Bug#309311: marked as done (nvidia-settings: #265640 is still present in sarge)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 23:10:28 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line nvidia-settings: #265640 is still present in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: severity 306439 serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 306439 serious Bug#306439: Ximian-connector/evolution-exchange authentication compatibility with Exchange 2003 broken Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

Processed: tagging 310150

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 310150 - sid Bug#310150: zaptel_1:1.0.7-4(i386/unstable): FTBFS: directories created with incorrect perms Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: tagging 305731

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 305731 = patch sarge Bug#305731: zaptel command ztcfg freezes on PowerPC causing boot failure Tags were: fixed patch Tags set to: patch, sarge > End of message, stopping process

Processed: tagging 310150

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 310150 sid Bug#310150: zaptel_1:1.0.7-4(i386/unstable): FTBFS: directories created with incorrect perms There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping proce

Bug#309313: marked as done (mysql driver cannot retrieve data)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 20:51:56 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309313: mysql driver cannot retrieve data has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#310088: marked as done (docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process)

Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 05:49:46 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug #31088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed: closing 307981, tagging 307981

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 307981 Bug#307981: Correction of typo in control 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#310151: fltk1.1_1.1.6-4(i386/unstable): should use AM_MAINTAINER_MODE

Package: fltk1.1 Version: 1.1.6-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of fltk1.1_1.1.6-4 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 33 > Build started at 20050520-1525 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.2

Bug#310150: zaptel_1:1.0.7-4(i386/unstable): FTBFS: directories created with incorrect perms

Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of zaptel_1:1.0.7-4 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 33 > Build started at 20050521-2001 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depend

Bug#304735: DB_TXN_NOSYN

Setting DB_TXN_NOSYN in DB_CONFIG when loading your database is a good thing to do to speed up performance, this is because writes will not be flushed or logs written on transaction commit. If you *leave this setting set* and your application fails, or you loose power on your system, it is possible

Bug#310088: Bug #31088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Franz, Martin, I'm not going to play severity ping-pong with you but I think you are wrong about this issue. First of all sorry to be harsh but the installation manual wouldn't have problems if you had used this package properly in the first place. You were ALWAYS supposed to use css for st

Bug#309737: marked as done (hotmail structure seems to have changed, gotmail doesn't work anymore)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 22:02:21 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309737: fixed in gotmail 0.8.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#309955: kdebindings: FTBFS: Undefined reference to KKeyNative::modXModeSwitch

reassign 309955 kdelibs,kdebindings thanks On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:40:42AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: > > ... > /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link i386-linux-g++ > -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_

Processed: Re: Bug#309955: kdebindings: FTBFS: Undefined reference to KKeyNative::modXModeSwitch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 309955 kdelibs,kdebindings Bug#309955: kdebindings: FTBFS: Undefined reference to KKeyNative::modXModeSwitch Bug reassigned from package `kdebindings' to `kdelibs,kdebindings'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#309313: mysql driver cannot retrieve data

Luk Claes writes: > Btw, the new version is 0.7.1-3.0.1 > I gave this new version a try and it looks ok to me. I guess you can close this bug. Thanks to you and Steve for fixing this problem in no time. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spam-protected email: replace the

Bug#310139: kmd: Integer overflow in ELF header parsing

Package: kmd Version: 0.9.19-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole kmd uses binutils-dev's BFD library for ELF header parsing and is therefore vulnerable to it's integer overflow in ELF segment handling. kmd needs to be recompiled against binutils-dev 2.15-6 once this

Processed: tagging 309760

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309760 = patch confirmed security Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop Tags were: confirmed patch Tags set to: patch, confirmed, security >

Processed: tagging 309760

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309760 = patch confirmed Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop Tags were: moreinfo security Tags set to: patch, confirmed > End of message, s

Processed: tagging 310111

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 310111 sid Bug#310111: haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-deps There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here

Processed: Fixed in upload of ikvm 0.14.0.1-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 299058 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#299058: new upstream release 0.12.0.0 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 307100 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#307100: ikvm: FTBFS: mono not configured correctly There were no tags set. T

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Remaining problems: > 1) The --noxrandr option is not documented in the manpage. I found it by > grepping through the code. Maybe the manpage should be regenerate with > help2man. > > 2) gcompris seems to a

