On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-01 23:17 +0200]:
The problem is, you need to entry points, one for testing as we know it,
one for rolling.
Actually, we need two entry points each, a default one and an
exceptional one. The latter
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:10:42AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 23:46 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Benefits for Debian:
- attract users who think that testing is only a development branch, and
want newer software than what one finds in stable. Those users are
On 05/02/2011 12:10 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 23:46 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Benefits for Debian:
- attract users who think that testing is only a development branch, and
want newer software than what one finds in stable. Those users are
likely to be rather advanced
Hai!
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Size is just one ingredient. There are plenty of other ways to diminish
barrier to deploy big changes in Debian: wider commit access rights,
larger VCS repositories, more
Heya,
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
I understand members of the release team feel particularly responsible to
do various release-critical tasks that should have been done by the
maintainers but haven't (for various reasons). And I guess that's the
reason of your remark.
But
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:13:31AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hai!
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Size is just one ingredient. There are plenty of other ways to diminish
barrier to deploy big
On 02/05/11 at 08:19 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:10:42AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 23:46 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Benefits for Debian:
- attract users who think that testing is only a development branch, and
want newer software
* Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org [110501 22:09]:
Who are they? Unlike this constant handwaving, I've shared my experience
(on #-devel), I'll repeat it here: at work we've like 10 Debian users,
some with stable, the other with unstable. Why? Because we're
developpers and if our software
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, it's mostly PR bullshit, and I don't expect it to significantly
change Debian development processes. However, communication is necessary
if we want to attract new users. What might change is more attention
from developers to
On 02/05/11 at 09:30 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, it's mostly PR bullshit, and I don't expect it to significantly
change Debian development processes. However, communication is necessary
if we want to attract new users.
Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 14:08 +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit :
This is something I can understand to an extent. Having a single
service providing access to the NSS databases would offer some
advantages. Unfortunately, I've only ever heard bad things about
nscd. If we could move to having a
Hi
Picking one piece that really leaves me WTF? out of this
way-too-long-thread. Happens to be a post by Lucas, but could be anyone
else too.
'rolling' is a statement by the project that we consider 'testing'
(renamed to 'rolling')
Why the heck do we start by renaming testing? This will
Hi,
On Sun May 01, 2011 at 21:53:58 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 20:51 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Sun May 01, 2011 at 20:02:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
2. determine who is in support of each action plan, through a GR or a
poll.
I don't think we
On Sun, 1 May 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
weren't there. But as a matter of fact, chances are that those people
wouldn't have been able to be Debian Developers today if it weren't
for the GR.
As I was the very first to apply under the GR (not in the first batch of
accepts though) I just
On 02/05/11 at 10:12 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
Picking one piece that really leaves me WTF? out of this
way-too-long-thread. Happens to be a post by Lucas, but could be anyone
else too.
'rolling' is a statement by the project that we consider 'testing'
(renamed to 'rolling')
On 02/05/11 at 10:31 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Sun May 01, 2011 at 21:53:58 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 01/05/11 at 20:51 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Sun May 01, 2011 at 20:02:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
2. determine who is in support of each
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net [2011-05-02 11:32]:
How much of that would apply if we renamed testing to rolling (because
it reinforces the PR message), but kept a symlink from testing to
rolling?
If you want that you need a GR as it overrides a delegate decision.
And I predict
Hi,
Since I already sent too many mails in the 'rolling' discussion, I
decided to send one more. Here is an attempt at a summary of what was
said so far. It might not be complete, it's probably a bit biased, but I
hope that it's still better than nothing. When replying, please try to
focus on
Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 02 May 2011 13:31:31 +0200, a écrit :
How we deal with freezes is the hard point in this discussion. I'm
personnally in favor of the freeze rolling for 3 months, then fork
frozen and unfreeze rolling plan, though it has some problems too
(it is not clear whether the
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's an
invitation to create an account.
You're Invited to Gmail!
priti kashyap has invited you to open a Gmail account.
Gmail is Google's free email service, built on the idea that email can be
intuitive, efficient, and fun.
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 13:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Benefits for Debian:
* Attract users who think that testing is only a development
branch, and want newer software than what one finds in stable.
Those users are likely to be rather advanced users (free
software
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:31:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Since I already sent too many mails in the 'rolling' discussion, I
decided to send one more. Here is an attempt at a summary of what was
said so far. It might not be complete, it's probably a bit biased, but I
hope that
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:40:21PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 13:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Benefits for Debian:
* Attract users who think that testing is only a development
branch, and want newer software than what one finds in stable.
Those
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-02 08:08 +0200]:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:56:14AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Pierre Habouzit [2011-05-01 23:17 +0200]:
The problem is, you need to entry points, one for testing as we know it,
one for rolling.
