Hi,
2016-10-14 7:36 GMT+02:00 Johannes Schauer :
> don't know if our current sbuild backporter Luca (in CC) would be willing to
> write such a patch, especially considering that
>
> - it is a feature of sbuild since version 0.67.0 (I corrected the wiki page
>accordingly) to *not* require sign
On Fri 2016-10-14 01:36:56 -0400, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> - it is a feature of sbuild since version 0.67.0 (I corrected the wiki page
>accordingly) to *not* require signing of the internal dummy repository (and
>thus you don't need to run sbuild-update --keygen anymore) and that
awesome
Hi,
Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2016-10-13 00:31:28)
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:42:15PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> gpg: Invalid option "--pinentry-mode"
>
> … it sounds like sbuild should at least have declared a versioned
> dependency on gnupg (>= 2.1), when --pinentry-mode was intro
On 10/13/2016 12:58 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Thomas Goirand (2016-10-12 23:42:15)
>> Dear backport maintainer,
>>
>> Since the upload of sbuild 0.71.0-2~bpo8+1 to stable backport, running
>> sbuild-update --keygen leads to this error message:
>>
>> gpg: Invalid option "--pinen
Hi,
Quoting Thomas Goirand (2016-10-12 23:42:15)
> Dear backport maintainer,
>
> Since the upload of sbuild 0.71.0-2~bpo8+1 to stable backport, running
> sbuild-update --keygen leads to this error message:
>
> gpg: Invalid option "--pinentry-mode"
>
> Indeed, it looks like --pinentry-mode isn't
5 matches
Mail list logo
