Re: L'oeuf et la poule, version Build-Depends

Jeremie Koenig wrote: Évidemment, pour compiler la libc, j'ai besoin du cross-compilo. Donc je Build-Depends: c-compiler-i386-msdosdjgpp. Seulement, pour compiler gcc, j'ai besoin des headers de la libc, donc je Build-Depends: djgpp. Et hop, une build-dépendence circulaire. Ca me tracasse quand

Re: ITO packages: ntop, apt-show-source

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote: Hi, On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote: Package: ntop Description: display network usage in top-like format ntop is a Network Top

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 22:07, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: [I've already asked a few relevant individuals about this, but am opening it up to the list at their suggestion.] I've recently been in touch with somebody (a lawyer and professor concerned with government open source policy) who is

Re: Firebird 0.6

Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So unless you have a better reason then PCness, I'll use either as the mood strikes me :) To be accurate, I don't think this is an example of PCness, but rather of PR-speak, the same sort of thing that goes into press releases (though I mean `public

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared it was at war. You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the U.S. going to help anything, regardless

second for John's amendment

Hello, I think that John's modification is a good thing. Hereby I second the amendment quoted below. Jochen On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:19:33PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: --- proposal-srivasta Fri May 16 09:42:59 2003 +++ proposal-jaqque Mon May 19 11:43:13 2003 @@ -1,139 +1,139 @@

Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge

Le dim 18/05/2003 à 16:52, Martin Schulze a écrit : I also wonder if there are efforts in progress to unify the kernel source through more than two architectures? This would require a group or architecture maintainers (current kernel package mantainers) to work collaboratively towards this

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:06:17PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared it was at war. You mean the iraq war? What's the

Re$B9f30(B! $B?M5$(B200 $B!s(BUP$BCf!*!*(B

$BF|K\0l$N=P2q$$7O%5%$%H$KL\;X$9!*(B $B$?$@:#2q0wEPO?$O(B20$B?M0J>e!"F|(B5000$B?MA}0wCf(B $B%a%k%H%b!*%d%j%H%b!*(B $BI,$:=P2q$($k(B $BKM$i$N;dC#$N!*"v#L#O#V#E"v(B $B"-"-(BAINO.COM $B"-"-(B (Bhttp://divide.jp/ai/ $B7HBS$+$i%"%/%;%9$b$G$-$^$9$h!*(B (B $B

Re: [OT] Storms (Re: Do not touch l10n files (was Re: DDTP issue))

On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:53 +0200 Martin Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:02:20 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: Tormenta en un vaso de agua in Spanish. So it seems that french and spanish drink more water than tea. Sturm im Wasserglas in German.

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Hi Greg, Now that you've got this release out, have you given any thought to the message I sent earlier about merging gdb server versions? Here it is again in case you've forgotten: Hi, The current version of gdbserver in uClinux-dist only works on the m68k. In my v850-specific version of

Bug#194280: ITP: dcraw -- This is a small utility which converts proprietary image formats used in various digital cameras into ppm

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-22 Severity: wishlist * Package name: dcraw Version : 1.110 Upstream Author : Dave Coffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.shore.net/~dcoffin/powershot * License : Unknown free (see below) Description :

Bug#194286: ITP: labrea -- a sticky honeypot and IDS

Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-22 Severity: wishlist * Package name: labrea Version : 2.5.beta1 Upstream Author : Tom Liston [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://labrea.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : a sticky honeypot

Error in upgrading libgd-perl?

Hi all, While trying to upgrade libgd-perl I get the following error: vivacia:/home/maulkin# apt-get install libgd-perl Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are

tagcolledit: first infancy of a GUI editor for package tags

Hello. I've started working at a GUI editor for package tags. It's called tagcolledit and you can find it in my apt repository: deb http://people.debian.org/~enrico/ unstable/$(ARCH)/ deb http://people.debian.org/~enrico/ unstable/all/ deb-src

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about the U.S. governments acts or positions? When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries

Re: Debian conference in the US?

* Simon Law ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared it was at war. If we have a sponsor and there are enough interested parties to warrent it I think we should do it.

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Hi, On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about the U.S. governments acts or positions?

Re: Firebird 0.6

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Dorland wrote: Could you be more specific? If there's a permission problem I'd like to fix it :) I've used the root account to install some mozilla - modules into /usr/lib/mozilla-firebird/chrome. After i changed into my normal user account I couldn't start

lintian: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath, --disable-rpath doesn't help

Hello all! I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run configure with --disable-rpath option. It is no automake problem... i've remake all automake stuff to check this. ./configure --disable-rpath works in so far that it sets or unsets $KDE_RPATH but -rpath appears

Re: Error in upgrading libgd-perl?

