On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote:
jigdo/, not jigdo-area/. (Not that it really matters...)
I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
anything more appropriate.
The reason not to
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 19:14, Richard Atterer wrote:
jigdo/, not jigdo-area/. (Not that it really matters...)
I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 22:44, jason andrade wrote:
On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
anything more appropriate.
The reason not to call it simply jigdo is that the jigdo-area contains
one or more versioned
On 15 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
I wasn't overly happy about using jigdo-area, but couldn't think of
anything more appropriate.
The reason not to call it simply jigdo is that the jigdo-area contains
one or more versioned directories, each of which contains a jigdo and a
snapshot
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#record-windows
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#record-mac
Hope this helps.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Atterer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:56 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Wuttke Joachim
Subject: Re: .raw extension
On 13 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote:
It looks like it will all become moot with the new jigdo scheme anyway,
because jigdo creates .iso files, and the rsync mirror setup is not
really needed any more, so published .raw files are likely to become a
thing of the past.
Is this an argument for
-Original Message-
From: Philip Hands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
IIRC the .raw extension was chosen because xcdroast (or something
similar) used that as it's default extension at the time debian-cd (or
probably slink-cd) was being written.
The .iso extension was chosen for the
7 matches
Mail list logo
