432819: ja-trans: should this package be removed?
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 432819 added: 432338
thanks
Stopping
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:34:11 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#439098: liblzo-dev: Not coinstallable with liblzo2-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: gtk2hs
version: 0.9.11-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/gtk2hs-0.9.11'
Package: wireshark
version: 0.99.6pre1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
Package: quiteinsanegimpplugin
version: 0.3-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
then mv -f
Package: libpam-unix2
version: 2.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Package: doc-debian-uk
version: 0.0.20061017-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building doc-debian-uk in
Package: libmatthew-java
version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
javadoc -quiet -author -link
Package: gimp-plugin-registry
version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building gimp-plugin-registry
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 433740 + patch
Bug#433740: pybaz - FTBFS: ImportError: No module named uid
Tags were: patch sid lenny
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: regina-normal
version: 4.3.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Package: muine
version: 0.8.7-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
Package: jarjar
version: 1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
javadoc:
[mkdir] Created dir:
Package: pearpc
version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
nasm -O99 -f elf -o jitc_tools.o -- jitc_tools.asm
Package: libsdl1.2
version: 1.2.11-9
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/nasm -f elf -i ../../src/hermes/
Package: junit
version: 3.8.1.1-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
(cd src;/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javadoc -d ../doc/api
tags 433740 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my pybaz 1.5pre1-3.1 NMU.
Ana
diff -u pybaz-1.5pre1/debian/changelog pybaz-1.5pre1/debian/changelog
--- pybaz-1.5pre1/debian/changelog
+++ pybaz-1.5pre1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+pybaz (1.5pre1-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ *
Package: linphone
version: 1.7.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Package: paketto
version: 1.10-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Package: inventor
version: 2.1.5-10-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[7]: Entering directory
Package: jaxme
version: 0.5.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
JM.localtest:
[javac] Compiling 13 source files
Package: mh-e
version: 8.0.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
emacs --batch --no-site-file --multibyte --eval (setq
Package: libcommons-modeler-java
version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
compile.tests:
[javac] Compiling 7
Package: fenix-plugins
version: 0.0.20070803-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
== CONFIGURE: fgfx-1.0/configure ==
cd
Package: gimp-resynthesizer
version: 0.15-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building gimp-resynthesizer in
Package: libtest-www-mechanize-perl
version: 1.14-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering
Package: ogre
version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking for pow in -lm... yes
checking for gzopen in
Hi ,
I checked this trouble.
I confirmed the same problem as Michael Ablassmeier occurred.
--
if i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../..-pipe
-D_REENTRANT -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i486 -ffast-math -msse
-mfpmath=sse -MT flash.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/flash.Tpo -c -o
On Don, 23 Aug 2007, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Yes, the fix is already committed to our svn depot. Stupid me checked
only upgrades from tetex/testing and forgot that texlive 2005 does
something different.
The fix works for all the other cases (modes.mf etc).
Setting up texlive-base-bin
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:17:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#433740: fixed in pybaz 1.5pre1-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:29:29PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
reopen 433739
found 433739 5.99.2
thanks
On 29/07/07 at 05:58 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
tag 433739 patch
thanks
Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19/07/2007):
mv offlineimap.html manual.html
man -t -l
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#439460: fixed in traffic-vis 0.34-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: lua-zip
version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/lua-zip-1.2.3'
Package: grass
version: 6.2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking for sql.h... yes
checking for location of ODBC
Hi,
Setting up texlive-base-bin (2007-13) ...
sed: -e expression #1, char 25: unterminated `s' command
dpkg: error processing texlive-base-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This is strange. I have tested the sed expression even in real
Package: cvs2html
version: 1.96-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Package: libgtk-java
version: 2.10.2-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
WARNING: Error while loading class BufferedReader
Package: libcommons-lang-java
version: 2.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
WARNING: ^
Package: pykdeextensions
version: 0.4.0-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Package: gfpoken
version: 0.29-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/gfpoken-0.29'
Package: sfftobmp
version: 3.0-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
g++ -g -O2 -o sfftobmp my_getopt.o cmdline.o codes.o
Package: libcsv-java
version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building libcsv-java in
Package: g-wrap
version: 1.9.6-3.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
Package: gutenprint
version: 5.0.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Package: swing-layout
version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building swing-layout in
Package: maint-guide
version: 1.2.11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
debiandoc2latexps -v -l de maint-guide.de.sgml
This
Package: libfreemarker-java
version: 2.3.10-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
[rmic]
Package: libsaxon-java
version: 1:6.5.5-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
WARNING: Error while loading class Element
Package: kde-guidance
version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Package: gimp
Version: 2.4.0~rc1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Gimp doesn't launch, but crashes with a segmentation fault instead. At
first, I suspected that my libkgtk2.0 packages from experimental were the
cause of the crash, so I downgraded to the unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
tags 439426 lenny sid
Bug#439426: Package should be updated for libpurple/pidgin
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
tags 439441 etch
Bug#439441: polipo 0.9.12 from Etch segfaulting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Dear release team!
