Julien Danjou wrote:
/nonexistent is the home of the buildd user.
In this case the $HOME does not exist and the build fails. No build
should try tro write in $HOME.
What about reading from $HOME. My package doesn't touch $HOME, but
SBCL (upon starting, tries to read ~/.sbclrc). If that allowed
found 400955 2.1.22.dfsg1-5
thanks
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 00:25 +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
The bug (or a related base64 bug) is unfortunately still present. To
reproduce:
[...]
Thanks for the report Michele, I'm marking this as found and I'm
starting to investigate. (I was able to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 400955 2.1.22.dfsg1-5
Bug#400955: base64 problems authenticating using gssapi
Bug marked as found in version 2.1.22.dfsg1-5.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
severity 401192 serious
Bug#401192: dsniff needs to depend on libnids1.21 instead of libnids1.20
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 08:32:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401513: fixed in libkexif 0.2.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 400955
Bug#400955: base64 problems authenticating using gssapi
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 400955 + pending
Bug#400955: base64 problems authenticating using gssapi
Tags were: patch confirmed
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 09:59 +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Thanks for the report Michele, I'm marking this as found and I'm
starting to investigate. (I was able to reproduce the bug as you
showed.)
Apparently the input string can be terminated by just a single LF. I
presume that in some
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 03:58:46 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
I took a better look at this, and here's an updated
0015_saslutil_decode64_fix:
if (inlen 0) {
/* check for trailing CRLF */
if (inlen == 2 in[0] != '\r' in[1] != '\n') {
if (saw_equal) {
return SASL_BADPROT;
Heya,
Please bin-NMU dsniff:
dsniff_2.4b1+debian-15, rebuild for libnids1.21 (#401192), 1, alpha, amd64,
arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mipsel, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc
This should fix the bug.
Marc
--
BOFH #291:
Due to the CDA, we no longer have a root account.
pgpcQu4mYlUDl.pgp
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061204 18:22]:
Package: mailutils
Version: 1:1.1+dfsg1-3.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of mailutils_1:1.1+dfsg1-3.1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu
by sbuild/s390 85
Could you perhaps
* Fabian Fagerholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 09:59 +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Thanks for the report Michele, I'm marking this as found and I'm
starting to investigate. (I was able to reproduce the bug as you
showed.)
Apparently the input string can be
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a+1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
the build of emacs failed on mipsel. Please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=emacs21ver=21.4a%2B1-2arch=mipselstamp=1165216366file=log
for the full build log.
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.6.ds1-7
* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061113 12:08]:
Note one additional change is necessary in the diffs shown below in the ARM
case: if BYTESWAPPED is TRUE, then MACHINE should not be defined. (In
particular, it should not be defined as NATIVE). If BTYPESWAPPED is FALSE,
then it would
Hi,
On Monday 04 December 2006 16:32, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
and then will receive notifications. Practically each source-upload
cause rejects.
If that patch is really that picky when it comes to versions of the
kernelsource, maybe you should depend on the very versions of the
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 10:02 +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
The previous version had inlen != 2 test which doesn't really make
much sense since we are checking the two next characters, so we need to
guarantee their presence.
Correct, I made a typo there.
I also added a second check for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
reassign 398039 ftp.debian.org
Bug#398039: RM: python-cjkcodecs; no longer useful for python2.4.
Warning: Unknown package 'ftp-master.debian.org'
Bug reassigned from package
Package: bootcd-mkinitrd
Version: 2.53
Severity: serious
Hi,
initrd-tools will go away prior to release of etch, and bootcd-mkinitrd
is the last package still depending on it. Please change that
dependency.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 401529 serious
tags 401529 moreinfo unreproducible
--
--
Roland Marcus Rutschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
just checked with all available DICOM files available to me. Could you please
send me an example DICOM file that provokes the segfault. Which program did
produce that DICOM file?
I agree that segfaulting is not the right behavior but it still works on all
DICOM formats I came across.
