Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fre, 18 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
Maybe this is just one more case of the #423143 type, texlive-base
hasn't been updated, but texlive-pdfetex is already removed?
Hmm, all this is quite strange. How how how can a package of TL2007 be
installed
was because upstream said they would release a fixed
version soon, but apparently that has not happened.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
\LastDeclaredEncoding doesn't work as expected as an
argument to \DeclareFontSubstitution. I currently don't have time to
look into the LaTeX Companion or similar resources - doesn anybody know
whether there's a reason for that, or whether it's just a bug?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2007-5
Severity: serious
It is surely a bug that this file has crept into tetex-extra, but
that bug is in testing, so we should allow upgrade here.
Thank you, fixed in svn.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
developers is now impossible.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
necessary?
-# dh_makeshlibs
-# dh_shlibdeps
+ dh_shlibdeps
dh_installdeb
dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
it doesn't fail on amd64 - is texlive-metapost
installed? According to the build log, feynmf declares:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0)
Build-Depends-Indep: perl, tex-common (= 0.16), tetex-bin, tetex-extra
This needs to be replaced with the proper texlive packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
, feynmf declares:
pbuilder does pull in texlive-metapost here on sid/amd64.
Can you provide the start of the log, where it parses and installs
build-deps?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
, it would be much better to ask upstream to change
from epsf.tex to graphicx.sty. For LaTeX documents, epsf.tex has been
obsolete for about 13 years...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
closely at the build
log. And actually it shouldn't be the responsibility of a package which
uses texinfo to figure that out. It makes sense that texinfo only
Suggests: a TeX system, but it should really suggest what it actually
needs.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
for it will be dropped soon when we talk about such timeframes
(could be like only 5 years left, or 10 if you're lucky). That's an
upstream issue, of course, but in case you have contact to them...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
-chroot-builds mandatory?
No chance.
I wasn't really serious...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
-recommended. But it's probably better to
switch to using graphicx.sty, although it needs a different syntax in
the file. epsf.tex is obsolete since about 13 years.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that
build-depend on TeX will need them, and there might be similar cases.
Or we just suggest maintainers to start with texlive-latex-recommended
instead of -base? Or we make clean-chroot-builds mandatory?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
user Debian TeX maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 420947 depends-on-tetex-base
tags 420947 patch
thanks
Patch: Just drop the useless Build-Dep on tetex-base
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
in lenny
which are meant as a help for users, but should *never* occur in
a control file.
This is an important bug which will get RC after lenny, at which time
the transitional packages will vanish.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
reassign 420559 xmltex
forcemerge 419987 420559
thanks
David Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
What are the arguments to these etex or pdfetex instances? Does
xmltex show up in each of them? If yes, this is a duplicate of
#419987.
In order to be able to install
does it in the UI, yes, it won't help. We could ask the stable
release managers to allow such a change in.
Answers to the rest of the mail later.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
.
Does this file exist on your system, and does
kpsewhich --progname=xelatex xu-ukrhyph.tex
find it?
Does anyone on the list know how xetex diverts the hyphenation patterns?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
/dvips/lucida
RMDIR /etc/texmf/map/dvips/cc-pl
RMDIR /etc/texmf/map/dvips/antt
RMDIR /etc/texmf/map/dvips/antp
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
uninstalled.
What are the arguments to these etex or pdfetex instances? Does
xmltex show up in each of them? If yes, this is a duplicate of
#419987.
In order to be able to install texlive, please remove xmltex.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
scripts.
I'm puzzled how that could vanish.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
(or was it
jadetex?), as well as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315762
We'll investigate this later.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
, and whether it's a problem on
jadetex' or tex-common's side.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
action).
No, it's not the transitional packages tetex-bin or tetex-extra;
only when tetex-base is purged are the files removed (at least the most
important ones, pdftexconfig.tex and config.ps).
I guess we are missing some more Replaces:
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couldn't texlive-base-bin conflict with xmltex?
Of course not, since that would mean that xmltex isn't installable any
more - there's no other TeX system in sid.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070420 09:20]:
Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couldn't texlive-base-bin conflict with xmltex?
Of course not, since that would mean that xmltex isn't installable any
more - there's no other TeX system
reassign 419987 xmltex
retitle 419987 configuration runs into neverending loop
# I don't like the phrase leaks memory, there's no C coding error here
Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070420 10:30]:
Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank
and upload to
CTAN.
Thanks to all who made this possible.
any chance that you find time for this?
TIA, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
, and that's it?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
)
So this could get a lenny-ignore, in case the AMS people don't get
amslatex sorted out in time.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Florent,
[...]
any chance that you find time for this?
