On 14967 March 1977, Gert Wollny wrote:
I so like proposals from people who have never ever done any of the work
they propose something one. BUt hey...
> (1) Given that all new source package come with an ITP bug, when a
> package must be rejected, the FTP team could CC this bug in the
> rejectio
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:02:10AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > > > I know for a fact that quite regularly licence checks on binNEW packages
> > > > causes RC bugs to pop up. I acknowledge it may be a burder for the ftp
> > > > team, but that reason alone probably de
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > I know for a fact that quite regularly licence checks on binNEW packages
> > > causes RC bugs to pop up. I acknowledge it may be a burder for the ftp
> > > team, but that reason alone probably deserves to keep binNEW as it is.
> >
> > That would seem to justify so
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:15:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes ("Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW
> process"):
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:17:11PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > IMO Debian's rules should require that the revision should be
> > > incremented
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 06 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:43:34PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> If a package is maintained in git, then re-using a version number
>> means force-pushing a git tag
> Just don't tag uploads until they are accepted.
This means that uploading
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 05:54:55PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> With my one of most active sponsors hat on: the current policy is that a
> version that has never hit the archive must not have a separate changelog
> entry, unless there are non-negligible users (such as a derivative, upstream
> repo
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 06 2018, Adam Borowski wrote:
> gaps in version numbering that come without an explanation also raise
> an eyebrow (thus such a gap needs a comment in the changelog).
I think this is the problem.
Ian's concern about non-identical but identically versioned source
packages flyi
Paride Legovini wrote:
|On 2018-03-01 18:17, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> But last week Paride committed "fixes"[1] after having been
|> prodded by some third party, and indeed, now S-nail is
|> reproducible on all Debian test boxes. The fix was to set the
|> built-in identification for the OS
On Tue 06 Mar 2018 at 18:34:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> bw writes ("Re: (solved) Re: wireless fail after stretch installation"):
> > I think the idea needs to be talked over a little better, because using
> > e/n/i for wireless by default after first boot has implications if the
> > user (who
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 00:30 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:27:40PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I know for a fact that quite regularly licence checks on binNEW packages
> > > causes RC bugs to pop up. I acknowledge it may be a burder for the ftp
> > > team, but t
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 07:27:40PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I know for a fact that quite regularly licence checks on binNEW packages
> > causes RC bugs to pop up. I acknowledge it may be a burder for the ftp
> > team, but that reason alone probably deserves to keep binNEW as it is.
>
> That
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 19:18 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:34:28PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > What might be reasonable is making the separation between binNEW and srcNEW
> > more obvious, especially for us on the other side. This would also
> > encourage the ftpmast
On Tue 06 Mar 2018 at 18:27:29 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brian writes ("Re: (solved) Re: wireless fail after stretch installation"):
> > #694068, #696755, #727740 and #777439.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I have read the bug logs and Trent Buck's message here
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Beaupre
* Package name: magic-wormhole-transit-server
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Brian Werner
* URL : https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole-transit-relay
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Desc
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:15:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > A changelog bloated with every replaced attempt is hard to read; gaps in
> > version numbering that come without an explanation also raise an eyebrow
> > (thus such a gap needs a comment in the changelog).
>
> How many replaced attem
bw writes ("Re: (solved) Re: wireless fail after stretch installation"):
> I think the idea needs to be talked over a little better, because using
> e/n/i for wireless by default after first boot has implications if the
> user (who is clueless) later installs a desktop environment.
If installing
Brian writes ("Re: (solved) Re: wireless fail after stretch installation"):
> #694068, #696755, #727740 and #777439.
Thanks.
I have read the bug logs and Trent Buck's message here
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694068#47
seems to suggest a way forward.
Perhaps someone would
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:34:28PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> What might be reasonable is making the separation between binNEW and srcNEW
> more obvious, especially for us on the other side. This would also
> encourage the ftpmasters to skip license checks for binNEW -- but again,
> without kno
Adam Borowski writes ("Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW
process"):
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:17:11PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > IMO Debian's rules should require that the revision should be
> > incremented (at least) when you have shared the previous revision with
> > other pe
Hi Steve
Please don't top-post and fix the length of your lines.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:22:22AM -0600, Steve Robbins wrote:
> Or: change the mechanism to avoid a trip through NEW for simple cases that
> Chris outlined: new binary or soname bump. Reserve NEW for truly new things.
Can you de
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:22:22AM -0600, Steve Robbins wrote:
> Or: change the mechanism to avoid a trip through NEW for simple cases that
> Chris outlined: new binary or soname bump. Reserve NEW for truly new
> things.
Let's not try to be wiser than ftpmasters: if, despite the increased
workloa
Or: change the mechanism to avoid a trip through NEW for simple cases that
Chris outlined: new binary or soname bump. Reserve NEW for truly new things.
On March 5, 2018 9:00:06 AM CST, "W. Martin Borgert" wrote:
>Quoting Chris Lamb :
>>> In many cases, there is an issue open about the new bina
On Tue 06 Mar 2018 at 15:01:03 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brian writes ("Re: (solved) Re: wireless fail after stretch installation"):
> > The plain and simple fact is that a user who installs over a wireless
> > link and does not have network-manager does not have any connectivity
> > to the inte
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:17:11PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes ("Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW
> process"):
> > If you consider it absurd to not increment the revision due to
> > changes that never made it in the archive, then I don't know where
> > it stop
Scott Kitterman writes ("Re: Updated proposal for improving the FTP NEW
process"):
> If you consider it absurd to not increment the revision due to
> changes that never made it in the archive, then I don't know where
> it stops.
IMO Debian's rules should require that the revision should be
incre
Brian writes ("Re: (solved) Re: wireless fail after stretch installation"):
> The plain and simple fact is that a user who installs over a wireless
> link and does not have network-manager does not have any connectivity
> to the internet after first boot. Long Wind solved the issue by taking
> the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andre Bianchi
Control: block 745661 by -1
Control: block 796777 by -1
* Package name: python-user-agents
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Selwin Ong, Loisaida Sam Sandberg
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/user-agents
* Licen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andre Bianchi
Control: block 745661 by -1
Control: block 796777 by -1
* Package name: siphashc
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Eli Janssen, Carlo Pires, Michal Čihař
* URL : https://github.com/WeblateOrg/siphashc/
* License
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 07:54:00 CET Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> We have licencecheck, and if that isn't good enough, we can improve
> it.
That's my cue to advertise "cme update dpkg-copyright" that uses licencecheck
output to provide a debian/copyright file
See [1] for details (and limitations)
On 2018-03-01 18:17, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> But last week Paride committed "fixes"[1] after having been
> prodded by some third party, and indeed, now S-nail is
> reproducible on all Debian test boxes. The fix was to set the
> built-in identification for the OS build environment to all
> "De
Pirate Praveen writes ("Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel]
three.js_80+dfsg2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> On വ്യാഴം 01 മാർച്ച് 2018 05:45 വൈകു, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For the avoidance of doubt, I don't have a problem with the specific
> > decision of ftpmaster here.
>
> Coming back to this specific r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergei Golovan
* Package name: itk4
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://incrtcl.sourceforge.net/itk/index.html
* License : BSD (the same as Tcl)
Programming Lang: C, Tcl
Description : [i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sergei Golovan
* Package name: itcl4
Version : 4.1.1
Upstream Author : Tcl Core Team
* URL : http://incrtcl.sourceforge.net/itcl/
* License : BSD (the same as for Tcl itself)
Programming Lang: C, Tcl
Description :
33 matches
Mail list logo