Actually, we need two entry points each, a
* Lucas Nussbaum [2011-05-02 09:20 +0200]:
On 02/05/11 at 08:19 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Also note that testing as is has not enough security support, and
read Carsten very good example of the PAM issues. How would CUT or
rolling address those?
The PAM issue outlines how splitting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian VoIP Team pkg-voip-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: python-starpy
Version : 1.0.0a13
Upstream Author : Michael C. Fletcher mcfle...@vrplumber.com
URL :
I too believe PPA for Debian is a must have, I personally was
thinking of making my own repository where I would store packages
before having them pushed into Debian, even if it was for
experimental.
Putting packages on Ubuntu PPA just doesn't feel right, thus I fully
support this idea and would
George Danchev wrote:
On Friday 29 April 2011 11:46:30 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- rename 'testing' to 'rolling' to make it clear that it's usable as
a rolling release
It is also possible that a 'rename' brings no more value, but a
confusion to the users for unpredictable amount of time.
Holger Levsen wrote:
Do you think a piuparts / policy workshop (or something) is useful at
DebConf11?
Please! There's never too much chocolate, cheese or QA in Debconf :)
--
.''`. Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself
: :' : -- The life of David Gale
`. `'
`-
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:00:58PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
First of all I think you should concede that the exercise you're asking
us to do cannot be done as easily as you did yours.
I don't concede that. I've read your mail, and to sum up you say:
(Note that the concede was on a side
Stefano Zacchiroli, 2011-04-30 12:56:15 +0200 :
[...]
What we lack for that to become a reality is just the code. Marc and
Tollef had set up a nice proposal [1] for GSoC this year and were
willing to mentor it, but unfortunately no student has shown up. If
there are people willing to
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
Testing also has just little protection against severe breakage if it is
frozen and updates need to go through rarely used suites. An example
illustrates this quite well:
Thanks for this example Carsten. However, one example is not
On Monday, May 02, 2011 07:31:31 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
...
How we deal with freezes is the hard point in this discussion. I'm
personnally in favor of the freeze rolling for 3 months, then fork
frozen and unfreeze rolling plan, though it has some problems too
(it is not clear whether the
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:46:40PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
I expect the multiarch paths to replace the 'traditional
cross-compiling' paths in due course for all target architectures,
including ones that aren't Debian-suported (i.e currently
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:48:22PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
We might some day later change the way apt works for upgrades is not an
argument for adding a pre-dependency now.
But that we do want to prevent a broken APT -- when using the
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:42:05PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:31:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Since I already sent too many mails in the 'rolling' discussion, I
decided to send one more. Here is an attempt at a summary of what was
said so far. It
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:48:27AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 07:31:31 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
...
How we deal with freezes is the hard point in this discussion. I'm
personnally in favor of the freeze rolling for 3 months, then fork
frozen and unfreeze rolling
* Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org [2011-05-02 18:23]:
Not that I don't understand your asking for reasons but... doesn't look
having a large user base look somehow appealing to you? I think many DDs
care for such since working on Debian brings more fun if someone's
actually using it.
Why do
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:34:02PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [110501 18:23]:
- APT entry to add (i.e. URL of the PPA so that the buildd can fetch
build-dependencies not satisfiable in the target suite)
Why not just use one location - shouldn't be
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org [2011-05-02 18:23]:
Not that I don't understand your asking for reasons but... doesn't look
having a large user base look somehow appealing to you? I think many DDs
care for such since
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:00:58PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
First of all I think you should concede that the exercise you're asking
us to do cannot be done as easily as you did yours.
I don't concede that. I've read
* Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org [2011-05-02 18:31]:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org [2011-05-02 18:23]:
Not that I don't understand your asking for reasons but... doesn't look
having a large user base look somehow
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:42:58PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Well I don't want to be convinced or not convinced, you misunderstood
why I'm asking that. I'm asking because I want to evaluate if rolling is
the sole answer we can bring to these people.
Oh no, not at all, I apologize if that
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:44:11PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org [2011-05-02 18:31]:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
* Jan Hauke Rahm j...@debian.org [2011-05-02 18:23]:
Not that I don't understand your asking for
Ingo Jürgensmann i...@2011.bluespice.org writes:
On Sun, 1 May 2011 01:36:38 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Sometimes we have a few packages we don't want to build on a certain
buildds. Sometimes this is because this package needs lots of ram. Or
it takes quite long and would waste the
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
I just wanted to add that if you would like more statistics reporting
for this purpose, I'll be happy to add that to sbuild. Currently we
only really report build time and disc space. If you want additional
data such as number of cores used,
* Jan Hauke Rahm (j...@debian.org) [110502 18:34]:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:34:02PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [110501 18:23]:
- APT entry to add (i.e. URL of the PPA so that the buildd can fetch
build-dependencies not satisfiable in the target
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:16:47PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Jan Hauke Rahm (j...@debian.org) [110502 18:34]:
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:34:02PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [110501 18:23]:
- APT entry to add (i.e. URL of the PPA so that the
* Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org) [110501 22:36]:
The problem with the moving target is that it means that d-i betas begin
to be broken as time goes on after their release, starting with the
smallest boot images and moving up to the netinst images.