This is now done.
Great, merci beaucoup. You've forwarded it to Lars, so that he'll do
the upload?
Sorry for taking so much time
Dear Ohura-san, dear TeX people,
this might need a change in the basic TeX packages.
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/tipa/t3enc.def)
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/cyrillic/t2aenc.def
! LaTeX Error
) and
\includegraphics.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
---End Message---
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
, and the packages it
pulls in will soon change.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
the
workaround to upgrade the context package.
That doesn't matter.
Regards, Frank
texmf.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Ian McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a bug. Current texlive-bin version in sid is 2007-3, and
the texlive-pdfetex package is no longer built in this version. The
Conflicts make sure that it cannot be installed together
: Command not found
make[1]: *** [simplecontext.pdf] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/albatross-1.36/doc'
epstopdf is in texlive-extra-utils
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
submitter 419434 Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: texlive-bin
Version: 2007-3
Severity: Serious
From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tetexlive-bin FTBFS on Alpha due to gcc PR28623
To: Debian TeX Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED
/mapping-texlive.html and by asking on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Frank
It has always been a bug to depend on tetex-base[1]
[1] except in some very special, theoretical case which AFAIK does not
apply to any package in Debian
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst
still
contained it...
From the name, fancydr.sty seems like providing similar functionality,
but I'd be very surprised if it was a drop-in replacement.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
case this bug will become RC again
after that.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
in it...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
: (500, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie
;
}
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
we've got some dependencies wrong, but I don't see it.
Hm, or it's a problem with the buildd log: the commandline in the buildd log
installs only texlive packages, but actualy tetex-bin is installed,
too. And that pulls in context.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gerd, hi Frank!
On Sam, 14 Apr 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
fmtutil: no format depends on
`/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/generic/config/language.dat'.
# sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-lang-german.postinst configure 21 | tee
postinst.log
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Now that the debhelper change has been reverted, we can't rebuild
texlive with fixed tex-common. We need to upload a reverted tex-common,
and then rebuild texlive. Until this has happened
this long ago...
So either something else is going wrong, or Rene used some --force-foo
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--force-foo
Just a plain upgrade out of aptitudes UI.
And no, I didn't use any --force foo. I wouldn't have reported a bug if
I had.
Hm, what was the state you started from? sid with tetex-extra
installed?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding
ii texlive-pictures 2007-2 TeX Live: Packages for drawings gr
ii texlive-pstricks 2007-2 TeX Live: PSTricks packages
ii texlive-publishers2007-2 TeX Live: Support for publishers
-- no debconf information
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
(= 2007)).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
# Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#
# Package: jadetex, texlive-lang-cyrillic
# Version: 3.13-7.1
# Severity: serious
#
# I'm not sure who is at fault. As soon as both are installed, format
# creation fails with
clone 419020 -1
reassign -1 texlive-lang-cyrillic
thanks
--
Dr. Frank
to be installed at the same time as tetex-*_3.0 is still
present would be a Conflict; and in this case, indeed, Replaces is the
better solution.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
).
... and it even makes sense for aptitude or dpkg to unpack the new
tetex-*_2007 last: They will be configured last, too, because they
depend on all the newly installed TL packages.
Okay, ich ziehe meinen Einspruch zurück. Let's go for Replaces.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
forcemerge 419060 418981
thanks
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
not get this even with /{engine,} removed from TEXFORMATS.
Do we need to ask upstream?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
packages that use
dh_installtex. I'd be greatful if you'd do the merging work yourself,
also for the other bugs you filed.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
didn't send:
dpkg -l tex-common ruby texlive-base-bin texlive-base texlive-metapost lmodern
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.d/*
These should all be correct in a fresh chroot, but they will hopefully
help us discover the real problem.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I upgraded tex-common to 1.5, the problem went away, so I assumed
this was the same as 418674. Do you still want the above information?
No, I was just offline when I read and answered the mail.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
on this? A patch maybe or a tip how you intend to solve it, so
that someone else can start testing, and NMU in case you won't find time?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
are needed at build time (Which
looks like a, err, GPL violation by the FSF, but probably the cause is
something else).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
diff -Nur gcc-avr-4.1.0/debian
the sources in gcc-4.1-source and in
gcc-avr, so I cannot judge whether this would be acceptable for etch.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
install/upgrade tests, even if
the change is seemingly trivial...
Fresh binNMUs have been scheduled for all reverse-dependencies
of libfuse2, so you should find a fixed sshfs package in t-p-u soon.
Thank you, Steve,
Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:54:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please re-NMU with the correct shlibs info?
