El 17/10/22 a las 14:04, Michael Biebl escribió:
Source: networking-mlnx
Version: 1:16.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
networking-mlnx FTBFS in unstable
It appears to be trigger lots of test suite failures and is killed
eventually
I think it's even worse than that: The test suite seems
Package: src:node-bunyan
Version: 2.0.5+~cs4.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
found 1069842 4.4.0-1
affects 1069842 + src:rjava
thanks
Thanks for the quick reply!
[ I'm adding the affects so that the bug is shown on the web page
for src:rjava. This helps to avoid duplicates, as there are more people
reporting FTBFS bugs ]
Thanks.
Package: src:zarr
Version: 2.17.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-icalendar
Version: 5.0.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:rjava
Version: 1.0-11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --buildsystem R
Package: src:khard
Version: 0.19.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with python3
Package: src:libcommons-fileupload-java
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:maven-dependency-analyzer
Version: 1.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh
Package: src:golang-github-aydinnyunus-blockchain
Version: 0.0~git20220623.647ebea-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
This package tries network access during build:
= TESTING ADDRESSES =
El 25/4/24 a las 7:15, Otto Kekäläinen escribió:
Bullseye oldstable update request filed in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069802
You can +1 it if you want to show support.
Thanks a lot! We don't +1 because this is not twitter/facebook :-)
but I have just made a comment to
Jeremy Bícha wrote:
It was also marked as severity important instead of RC because it does not
affect official buildds.
Not true:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libsoup2.4=all
See also:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gcr=all
and also:
retitle 1069415 libsoup2.4: FTBFS: failing tests
thanks
El 24/4/24 a las 18:26, Andreas Metzler escribió:
On 2024-04-20 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libsoup2.4
Version: 2.74.3-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
[...]
(hsts-test:547071): GLib-Net-WARNING **: 04:03:06.247: Failed to
El 22/4/24 a las 8:47, Otto Kekäläinen escribió:
I was able to reproduce this for Bookworm both locally and in CI at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-4/-/jobs/5620032
After importing latest upstream build/test passes:
https://salsa.debian.org/otto/galera/-/jobs/5624466
Stable
El 25/3/24 a las 20:12, Chris Lamb escribió:
Alberto Bertogli wrote:
If you know of a functional official image that I can use to try to
reproduce the problem, or recently-tested steps I can follow to get
a working qemu install, please let me know.
Alas, I can't actually be helpful here.
tags 1012690 + patch
thanks
Hello Víctor.
I believe the attached patch will be enough to fix the build failure
(but you might want to update other things as well).
I would gladly be your sponsor if you still need it.
Thanks.diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 0e9a667..9b33160
Package: openstack-dashboard
Version: 3:24.0.0-2
Affects: src:designate-dashboard
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks other packages
Dear maintainer:
During an incremental rebuild of all packages in trixie, package
"designate-dashboard"
failed to build due to a postinst error in
Package: src:lua-mode
Version: 20210802-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with elpa
Package: src:totalopenstation
Version: 0.5.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
found 1069059 239-1
found 1069059 287-1
tags 1069059 + bullseye bookworm
thanks
El 15/4/24 a las 19:28, Salvatore Bonaccorso escribió:
The update for cockpit in DSA 5655-1 had problems with the
test-sshbridge test, causing FTBFS:
For completeness: this was already happening in bullseye and
El 14/4/24 a las 13:25, Sylvestre Ledru escribió:
I am sorry but I am not sure to see how it is actionable.
Without a test case, i don't think there is much I can do here.
The test case is that nvda2speechd fails to build from source.
With rust, cargo, custom build script, there are many
Package: src:python-musicpd
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:circe
Version: 2.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with elpa
Package: src:moment-timezone.js
Version: 0.5.32+dfsg1-2+2021a
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye bookworm trixie sid ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
This package currently fails to build from source in all supported
distributions.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_clean
debian/rules binary
dh
Just for the record: I finally used this, in line with the original proposal:
Replaces: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307-1~)
Breaks: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307-1~)
Thanks.
Ok. This is a little bit subtle.
I naively tried to simplify the fields by using this:
Replaces: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307)
Breaks: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307)
But this actually means upstream version 1.3, debian revision 20240307,
not upstream 1.3-20240307.
I guess I should use 1.3-20240307-0 at
El 8/4/24 a las 9:18, Helmut Grohne escribió:
Package: libdialog-dev
Version: 1.3-20240307-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + dialog
libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an
unpack error from dpkg.
The
forwarded 1060939 https://github.com/workalendar/workalendar/issues/764
tags 1060939 + bookworm
thanks
Package: src:golang-github-antonini-golibjpegturbo
Version: 0.0~git20141208.c03a2fa-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
[...]
github.com/antonini/golibjpegturbo
dh_auto_test -O--builddirectory=_build -O--buildsystem=golang
cd _build && go test -vet=off -v -p 20
El 23/12/23 a las 3:07, Otto Kekäläinen escribió:
Sure, this will be fixed (automatically) with uploading latest upstream minor
release as stable update, and I intend to do it in coming 1-2 weeks.
