Il 26 maggio 2010 23.40, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org ha scritto:
[...]
La domanda per questa lista è quindi: ci interessa? Se si organizziamo
un evento Debian-Ubuntu Community Conference - Italia (nome tirato a
caso in quel momento) @ Perugia, 18/9/2010. Se no ognun per se (a quel
punto
Alcuni aggiornamenti:
Nel caso la cosa interessi, ecco i dettagli logistici che grazie a Paolo
abbiamo già recuperato:
- quando: domenica 18 settembre 2010
- dove: Perugia (I.T.C. Aldo Capitini - Vittorio Emanuele Secondo)
- spazi: 2 aule (una per talk, una a-la hacklab)
Ho avuto modo di
Stefano Zacchiroli scrisse:
- per un motivo o per l'altro, da qualche anno non siamo più riusciti
a rifare la DCC-IT, magari unendo le forze abbiamo un po' più di massa
critica organizzativa
Ah... in gran parte per mia mancanza, l'anno scorso non sono riuscito a
trovare il tempo per
Il 27 maggio 2010 17.34, Luca Bruno lu...@debian.org ha scritto:
[...]
Ottimo. Noto che anche Marco si sta muovendo, possiamo vedere di
occuparcene insieme. Immagino che zack non avrebbe problemi a
scaricarci la cosa ;)
/me ci sta ;)
Inoltre, di solito gli incontri li facciamo durare più di
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Cari tutti,
ho incontrato di recente Paolo Sammicheli (in copia) che si occupa di
organizzare la presenza della comunità Ubuntu-it al prossimo software
freedom day, il 18 Settembre 2010 a Perugia.
La cosa mi interesserebbe davvero essendo anche Perugia abbastanza
On 2010-05-26, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
ETOPIC. You have to specify the format in the package. Nowhere they
write that 1.0 will disappear. And they say in the long term too, so
debian/source/format should be propagating
On Thu, 27 May 2010 00:16:01 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
Putting the list back into the loop.
On 26/05/10 23:34, Neil Williams wrote:
Declaring a format mandates touching every single package because
the vast majority of packages are currently dpkg source format 1.0
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:44:52 +0200
Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I think the announcement is wrong, we cannot ever expect every
single package to be touched for any single change. We don't even
do that when libc changes
26.05.2010 22:32, Daniel Baumann wrote:
[]
how about adding your parameters to EXTLINUX_PARAMETERS in
/etc/default/extlinux? then they will be used for all images in the
config automatically.
in case that's not what you were looking for: as stated in another mail,
i've added
On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:11:36 + (UTC)
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de wrote:
On 2010-05-26, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
ETOPIC. You have to specify the format in the package.
The lack of debian/source/format should be a de
On 2010-05-27, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
No, it doesn't. It is now but at some point there won't be any
default, meaning that if you don't have debian/source/format, dpkg
will error out. Nothing wrong with that.
If, eventually, dpkg fails with an error when debian/source/format
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:54:03AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:44:52 +0200
Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
There is nothing wrong with a source package that glides through
several stable releases without needing a rebuild, especially if it
only builds an
On 05/27/2010 08:54 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Just one question: why /boot/extlinux/ ? Why can't it be
placed directly to /boot, so that all kernel images may be
referenced using relative paths?
there's more than one file used for the config, so putting them into an
own directory is better
Neil,
am Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:04:25AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
dpkg should not abort - that will cause a FTBFS through no fault of the
package. First thing dpkg-buildpackage does is pack up the unpacked
source.
no, it does not for '-B', which is what our infrastructure uses.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ihor Kaharlichenko ce...@mifprojects.com
* Package name: python-django-photologue
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Justin Driscoll justin.drisc...@gmail.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/django-photologue/
* License :
On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:12:24 +0200
Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
Data packages are a good point, to which I reply: how will they take
advantages of new compression formats?
No need - just because these are data packages doesn't mean they are
even tens of kilobytes in size. These are source
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
But like lilo it stays out of unallocated (and therefore not backed up)
sectors. The boot block of extlinux is installed in the boot sector
of a partition, and the second stage loader occupies a file within the
Hi,
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
* dpkg-dev provides a new script called dpkg-buildflags that packages
should use in debian/rules to retrieve the default value of various
compilation flags. Bug #578597[1] has been submitted against
debian-policy. When
Le mercredi 26 mai 2010 à 23:19 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
I realise that, but it's not default in various web browsers. (Well,
most I've used seem to support both C-PgUp/C-PgDn and C-TAB/C-S-Tab).