An intermittent upload of liblash2 (0.5.3-1) contained an incorrect
soname. This error was fixed in 0.5.3-2, but glashctl and muse had been
rebuilt in the meantime and picked up a bogus dependency on
liblash.so.1. A simple rebuild should get things straight. Could you
please
On Friday 24 August 2007, Christoph Pfister wrote:
Most of the dependencies were turned into Recommends: beginning with
version 1.1.7-2. This renders the package unusable for almost
(possibly that there's exception; but I can't imagine any) every user
of the library; except for those people
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:32:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#439507: fixed in lua-zip 1.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 439503 gjdoc
Bug#439503: libsaxon-java: FTBFS: Exception in thread main
java.lang.NullPointerException
Bug reassigned from package `libsaxon-java' to `gjdoc'.
reassign 439501 gjdoc
Bug#439501: libgtk-java: FTBFS: Exception in thread main
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:47:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432424: fixed in osgcal 0.1.44-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Barbara Beeton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Karl Berry wrote:
[...]
I asked Barbara Beeton at the AMS about taking care of the pcatcode
madness, in hopes we can get a free version shortly. I'm sure they did
not intend the current situation.
the current
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Setting up texlive-base-bin (2007-13) ...
sed: -e expression #1, char 25: unterminated `s' command
dpkg: error processing texlive-base-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This is strange. I
On Sam, 25 Aug 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
- sed -i -e s/^$format[[:space:]].*/$modified_line/ $new_cfg
+ sed -i -e s/^$format[[:space:]].*/$modified_line/ $new_cfg
Hi Frank,
you did remove the in change 2578 ... in texlive-base-bin.postinst.pre.
with the log message
fix the
Package: kdelibs4-dev
Version: 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-5
Severity: serious
There was an error in today's aptitude safe-upgrade (sorry for the
German):
,
| Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von kdelibs4-dev 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-4 (durch
.../kdelibs4-dev_4%3a3.5.7.dfsg.1-
| 5_i386.deb) ...
| Entpacke Ersatz für
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:07:51 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#439472: wireshark: FTBFS: gthread.h:335: warning: cast
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
tag 436703 patch
thanks
Hi,
I'm attaching a patch that fixes it. It basically follows
http://linux-ata.org/shutdown.html and skips the drive shutdown when the
respective /sys/block/sdX/device/scsi_disk:*/manage_start_stop exists
(leaving it for the kernel to do).
After fixing, contact
Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#439455: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 436703 patch
Bug#436703: /sbin/shutdown fails to properly spindown drive
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
tags 423740 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#423740: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: gcjh: Command not found
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 439426 gaim-galago
Bug#439426: Package should be updated for libpurple/pidgin
Bug reassigned from package `galago-gaim-feed' to `gaim-galago'.
forcemerge 430949 439426
Bug#430949: gaim-galago needs porting to pidgin (untested patch included)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
fixed 431710 2.1.10
Bug#431710: piuparts test: fails to remove: axyl-lucene postrm error: AXYL_HOME
undefined!
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.1.10.
End of message, stopping
tags 439457 pending
quit
We're waiting for the CRAN archive to provide the matching rggobi for the new
ggobi released this week. Upstream has it, we just haven't gotten it yet.
Dirk
On 25 August 2007 at 09:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Package: rggobi
| version: 2.1.5-2
| Severity: serious
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 299487 -1
Bug#299487: jags: Jags crash when I click on the (+) to expand a workgroup
Bug 299487 cloned as bug 439526.
close 299487
Bug#299487: jags: Jags crash when I click on the (+) to expand a workgroup
'close' is deprecated; see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 429117 -1
Bug#429117: please update/request removal of your package
Bug 429117 cloned as bug 439527.
close 429117
Bug#429117: please update/request removal of your package
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