This is a consequence of its broken build-depends (Bug #193602). -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Re: ITP: codestriker -- A web based collaborative code review tool

I know have a working package (lintian clean). Can be found here : deb http://nthomas.free.fr/debian sid main deb-src http://nthomas.free.fr/debian sid main Hope this helps, Nicolas ps: still looking for a sponsor..

Orphaning my packages

Hello! [Please CC me!] I have some packages left I'd like to orphan: fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular software synth. Needs fltk. aseqview: displays ALSA synthesizer events. I'd be glad

Re: HylaFax

I have heard that Hylafax has a Windows client available. (I am not sure if this just gives the ability to send faxes or if it also lets you view received faxes though). Yes, there's WHFC ( http://www.uli-eckhardt.de/whfc/download.shtml ) a client program for windows to send faxes through a

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : Hi, On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you

Re: Orphaning my packages

Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd be glad if someone could orphan the packages that nobody wants to take right now, because I don't have access to a debian system to do it myself. I'd be willing to adopt fltk1.1, and will also upload a new build of spiralsynthmodular shortly

Re: Debian conference in the US?

* Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Both points of view make sense. Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a good compromise for everybody. People that do not want to go to USA are not forced to, others that do not think USA should be avoided would surely

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:06, Mathieu Roy wrote: If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government won't last. Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy people who lose their jobs because of the economy sucking. Hm, as could be seen in Iraq, boycotts

Re: Orphaning my packages

This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on these. Morgon -- You said homosexuals form a

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about the U.S. governments acts or

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 12:17:32PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: As one of the 200+ developers in the USA I don't feel it should be avoided and I feel quite out in the cold most of the time when these conferences come around because I don't have the funds to go elsewhere. I don't see any problem

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Stephen Frost wrote: I don't see any problem with having conferences in the USA, or other places for that matter, provided there are enough people who will go to warrent it and there is someone willing to sponsor it. Lots of people might not be willing to go to the USA for political reasons,

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté : On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Miles Bader dijo [Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:06:17PM +0900]: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared it was at war. You mean the iraq war? What's the

Re: Accepted ptkei 1.18.0-4 (all source)

On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: reopen 192068 thanks John O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100 Source: ptkei Binary: ptkei Architecture: source all Version: 1.18.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

Re: Debian conference in the US?

* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: It's really not any more expensive to travel to Toronto or Vancouver than it is to travel a similar distance inside the US[1]. Once you get there you'll find that the conference is cheaper since the Canadian dollar is (still) weaker than the US dollar.

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Debian conference in the US?

As other people have said: I'm not going, but I don't object to a conference in the US per se. Same here. Even if I had the money to attend, I wouldn't like to travel to the US because of the new copyright and anti-terrorist laws. Still, I think it's a good idea to arrange a conference for

Re: Accepted ptkei 1.18.0-4 (all source)

Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: reopen 192068 thanks John O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100 Source: ptkei Binary: ptkei Architecture: source all

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

This one time, at band camp, Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:49:52PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS

Re: Orphaning my packages

Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

* Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. He's

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

El día 22 may 2003, Francesco Paolo Lovergine escribía: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. This use

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

* Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. The

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:49:52PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS

Re: Orphaning my packages

This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) wrote: fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on these. No offense, but are you

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. Debian Developers' Reference actually recommends doing that on

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

This one time, at band camp, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. Debian Developers' Reference actually recommends doing

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. The developers references tells that both methods are allowed in 5.11.4

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:27:40PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote: * Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. Debian Developers' Reference actually recommends

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276) Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: It's much more helpful to write this as: yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and usefulness is :) At least I think it is not a good idea to talk about

Re: lintian: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath, --disable-rpath doesn't help

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Muszynski wrote: Hello all! I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run configure with --disable-rpath option. It is no automake problem... i've remake all automake stuff to check this. ./configure

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

This one time, at band camp, Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it does not _recommend_ that, don't misrepresent it! [...] It is an old tradition to acknowledge bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads in the first changelog entry of the proper maintainer upload, for instance, in

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying

Hello Raul, On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 04:57:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: Hard to understand? We'd require a certain level of voter approval before we'll consider an option -- options which don't achieve that can't win. How is this hard to understand? The thing which is hard to understand, is

voting system overview

Hello, For those of you, who want to make a well-informed decision in the upcoming general resolution about our voting system, the following web page should be interesting. http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/comp/vote.html There I put together pointers to all relevant

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:33:05PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: Shall I go on? No. Michael -- -!- bunny is now known as trinityBunny trinityBunny =) * trinityBunny doubles flips in the room, slow motion rotates around jbailey waves h at him in fast motion and stands still.