This is probably the major gripe for me each time I end up using
epiphany for anything.
I
On 05/26/2010 11:07 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Environment variables do not override variable definitions in a makefile.
You can't believe how messy upstream stuff can be. Messing with $(LDFLAGS) and
$${LDFLAGS} and simmilar stuff just happens
--
Bernd Zeimetz
Hi!
* Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de [2010-05-27 08:11:36 CEST]:
| As far as I understood it, it's not that much about unpacking, because
| the format is pretty clear then, but about packing (or in this case
| repacking) the source package. There you should be explicit in what
| you mean
Hi,
piuparts has discovered a problem with one of my packages [1] and while
analyzing it, Holger and I came to the result, that piuparts *may* be
working wrong here - it removes the depends before purging my
(the tested) package.
Thus we are seeking for your opinion and suggestions.
For those
* Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de [2010-05-27 09:05:39 CEST]:
But I guess we already determined that automatic detection of various
things isn't always the best choice. Making 1.0 non-native and 1.0
native explicit wouldn't sound too wrong. :P)
Unfortunately, dpkg doesn't support that - thus
Hi!
* Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org [2010-05-27 10:05:51 CEST]:
Yes, we're starting a long-term migration that will require every
package to be modified. The reasons are that the dpkg maintainers
consider the format 1.0 to no longer be a desirable default for
dpkg-source given
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:26:02AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
* Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de [2010-05-27 08:11:36 CEST]:
| As far as I understood it, it's not that much about unpacking, because
| the format is pretty clear then, but about packing (or in this case
| repacking)
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
There is one possible benefit: impossibility to create a native package
when the .orig.tar.gz is missing, which happens much too often.
in my world (which doesnt consist entirely out of Debian main on
ftp.debian.org) this is a regression.
Ludovic Brenta ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org writes:
Over the last two weeks I have been testing upgrades of Ada packages
from Lenny to Sid and Squeeze in a chroot.
Thanks for looking at this.
...
The reason for all this is that when a package libX2-dev Conflicts: with
and Replaces: a
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:43 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh said:
How will adduser cope with group addition; does it skip UIDs until
it finds an unused unique UID/GID pair?
That certainly is the only approach that makes sense - it has the
benefit of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Why they want it unfortunately is a wrong reasoning - the actual
pending and still unanswered question is why it is needed. They
want people to switch to 3.0. By forcing to put something into
debian/source/format people start
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de [2010-05-27 09:05:39 CEST]:
But I guess we already determined that automatic detection of various
things isn't always the best choice. Making 1.0 non-native and 1.0
native explicit wouldn't sound too wrong. :P)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Why they want it unfortunately is a wrong reasoning - the actual
pending and still unanswered question is why it is needed. They
want people to switch to 3.0. By
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:26:02AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
* Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de [2010-05-27 08:11:36 CEST]:
| As far as I understood it, it's not that much about unpacking, because
| the format is
Stephen Leake wrote:
Ludovic Brenta ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org writes:
The reason for all this is that when a package libX2-dev Conflicts:
with
and Replaces: a package libX1-dev, aptitude does not remove libX1-dev
and install libX2-dev; instead, it marks libX1-dev as broken and leaves
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:35:34AM +0200, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:43 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh said:
How will adduser cope with group addition; does it skip UIDs until
it finds an unused unique UID/GID pair?
That
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
It would be very helpful if the dpkg source format 1.0 could also allow
.orig.tar.bz2 packages in the archive. The reason for the request should
be quite obvious - more and more upstream packages are shipped in bzip2
compressed tarballs.
]] Neil Williams
| You seem to think that every package is going to be uploaded just for
| the sake of an upload.
|
| There is no way to guarantee that ALL packages in Debian will be
| uploaded again by some point in the future.
|
| If a package does not need an upload - e.g. the only issue is
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
Why would you like to go another way with mail servers?
