He has a right to call a GR.You are trying your hardest to make sure systemd is theonly choice for all linux systems, all major linux distros,and if we don't like it we can "go use MacOSX or BSD" or"roll your own distro".The fact is that SysV works NOW. The scripts work and are stable and are
He has a right to call a GR.
You are trying your hardest to make sure systemd is the
only choice for all linux systems, all major linux distros,
and if we don't like it we can go use MacOSX or BSD or
roll your own distro.
The fact is that SysV works NOW. The scripts work and
are stable and are
Re: Four people decided the fate of debian with systemd. Bad faith likelySystemd is over 200,000 lines of ring0 running bullshit.Regular inits are under 10k lines of code inclusive.Some are 100 lines of code.Hmm which is easier to find exploits in.SystemD.Notice how the fknuts always try to change
I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting, as I haven't seen much of
its contents mentioned or alluded to so far in this thread, and it's
quite relevant to how much we should expect this to be a problem:
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes:
I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting, as I haven't seen much of
its contents mentioned or alluded to so far in this thread, and it's
quite relevant to how much we should expect
I have reposted an improved version of this reply to debian-project and
debian-vote, in response to the proposed GR, since I think the TC work has
concluded and that's now the appropriate forum for the conversation. We
can keep talking about it here if that seems like a good idea for some
reason
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org writes:
I ran across this interesting post from an upstream GNOME developer
which I think deserves some signal-boosting ...
Indeed. Thanks for the pointer.
Bdale
pgprLKfQDUuJW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Russ Allbery dixit:
But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to worry
about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind implementations do
*not* materialize, or if they do materialize but then people lose interest
I question why logind is needed in the first place.
Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de writes:
Russ Allbery dixit:
But when providing project-wide guidance, we have an obligation to
worry about the error conditions as well. If multiple logind
implementations do *not* materialize, or if they do materialize but
then people lose interest
I
For the record, debian-ctte can have the same spam cleaning operation
than any Debian list.
Anyone can report any mail in Debian mailing lists as spam. For
instance, the following:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/03/msg1.html
has a Report as spam button on the upper right corner.
10 matches
Mail list logo