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

Em Thu, 22 May 2003 01:26:27 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: It's much more helpful to write this as: yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and usefulness is :) At least I

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. The developers references

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying

On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 04:57:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: Hard to understand? We'd require a certain level of voter approval before we'll consider an option -- options which don't achieve that can't win. How is this hard to understand? On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:50:02AM +0200, Jochen

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Brian Nelson wrote: If you don't do this, the original bug submitters will see a bug has been fixed, but probably not remember what the bug was, especially if he or she filed multiple bugs for the package. Furthermore, it's a real pain to have to look at the BTS, and

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:11:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: Consider the admin, who discovers some bug. They look at the changelogs for the problem package, seeing if it had a similiar bug. Also, consider that this system is not online, and the admin has no network connection. Well, an admin

Re: Orphaning my packages

Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: None taken. And no, I am not. [a DD] OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500 Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action. What you say is

Re: Debian conference in the US?

Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And I know of approixmatly zero Americans who have reason to boycott Canada. Er, well. I doubt there's a government in existance that hasn't done something objectionable enough to piss off a foreigner somewhere (e.g., recent european attempts to export

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:11:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: Consider the admin, who discovers some bug. They look at the changelogs for the problem package, seeing if it had a similiar bug. Also, consider that this system is not online, and the

Re: Debian conference in the US?

On Fri, 23 May 2003 03:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote: You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of living of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my government (which I have little control over), and you expect me to roll over and congratulate you all on

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:51:33PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: Admin installs from cd. Admin runs programs. Admin finds something he thinks is a bug. Admin reads changelog to see if the bug existed previously. hmm.. why would he do that? Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Debconf 3

Pero si nos ponemos las pilas, se puede organizar en España. Al fin y al cabo, sólo es que alguien se mueva un poco para buscar un sitio y empezar a conseguir patrocinadores. Pues a mí se me ocurre hacer la en el sur, rollo Mérida, en plan colegio mayor y muy muy secta :-)

Re: Debconf 3

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:20:47PM +0200, Amaya wrote: No tiene por qué llamarse Debconf ;-) Le podemos llamar la European Debian Celebration si queremos ;-) O DefCon en memoria de esa gran pelicula que nos intrudujo los terminos anglosajones para denominar guerra nuclear inminente =) (Estoy

DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

Hola a todos, sólo deciros que: Algunos estamos intentando que la DebConf4 sea en nuestra tierra, motivos hay suficientes: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por kilómetro cuadrado. * Un horizonte de proyectos a realizar, de los

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

On May/22, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por kilómetro cuadrado. Hombre, no creo que éste sea buen argumento. No sé cuántos desarrolladores hay entre España y Sudamérica, pero

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

El jue, 22-05-2003 a las 10:24, Roberto Suarez Soto escribió: On May/22, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por kilómetro cuadrado. Hombre, no creo que éste sea buen argumento. No sé

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

El día 22 may 2003, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez escribía: Hola a todos, sólo deciros que: Algunos estamos intentando que la DebConf4 sea en nuestra tierra, motivos hay suficientes: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

El jue, 22-05-2003 a las 10:52, Roberto Suarez Soto escribió: De todas formas, sigue habiendo más usuarios potenciales en USA o Europa que en España/Sudamérica, simplemente porque un ordenador es más asequible en USA y Europa que en Sudamérica. Y sí, otra vez es una opinión personal no

Re: Un par de problemas empaquetando aplicaciones KDE

Al mié 21 de may de 2003 a las 02:28 +0200, Alex escribió: Hola. Antes de nada, un par de cosas. En primer lugar, saludar a los miembros de la lista (es mi primer correo aquí), y felicitar a todos los que ayudan a Debian de cualquier forma. Esta distribución a mí me está encantando en

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

On May/22, Jesus Climent wrote: De todas formas, sigue habiendo más usuarios potenciales en USA o No da una. por kilometro cuadrado ¿Y eso? :-? Por extensión, es más grande el territorio de Sudamérica y España sumado que el de USA o el resto de Europa. No creo que sea mucha

Re: DebConf4, Espaa si Espaa no y tal y tal

El 22-may-2003 a las 10:24:21, Roberto Suarez Soto escribió: On May/22, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por kilómetro cuadrado. Hombre, no creo que éste sea buen argumento. No sé

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 11:20:42AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: Lo único que digo yo es que la próxima toca en el continente americano, por el acuerdo tácito que hay de hacer una un año en un lado y otra en el otro. A ver, distingamos dos cosas: 1.- la Debconf que se hace todos

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: On May/22, Jesus Climent wrote: De todas formas, sigue habiendo más usuarios potenciales en USA o No da una. por kilometro cuadrado ¿Y eso? :-? Por extensión, es más grande el territorio de Sudamérica y

Re: DebConf4,España si España no y tal y tal

Mensaje citado por: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:52:12AM +0200, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: On May/22, tapia wrote: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por kilómetro cuadrado. Ha