Because upstream doesn't want a conf.d folder, unfortunately, and that
Well, you can have something equal without upstream support by
concatenating conf.d snippets
* Mike Hommey [2010-05-27 12:00 +0200]:
There is one possible benefit: impossibility to create a native package
when the .orig.tar.gz is missing, which happens much too often.
Doesn't look like it's impossible:
| dpkg-source: info: source format `3.0 (quilt)' discarded: no orig.tar file
found
* Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org [2010-05-27 15:44 +0200]:
* Mike Hommey [2010-05-27 12:00 +0200]:
There is one possible benefit: impossibility to create a native package
when the .orig.tar.gz is missing, which happens much too often.
Doesn't look like it's impossible:
| dpkg-source:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:44:40PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Mike Hommey [2010-05-27 12:00 +0200]:
There is one possible benefit: impossibility to create a native package
when the .orig.tar.gz is missing, which happens much too often.
Doesn't look like it's impossible:
| dpkg-source:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asias He asias.he...@gmail.com
* Package name: ibus-table-chinese
Version : 1.3.0.20100527
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ibus/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : provide chinese input
* Gerfried Fuchs rho...@deb.at [100527 11:47]:
Requiring the file won't get rid of format 1.0 but will make people put
1.0 into debian/source/format. Planing to make the file mandatory might
indeed make more people think about it, though having the file won't
make the format 1.0 go away.
* Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org [100527 11:32]:
Alternatively, we could modify piuparts not to remove dbconfig-common
before the tested package isn't gone (or actually: not to try to remove
any deps before the tested package isn't gone) and thus ignore this
problem, defining it as not usual
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 08:05:32AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm still feeling uneasy about this whole bash-dash thing. We sacrified
a lot of usability in the name of POSIX compliance (only a minority of
users care) and a few seconds spared during boot (who cares? I only boot
my laptop for
On 25 May 2010 at 06:59, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org writes:
| Every now and then mini-dinstall throws us a curve ball. Right now I am
| seeing the errors below on my testing box (which is otherwise current).
|
| What can we do to fix the index file? I
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org writes:
Paul Vojta, le Thu 27 May 2010 00:47:14 +, a écrit :
In article enjn8-64s...@gated-at.bofh.it,
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu wrote:
Sorry, I don't trust in the future of LILO myself. If there's anything
which only LILO can do, I recommend you
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:10:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Colin added himself to the Uploaders field when I requested him to do so,
as he's been in charge of Ubuntu's switch to GRUB2 for Ubuntu and after
the
2010/5/26 Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de:
Harald Braumann ha...@unheit.net wrote on Tue, 25 May 2010:
On simple standard system -- one disk, one kernel in /boot, no fancy
stuff -- it works quite well.
This is enough to use grub2 for new installing of Debian.
On other systems it often
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:08:26 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[reprepro]
One think I could not answer was: can it do what mini-dinstalled called
archive_style = flat
so that we could cook-up an in-place substitution?
I don't think so.
The answer seems to be
No and pools have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org
* Package name: libversion-perl
Version : 0.82 (upstream), 0.8200 (Debian package)
Upstream Author : John Peacock jpeac...@cpan.org
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/version/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: chrysn chr...@fsfe.org
* Package name: openscad
Version : 2010.05
Upstream Author : Clifford Wolf cliff...@clifford.at
* URL : http://www.openscad.org/
* License : GPL-2+ with exception for CGAL (libcgal)
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@2008.43-1.org
* Package name: libcpan-meta-perl
Version : 2.101461
Upstream Author : David Golden dagol...@cpan.org,
Ricardo Signes r...@cpan.org
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ansgar Burchardt ans...@2008.43-1.org
* Package name: libmoosex-types-perl-perl
Version : 0.101340
Upstream Author : Ricardo SIGNES r...@cpan.org
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-Perl/
* License : Artistic
[Gerfried Fuchs]
Requiring the file won't get rid of format 1.0 but will make people put
1.0 into debian/source/format. Planing to make the file mandatory might
indeed make more people think about it, though having the file won't
make the format 1.0 go away.
It's pretty clear that this is
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:54:17PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Neil Williams
| You seem to think that every package is going to be uploaded just for
| the sake of an upload.
| There is no way to guarantee that ALL packages in Debian will be
| uploaded again by some point in the
]] Steve Langasek
| On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:54:17PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| ]] Neil Williams
|
| | You seem to think that every package is going to be uploaded just for
| | the sake of an upload.
|
| | There is no way to guarantee that ALL packages in Debian will be
| |
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
There are mostly three possibilities:
2) not require the file but choose old format in that case
- in case of error people silently get the old deficit format
That problem can easily be avoided by adding deprecation warnings.
Debhelper does this for packages that
On 27/05/2010 21:17, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I wasn't around for the libc5 = libc6 transition, but my understanding
is it was larger than 20% of the archive. I would guesstimate the
removal of /usr/X11R6 at being around the 20% mark (including binNMUs
and all). So while they're uncommon,
Peter Samuelson wrote:
It's pretty clear that this is social engineering. The dpkg
maintainers want to force every package maintainer to _think_ about
which source format they wish to use. To ensure that, in the long run,
you no longer have the choice to simply ignore the format war.
I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller steffen_moel...@gmx.de
* Package name: libfsoresource
* URL :
http://wiki.freesmartphone.org/index.php/Implementations/libfsoresource
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : freesmartphone.org
Joey,
first of all thanks for the data... :)
On 2010-05-27, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote:
I wonder if anything can be learned from debhelper's history of
compatability levels.
numpkgs compat level introduced deprecated
1 8 Jun 2010
You really are from the
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-debbugs-cc: debia...@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I no longer have time and working hardware to maintain and test the package.
I'm therefore looking for somebody who wants to adopt it.
Anyone willing to maintain it please contact the
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 22:59:25 +0200
Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:43:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 05/24/2010 11:05 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I think the announcement is wrong, we cannot
On Tuesday 25 May 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc
file that corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain,
review and fix. The .dsc files contain checkbashisms' output.
Do you want to start a list with errors that can be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Örjan Persson ora...@fobie.net
* Package name: python-setproctitle
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Daniele Varrazzo daniele.varra...@gmail.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/py-setproctitle/
* License : BSD
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
shipped with the amavis package.
Quite not. You also need to configure the incoming and outgoing ports of
amavis the correct
Am Thu, 27 May 2010 11:35:34 +0200
schrieb Wolodja Wentland:
why not make the decision to use UPG explicit by setting
UPG = True
I would say UPGs are already explicitly used.
If your UPG = True means that newly created users are created with user
private groups, than that is USERGROUPS=yes
Am Fri, 28 May 2010 00:15:17 +0200
schrieb C. Gatzemeier c.gatzeme...@tu-bs.de:
but now, if we
activate pam_umask, it will read UMASK 022 from login.defs again (and
relax it conditionally).
err, that is the case if you keep the UMASK 022 and usergroups
option (the defaults). Of course you
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:05:51 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Yes, we're starting a long-term migration that will require every package
to be modified. [..]
No, we won't break packages, it's a migration and dpkg-source will be
switched only when all packages have been modified. There are
2) A special case is true: The group is set as the main group of the
user (in /etc/passwd) while the user is NOT added to his group
in /etc/groups.
May pam_umask test this, for umask relaxation?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:47PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
How many packages are we talking about here? Is there a way to get the
number of packages that have the same version in Lenny and Squeeze?
According to a quick query on UDD, there are 3169 source packages which
have the same source
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 630 (new: 8)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 123 (new: 3)
Total number of packages
Dear all,
binary packages are built from unpacked sources through a simple interface that
combines targets of the debian/rules file and environment variables, to build
packages whose structure is documented in our Policy. What about applying the
same logic for building source packages?
This
Hi,
I'm developer of Spacewalk [1,2]. Spacewalk is an open source (GPLv2)
Linux systems management solution. It is the upstream community project
from which the Red Hat Network Satellite product is derived.
Recently we added initial support for Debian [3,4]. We even build
packages for Debian
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 06:08:43AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi,
I'm developer of Spacewalk [1,2]. Spacewalk is an open source
(GPLv2) Linux systems management solution. It is the upstream
community project from which the Red Hat Network Satellite product
is derived.
Recently we added
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Silva rac...@makeworld.com
* Package name: marave
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Roberto Alsina rals...@netmanagers.com.ar
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/marave/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Python,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:20:31 +0900
Source: haskell-fastcgi
Binary: libghc6-fastcgi-dev libghc6-fastcgi-prof libghc6-fastcgi-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3001.0.2.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
, linker and binary utilities (source)
binutils-spu - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities targeted for
spu-e
Closes: 581156 582490
Changes:
binutils (2.20.51.20100527-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Snapshot, taken from the trunk 20100527.
.
[ Jonathan Nieder ]
* debian
-4.4 (4.4.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Update to SVN 20100527 from the gcc-4_4-branch (r159909).
- Fix PR rtl-optimization/39580, PR target/44199, PR target/43733,
PR target/44245, PR tree-optimization/43845, PR debug/44205,
PR bootstrap/43870, PR target/44074, PR target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:49:01 +0200
Source: h5py
Binary: python-h5py
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Soeren Sonnenburg so...@debian.org
Changed-By: Soeren Sonnenburg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:34:24 +0200
Source: mdadm
Binary: mdadm mdadm-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian mdadm maintainers pkg-mdadm-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:54:25 +0300
Source: openoffice.org-voikko
Binary: openoffice.org-voikko
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Timo Jyrinki t...@debian.org
Changed-By: Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:18:33 +0200
Source: php-net-ftp
Binary: php-net-ftp
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dario Minnucci mid...@debian.org
Changed-By: Dario Minnucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 02:44:42 +0200
Source: redmine
Binary: redmine redmine-mysql redmine-pgsql redmine-sqlite
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:39:32 +0300
Source: suomi-malaga
Binary: voikko-fi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Timo Jyrinki t...@debian.org
Changed-By: Timo Jyrinki t...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:48:40 +0200
Source: gmic
Binary: gmic gimp-gmic
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.5.1+dfsg2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernd Zeimetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:49:47 +0200
Source: lua-json
Binary: liblua5.1-json
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernd Zeimetz b...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:32:33 +0200
Source: mpclib
Binary: libmpc-dev libmpc2
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laurent Fousse laur...@komite.net
Changed-By: Laurent Fousse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:40:26 +0900
Source: libbio-mage-utils-perl
Binary: libbio-mage-utils-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 20030502.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 00:01:05 +0900
Source: libconfig-mvp-reader-ini-perl
Binary: libconfig-mvp-reader-ini-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.101460-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:23:06 -0400
Source: libforms
Binary: libforms2 libformsgl2 libforms-dev libformsgl-dev libforms-bin
libforms-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.0.93sp1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:01:14 +0200
Source: hobbit-plugins
Binary: hobbit-plugins
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100527
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg m...@debian.org
Changed-By: Christoph Berg m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:56:46 +0530
Source: ttf-indic-fonts
Binary: ttf-indic-fonts ttf-bengali-fonts ttf-devanagari-fonts
ttf-gujarati-fonts ttf-kannada-fonts ttf-malayalam-fonts
ttf-malayalam-fonts-udeb ttf-oriya-fonts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:15:34 -0300
Source: mutter
Binary: mutter libmutter-private0 mutter-common libmutter-dev gir1.0-mutter-2.31
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.31.2-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:10:43 +0100
Source: telepathy-mission-control-5
Binary: telepathy-mission-control-5 telepathy-mission-control-5-dbg
libmission-control-plugins0 libmission-control-plugins-dev
libmission-control-plugins-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:06:46 +0100
Source: telepathy-mission-control-5
Binary: telepathy-mission-control-5 telepathy-mission-control-5-dbg
libmission-control-plugins0 libmission-control-plugins-dev
libmission-control-plugins-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:50:21 +0200
Source: pyexiv2
Binary: python-pyexiv2 python-pyexiv2-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.2.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:51:48 +0200
Source: fglrx-driver
Binary: fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-glx-ia32 fglrx-source fglrx-modules-dkms
fglrx-control fglrx-atieventsd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:10-5-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:01:28 +0100
Source: ldns
Binary: libldns1 libldns-dev ldnsutils python-ldns
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.6.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 08:08:13 -0400
Source: raidutils
Binary: dpt-i2o-raidutils raidutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.6-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Barak A. Pearlmutter b...@debian.org
Changed-By: Barak
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