Processed: Re: gcompris: crash at start up

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 310058 important Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi Bill, Yann, > > What does `xdpyinfo | grep RANDR` show? My X server (FBDev) has this > enabled. Perhaps your server doesn't, and gcompris isn't handling > this gracefully? Attached is a patch (against 6.5.3) that fixes up the co

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

severity 310058 important thanks On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:35:51PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi Bill, Yann, > > > > I tried to reproduce this on sid/powerpc, but it runs O

Processed: Patch now available

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310058 + confirmed patch Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#309677: Dumps core on Alpha

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:05:53PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:13:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Here's the (not so useful) backtrace: > Since I don't have access to alpha desktop it would be quite hard to debug > the problem. > One more question. D

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

The reworked patch is in wishlist #310126, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310126 Regards, Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310127: icu-doc is built by the icu and the icu28 source package

Package: icu Version: 2.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the icu-doc package built from the icu source. diff -u icu-2.1/debian/changelog icu-2.1/debian/changelog --- icu-2.1/debian/changelog +++ icu-2.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9

Bug#308625: marked as done (binutils: Integer overflow in ELF segment parsing)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 16:32:25 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308625: fixed in binutils 2.15-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#309093: somaplayer: Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

tags 309093 + patch thanks On 2005-05-21, Roger Leigh wrote: > I took a look at the patch you posted to -release. I found a problem > with it. You need to use the -l and -L option to dh_shlibdeps to make > it use the shlibs files generated by dh_makeshlibs. For example > > - -l$(CURDIR)debian/

Processed: Re: Bug#309093: somaplayer: Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309093 + patch Bug#309093: depend on libsomaplayer There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop

Well, I can reproduce a bug and made a fix for it. 1. How to reproduce: config: --- # Taken from .fvwm2rc # Setup more than 3x3 virtual pages DesktopSize 3x3 # Make emacs start on different page Style Emacs StartsOnPage 0 1 --- Now I start emacs. It is started on page 0,1. Then I switch to any

Processed: closing 308762, tagging 308762

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 308762 Bug#308762: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanati

Bug#309648: marked as done (Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 15:47:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309648: fixed in cheetah 0.9.16-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.2132 +0200]: > Quoting from the patch you mailed earlier today: > > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > +echo -n "Creating raid device nodes: " > +cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAK

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:43:43PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Bill, Yann, > > I tried to reproduce this on sid/powerpc, but it runs OK: OK, I can now confirm it only occurs if RANDR is missing in the X server. gcompris is simply not dealin

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:58:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > (taking unrelated bugs out of the loop.) > > also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1957 +0200]: > > * at S40 or so, you come along, see that /dev/md0 exists, and decide > > not to do MAKEDEV > > No, I

Bug#309982: Multiple buffer overflows in picasm

tags 309982 + patch thanks On 2005-05-21, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > FIX INFORMATION > * > The maintainer, Timo Rossi, has fixed the picasm packages and provided > a new security release, picasm 1.12c. The fixed packages are > available from

Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:42:33AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > | On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > | > |>Steve Langasek wrote: > |>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > |>| > |>|>| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libld

Processed: Uploaded Security Fix to ClamSMTP

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309648 pending patch sarge Bug#309648: Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp Tags were: security Tags added: pending, patch, sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#310058: gcompris: crash at start up

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bill, Yann, I tried to reproduce this on sid/powerpc, but it runs OK: $ gcompris ** Message: gcompris_set_locale '' ** (gcompris:32489): WARNING **: Requested locale '' got 'en_GB.UTF-8' open /dev/sequencer: No such file or directory Opened audi

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

(taking unrelated bugs out of the loop.) also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1957 +0200]: > * at S40 or so, you come along, see that /dev/md0 exists, and decide > not to do MAKEDEV No, I come along at S25 and I do not give a flying food for whether /dev/md0 exists

Bug#310117: monodevelop: FTBFS in experimental with mono-mcs from unstable.