Hi. Can you elaborate on that? Release managers do not usually allow
new upstream releases in
Hi.
I have just reuploaded version 3.22.
This is certainly not the ideal state for this ancient
package, but I believe it's slightly better than keeping
an important regression forever.
If upstream decides to maintain procmail again (which means
addressing regressions, not merely making a new
Version: 2.45.3+ds-3
El 28/3/24 a las 23:38, Daniel Swarbrick escribió:
On 28.03.24 23:33, Santiago Vila wrote:
If you prefer I could report this build failure in a new report
(or you can also use the clone command so that the bug has a new number,
then close the old bug).
Please report
El 28/3/24 a las 22:42, Daniel Swarbrick escribió:
I think you are taking the "FAILED" out of context and misinterpreting the test
output.
This is very likely, yes, and I'm sorry for that.
If you prefer I could report this build failure in a new report
(or you can also use the clone command
El 28/3/24 a las 22:42, Daniel Swarbrick escribió:
Please can you find in your logs the _actual_ failing test or tests, because it
is not TestRulesUnitTest.
Ok, I'm attaching one of my build logs for version 2.45.3+ds-3.
This one was tried on a m6a.large instance from AWS, which has 2 CPUs.
Ok, the problem was that CFLAGS now contains
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration
by default, set by dpkg-buildflags in unstable.
The minimal fix is to drop such option, by adding this line to debian/rules:
export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
I'm Cc:ing
found 1064765 2.45.3+ds-3
thanks
Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
* Add new 0022-Support-prometheus-common-0.47.0.patch (Closes: #1064765)
Hello. I don't quite understand how the above fix is related to
the bug itself (but maybe it's because I don't know prometheus internals).
In either case, this
I saw this go past, and it seemed that the solution was indeed just to #include
; are you saying it's more complicated than that?
It depends on how much good we want the fix to be.
I started to add such includes every time the C compiler suggested it.
When I had already a bunch of them, I
]
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:51:31 +
Resent-From: Lucas Nussbaum
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila
Fecha: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:44:18 +0100
De: Lucas Nussbaum
Responder a: Lucas Nussbaum , 1066...@bugs.debian.org
Para: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Source
Package: src:python-pykmip
Version: 0.10.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make: pyversions:
Package: src:node-y-protocols
Version: 1.0.5-7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:flask-login
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:mailscripts
Version: 28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with elpa
found 1057548 24.1.1-1
retitle 1057548 cloud-init: FTBFS: missing Build-Depends on passwd
tags 1057548 + patch
thanks
Hello.
I don't quite understand why this bug was closed with this changelog entry:
* New upstream version 24.1 (Closes: #1057548)
I did not ask for a new upstream version
Package: src:gdb-mingw-w64
Version: 13.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
This package FTBFS in trixie with internal compiler error, and that
has been the case for several months now.
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/trixie/amd64/gdb-mingw-w64.html
Naturally,
tags 1057549 + patch
thanks
Hi.
I looked at the build log and found the problem: The package has a missing
build-depends on passwd, which is no longer build-essential in trixie/sid.
I am a member of Debian Go (joined to do QA stuff).
Would it help if I fix this myself by doing a "Team Upload"?
reopen 1057562
found 1057562 4.2.0-3
thanks
Ignore build test failures on s390x (Closes: #1057562)
This is wrong for several reasons.
- The bug report did not say anything about s390x.
- This is still happening on version 4.2.0-3. I can still reproduce
it 100% of the time here, and I'm
tags 1042299 - trixie sid
tags 1042299 + bookworm
thanks
Hi. I found this bug while rebuilding all packages in bookworm:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bookworm/amd64/libfirefox-marionette-perl.html
I'm fixing the metadata since it's a FTBFS bug.
Would be possible to fix
El 20/12/23 a las 21:08, Rafael Laboissière escribió:
HOME := $(shell mktemp -d)
so that the same directory is never used twice between consecutive builds.
Yes, this is a much better solution. Thanks for the suggestion. I am just
wondering: is there a simple way to delete the temporary
El 16/12/23 a las 22:30, Rafael Laboissière escribió:
I did the investigation again, using pbuilder. Here is what I found:
– In my case, pbuilder sets HOME=/nonexistent/ and debhelper (compat level =
13) keeps that setting. Hence, the package FTBFS.
– If I use "export HOME = /tmp", for
El 20/12/23 a las 7:02, Rafael Laboissière escribió:
Hi Santiago and Lucas,
You have filed bug reports against octave-netcdf (Bug#1057590) and
octave-ncarray (Bug#1057589 and Bug#1058281). These packages FTBFS due to an
issue in the netcdf package (Bug#1058281), which has been fixed thanks to
El 20/12/23 a las 7:02, Rafael Laboissière escribió:
Hi Santiago and Lucas,
You have filed bug reports against octave-netcdf (Bug#1057590) and
octave-ncarray (Bug#1057589 and Bug#1058281). These packages FTBFS due to an
issue in the netcdf package (Bug#1058281), which has been fixed thanks to
severity 1057933 normal
thanks
Hi.