Please take my apologies, uploaded with the following updated patch:
diff -Nur fuse-2.5.3
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise, I can offer to do an NMU, this would be the diff:
After your ACK on IRC, and with further hints by Julien Cristau on
#debian-release, I have uploaded with the following diff:
diff -Nur fuse-2.5.3.old/debian/changelog fuse-2.5.3/debian/changelog
---BeginMessage---
Frank Küster wrote:
Dear Mats,
the amsn project (http://sourceforge.net/projects/amsn/) is currently
checking the license status of all the files they use.
Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upstream answered:
Thanks for noticing, we just added
this is OK for you. In cvs now.
It is okay, but I think you should remember to distribute a copy of the BSD
license, with ORGANIZATION replaced by QuickTimeTcl project (or
similar) with the next release.
Regards, Frank
P.S. Mohammed, do you need a sponsor?
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.18-4-686:
linux-image-2.6.18-4-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.18-4-686: true
linux-image-2.6.18-4-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.18-4-686: true
linux-image-2.6.18-4-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
the name of the
ORGANIZATION nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse
or promote... clause of the BSD license.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
- dh_makeshlibs -V libfuse (= 2.5)
+ dh_makeshlibs
dh_installdeb
dh_shlibdeps
dh_gencontrol
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
(fuse), I guess a
sid tag is the right way to indicate this, correct?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
-common/xwrapper/allowed_users: Console Users Only
x11-common/xwrapper/actual_allowed_users: console
x11-common/xwrapper/nice_value/error:
x11-common/x11r6_bin_not_empty:
x11-common/upgrade_issues:
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debconf (developer): -- INPUT low x11-common/xwrapper/allowed_users
debconf (developer): -- 30 question skipped
debconf (developer): -- GO
Use of uninitialized value in join or string at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/DbDriver/Stack.pm line 104, GEN1 line 4
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add this to afnix:
Conflicts: aleph
Replaces: aleph
This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
Isn't
Provides: aleph
also needed?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
this in a later release?
If we can get clarification from upstream, we can as well put it into
the package, but whether this would be etch-ignore I don't know.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
tags 411078 -patch
thanks
utils/BWidget-1.7.0/ChangeLog: * LICENSE.txt: Removed LGPL license; added
Tcl-license terms.
Actually, I have no idea why you think the grep results suggest to
look
,
even if I have a different way to look at things and found out
(correctly or not) that it's simple to fix the configuration file location.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:25:42AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You say that while later on you claimed not to understand everything about
the
package (update script). Don't you have the impression that this judgement
is
also based
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
It's at least an order of magnitude more complicated (=error-prone) than
the
solution Romain has implemented,
That's correct, not solving the FHS violation is simpler than doing
exhaustive testing. And this I didn't want to do on a bug
that had an etch-ignore tag. But it seems the tag is based on
incomplete information about options to solve the bug, isn't it?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Guanghui Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the delay. I will test and patch it tonight.
Great to hear that. I'm going to do something else then this weekend :-)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
, but the discussion among the upstream developers shows
progress. Essentially, a solution seems to be decided upon, but the
implementation is unclear.
I'd rather wait for them to decide on that, in order to not deviate from
upstream.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:54:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
What do you think?
It's at least an order of magnitude
the error messages that you got when you tried to install.
If you no longer have them, please send the output of
dpkg -l mysql-server-5.0
dpkg --configure -a
apt-get -f install
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
data from dependencies of tetex-bin
(e.g. tetex-base) and hence the package has no reason to depend on
them.
I uploaded to unstable stripping the dependency.
Fine. Should I include an unfreeze request with our request to let the
fixed texlive in?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank!
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
I discovered this while working on the new upstream version. My machine
and my time constraints don't allow to work on two versions at the same
time. Therefore this will have to wait one or two
.
It was too early in the morning. I read '' where in fact it uses
''.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 21 février 2007 12:54, Frank Küster a écrit :
To me that looks a bit more complicated than one would like, but still
quite manageable, and acceptable for fixing a RC bug in etch.
Not that I don't see any solution, but I would prefer
/localhost\:_debian_dists_unstable_non-free_binary-i386_Packages
(578)[17:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
not convince we want a
separate package.
I don't have much time to look at these patches; would you be willing
to contact the texlive mailing list?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: texlive-extra-utils
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-10, 2005.dfsg.2-11
Severity: serious
$ findpkg -r dvidvi
testing
[...]
usr/bin/dvidvi
tex/dvidvi,tex/texlive-extra-utils
[...]
usr/share/man/man1
.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
201 - 300 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