Package: monodevelop Verison: 0.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, When building the monodevelop from experimental with just the mono-jit only the required packages from experimental it's failing to build. This was using mono-mcs 1.0.5-3 from unstable. It gives the following error: Ma

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Steve Langasek wrote: Uh, it's clear by looking at this diff that the current version of debian/control was not autogenerated from debian/control.in, and in fact should not be as debian/control.in is variously broken. The Conflicts: libglui2, for instance, still applies for upgrades from woody.

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:49:24PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: > tags 310077 + patch > thanks > The attached patch should fix the problem. > diff -ruN glui-2.2/debian/control glui-2.2-new/debian/control > --- glui-2.2/debian/control 2005-05-21 21:43:21.388784592 +0200 > +++ glui-2.2-new/debian

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:31:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: glui > Version: 2.2-2 > Severity: serious > Your debian/control file lists those packages: > Package: libglui-dev > Architecture: any > Depends: libglui2 (= ${Source-Version}), libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev > Package: libglui2 >

Bug#309737: Patch

There is a patch available in upstream's sf bts at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1205355&group_id=96810&atid=615991 I attached it for reference but I haven't reviewed it yet. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ --- gotmail-0.8.2/

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

tags 310077 + patch thanks The attached patch should fix the problem. Regards, Torsten diff -ruN glui-2.2/debian/control glui-2.2-new/debian/control --- glui-2.2/debian/control 2005-05-21 21:43:21.388784592 +0200 +++ glui-2.2-new/debian/control 2005-05-21 21:40:36.663826592 +0200 @@ -2,14 +2,14

Bug#301560: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 07:29:55PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1917 +0200]: > > > - echo "Starting raid devices: " > > > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > > > +echo -n "Creating

Processed: tagging 309737

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309737 patch Bug#309737: hotmail structure seems to have changed, gotmail doesn't work anymore There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing h

Processed: Re: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310077 + patch Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Hi Torsten, On Saturday, 21 May 2005, you wrote: > reassign 310088 debian-installer-manual > severity 310088 normal > thanks > > On 2005-05-21, Frans Pop wrote: > > Although the issue in itself is probably not extremely important, I stll > > think it is RC because it is an regression for which ot

Bug#310111: haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-deps

Package: haskell-http Version: 0.4.20041219-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 33 > Build started at 20050521-1830 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied b

Bug#294404: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

also sprach Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1917 +0200]: > > - echo "Starting raid devices: " > > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > > +echo -n "Creating raid device nodes: " > > +cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAKEDEV

Bug#301560: Bug#273182: a possible fix/workaround

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:35:48PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > - echo "Starting raid devices: " > + if [ -d /dev/.udevdb -a ! -e /dev/md0 -a ! -e /dev/md/0 ]; then > +echo -n "Creating raid device nodes: " > +cd /dev && WRITE_ON_UDEV=1 ./MAKEDEV md > +echo "

Processed: retitle 301560 to with udev, mdadm --scan uses wrong device name and fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > retitle 301560 with udev, mdadm --scan uses wrong device name and fails Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?) Changed Bug title. > End of me

Processed: Re: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 310088 docbook-xsl Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `docbook-xsl'. > severity 310088 grave Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regress

Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

reassign 310088 debian-installer-manual severity 310088 normal thanks On 2005-05-21, Frans Pop wrote: > Although the issue in itself is probably not extremely important, I stll > think it is RC because it is an regression for which other packages > (probably xsltproc) need to be fixed, for which t

Processed: Re: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 310088 debian-installer-manual Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process Bug reassigned from package `docbook-xsl' to `debian-installer-manual'. > severity 310088 normal Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unaccep

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

hi again, On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:47:19PM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > it seems like cdbs trys to patch within the first one (which is empty) > and therefore fails to find the files. the cause for this is the following statement in debian/rules: DEB_TAR_SRCDIR=$(shell ls clearsilver-*

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

tags 310073 patch thanks debian/rules has a rather unwise definition of DEB_TAR_SRCDIR that means the build directory isn't determined consistently. This seems to fix it: --- debian/rules~ +++ debian/rules @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f -DEB_TAR_SRCDIR=$(shell ls clearsilver-* | sed -e 's/

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

hi, the build process generates 2 directories within build-tree, called "clearsilver-0.9.13 clearsilver-0.9.13" and "clearsilver-0.9.13" it seems like cdbs trys to patch within the first one (which is empty) and therefore fails to find the files. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Processed: Re: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 310073 patch Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler.