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 09:47:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401615: fixed in ttf-dejavu 2.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 401529 serious
Bug#401529: medicon: Segmentation fault!
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
tags 401529 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#401529: medicon: Segmentation fault!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 401570 libswt-gtk-3.2-jni
Bug#401570: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: apt-get upgrade fails
Bug reassigned from package `libswt3.2-gtk-jni' to `libswt-gtk-3.2-jni'.
severity 401570 important
Bug#401570: libswt3.2-gtk-jni: apt-get upgrade fails
Severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 401114 apt
Bug#401114: debian-archive-keyring: should probably depend on apt = 0.6
Bug reassigned from package `debian-archive-keyring' to `apt'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reassign 401570 libswt-gtk-3.2-jni
severity 401570 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:32:24PM +0100, Boris Kleibl wrote:
Package: libswt3.2-gtk-jni
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Doing
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
leads to the
tags 401614 moreinfo
thanks
Florian Weimer wrote:
Package: serendipity
Tags: security
Severity: grave
Version: 1.0.3-4
Version 1.0.4 fixes a directory traversal security bug. Please
mention the ID CVE-2006-6242 in your upload.
I'm not sure that it does. The changelog of that version is
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:58:59 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line commons-daemon_1.0.2~svn20061127-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS:
missing build-deps?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
clone 398039 -1
Bug#398039: RM: python-cjkcodecs; no longer useful for python2.4.
Bug 398039 cloned as bug 401675.
reassign 398039 python-cjkcodecs
Bug#398039: RM: python-cjkcodecs;
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 401614 moreinfo
Bug#401614: CVE-2006-6242: fixed in serendipity 1.0.4
Tags were: security
Tags added: moreinfo
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 401614 normal
Bug#401614: CVE-2006-6242: fixed in serendipity 1.0.4
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
tags 401614 -moreinfo
Bug#401614: CVE-2006-6242: fixed in serendipity 1.0.4
Tags were: moreinfo security
Tags removed: moreinfo
severity 401614 normal
tags 401614 -moreinfo
thanks
Florian Weimer wrote:
Version 1.0.4 fixes a directory traversal security bug. Please
mention the ID CVE-2006-6242 in your upload.
If you want to apply a patch, this seems to be upstream trunk revision
1528, but it's better to check that
Hi,
as agreed on IRC, I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nru /tmp/lF0wIU5S1h/apt-0.6.46.3/apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc
/tmp/KFa23oVzhG/apt-0.6.46.3/apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc
--- /tmp/lF0wIU5S1h/apt-0.6.46.3/apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc
Package: mailscanner
Version: 4.55.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Mailscanner fails to start since upgrade. Manually running the daemon
gives error message:
Can't locate Sys/Hostname/Long.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/share/MailScanner /etc/perl
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401114: fixed in apt 0.6.46.3-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401017: fixed in apt 0.6.46.3-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:32:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400874: fixed in apt 0.6.46.3-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 400057 patch
Bug#400057: libbonobomm1.3: FTBFS: orbit-idl-2: Unknown option -lcpp
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:47:59 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401325: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:48:55 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401325: fixed in openoffice.org 2.1~rc2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
As Julien suggested, I'm modifying the previous patch and uploading this as
an NMU for tochnog.
The package builds fine inside and outside a pbuilder.
I'm attaching the interdiff output of the NMU that I'm about to upload.
--
Love,
Marga
diff -u tochnog-20010124/debian/changelog
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
retitle 398039 RM: python-cjkcodecs -- RoQA; python 2.3 only
Bug#398039: python-cjkcodecs: irrelevant for python 2.4, should not ship with
etch
Changed Bug title.
End of message,
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:45:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397216: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl: FTBFS: wrong byteswap
on mipsel and arm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397655: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397676: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397676: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
At 1165305506 time_t, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
What about reading from $HOME. My package doesn't touch $HOME, but
SBCL (upon starting, tries to read ~/.sbclrc). If that allowed on
autobuilders?
If it is not, I might have a way to work around it.
It can try but should not fail for that.
--
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397676: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 400105 important
Bug#400105: mgp: causes X Error
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397655: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 08:29:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line dish Philippa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 08:29:57 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line dish Philippa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
severity 400105 important
thanks
Downgrading the severity of this bug, because the X error doesn't
appear on my latest sid environment. Though I don't know the
details of the X error...
On December 2, 2006 at 9:29AM +0900,
tats (at vega.ocn.ne.jp) wrote:
On December 1, 2006 at 1:49PM +0100,
Steve Langasek wrote:
The point is that, according to the bug submitter, programs being run
*under* multi-gnome-terminal don't have $DISPLAY set in their environment.
It may indeed still not be an m-g-t bug, but at least it doesn't appear to
be a gdm bug.
I, too, doubt that it's a
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 13:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397655: fixed in debiandoc-sgml 1.1.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
debiandoc-sgml and debian-reference packages have been released.
Thanks. I uploaded debiandoc-sgml and one more package today.
I will do debian-reference later.(once
If you are having problems with DVD writing, I recommend to
upgrade to a programt hat supports DVD writing:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: le-dico-de-rene-cougnenc
Followup-For: Bug #401566
Dear all,
Here is a debdiff which turns the patch from Aurelien into a NMU. I
tested the patch in a ppc64 chroot and it seems to work well. Just in
case it is useful, I also uploaded the NMUed package on Mentors. I hope
that it can make
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I think Loïc's analysis is wrong here
(But certainly Cc:ing him would help getting his feedback.)
as XUL isn't using the condensed
version of the DejaVu (or Vera) fonts. For most pages, it is using the
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:45:02 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293962: overlapping elements
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401594: fixed in puredata 0.40.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 353277 =
Bug#353277: should be in contrib
Bug#353278: should be in contrib
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reopen 353278 =
Bug#353278: should be in contrib
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:49:32AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: mozilla
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It's impossible to install mozilla.
apt-get install mozilla throw:
Les paquets suivants contiennent des d?pendances non
Julien Danjou wrote:
It can try but should not fail for that.
I've done some testing. SBCL does indeed fail for that. The
work-around I envision is
HOME=some valid dir /usr/bin/sbcl
--
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:52:29 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [CAN-2005-2414] Race condition in the XPCOM library
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
I am getting upset now
Apt-get is again segfaulting!
Yesterday I removed the *.bin files from /var/cache/apt. Then ran
apt-get update, apt-get -V upgrade and apt-get clean.
Now I do apt-get update and it segfaults again!!!
Grmbl.
-- Jan Evert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:57:06 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [CVE-2005-1790] DoS against Mozilla-based browsers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:01:53 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#386541: downgrade to 1.7.8-1sarge7.1 helps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
#Oops, retitled the wrong one
retitle 398039 RM: python-cjkcodecs; no longer useful for python2.4
Bug#398039: RM: python-cjkcodecs -- RoQA; python 2.3 only
Changed Bug title.
End of
Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 10:18, Andreas Barth a écrit :
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a+1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
the build of emacs failed on mipsel. Please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=emacs21ver=21.4a%2B1-2arch=mipselstamp=1165216366file=log
for the full build log.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 401529 = upstream
Bug#401529: medicon: Segmentation fault!
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags set to: upstream
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395498: fixed in vcs-tree 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 401529 = upstream
--
--
Roland Marcus Rutschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
pgpEUEm22cRf7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:33, David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 12:24, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
Hi,
just checked with all available DICOM files available to me. Could you
please send me an example DICOM file that provokes the segfault. Which
program did produce
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:54:07 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396882: Acknowledgement (mozilla-calendar: crashes
whenever I try to add an entry)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Jan
It has been suggested that this *may* be a networking problem [1, 2,
3]. This is a wild suggestion that could be totally wrong, but I think
that it is worth a shot.
