Bug#409524: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#409524: FTBFS: illegal input sequence at position 1323

* Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-03 21:57]: Am Samstag, den 03.02.2007, 20:25 +0100 schrieb Martin Michlmayr: Package: docbook2x Version: 0.8.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid This package fails to build in sid (but not in etch): Automatic build of docbook2x_0.8.3-1

Bug#409725: marked as done (libclucene-dev: Can't compile against CLucene.h)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:15:24 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line clucene-config.h path has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#380484: marked as done (libclucene-dev puts .h file in /usr/lib)

Your message dated Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:15:24 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line clucene-config.h path has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#409400: dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/

Hi Frank, On 2/8/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug is soon one week old. Unless the maintainer speaks up with other plans, I'm going to NMU this with urgency=high tomorrow. you could help by including a patch in the bug report. Thanks, Torsten -- blog:

Processed: Submitter fix

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 353664 ! Bug#353664: nvidia-graphics-modules-i386: inconsistent dependency level on stock kernel packages Changed Bug submitter from Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently

Bug#409400: dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/

Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Frank, On 2/8/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug is soon one week old. Unless the maintainer speaks up with other plans, I'm going to NMU this with urgency=high tomorrow. you could help by including a patch in the bug report.

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#409246: discover does not detect vmwares emulated graphic card any longer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 409246 discover-data Bug#409246: discover does not detect vmwares emulated graphic card any longer Bug reassigned from package `discover' to `discover-data'. severity 409246 serious Bug#409246: discover does not detect vmwares emulated

Bug#410118: marked as done (mesa_6.5.2-2(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): Installs to /usr/lib64, tries to copy from /usr/lib)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:02:10 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#410118: fixed in mesa 6.5.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#409075: lilo strace output

On Wed, Feb 07, 2007, Warren Turkal wrote: 22.7.3 does not work. Is there any chance of copying the required logic from fdisk to lilo in time for Etch? The preferred path for fixing for now still seems to be fixing the kernel. This bug has a release critical severity, so theoritically we

Bug#409169: ocamldsort: diff for NMU version 0.14.3-1.4

tags 409169 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my ocamldsort 0.14.3-1.4 NMU. diff -u ocamldsort-0.14.3/debian/changelog ocamldsort-0.14.3/debian/changelog --- ocamldsort-0.14.3/debian/changelog +++ ocamldsort-0.14.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +ocamldsort (0.14.3-1.4) unstable;

Processed: ocamldsort: diff for NMU version 0.14.3-1.4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 409169 + patch Bug#409169: ocamldsort: missing OCaml runtime dependency on some architectures There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#409169: marked as done (ocamldsort: missing OCaml runtime dependency on some architectures)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:32:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#409169: fixed in ocamldsort 0.14.3-1.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Tagging more pending bugs.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 409497 + pending Bug#409497: viewcvs: [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for debconf messages Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 409774 + pending Bug#409774: viewvc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on quilt There were no tags set. Tags

Bug#402753: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

Yitzchak Gale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This package is supposed to provide documentation, but none at all is provided due to bugs. So this is a grave bug. Well, there are still the info files. Whether it is grave or important to not include the html docs, this I leave to the maintainer.

Bug#409400: dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/

On 2/8/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: dvipng Version: 1.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch This bug is soon one week old. Unless the maintainer speaks up with other plans, I'm going to NMU this with urgency=high tomorrow. Sorry

Bug#402753: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

Frank Küster wrote: Well, there are still the info files. Whether it is grave or important to not include the html docs, this I leave to the maintainer. Never mind, let's fix it! However, the bug can be fixed by adding rsync to Build-Depends-Indep. At least this helped when I tried in a

Bug#409629: rhino: Bug opened by bug #395525

Package: rhino Version: 1.6r2-3 Followup-For: Bug #409629 This bug was introduced because of the fix for bug #395525: * debian/patches/02-dont_build-toolsrc.patch: added. Don't build * toolsrc and xmlimplsrc because they use Sun classes to build. If you want * to build them, just remove the

Processed: This has been reported before

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forcemerge 402753 395494 Bug#402753: lilypond-doc: html docimentation does not install properly Bug#395494: lilypond-doc: index.html does not exist installation error Forcibly Merged 395494 402753. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 303962 serious Bug#303962: lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages Bug#306590: lilypond has /usr/bin/ps2png Severity set to `serious' from `normal' clone 303962 -1 Bug#303962: lilypond: conflict with tth -