It works on m6a.large instances, which have an AMD EPYC processor.
I'm downgrading as a cautionary measure.
My theory right now is that the package needs more than 4 GB of RAM
to build, but does not show a meaningful error message if that's not
the case.
Now
El 15/12/23 a las 17:00, Rafael Laboissière escribió:
[…]
HOME=/sbuild-nonexistent
[…]
It seems that your building system is setting HOME to an non-existent
directory. How do you explain that ?
In this case, given its name, the variable is set by sbuild
before starting the
El 13/12/23 a las 9:27, Rafael Laboissière escribió:
i.e. you may rely on a writable $HOME if it's for a "good cause" (i.e.
dh_auto_test).
So, the simple question: Should this not be also implemented in dh_octave_check
as well, which is what octave-vibes was using?
Thanks for bringing this
# Currently happening on bullseye
found 1024506 20.10.5+dfsg1-1+deb11u2
thanks
Hi. This is happening on bullseye:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/amd64/docker.io.html
Thanks.
Hi. This is from Alex Sisson, the upstream author:
Hi, there's a version to test from https://codeberg.org/alexs/shed , dev
branch, please give that a quick test and if you're happy with that and I'll
make a 1.16 release.
Thanks.
Hello.
I'm sorry to see this package removed because of this bug which I filed.
I trust that removing the package was the right thing to do, but I just
read the removal request you did to ftpmasters (#1058025) and would
like to make a minor comment which is only indirectly related:
This is
reassign 1057605 src:python-greenlet
affects 1057605 src:python-oslo.versionedobjects
fixed 1057605 3.0.1-1
forcemerge 1055498 1057605
thanks
Thomas Goirand wrote:
The issue, if I understand it correctly, was simply Greenlet not built
for Python 3.12.
That's what it seems, yes. The greenlet
# Also happens in bookworm
found 1057951 3.2.1+ds-6
thanks
El 11/12/23 a las 12:06, Andrius Merkys escribió:
I can reproduce this in clean chroot on barriere.d.o. Interestingly, FTBFS
happens only when building on two threads, four thread build succeeds. I have a
feeling that the test
El 10/12/23 a las 23:31, tony mancill escribió:
I'm not able to reproduce this locally, and the only potentially
relevant difference I see between the AWS testbed and my local
environment is that I am running Intel and the AWS system is AMD.
Well spotted! Yes, I believe that could explain the
El 10/12/23 a las 22:09, Markus Uhlin escribió:
My guess is that Ncurses is built with '--enable-opaque-curses' and defines
NCURSES_OPAQUE=1.
I'm currently running stable so I'm not able to reproduce the problem but if
you can give me access to a computer where the problem occurs I can
Package: src:promod3
Version: 3.3.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:dask.distributed
Version: 2023.8.0+ds.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:ycm-cmake-modules
Version: 0.13.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:ydpdict
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:recommonmark
Version: 0.7.1+ds-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:swirc
Version: 3.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --without
Package: src:pkcs11-provider
Version: 0.2+g20231107-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-duniterpy
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:odpic
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:ncurses-hexedit
Version: 0.9.7+orig-7.2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:libjose4j-java
Version: 0.7.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:kgb-bot
Version: 1.59-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:libjs-jquery-jstree
Version: 3.3.16+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh
Package: src:greetd
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:cunit
Version: 2.1-3-dfsg-2.6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:buildbot
Version: 3.9.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:boinctui
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
El 6/12/23 a las 12:52, Dominique Dumont escribió:
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 23:06:12 CET you wrote:
Wrote documentation in lib/Config/Model/models/LCDd/yard2LCD.pod Cannot
determine local time zone
[DZ] beginning to build Config-Model-LcdProc
I've seen this error from time to time. I don't
Package: src:python-oslo.policy
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make:
Package: src:python-scrapy
Version: 2.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-kaptan
Version: 0.5.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:raku-meta6
Version: 0.0.29-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:shed
Version: 1.15-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:zsh
Version: 5.9-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:tpm2-pytss
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-discord
Version: 2.3.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:sphinx-design
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
Package: src:shim
Version: 15.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
Package: src:python-oslo.versionedobjects
Version: 3.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make:
Package: src:texext
Version: 0.6.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
Package: src:scm
Version: 5f3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
debian/rules
Package: src:python-pytest-trio
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-sphinxcontrib.apidoc
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
make:
Package: src:python-repoze.sphinx.autointerface
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:qflipper
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:python-pynndescent
Version: 0.5.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary
Package: src:xonsh
Version: 0.14.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with
Package: src:publican
Version: 4.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with linktree
Package: src:tetradraw
Version: 2.0.3-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build --with
1 - 100 of 2618 matches
Mail list logo