Delete the *.bin files and have apt recreate them as before, and then
set the TCP window scaling to 0 with
echo 0
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:13:55 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 17:21, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:33, David Baron wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 12:24, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
Hi,
just checked with all available DICOM files available to me. Could you
please send me an
On 12/5/06, Jan Evert van Grootheest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting upset now
Apt-get is again segfaulting!
Yesterday I removed the *.bin files from /var/cache/apt. Then ran
apt-get update, apt-get -V upgrade and apt-get clean.
Now I do apt-get update and it segfaults again!!!
A
medcon recompiled without optimization and with debugging symbols:
CFLAGS=-g -O0 DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug, noopt, nostrip dpkg-buildpackage -uc
-us -rfakeroot
Running on Debian Unstable AMD64.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2aea4eac2d45 in DecodeFirstRow
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been found in the real plugin of libxine. See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23218/
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:30:18 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line documentation was removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: l2tpns
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerabilit has been found in l2tpns. See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23230/
for details.
According to secunia, it is fixed in 2.1.21.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#401677: fixed in mailscanner 4.55.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
I have absolutely no idea what these changes means, but it was quite
trivial to avoid segfaulting.
This might mean that we now produce incorrect results or some other
really misleading and stupid problem.
Anyway this avoids the segfault for the given testcase.
Patch attached.
--
Regards,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Package: l2tpns
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerabilit has been found in l2tpns. See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23230/
for details.
According to secunia, it is fixed in 2.1.21.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
reassign 400341 iceape
Bug#400341: Contains non-free files.
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla' to `iceape'.
merge 400341 401266
Bug#400341: Contains non-free files.
Bug#401266:
Ok, the previous patch is totally wrong... sizeof(*curRowBuf) is not the
correct value to check the allocated number of columns, it's way to
small..
--
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: horde3
Version: 3.1.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed horde3 on etch using a clean system that had no previous
horde/imp installation. After having carried out every single step
in the installation checklist, changed the authorization bits and so on,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 375077
Bug#375077: udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server - boot fails
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug#375215: libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup
At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
If you need more information, please let me know.
Could you try to
(gdb) print index
(gdb) print inq.ProductIdentification[index]
(gdb) print *tmp
Is there any chance I could get
Hi,
I've compiled varmon again with -ggdb from vanilla source. Here is the
progress:
hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make clean
rm -f *.o core varmon
hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make varmon
gcc -o varmon varmon.c -Wall -lncurses -ggdb
varmon.c: In function ‘get_backplane_info’:
varmon.c:166: warning:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
Package: tdb
Version: 1.0.6-13
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
[..]
This builds for me in pbuilder unstable i386.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
[...]
./libs/ljpg/mcu.h:
typedef unsigned short ComponentType; /* the type of image components */
typedef ComponentType *MCU; /* MCU - array of samples */
test.c tell me that sizeof(unsigned short) is 2, so
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
I don't see how this relates to my analysis. I upgraded fontconfig,
and the fonts were ugly. I removed DejaVu Condensed, and the fonts
were nice again, and the result of fc-match changed as well; certainly
you can explain what part
severity 401757 important
thanks
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:00:02PM +0100, Massimo Manghi wrote:
Package: horde3
Version: 3.1.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed horde3 on etch using a clean system that had no previous
horde/imp installation. After
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
severity 356652 serious
Bug#356652: gxmms: should bre removed now that playground is in debian
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
If you need more information, please let me know.
Could you try to
(gdb) print index
$1 = 2108
(gdb) print
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 401554 pending
Bug#401554: mpt-status: init script fails due to use of daemon
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
Right, the current DejaVu font package has a broken version of condensed
which does not correctly report the setwidth value in the OS/2 header of
the file. I think this will cause the incorrect font selection error
that we've seen in this case.
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
