Ideas

Good morning all, I hope you're doing well today. I am writing to you today to discuss a few ideas, proposals and concerns that I have about my experience in the Debian community over the past 6 months or so: Script for Point Release ISO Testing

Re: Package "usr-is-merged" is reported as missing in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) during installation with live-installer/enable=false

Hello, On 02/05/2024 08:07, Roland Clobus wrote: Hello, On 01/05/2024 23:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Thanks Cyril for passing along the mail to the debian-live mailing list. Computer Enthusiastic (2024-05-01): The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5

Re: Package "usr-is-merged" is reported as missing in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) during installation with live-installer/enable=false

Hello, On 01/05/2024 23:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Thanks Cyril for passing along the mail to the debian-live mailing list. Computer Enthusiastic (2024-05-01): The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) fails the installation of the

Re: Package "usr-is-merged" is reported as missing in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) during installation with live-installer/enable=false

Hello, And thanks for the report. Cc += debian-live@ Computer Enthusiastic (2024-05-01): > The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5 > (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) fails the installation of the base > system when started with the following preseed parameters: >

Package "usr-is-merged" is reported as missing in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) during installation with live-installer/enable=false

Hello, The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) fails the installation of the base system when started with the following preseed parameters: live-installer/enable=false firmware=never The Debian installer stops

Debian DVD Installer bug/issue that has arisen with Bookworm

I'm a 10+ year Debian user and Free Software supporter. The release notes for Bookworm are currently telling users that they can use "firmware=never" to continue installing Debian without non-free-firmware, as was possible with Bullseye and earlier releases. And when installing from non-live DVD

4/29 weekly ISO

Hello! I downloaded the weekly Trixie/Testing Netinstall & DVD1 iso's, but both failed multiple times. It didn't matter if I downloaded with Firefox, or by curl. All attempts failed installing the Base packages. It hung, and would not recover. Please regenerate before next week. Thank you!

Bug#1070067: debian-cd: daily arm64 netinst image: GRUB menu is complex

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: minor User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: openqa Hello maintainers of the arm64 netinst image, The issue: Recently I've updated the openQA boot walk test [1] to match the actual GRUB boot menu for the arm64 netinst image (taken from the daily

Bug#1070006: debian-cd: daily arm64 netinst image: GRUB not started in graphical mode

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: minor User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: openqa Hello maintainers of the netinst image, The issue: As seen on openQA [1], the GRUB menu for the arm64 netinst image (taken from the daily builds [2]) does not use the graphical mode, but text

Bug#1069682: debian-cd DVD source run failing

Package: cdimage.debian.org As a reminder for me: the latest weekly build failed, looks like source packages no longer fit??? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 05:44:48PM +0100, Andy Simpkins wrote: > > On 21/04/2024 01:57, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > > Hiya! > > > > > > > > Not wanting to

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On 21/04/2024 01:57, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Hiya! Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to? Right now I can still have 27th April on the cards

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

I'm free, happy to travel to Cambridge or do it from home. Emyr On 21/04/2024 07:43, Luna Jernberg wrote: as i indicated on IRC 27th April works for me May does not really work for me however Den sön 21 apr. 2024 kl 02:58 skrev Steve McIntyre : On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100,

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

as i indicated on IRC 27th April works for me May does not really work for me however Den sön 21 apr. 2024 kl 02:58 skrev Steve McIntyre : > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Hiya! > >> >

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Hiya! > > > > Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to? > > > > Right now I can still have 27th April on the cards but we're missing FTP and

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Hiya! >> >> Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to? >> > >Right now I can still have 27th April on the cards but we're missing FTP and >press.

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hiya! > > Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to? > Right now I can still have 27th April on the cards but we're missing FTP and press. It's next week, we'd have to know this weekend and get frozen. Mark

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

Hiya! Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to? On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:53:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >>Hi, >> >>As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. >> >>April 13th >>- Not great for

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Philip Hands (2024-04-15): >> On the other hand, it's taken over a month so far. Rather than living in >> hope for another month, I thought it might be worth removing this as a >> blocker (I've had to tell a couple of people that they'll need to wait >> before they can

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Philip Hands (2024-04-15): > On the other hand, it's taken over a month so far. Rather than living in > hope for another month, I thought it might be worth removing this as a > blocker (I've had to tell a couple of people that they'll need to wait > before they can do their salsa-CI tests :-/ )

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Philip Hands (2024-04-14): >> I realised that there might be a way to kludge around the current D-I >> build failures, so I gave it a try and it seems to work: >> >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/45 >> >> That creates