Bug#389127: non-free Firefox icon included

Sorry, the bug numbers in the changelog entry were invalid. The correct one is of course #389127 Best regards, Gonéri pgp8HvMOvrah9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#409400: dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/

Hi Frank, On 2/8/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, you need a sponsor. My criteria for sponsoring are a bit more restrictive than for NMUs, and I've had a look at the package, and some comments: Thank you for pointing out these things. - debian/copyright: You (or rather Brian

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 402753 patch Bug#402753: lilypond-doc: html docimentation does not install properly There were no tags set. Bug#395494: lilypond-doc: index.html does not exist installation error Tags added: patch clone 402753 -1 Bug#402753: lilypond-doc: html

Bug#402753: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

tags 402753 patch clone 402753 -1 severity -1 normal retitle -1 lilypond-doc: building succeeds even if rsync commands fail thanks Yitzchak Gale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster wrote: Well, there are still the info files. Whether it is grave or important to not include the html docs,

Bug#409400: dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/

Varun Hiremath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/8/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: dvipng Version: 1.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch This bug is soon one week old. Unless the maintainer speaks up with other plans, I'm going to

Bug#409434: Upgrade

Le jeudi 8 février 2007 03:03, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : Under the circumstances, I would be willing to grant an etch-ignore exception for the file location.  If the location of the file is still causing upgrade errors (which seems possible, since the symlinks under /etc/mediawiki1.7 are

Bug#410199: rawdog: Critical UnicodeDecodeError while writing.

Package: rawdog Version: 2.10.dfsg.1-1 Severity: grave I'm encountering a critical error while trying to update and write news with rawdog. % /usr/bin/rawdog -u -w Starting update Will update 1 feeds Updating feed 1 of 1: http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot Expired 0 articles, leaving 15

Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: causes serious data loss The current latest 2.6 kernel in unstable causes serious data loss when using XFS over dm-crypt due to a bug or a number of bugs in dm-crypt. Generally XFS metadata

Bug#409999: marked as done (fcitx crash when using wubi input method on powerpc platform)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#40: fixed in fcitx 1:3.4.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#409524: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#409524: FTBFS: illegal input sequence at position 1323

* Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-08 13:53]: Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere: The package builds correctly in my sid chroot on i368. Not in my sid-pbuilder (ditto i386). The difference between Etch and Sid is the higher versioned

Processed: Request for help

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 408045 + help Bug#408045: gcc-h8300-hms_1:3.4.6-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: conflicting declarations There were no tags set. Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#408045: Request for help/hppa access

Hi! This FTBFS is very strange, as already explained on [1]. I've asked the buildd admins for help, but not seen any response. I thus wonder if I could get access to some hppa machine to retry building the package (I'm not a DD yet, however) or you could help me in some other way in debugging

Bug#409400: marked as done (dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:47:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#409400: fixed in dvipng 1.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Submitter address change

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 401099 ! Bug#401099: Fwd: Distributing ctadverts.tcl violates policy 2.2.1 Changed Bug submitter from Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter

Bug#406331: Intent to NMU

I have applied the patch provided by Andreas Henriksson, and I have verified that it fixes this problem. I'm therefore going to upload a fixed version of xcdroast, including this patch. While making the package, lintian made me notice that the quilt version was unspecified, while the include

Bug#409400: dvipng: wrong dependency: s/tetex-base/tetex-bin/

Varun Hiremath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please check the corrections: http://varun.travisbsd.org/debian_packages/dvipng/dvipng_1.9-2.dsc Upload is under way. Will you ask on -release for a freeze exception? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein

Bug#400021: Intent to NMU

Hi! Jokosher is currently not migrating to testing due to two missing dependencies. I've prepared an NMU that fixes these two bugs. I'm attaching the full interdiff output (just the changelog entry and the dependency change). Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable

Bug#409524: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#409524: FTBFS: illegal input sequence at position 1323

Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 17:07 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere: * Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-08 13:53]: Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere: The package builds correctly in my sid chroot on i368. Not in my sid-pbuilder (ditto

Bug#409075: lilo strace output

On Thursday 08 February 2007 01:22, you wrote:  The preferred path for fixing for now still seems to be fixing the  kernel.  This bug has a release critical severity, so theoritically we  should address it before etch. Why was the functionality removed from the kernel? Or alternatively, why

Bug#396256: Patch in stable version

This version fixes the bug in the stable version. wv_1.0.2-0.1sarge1.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data Format: 1.0 Source: wv Version: 1.0.2-0.1sarge1 Binary: wv Maintainer: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.5.8 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4),