We could e.g. create an copy of testing at the
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt (h...@ftwca.de) [110502 09:12]:
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
- PPA should focus on:
* co-installability when endurable;
* documented and working rollback to unstable (IOW downgrading a
package to unstable when co-installability
* Jan Hauke Rahm (j...@debian.org) [110502 19:22]:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:16:47PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
I guess I'm misunderstanding you here, so please help me out. If a
package is being worked on in different PPAs regarding different
problems (thinking of serializing
Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org writes:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 01:31:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Since I already sent too many mails in the 'rolling' discussion, I
decided to send one more. Here is an attempt at a summary of what was
said so far. It might not be complete,
On Saturday, April 30, 2011 07:36:38 PM Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem I need to solve in perl within wanna-build:
Sometimes we have a few packages we don't want to build on a certain
buildds. Sometimes this is because this package needs lots of ram. Or
it takes quite long and
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110502 19:32]:
If one could do something like:
wb gb libieee1284 mod-wsgi nflog-bindings zinnia . ia64 . !caballero
good idea. I'll consider how to do that.
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Monday, May 02, 2011 12:26:05 PM Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:48:27AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Monday, May 02, 2011 07:31:31 AM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
...
How we deal with freezes is the hard point in this discussion. I'm
personnally in favor of the
Andreas Barth wrote:
We could e.g. create an copy of testing at the time, so that the betas
will work for 3 weeks or so. Perhaps we should take an hour or so
during debconf and see where we arrive?
There is a spec for doing so, which aj mostly developed, at
'rolling' is a statement by the project that we consider 'testing'
(renamed to 'rolling')
Why the heck do we start by renaming testing? This will seriously
disrupt service for anyone for DAYS. There are just too many places
tools are using testing hardcoded. Too many users having that in
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
It's not that non-self-hosting archs should be treated differently from
self-hosted archs, but that they should be treated the *same* including the
requirement that multiarch directories be reserved for packages of the
Hi,
Someone with the handle 'mfv' came into the gtkpod irc channel wondering
about gtkpod dependencies as he was packaging it for debian.
I have already produced an ubuntu ppa for the 2.0.1-beta so thought the
debian directory would be useful.
Please find attached.
(Not registered so please cc
Le lundi 02 mai 2011 à 19:31 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
To those users that want newer software my next question would be What
software?. My feeling there is that it is only some software, allways
the same software and used for the same use case: KDE / Gnome /
Multimedia stuff for
On Mon, 02 May 2011 19:54:14 +0100, phantomjinx wrote:
Hi,
Someone with the handle 'mfv' came into the gtkpod irc channel wondering
about gtkpod dependencies as he was packaging it for debian.
I put him in CC.
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
:
Hello!
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other in a additional message
* File one bug and refer to the second package
* Something different
Patrick Strasser wrote:
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
Thanks for spotting this bug. Your contribution to Debian is
appreciated.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other
On 05/02/2011 10:46 PM, Amaya wrote:
Patrick Strasser wrote:
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
Thanks for spotting this bug. Your contribution to Debian is
appreciated.
What would be the right way:
*
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library.
I knew it! :)
I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...)
--
.''`. Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself
: :' : -- The life of David Gale
`. `'
`-Proudly running Debian
Hi!
On 02/05/2011 20:54, phantomjinx wrote:
Hi,
Someone with the handle 'mfv' came into the gtkpod irc channel wondering
about gtkpod dependencies as he was packaging it for debian.
It was me :-) Sorry if I didn't wait long enough for your direct reply.
I have already produced an ubuntu
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:20:12PM +0200, Patrick Strasser wrote:
Hello!
I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf)
exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs.
What would be the right way:
* File two bugs and refer to each other in a additional
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
[ Note that my position is based on the assumption that we have a share
of DDs interested in rolling similar to the share of DDs interested in
stable releases. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to know where we
stand regarding this. ]
I'm very
Hi,
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:18:45PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library.
I knew it! :)
I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...)
Because you looked at okular first.
okular uses libpoppler-qt4-3 which depends on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 02/05/2011 16:46, Amaya a écrit :
Patrick Strasser wrote:
If d.devel.general is the wrong group, I beg you all pardon and would
be thankful for naming a proper group.
