Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 12/01/2016 05:53 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> Just installed and tested in the build VM on pettersson, and things
>> look much better \o/
>
>Great!
>
>For the arm64 build, I may need a bit of help on how to get things done
>for EFI support. Does anyone have a simple sc
> "Fathi" == Fathi Boudra writes:
Neither of these changes should be needed, no.
--force-removable-media should cover both, and if it doesn't get the bug
fixed in grub-install.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Thomas" == Thomas Goirand writes:
>
>
> Thomas> Great!
>
> Thomas> For the arm64 build, I may need a bit of help on how to get
> Thomas> things done for EFI support. Does anyone have a simple
> Thomas> script to show me, o
> "Thomas" == Thomas Goirand writes:
Thomas> Great!
Thomas> For the arm64 build, I may need a bit of help on how to get
Thomas> things done for EFI support. Does anyone have a simple
Thomas> script to show me, on which I could cheat on?
I submitted fairly simple EFI patches
On 12/01/2016 05:53 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 12/01/2016 04:20 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> I'd suggest maybe trying doing a stretch debootstrap locally using the
>>> same set of packages as the build script first, and see wha
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 12/01/2016 04:20 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'd suggest maybe trying doing a stretch debootstrap locally using the
>> same set of packages as the build script first, and see what's
>> *Actually* breaking...
>
>That's what I did,
On 12/01/2016 04:20 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'd suggest maybe trying doing a stretch debootstrap locally using the
> same set of packages as the build script first, and see what's
> *Actually* breaking...
That's what I did, and that's how I found out that libpam-systemd was
the root cause of s
On 12/01/2016 04:20 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'd suggest maybe trying doing a stretch debootstrap locally using the
> same set of packages as the build script first, and see what's
> *Actually* breaking...
That's what I did, and that's how I found out that libpam-systemd was
the root cause of s
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:43:18AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 11/30/2016 08:35 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Do the openstack images use debootstrap as a package resolver?
>
>Yes.
>
>> If so, yeah, that broke for most nontrivial installations in stretch.
>
>After some tests, it is libpam-systemd
> "Bastian" == Bastian Blank writes:
Bastian> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:43:18AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> > If so, yeah, that broke for most nontrivial installations in
>> stretch. After some tests, it is libpam-systemd that is pulling
>> systemd-shim.
Bastian> Th
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:43:18AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > If so, yeah, that broke for most nontrivial installations in stretch.
> After some tests, it is libpam-systemd that is pulling systemd-shim.
This is a bug in the dependency resolver in debootstrap. The easiest
fix is to not use
On 11/30/2016 08:35 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Do the openstack images use debootstrap as a package resolver?
Yes.
> If so, yeah, that broke for most nontrivial installations in stretch.
After some tests, it is libpam-systemd that is pulling systemd-shim. So
I wonder 2 things:
1/ Do we really ne
Do the openstack images use debootstrap as a package resolver?
If so, yeah, that broke for most nontrivial installations in stretch.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:58:05AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 11/20/2016 07:15 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> They've been failing for a while, it seem.s Looking in logs on
>> pettersson, I can see what looks like the culprit in debootstrap
>> output:
>>
>> ...
>> W: Failure while i
On 11/20/2016 07:15 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> They've been failing for a while, it seem.s Looking in logs on
> pettersson, I can see what looks like the culprit in debootstrap
> output:
>
> ...
> W: Failure while installing base packages. This will be re-attempted
> up to five times.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