severity 308848 serious thanks On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:53:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Is this really a serious bug? The package built just fine for me, but > I already had a java compiler installed. I had a look in the debian > policy, but didn't find any requirement that a pa

Processed: Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309257 wontfix Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Processed: Re: Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308848 serious Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler. Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around

This does not work as the previous fluxbox's files are still installed when the diversion is being removed, causing dpkg-divert to fail when overwriting /usr/bin/bsetbg (belonging to fluxbox) with the diverted /usr/bin/bsetbg.blackbox (belonging to blackbox). You should remove the diversions for b

Processed: tagging 301560

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 301560 = fixed patch Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?) Tags were: pending confirmed patch Tags set to: fixed, patch > End of messag

Processed: Re: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308848 important Bug#308848: postgis: FTBFS: Should build depend on specific java-compiler. Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#308624: Patch for security bug in gdb

Hi, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:48:12AM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Attached to this mail a patch which fixes a security problem in gdb. >> >>I tested the patch and it works. Patch comes from the current snapshot >>of gdb, I backported it. >> >>Bug #3086

Bug#294404: a possible fix/workaround

severity 273182 critical merge 273182 294404 tags 294404 = patch confirmed pending tags 301560 = patch confirmed pending thanks Okay, Steve's config.c patch in addition to Marco's suggestion appear to solve this bug. Attached is the final patch for an NMU. I have tested this only on VMware (but w

Processed: reassign 273182 to mdadm, severity of 273182 is critical, merging 273182 294404

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 273182 mdadm Bug#273182: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-raid to start them. All sw-raid filesys fail to mount. Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6

Processed: Re: a possible fix/workaround

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 273182 critical Bug#273182: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-raid to start them. All sw-raid filesys fail to mount. Severity set to `critical'. > merge 273182 294404 Bug#273182: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-rai

Bug#309367: marked as done (Syntax error in Build-Depends)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:20 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309367: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#310088: docbook-xsl: Unacceptable regression at this point in release process

Package: docbook-xsl Version: 1.68.1-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Although the issue in itself is probably not extremely important, I stll think it is RC because it is an regression for which other packages (probably xsltproc) need to be fixed, for which there is no

Bug#294404: a possible fix/workaround

Thanks to Marco d'Itri's followup to #294404, I have implemented a fix to the problem that mdadm and udev don't like each other. It is a slighly modified version from Marco's suggestion. Patch attached. The idea is that mdadm checks whether /dev/md0 or /dev/md/0 is present and if not, that it crea

Bug#305216: more infos

just another bit of information I was asking myself about the patch: 16:19 < aba> why the "*/.." in "setattr --barrier /var/lib/vservers/*/.. || true"? And why || true - don't we want to fail if it's not possible? 16:20 < Bertl> aba: probably opens a can of worms ... 16:20 < Bertl> aba: i.e. what i

Bug#308421: Ten-song submissions limit loses data

Michael Ablassmeier wrote: indeed, i can reproduce this. From about 100 Submissions only ~10 found its way into the audioscrobbler database. Yes, this one is simple enough the patch out (it's a one-line change, I'll send you the patch if you want). However, upstream put it in to try and work

Bug#301560: a possible fix/workaround

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.21.1612 +0200]: > Patch attached. There must be a cure for this crap. Now they are attached. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have

Processed: Replacing depreceated e-Mail address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 265539 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#265539: Possible license conflict. GPL but links against OpenSSL. Changed Bug submitter from Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 232543 Andrea

Bug#309093: Just to be sure: will this upload be harmful?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I took a look at the patch you posted to -release. I found a problem with it. You need to use the -l and -L option to dh_shlibdeps to make it use the shlibs files generated by dh_makeshlibs. For example - -l$(CURDIR)debian/libsomaplayer0/us

Bug#310077: glui: Wrong package name in control file.

Package: glui Version: 2.2-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your debian/control file lists those packages: Package: libglui-dev Architecture: any Depends: libglui2 (= ${Source-Version}), libstdc++-dev, glutg3-dev Package: libglui2 Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} However, the .dsc says: Sour

Bug#309969: synaptic: segmentation fault

severity 309969 important tags 309969 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305216: Patch attached

tags 305216 +patch thanks This will probably occur on everything newer than 2.4.28, I have this on 2.4.30 and 2.6.10. I've created a patch to do this the Correct Way(tm), according to Bertl @ #vserver on OFTC. Maybe the checking of the attributes isn't perfect yet, but it's a start ;) Tom diff

Processed: Patch attached

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 305216 +patch Bug#305216: util-vserver: Error upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Processed: Re: synaptic: segmentation fault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309969 important Bug#309969: debian.org> synaptic: segmentation fault Severity set to `important'. > tags 309969 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#309969: debian.org> synaptic: segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible,

Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.

Package: clearsilver Version: 0.9.13-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to buld with the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/clearsilver-0.9.13' patches: debian/patches/document.py.diff Trying patch debian/patches/document.py.diff at level 0...1...2...failure. make:

Bug#309969: synaptic: segmentation fault

Hi, First, "Failed to exec method /usr/lib/apt/methods/ftp" is very strange situation. You did check by apt-get upgrade/dist-upgrade, but it doesn't help investigation. ftp method will be called when update or install really something. I believe you will meet some errors when you do "apt-get updat

Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:09:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Sjoerd, > > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:20:13AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > Just uploaded hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates. This removes > > > t

Processed: tagging 309760

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309760 + moreinfo Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop Tags were: security Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#309871: desktop-profiles: Messes with conffiles of other packages

On Friday 20 May 2005 12:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 20-05-2005 10:46, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > > On Friday 20 May 2005 09:42, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > was planning on contacting the gconf2 maintainer already (I'll probably > > get around to that this weekend), I don't expect tha

Bug#309760: xlockmore-gl: xlock dies when (fv)wm switches virtual desktop

Hi, I'm trying to reproduce bug you reported, but I couldn't succeed (xlock dies) it. Could you show us your fvwm configuration? Because I couldn't understand what's mean "I have set up my FVWM so windows related to Gaim always are put on the same virtual desktop.". This looks be very rare case

Bug#305216: this is serious

Hi, I just checked with upstream about this bug: 14:09 < Bertl> aba: no util-vserver script/package should ever do chmod 000 since 0.30 or so ;) 14:10 < Bertl> aba: instead use setattr --barrier (which will know what to do regardless of the kernel) 14:11 < Bertl> btw, that's the way it is done

Bug#310035: Elinks contains nonfree code

Hello Steve, On Sat, 21 May 2005 03:10:19 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Timo Lindfors has pointed out to me on IRC that this is a duplicate of bug > #300889, which was fixed upstream in 0.10.4. That version hasn't reached > testing yet, though, because there have been 6 new u

Bug#310050: leaves stray diversions around

[martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 11:48AM Saturday May 21]: > Package: fluxbox > Version: 0.9.11-1 > Severity: critical > Fluxbox 0.9.11-1 does not provide bsetbg and does not register > diversions for bsetbg anymore (#263512), but it also does not delete > existing diversions from previous

Processed: Adding the tags

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 303300 = security, woody Bug#303300: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953) Tags were: sarge patch security Tags set to: security, woody > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#310005: [zobel@ftbfs.de: Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed.]

retitle 310005 Better documentation needed for mips/mipsel upgrades severity 310005 important thanks > - Forwarded message from Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - [snip] > Archive date: Thu May 19 19:00:01 UTC 2005 > Upgrade date: Sat May 21 04:17:36 CEST 2005 > uname -a: Linux sign

Processed: Re: [zobel@ftbfs.de: Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed.]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 310005 Better documentation needed for mips/mipsel upgrades Bug#310005: no aptitude on mips/mipsel on Woody, upgrade kernels needed. Changed Bug title. > severity 310005 important Bug#310005: Better documentation needed for mips/mipsel upgrades

Bug#304735: How stable is BDB?

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:58:13PM +1200, Martin Langhoff (CatalystIT) wrote: > As recently as November 2004, I was seeing serious lockups and dataloss > with BDB backends, due to upstream bugs in the BDB integration, and all > our LDAP setups ended up using LDBM due to reliability concerns. > T

  1   2   >