I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting, as I haven't seen much of
its contents mentioned or alluded to so far in this thread, and it's
quite relevant to how much we should expect this to be a problem:
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes:
I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting, as I haven't seen much of
its contents mentioned or alluded to so far in this thread, and it's
quite relevant to how much we should expect
I have reposted an improved version of this reply to debian-project and
debian-vote, in response to the proposed GR, since I think the TC work has
concluded and that's now the appropriate forum for the conversation. We
can keep talking about it here if that seems like a good idea for some
reason
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes:
I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting ...
Indeed. Thanks for the pointer.
Bdale
pgprLKfQDUuJW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Russ Allbery dixit:
But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to worry
about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind implementations do
*not* materialize, or if they do materialize but then people lose interest
I question why logind is needed in the first place.
Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de writes:
Russ Allbery dixit:
But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to
worry about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind
implementations do *not* materialize, or if they do materialize but
then people lose interest
I
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:04:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
With all 8 votes cast, this CFV on the init system coupling issue has
ended in a tie between options L and N. Given my vote on this
issue, it should be no
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140221 19:06]:
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:58:25AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140221 19:06]:
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140221 19:06]:
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init support
FD Further
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init
Ian Jackson writes (Bug#727708: Call for Votes on init system coupling):
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A Advice:
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A Advice: sysvinit compatibility in
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
that have been put.
The options on the ballot are:
L Software may not depend on a specific init system
N No TC resolution on this question at this time
A
17 matches
Mail list logo