Re: DebConf4,España si España no y tal y tal

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 02:42:02PM +0200, Roberto Santos wrote: ¿cuantos vendreis? lo digo para decirle a mi padre el numero de cochinos que tiene que criar este año ;) Y para los que no comemos carne sin plumas, una ensaladita? data -- Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland |

nuevo y pregunta

Hola, llevo ya un tiempo lurking esta lista de correo. Así que sirva este mensaje de presentación. Hace ya tiempo que uso debian y cada día estoy más encantado. Tengo en mi casa un sistema de sensores de temperaturas conectados a una caja debian que me va registrando la temperatura y haciendo

Re: Un par de problemas empaquetando aplicaciones KDE

Hola Alex y Eric, On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 11:29:28AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: Al mié 21 de may de 2003 a las 02:28 +0200, Alex escribió: Bueno, a lo que iva... Estoy intentado empaquetar KMess para una máquina con Woody, más las actualizaciones de KDE (es lo que tengo yo, y

Re: Debconf 3

El jue, 22-05-2003 a las 03:40, Gunnar Wolf escribió: Pero si nos ponemos las pilas, se puede organizar en España. Al fin y al cabo, sólo es que alguien se mueva un poco para buscar un sitio y empezar a conseguir patrocinadores. Pues a mí se me ocurre hacer la en el sur,

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 03:24, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: On May/22, Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez wrote: * Unos proyectos en marcha que hace EMHO la comunidad de usuarios Debian mayor del mundo, al menos por kilómetro cuadrado. Hombre, no creo que éste sea buen argumento. No sé

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 04:20, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: Lo único que digo yo es que la próxima toca en el continente americano, por el acuerdo tácito que hay de hacer una un año en un lado y otra en el otro. ¿Por qué no se intenta como con la Copa Mundial? ;) ¿O bueno, lo que se

Re: Un par de problemas empaquetando aplicaciones KDE

El Jueves, 22 de Mayo de 2003 15:19, Guillem Jover escribió: [...] Que contiene el Build-Depends de debian/control ? Hmmm, pero si le compila sin debianizar, las Build-Depends _tendrian_ que estar bien. Puede que el problema venga de los flags que se le pasa al compilador o de que

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

(por favor, no me incluyáis en el CC, leñe!) El día 22 may 2003, David Moreno Garza escribía: On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 04:20, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: Lo único que digo yo es que la próxima toca en el continente americano, por el acuerdo tácito que hay de hacer una un año en un lado

Re: nuevo y pregunta

El día 22 may 2003, Jesús Roncero escribía: Hola, llevo ya un tiempo lurking esta lista de correo. Así que sirva este mensaje de presentación. Hace ya tiempo que uso debian y cada día estoy más encantado. Tengo en mi casa un sistema de sensores de temperaturas conectados a una caja

Problema con apt-get update

Hola a todos Hace una semana o asi que instale knoppix v3.2 en el disco duro y ademas de algun otro problema no tan grabe hoy no he conseguido actualizarla ya ke al hacer un apt-get update me responde tal ke asi.. Fetched 9546kB in 6m10s (25.8kB/s) Reading Package Lists... Error! E: Dynamic

Re: Problema con apt-get update

El Thu, May 22, 2003 at 06:49:47PM +0200, Daniel Firvida escribió: Hola a todos Hace una semana o asi que instale knoppix v3.2 en el disco duro y ademas de algun otro problema no tan grabe hoy no he conseguido actualizarla ya ke al hacer un apt-get update me responde tal ke asi..

Re: Problema con apt-get update

El Jueves, 22 de Mayo de 2003 19:14, Sergio Talens-Oliag escribió: El Thu, May 22, 2003 at 06:49:47PM +0200, Daniel Firvida escribió: Hola a todos Hace una semana o asi que instale knoppix v3.2 en el disco duro y ademas de algun otro problema no tan grabe hoy no he conseguido actualizarla

Re: DebConf4, España si España no y tal y tal

David Moreno Garza dijo [Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:15:06AM -0500]: ¿Y si se celebrara en algún lugar con no muchos desarrolladores de Debian, precisamente para difundir y predicar Debian? :-D No sé... Me viene a la mente algún país de Latinoamérica, donde no hay una gran cantidad de

Re: Problema con apt-get update

El Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:02:23PM +0200, Daniel Firvida escribió: El Jueves, 22 de Mayo de 2003 19:14, Sergio Talens-Oliag escribió: El Thu, May 22, 2003 at 06:49:47PM +0200, Daniel Firvida escribió: Hola a todos Hace una semana o asi que instale knoppix v3.2 en el disco duro y ademas

Re: Problema con apt-get update

Daniel Firvida [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo: El Jueves, 22 de Mayo de 2003 19:14, Sergio Talens-Oliag escribió: Pues .. no ;( aunke efectivamente esto es Sid y tenia un apt-get version 0.5.4.x sigue tal cual.. ami lo ke me descoloca un poco es Dynamic MMap ran out of room .. ke no tengo ni idea