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Philip Hands (2024-04-14): > I realised that there might be a way to kludge around the current D-I > build failures, so I gave it a try and it seems to work: > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/45 > > That creates dummy udebs with the missing names,

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Hi, I realised that there might be a way to kludge around the current D-I build failures, so I gave it a try and it seems to work: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/45 That creates dummy udebs with the missing names, where each depends upon the matching

ISO images with malicious code

Hello and welcome. https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/ As you can see, as of 2024-03-07 it is not possible to build the current amd64 (weekly-builds) Debian testing image. However, the available ISO image (according to:

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

13th April = does not work for me, going to my brother in Borås to later go to foss-north 2024 in Gothenburg 20th and 27th April works for me 4th of May does not work for me will be at Curl-up Curl developer conference here in Stockholm 11th of May might maybe work for me, but might also want to

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. > Can do all, I think, Andy (amaca...@debian.org) > > Adam >

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

Just one thing could you please pull all world wide repos so the repos that are new are there and defunct repositories don’t appear. My repositories have been registered repositories for years and newer been in one release Mike Hosken Sent via my iPhone > On 3 Apr 2024, at 08:40, Jonathan

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. > >April 13th >- Not great for me for personal reasons, mhy previously said no. I >could probably do if need be Works for me. >April 20th >- Doesn't work for me; I'm

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > April 13th > April 20th > April 27th At current progress I expect to be available for the SRM side 13th or 27th. We're in a good position to freeze this weekend to make the 13th, if others are available then. The 20th is a no for

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

Hi, On Mon, 01, Apr, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt spoke thus.. > April 13th > - Not great for me for personal reasons, mhy previously said no. I > could probably do if need be 13th is completely out for me. > May 11th > - Should work for me Looks like it'll work at present.

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2024-04-01): > As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. I should be able to make anything work. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Re: Re-planning for 12.6

On 01/04/2024 13:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. April 13th - Not great for me for personal reasons, mhy previously said no. I could probably do if need be April 20th - Doesn't work for me; I'm away from the Tuesday before until late

Re-planning for 12.6

Hi, As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates. April 13th - Not great for me for personal reasons, mhy previously said no. I could probably do if need be April 20th - Doesn't work for me; I'm away from the Tuesday before until late on the Friday April 27th - Doesn't work for

Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6)

On 29/03/2024 22:34, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:24:09PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 17:35 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-

Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6)

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:24:09PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 17:35 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for >> Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm- >> proposed-updates will be frozen during

Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6)

On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 17:35 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for > Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm- > proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceeding weekend. Due to recent events, the point release has

Re: Where to download cd iso?

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 02:24:10PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >Hi, > >Tatsu Takamaro wrote: >> I've received my own message to you. But I don't see your answer... > >Well, i have't seen that message and the mailing list archive doesn't >show it either: >

Re: Where to download cd iso?

Hi, Tatsu Takamaro wrote: > I've received my own message to you. But I don't see your answer... Well, i have't seen that message and the mailing list archive doesn't show it either: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2024/03/threads.html (The one i reply to is your follow-up:

Re: Where to download cd iso?

I've received my own message to you. But I don't see your answer... вт, 26.03.2024 20:25, Tatsu Takamaro пишет: I don't see the cd iso on the iso-cd page. I mean a usual one, not a netinst.

Bug#1067649: Verification page is not accessible from the homepage

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: debian-cd@lists.debian.org Dear www and CD teams, When the Download link in our homepage was changed to start the iso download right away, the old download page [1] became inaccessible (at least not easily-accessible), making it very hard

Re: Bug#902668: Draft for rewrite of https://www.debian.org/CD/verify

Hi, Tassia Camoes Araujo (2024-03-25): > I've reviewed the proposed patch, and I think it should be applied as > soon as possible. > > It seems Laura was waiting for a final review before applying this patch > (long overdue!), which IMHO would bring much more clarity to the image > verification

Re: problems with amd64 testing images

Hi, Jogi Hofmüller (2024-03-24): > I just failed to install debian testing using the latest > debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso. for amd64 this has two problems: > > 1) it misses at least libaio.so so pvcreate does not run and I cannot set up > the disk as planned > 2) it is more than 2 weeks

problems with amd64 testing images

Dear all, I just failed to install debian testing using the latest debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso. for amd64 this has two problems: 1) it misses at least libaio.so so pvcreate does not run and I cannot set up the disk as planned 2) it is more than 2 weeks old (2024-03-09) and there are no

回复: Request for keeping generating non-installable i386 DVDs/BDs

Keeping only .jigdo files for i386 DVDs/BDs is enough, and a real DVD-1 or a BD-1 iso is not needed to be stored on the server. Then someone can sell or distribute a set of 'official' amd64 DVDs/BDs with companion non-installable i386 DVDs/BDs which can be used without Internet.

Re: lvm2 udebs vs. libaio1-udeb (was: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid)

Hi! On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 23:13:31 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-21): > > I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb > > is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of > > `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the

Request for keeping generating non-installable i386 DVDs/BDs

Dropping i386 DVDs/BDs is making amd64 DVDs/BDs not complete, because offline users cannot use multiarch any more, especially wine - amd64 DVDs/BDs only contains wine64, not wine32. There are also some legacy i386 softwares not upgraded to amd64 in the i386 DVDs/BDs. Offline users is not so

New `debian-cd` mirror application

Hi, I'd like to apply for a new Debian CD mirror, based in Vietnam Here's the link to the mirror: http://mirror.kirbee.tech/debiancd/ Server bandwidth: 200Mbit/s Thanks and regards.

lvm2 udebs vs. libaio1-udeb (was: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid)

Hi, Cyril Brulebois (2024-03-21): > I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb > is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of > `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies > would be sufficient (and might happen at some

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Hi, Roland Clobus (2024-03-21): > On 21/03/2024 15:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote: […] > The diagram shows nicely that the t64-transition is affecting the > installer, with currently 1 major bottleneck, libpng16-16t64-udeb: > https://d-i.debian.org/dose/graph-unstable-amd64.png Glad you like it,

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Hello Cyril, list, On 21/03/2024 15:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/03/msg00102.html The diagram shows nicely that the t64-transition is affecting the installer, with currently 1 major bottleneck, libpng16-16t64-udeb:

Bug#1067442: marked as done (contains files for different architecture)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:25:35 +0100 with message-id <20240321162535.eo3ebgnohaq5o...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1067442: contains files for different architecture has caused the Debian Bug report #1067442, regarding contains files for different architecture to be marked as

Bug#1067442: contains files for different architecture

Package: syslinux-efi Version: 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: dbarysh...@gmail.com The ARM64 syslinux-efi package binaries for x86 instead instead of ARM binaries: $ uname -m aarch64 $ file /usr/lib/SYSLINUX.EFI/efi*/syslinux.efi

Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Roland Clobus (2024-03-19): > For the other images, the installer is currently failing to build from > source, as some dependencies (in the udebs) are still missing (due to > the t64-transition). > > The latest message (from my local build_cdrom_gtk.log) is: > > The following packages have

Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Hello list, Since two days the live images based on sid can be generated again (hurray!), now that debootstrap is able to generate a bootstrap again. The smallest image is generated properly now, because it does not have an installer. For the other images, the installer is currently failing

Minor suggested change to https://www.debian.org/CD/live/#choose_live

Hello Debian CD team I am not sure if this is the correct channel for such a request, but if not, I am hoping you can point me in the right direction. I am writing about the page "https://www.debian.org/CD/live/#choose_live;. I just want to say that I found it less-than-obvious how to start

Weekly builds missing logfiles

Debian weekly installation images builders, Weekly build for amd64: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/ These failed Mar 11 and 18. This page has links to eight logfiles for Mar 11 and eight for Mar 18. Clicking on all of them results in "Not Found". Weekly build for

"USB" ISO sets / apt-cdrom USB counterpart?

Good evening/morning everyone, I find myself in a thought: as USB media becomes cheaper and cheaper, more so than even Blu-Ray discs or especially DVDs, why not a full USB set, for 16 or 32GB flash drives? Or at the very least, more automated support for people who need to use flash drives with

Processed: retitle 1065435 to aptitude: FTBFS on armhf and armel: deduced conflicting types for parameter ‘const T’ (‘long int’ and ‘__suseconds64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’}) ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1065435 aptitude: FTBFS on armhf and armel: deduced conflicting types > for parameter ‘const T’ (‘long int’ and ‘__suseconds64_t’ {aka ‘long long > int’}) Bug #1065435 [src:aptitude] aptitude: FTBFS on armhf and armel (probably

Re: Jigdo files wrong?

Hi Marcelo, On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:25:49PM -0300, Marcelo B. wrote: >Hi guys, there seem to be a problem with AMD64's jigdo files of the weekly >builds: they're all the same at 120 bytes in size. ACK, thanks for reporting. I'll take a look. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Jigdo files wrong?

Hi guys, there seem to be a problem with AMD64's jigdo files of the weekly builds: they're all the same at 120 bytes in size. Regards.

Bug#1036828: marked as done (debian-cd: wrong firmware archives built and published for D-I releases?)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:46:14 + with message-id <20240224144614.ga3076...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1036828: debian-cd: wrong firmware archives built and published for D-I releases? has caused the Debian Bug report #1036828, regarding debian-cd: wrong firmware

Bug#1036828: debian-cd: wrong firmware archives built and published for D-I releases?

Followup-For: Bug #1036828 X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:01:31 +, I wrote: > Should this bug be closed? (the logic to skip the experimental/sid firmware > image build during non-testing builds is in place for both bookworm and > trixie) Nope, it looks like I've

Bug#1036828: debian-cd: wrong firmware archives built and published for D-I releases?

Followup-For: Bug #1036828 X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org Hi Cyril, Should this bug be closed? (the logic to skip the experimental/sid firmware image build during non-testing builds is in place for both bookworm and trixie) Regards, James

CD-Mirror

Hi, we want to add our CD-Mirror : https://mirror.fra.macarne.com/debian-cd/ please let me know if you need anything else from us. Location is in our POP Frankfurt am Main, Sponsor Macarne LLC, contact n...@macarne.com Thanks and greetings, Arne smime.p7s

Upcoming stable point release (12.6)

Hi, The next point release for "bookworm" (12.6) is scheduled for Saturday, April 6th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceeding weekend. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, 12, Feb, 2024 at 06:04:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus.. > Hi, > > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: > > 7 April > 13 April > 20 April 7th or 20th should be ok, but 13th is out for me. Mark -- Mark Hymers signature.asc Description:

Processed: Re: Bug#1063858: Acknowledgement (False disk set size in README.(html|txt), and a few minor corrections)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1063858 3.2.1 Bug #1063858 [debian-cd] False disk set size in README.(html|txt), and a few minor corrections Marked as found in versions debian-cd/3.2.1. > severity 1063858 minor Bug #1063858 [debian-cd] False disk set size in

Re: Planning for 12.6

Hi, On 2/12/24 17:28, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:04:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: >> >> 7 April >> 13 April >> 20 April > > Any of those should work for me, assuming (re Adam)

Bug#1063858: False disk set size in README.(html|txt), and a few minor corrections

Package: debian-cd X-Debbugs-Cc: J.A. Bezemer , Steve McIntyre Version: 3.2.1 Severity: minor Dear maintainers, dear Steve[1]: In the official current stable (12.5) images, the /README.(html|txt) files (see att.) seem to miscount the total number of disks in each set. For instance, in

Re: Planning for 12.6

On 13 February 2024 14:30:50 GMT, Luna Jernberg wrote: >7th or 20th April should work for me >13th i need to relax a bit before heading to foss-north 2024: >https://foss-north.se/ > >Den tis 13 feb. 2024 kl 07:56 skrev Cyril Brulebois : >> >> Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12): >> > 12.6 should be

Re: Planning for 12.6

7th or 20th April should work for me 13th i need to relax a bit before heading to foss-north 2024: https://foss-north.se/ Den tis 13 feb. 2024 kl 07:56 skrev Cyril Brulebois : > > Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12): > > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: > > > >

Re: Planning for 12.6

Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12): > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: > > 6 April > 13 April > 20 April Any of those should work. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member --

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:29:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 18:04 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability > > for: > > > > 7  April > > I assume you mean the 6th here. That should be doable. I did. > >

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:04:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: > >7 April >13 April >20 April Any of those should work for me, assuming (re Adam) that you mean 6 April and not 7 April. -- Steve McIntyre,

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:04:17PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: > > 7 April > 13 April > 20 April > > Thanks, > Should be available for all these Andy > -- > Jonathan Wiltshire

Re: Planning for 12.6

I'm pretty sure I'm ok for all those dates, but will confirm. Emyr On 12/02/2024 18:04, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: 7 April 13 April 20 April Thanks,

Re: Planning for 12.6

On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 18:04 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability > for: > > 7  April I assume you mean the 6th here. That should be doable. > 13 April Could work, but I would prefer not to for personal reasons. > 20 April I'll

Planning for 12.6

Hi, 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for: 7 April 13 April 20 April Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223

Question about https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/CRAN/web/packages/psychrolib/readme/README.html

Hello I’m Olive and I run an advanced AI service called ZeroGPT's Citation Generator : https://www.ZeroGPT.com/Citation-Generator ZeroGPT's Word Counter is a Free and revolutionary tool to an innovative tool designed to effortlessly track and analyze word usage in your documents. With its

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

you have to do the testing without me this weekend, still sick and need to rest, rest of this week but will help out another time when i feel better again Den tors 8 feb. 2024 kl 07:55 skrev Luna Jernberg : > > Might have to back out sadly, have come up with sickness, but good > luck in the

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

Might have to back out sadly, have come up with sickness, but good luck in the testing, but can't promise i will help this round as i might need to rest sickness away Den ons 17 jan. 2024 kl 08:44 skrev Luna Jernberg : > > That should work for me > > Den ons 17 jan. 2024 kl 07:41 skrev Jonathan

Bug#1062000: marked as done (debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the contrib section)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Feb 2024 20:52:08 + with message-id <20240201205208.gg2747...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1062000: debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the contrib section has caused the Debian Bug report #1062000, regarding debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the

Bug#1062000: debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the contrib section

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: mikeonthecompu...@gmail.com Debian 12, bookworm, images are missing the contrib section of the repositories in their entirety. This prevents the use of, for instance, installing ZFS on an offline computer. There is quite a lot

Upcoming oldstable point release (11.9)

Hi, The next point release for "bullseye" (11.9) is scheduled for Saturday, February 10th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Upcoming stable point release (12.5)

Hi, The next point release for "bookworm" (12.5) is scheduled for Saturday, February 10th. Processing of new uploads into bookworm-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

That should work for me Den ons 17 jan. 2024 kl 07:41 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire : > > > On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 21:25 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) > > > and 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye >

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

> On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 21:25 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) > > and 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye > > before LTS. > > > > Please indicate availability for: > > > >   Saturday  3rd

Re: Weekly builds of installer/live images failing

Hello Daniel, On 16/01/2024 09:52, Daniel Lewart wrote: However, on Jan 8 and 15, the weekly builds of installer/live images have been failing. I'll guess that these are part of the fallout from "the big linux changes": https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2023/12/msg00421.html

Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter installation phase. Bookworm ISO images have no problems and are successful. System dmidecode data: # dmidecode 3.4 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.

Weekly builds of installer/live images failing

Debian Images and Live Teams, First I would like to thank Roland Clobus, et al, for your excellent achievement of creating reproducible live images. However, on Jan 8 and 15, the weekly builds of installer/live images have been failing. I'll guess that these are part of the fallout from "the big

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

All of them I think are ok for me at the present time :) Emyr On 15/01/2024 06:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 21:25 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) and 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 21:25 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) > and 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye > before LTS. > > Please indicate availability for: > >   Saturday  3rd February (preferred for

Re: Re: Automatically seeding Debian torrents

I'm getting the impression that OP was asking about something like this: https://archlinux.org/feeds/releases/ Do note that the RSS entries provide a direct link to a .torrent file, like: https://archlinux.org//releng/releases/2024.01.01/torrent/ The feed I linked could be consumed by a human,

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

Hello for webmasters the status remains the same as last time, so we have no tasks to do in point releases. Kind regards El 12 de enero de 2024 13:12:31 CET, Mark Hymers escribió: >On Tue, 19, Dec, 2023 at 09:25:06PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus.. >> It's time to set a date for 12.5

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

On Tue, 19, Dec, 2023 at 09:25:06PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus.. > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) and > 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye before LTS. > > Please indicate availability for: > > Saturday 3rd February

Re: cd-image test builds for DebianEdu

Hi Steve, hi all, (Cc:ing debian-cd & debian-edu MLs) On Fr 22 Dez 2023 13:24:01 CET, Guido Berhoerster wrote: Hi Steve, Mike Gabriel (sunweaver@) and I are currently doing QA work to prepare the formal release of DebianEdu bookworm with the next point release. It would be really helpful if

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

Hi, The most likely contenders are 10th and 17th February but unless I missed it, there's no indication from ftp-master (crucial) or webmasters (highly desirable). Are either of those dates preferable for you? Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org

Bug#933981: cdrom: USB, KVM create connect/disconnect loop in level1 (repair) install

On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:28:47 -0400 Tom Sullivan wrote: > Package: cdrom > Severity: grave > Tags: d-i > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > * What led up to the situation? > > I had another machine that gave kernel panic while upgrading from Stretch to > Buster. Use

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

Sorry, super late on this one. I withdraw my 'vote' and will acquiesce to which ever date the group selects. I do like the 17th though. Original Message Subject: Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9 From: Luna Jernberg To: Cyril Brulebois , Luna Jernberg Cc: Steve McIntyre , Jonathan

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

Hey! 10th or 17th works for me the 17th the best Den tors 28 dec. 2023 kl 03:41 skrev Cyril Brulebois : > > Steve McIntyre (2023-12-26): > > Any of those *should* be OK for me. > > Ditto. > > > Cheers, > -- > Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) > D-I release

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >