On Sun, 22 May 2016 04:50:07 -0700 Geza Kovacs
wrote:
> Hi I'm the maintainer of unetbootin, I just stumbled upon this bug
report,
> sorry you have been having issues. The underlying issue appears to be
that
> some of Debian's ISO files violate the Joilet standard - the
Hi I'm the maintainer of unetbootin, I just stumbled upon this bug report,
sorry you have been having issues. The underlying issue appears to be that
some of Debian's ISO files violate the Joilet standard - the standard does
not permit filenames exceeding 64 characters in length, as you can see at
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:06:18 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Source: unetbootin
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: wasting massive amounts of developer and user time
>
> I've already added one wishlist bug for d-i to add code to detect
> unetbootin usage
DD doesn't work for me. It never has on linux. It creates a nonbootable
brick. As a matter of fact, no tool on the linux platform used to create
bootable usb drives based on an ISO image has ever worked for me. Strangely
enough, unetbootin, although the bootable usb it creates is buggy, actually
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I think you missed the part where I was talking about non-Debian
images. It clearly breaks non-Debian images as well, for example
It needs a list of images it can operate on, and refuse on all
others, then.
FreeDOS. Just look at the bug
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I fully agree with Steve's stance. unetbootin is currently completely
broken and I don't think it should actually be shipped with Jessie.
Shipping it with jessie is irrelevant to using it for Debian images.
After all, corrupted
Hi!
I fully agree with Steve's stance. unetbootin is currently completely
broken and I don't think it should actually be shipped with Jessie.
Just as of yesterday, a colleague of mine created a bootable USB flash
drive with FreeDOS in order to flash the BIOS firmware of the new
servers we got.
On 02/17/2015 11:11 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Completely disagree: unetbootin is the tool of choice to create
bootable images for a variety of distributions, so shipping it
with Debian is correct, for those distributions. Just that the
software should not be used for creating broken *Debian*
Hi!
Can you give me pointers where those bugreports exist? Do you have
first hand experience that it's not working correctly?
I made netboot images onto my USB sticks and they worked.
This exchange is sadly pretty common when it comes to unetbootin and we see
this frequently in #debian.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 07:40:11PM +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Steve,
Hi!
USB-bootable installer images, but these days seems responsible for
lots of user problems and difficult-to-resolve bug reports. Using it
for Debian CD images creates USB images
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Also please note it's not a Debian specific tool. But it may exists in
Right. I think users of Debian derivate which must not be named
use it when they don’t manage to type “sudo dd”. I suggest to
patch it upstream to recognise at the very
Processing control commands:
tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #775689 [src:unetbootin] Do NOT use unetbootin for Debian CD images
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
775689: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775689
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Steve,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Source: unetbootin
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: wasting massive amounts of developer and user time
I've already added one wishlist bug for d-i to add code to detect
Source: unetbootin
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: wasting massive amounts of developer and user time
I've already added one wishlist bug for d-i to add code to detect
unetbootin usage and complain about it, but I've not got there
yet. unetbootin used to be a helpful tool for many
14 matches
Mail list logo