Bug#408701: [ISC-Bugs #16647] PPC atomic ops

tags 408701 patch thanks On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 the mental interface of Mark Andrews via RT told: Looking at the assembly it looks like we are using a different syntax. We are using r# where # is the register number. The rest of the code just uses # (no r in front). IBM shows code without

Processed: Unmerge and update severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unmerge 388616 Bug#388616: mediawiki1.7: configuration file not below /etc Bug#393962: Upgrade blows away configuration files if stored in /etc/mediawiki1.7 Bug#409434: mediawiki1.7: Nuked my LocalSettings.php in /etc Disconnected #388616 from all

Processed: Updating info after some work in this bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 396256 Bug#396256: CVE-2006-4513: wvWare Multiple Integer Overflow Vulnerabilities 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. found

Processed: Re: [ISC-Bugs #16647] PPC atomic ops

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 408701 patch Bug#408701: FTBFS: PPC asm Tags were: experimental Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#388616: Upgrade

Le jeudi 8 février 2007 15:22, Romain Beauxis a écrit : Le jeudi 8 février 2007 03:03, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : Under the circumstances, I would be willing to grant an etch-ignore exception for the file location.  If the location of the file is still causing upgrade errors (which seems

Processed: Oooops....

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 396526 1.0.2-0.1 Bug#396526: Should conflict with older versions of epiphany-extension-gwget Bug marked as not found in version 1.0.2-0.1. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) tags 296526 - sarge patch Bug#296526: does not like

Processed: closing 409246

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 close 409246 2.2007.02.02 Bug#409246: discover does not detect vmwares emulated graphic card any longer 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug

Processed: reopening 401099

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 reopen 401099 Bug#401099: Fwd: Distributing ctadverts.tcl violates policy 2.2.1 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as

Bug#410047: infinite dialog popups

Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: Package: gajim Version: 0.10.1-6 Severity: serious Gajim is unusable with a Wildfire server [1]. The issue is fixed in the last upstream release. Is it possible to have a backport for testing before Etch release? http://trac.gajim.org/ticket/2028 Best regards,

Bug#408884: marked as done (emacs-snapshot_1:20070128-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: hppa support dropped?)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 20:32:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#408884: fixed in emacs-snapshot 1:20070208-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#306590: lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages

# severity 303962 serious # clone 303962 -1 #...merged, use one of the bugs unmerge 306590 303962 reassign 306590 tty retitle 306590 tth: conflict with lilypond - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages stop (Fullquote of myself so that it is in both bugs) Dear lilypond and tth maintainers, [EMAIL

Bug#410246: tau_2.16-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

Package: tau Version: 2.16-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Heya, tau failed to build, here's the relevant part from the build log: Automatic build of tau_2.16-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64 98-farm Build started at 20070208-2038

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # severity 303962 serious # clone 303962 -1 #...merged, use one of the bugs unmerge 306590 303962 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign 306590 tty Bug#306590: lilypond has /usr/bin/ps2png Warning: Unknown package 'tty'

Bug#410248: tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1: Will not start as user, , , executable is set as root, root ... security thoughts say this is wrong.

Package: tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1 Version: 0.96.1svn12109-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Processed: severity of 402450 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 402450 serious Bug#402450: ppp-udeb: PPPoE connection is not brought up in the installed system (does not write a section in /etc/network/interfaces) Severity set to `serious' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#410246: marked as done (tau_2.16-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC)

, here's the relevant part from the build log: Automatic build of tau_2.16-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64 98-farm Build started at 20070208-2038 ** [...] g++ -g -O2 -shared -o libTAUsh-linuxtimers-pthread.so

Bug#409524: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#409524: FTBFS: illegal input sequence at position 1323

* Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-08 19:17]: It's currently in the debian-xml-sgml group's CVS, so I thought, the group is already responsible. I'm currently busy with docbook-xsl and docbook-defguide, but when the current updates are finished, I would try to package the latest

Processed: severity of 403405 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403405 important Bug#403405: video1394 broken on linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#303962: marked as done (lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:30:46 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303962: lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: Bug#402753: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 402753 important Bug#402753: lilypond-doc: html docimentation does not install properly Bug#395494: lilypond-doc: index.html does not exist installation error Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#388616: Upgrade

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:22:06PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: Le jeudi 8 février 2007 03:03, Filipus Klutiero a écrit : Under the circumstances, I would be willing to grant an etch-ignore exception for the file location.  If the location of the file is still causing upgrade errors

