Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-17 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:31:46 +0100, Enrico wrote in message <20170309193146.pvwrlt3qwgdw2...@enricozini.org>: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:14:52PM -0600, Robin Tarsiger wrote: > > > I cannot speak for "all humans", but as a robin, I hereby claim my > > right to not be in either of these sets.

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-11 Thread Thomas Harding
I wish you licence that text under cat licence, or, at option, above. While nested cat is unclear as licenced or not. I ensure my cat is not reproductible, with any warranty based on Free Speech. Having a binary form which need some debugging (including severe bits), and an insurance I

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-10 Thread Enrico Zini
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:36:27PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Also, while your delusion about superiority of _robins_ is irrelevant to > freeness of the license, I'd like to present a rebuttal. Robins. Because quantum. https://phys.org/news/2011-01-quantum-robins.html

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-09 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:14:52PM -0600, Robin Tarsiger wrote: > On 2017-03-08, Adam Borowski wrote: > > # Everyone who recognizes the superiority of the species Felis catus over > > # mere Homo sapiens > [...] > > # Those who have yet to mend the error of their ways > [...] > > On the other

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-09 Thread Enrico Zini
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:14:52PM -0600, Robin Tarsiger wrote: > I cannot speak for "all humans", but as a robin, I hereby claim my right > to not be in either of these sets. After all, cats and humans are _both_ > obviously inferior to glorious birds! Cheep! I, for one, welcome our new

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-09 Thread Robin Tarsiger
On 2017-03-08, Adam Borowski wrote: > # Everyone who recognizes the superiority of the species Felis catus over > # mere Homo sapiens [...] > # Those who have yet to mend the error of their ways [...] > On the other hand, it is clear that all humans belong to at least one of > these sets, at least

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-09 Thread Thomas Harding
That's obviously a useless use of cat, as licensing orthogonally on any concept of superior species would be better replaced by a cut of tee. Le 8 mars 2017 22:20:15 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski a écrit : >Hrm, looks like I have a problem with a ftpmaster being in denial. > >#

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-09 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2017-03-08 at 22:20:15 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Hrm, looks like I have a problem with a ftpmaster being in denial. > [...] > # Those who have yet to mend the error of their ways are also given all of > # the above rights, albeit grudgingly. > [...] > Thus, could anyone help, and pick a

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-08 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Adam Borowski dijo [Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:20:15PM +0100]: > (...) And as for non-copyleft licenses, there's way too many of them > to rationally choose. > > Alas, I have a problem: > * I can't seem to find a single die > * I have no ChaosKey or similar true random generator > * my CPU has no

Re: braillegraph_0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-08 Thread Adam Borowski
Hrm, looks like I have a problem with a ftpmaster being in denial. # Cat Supremacy License, version √-1 # # Everyone who recognizes the superiority of the species Felis catus over # mere Homo sapiens is hereby gladly granted the right to use, modify, # distribute, sell, borrow,