I'm inclined to believe that discussing propper BTS handling does
On 30 April 2011 20:56, Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org wrote:
Some FAQ on this topic:
Q: Why don't you use Launchpad's PPA?
A: Last time I looked into it (together with some Launchpad engineers at
past UDS), the PPA module was too tightly integrated with other
Launchpad parts to
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Yes, absolutely. I'd even dare to say that having something like PPA for
Debian is a priority. It would be yet another way to enable people to
experiment with big changes in Debian, showing their value, with minimum
impact on the work of others.
Julien was also working on it at the same time, so I'm adding him to CC as well.
On 03/05/2011 05:22, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Hi!
On 02/05/2011 20:54, phantomjinx wrote:
Hi,
Someone with the handle 'mfv' came into the gtkpod irc channel wondering
about gtkpod dependencies as he was
(Ccing -devel@, since I have been asked about that by others)
On 03/05/11 at 01:16 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
tag 624997 - wheezy
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: writerperfect
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
No.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 20:28:52 +0300
Source: skrooge
Binary: skrooge skrooge-common
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 06:11:16 +0200
Source: eglibc
Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd
libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic libc6-udeb libc6.1 libc6.1-dev
libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 08:52:02 +0300
Source: smb4k
Binary: smb4k
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.10.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team pkg-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Fathi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 08:52:51 +0200
Source: reportbug
Binary: reportbug python-reportbug
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Reportbug Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:15:27 +0300
Source: pykickstart
Binary: python-pykickstart
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.83-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 09:40:28 +0200
Source: stardict-czech
Binary: stardict-czech
Architecture: source all
Version: 20110501-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By: Michal Čihař
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:33:17 +0700
Source: gmult
Binary: gmult
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 7.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Mahyuddin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 09:38:33 +0200
Source: lazygal
Binary: lazygal
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:09:55 +0200
Source: libprelude
Binary: libprelude-dev libprelude2 libprelude2-dbg libprelude-perl
python-prelude
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mickael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 09:44:24 +0200
Source: stardict-english-czech
Binary: stardict-english-czech
Architecture: source all
Version: 20110501-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 09:46:42 +0200
Source: stardict-german-czech
Binary: stardict-german-czech
Architecture: source all
Version: 20110501-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 17:55:01 -0300
Source: translatoid
Binary: plasma-widget-translatoid
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.30+svn1226145-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:32:40 +0200
Source: gupnp
Binary: libgupnp-1.0-3 gir1.2-gupnp-1.0 libgupnp-1.0-dev libgupnp-1.0-dbg
libgupnp-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:27:57 +0200
Source: spark
Binary: spark
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2010.0.deb-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Євгеній Мещеряков eu...@debian.org
Changed-By: Євгеній Мещеряков
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:20:13 +0200
Source: bird
Binary: bird bird6
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
Changed-By: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:36:26 +0300
Source: k3b
Binary: k3b k3b-data k3b-extrathemes k3b-i18n libk3b-dev libk3b6
libk3b6-extracodecs k3b-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 15:02:30 +0100
Source: pperl
Binary: pperl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.25-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de
Changed-By: Dominic Hargreaves d...@earth.li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:39:51 -0400
Source: python-whisper
Binary: python-whisper
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Elliot Murphy ell...@ubuntu.com
Changed-By: Elliot Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 13:48:43 +0300
Source: libgcal
Binary: libgcal0 libgcal-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Banck mba...@debian.org
Changed-By: Fathi Boudra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:18:16 +0200
Source: db4.6
Binary: libdb4.6 db4.6-util
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.6.21-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Berkeley DB Group pkg-db-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:16:29 +0200
Source: db4.7
Binary: libdb4.7-dev libdb4.7 db4.7-util
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.7.25-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Berkeley DB Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:32:59 +0200
Source: db4.8
Binary: libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8 db4.8-util
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.8.30-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Berkeley DB Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 18:24:27 +0900
Source: debiandoc-sgml
Binary: debiandoc-sgml
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org
Changed-By: Osamu Aoki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 12:29:37 +0200
Source: mesa
Binary: libgl1-mesa-swx11 libgl1-mesa-swx11-dbg libgl1-mesa-swx11-i686
libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev libegl1-mesa libegl1-mesa-dbg libegl1-mesa-dev
libegl1-mesa-drivers libegl1-mesa-drivers-dbg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:47:53 +0300
Source: mic2
Binary: mic2
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.24.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org
Changed-By: Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 13:55:25 +0200
Source: prelude-lml
Binary: prelude-lml
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mickael Profeta prof...@debian.org
Changed-By: Pierre Chifflier
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