Bug#402753: lilypond-doc : there is no HTML documentation at all

severity 402753 important thanks On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 02:29 +0200, Yitzchak Gale wrote: This package is supposed to provide documentation, but none at all is provided due to bugs. So this is a grave bug. Your hypothesis is incorrect. But thanks for the attention to the bug, and the work on

Bug#306590: marked as done (tth: conflict with lilypond - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages)

Your message dated Thu, 08 Feb 2007 13:30:46 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303962: lilypond: conflict with tth - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: bouncycastle: empty -gcj packages on hppa

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 409002 minor Bug#409002: bouncycastle: empty -gcj packages on hppa Severity set to `minor' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: Re: Processed: severity of 402450 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # this is important and fixed in Sid # the package will migrate in Etch with the rest of the D-I components severity 402450 important Bug#402450: ppp-udeb: PPPoE connection is not brought up in the installed system (does not write a section in

Bug#388616: Upgrade

Le jeudi 8 février 2007 22:17, Steve Langasek a écrit : I think the bug #388616 should be granted this etc-ignore. The configuration file is never shiped with the package nor generated by the software. It is generated in config/ directory, and happen normaly only at first install. My

Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:11:32PM +0200, Sami Liedes wrote: XFS, but that triggers it easily and often. A fix was merged upstream in 2.6.18.6 ([PATCH] dm crypt: Fix data corruption with dm-crypt over RAID5), but is not apparently included in the Debian kernel (or at least I ran into this with

Processed: Removing a patch tag, the patch is already applied in the kernel that crashed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 tags 410204 -patch Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Processed: severity of 402450 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 402450 2.4.4rel-4.1 Bug#402450: ppp-udeb: PPPoE connection is not brought up in the installed system (does not write a section in /etc/network/interfaces) Bug marked as found in version 2.4.4rel-4.1. retitle 402450 PPPoE connection and lo are

Processed: Re: Bug#410248: tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1: Will not start as user, , , executable is set as root, root ... security thoughts say this is wrong.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 410248 gtk-gnutella Bug#410248: tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1: Will not start as user, , , executable is set as root, root ... security thoughts say this is wrong. Warning: Unknown package 'tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1' Bug reassigned from

Bug#410248: tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1: Will not start as user, , , executable is set as root, root ... security thoughts say this is wrong.

reassign 410248 gtk-gnutella found 410248 0.96.1svn12109-1 tags 410248 -security thanks Please put your bug report in the body of the message, not in the subject. On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:48:10PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tk-gnutella-0.96.1svn12109-1 Version: 0.96.1svn12109-1

Bug#400333: marked as done (wormux - FTBFS: Buld-depends on unavailable package libsdl-ttf1.2-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:02:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#400333: fixed in wormux 0.7.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: retitle 402450 to PPPoE connection and lo are not brought up in the installed system

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 402450 PPPoE connection and lo are not brought up in the installed system Bug#402450: PPPoE connection and lo are not brought up in the Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) End of message, stopping

Bug#409774: marked as done (viewvc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on quilt)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:02:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#409774: fixed in viewvc 1.0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#410248: This bug report is mostly invalid

As Steve pointed out, the permissions on gtk-gnutella's binary look fine: $ ls -l `which gtk-gnutella` -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2726984 Oct 15 19:00 /usr/bin/gtk-gnutella* Submitter, please note that the setuid bits are off, so gtk-gnutella will run as whoever invokes it, and not as root. The

Bug#410271: fails to create database

Package: tdl Version: 1.5.2-2 Severity: grave When trying to add a task I get this message: warning: no database found above this directory When trying to add it again or trying to save it the message looks like this: Database ./.tdldb appears to be locked by (pid,node,user)=(9707,thor,rjc)

Processed: severity of 402450 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 severity 402450 important Bug#402450: PPPoE connection and lo are not brought up in the installed system Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping

Bug#410272: Font /usr/share/games/wormux/font/DejaVuSans.ttf can't be found!

Package: wormux Version: 0.7.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! Wormux is failing to load since it searches for a font file that isn't available: == (...) [ Run game ] Error: Font /usr/share/games/wormux/font/DejaVuSans.ttf can't be found! ! Error in

Processed: Uups, I messed up.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # reassign 306590 tty # Bug#306590: lilypond has /usr/bin/ps2png # Warning: Unknown package 'tty' reassign 306590 lilypond Bug#306590: tth: conflict with lilypond - /usr/bin/ps2png in both packages Warning: Unknown package 'tty' Bug#303962: lilypond: