Hi Didier,
Thanks for caring.
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:36:07PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le jeudi, 30 novembre 2017, 14.03:15 h CET Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > Having said that though, I'm also not convinced that the current
> > completely private system is working very well.
> >
Le mardi, 28 novembre 2017, 09.40:45 h CET Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> I have finally finished drafting the "Nominations to the Technical Commitee"
> procedure. The point of it is to document current practice, and create a
> basis for discussion. It also outlines what is made public and when.
Le jeudi, 30 novembre 2017, 14.03:15 h CET Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> Having said that though, I'm also not convinced that the current
> completely private system is working very well.
>
> Speaking as someone who's been a candidate for a number of past
> appointments now, the process feels too mu
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:25:01AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le jeudi, 30 novembre 2017, 14.03:15 h CET Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:48:25AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > My rationale is that the private "vote" isn't a vote on the appointment,
> > > it's a
Sean Whitton dijo [Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:57:01PM -0700]:
> > So to answer your question specifically; I don't think the TC hides
> > the numbers on purpose, it just doesn't really go through the effort
> > of making them public.
> >
> > Another aspect there also is that we don't want to put anyon
Hello Didier,
On Fri, Dec 01 2017, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> So to answer your question specifically; I don't think the TC hides
> the numbers on purpose, it just doesn't really go through the effort
> of making them public.
>
> Another aspect there also is that we don't want to put anyone wh
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: TC nomination procedure v0"):
> It's a vote that will have effect on the appointment of a person to the
> TC. The constitution specifically wants appointment votes to be public.
> Without wanting to comment on the letter, I think this is
Le jeudi, 30 novembre 2017, 14.03:15 h CET Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:48:25AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > My rationale is that the private "vote" isn't a vote on the appointment,
> > it's a vote to figure out whether the future appointment vote will have
> > consensu
Le mardi, 28 novembre 2017, 14.26:05 h CET Sean Whitton a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 28 2017, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > - The TC *does not* make the number of nominees or number of
> > accepted nominations public.
>
> I'm curious to here the thinking behind this particular line of the
> pro
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:48:25AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:40:45AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > Question:
> > >
> > > - Does this private vote respect letter and/or intent of §6.3.4 "votes
> > > on
> >
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 28 2017, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> - The TC *does not* make the number of nominees or number of
> accepted nominations public.
I'm curious to here the thinking behind this particular line of the
procedure.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:40:45AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Question:
> >
> > - Does this private vote respect letter and/or intent of §6.3.4 "votes on
> > appointments must be public"?
>
> No. However, I think it is wrong for anyone t
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:40:45AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Question:
>
> - Does this private vote respect letter and/or intent of §6.3.4 "votes on
> appointments must be public"?
No. However, I think it is wrong for anyone to insist on that, and I
think the constitution should be u
Dear TC, dear Project members,
I have finally finished drafting the "Nominations to the Technical Commitee"
procedure. The point of it is to document current practice, and create a basis
for discussion. It also outlines what is made public and when.
I welcome any direct formatting or phrasing cha
14 matches
Mail list logo
