* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051006 17:13]:
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and furthermore, there are some of us who have been quietly waiting for
things to settle down from the previous major transitions before doing
our own, at the request of the release team.
I'm only
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051001 22:42]:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Mailing {alpha,mips,[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my best guess. There
is usually no reply, but from some cases I conclude the mailboxes are
read. I don't know if those addresses are documented anywhere.
They're not.
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050929 10:07]:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action
for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050928 14:54]:
Wouldn't it be possible to do the following: teTeX-3.0 is uploaded to
unstable, including the libkpathsea4 and libkpathsea4-dev packages (it
uses the library itself), but at the same time libkpathsea3 and
libkpathsea-dev are still available as
Hi all,
We had a very productive QA Team Meeting in Darmstadt from the 9th to
the 11th of September[1]. The participants had a lot of fruitful
discussions during the weekend. Besides minor bits that just
happened, the following major issues progressed significantly:
* Mass package removal
Hi,
* Lennert Buytenhek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050925 11:32]:
So far we have (for sarge):
- patches for apt, build-essential, cdrdao, dpkg, gcc, glibc, kaffe,
libsdl, linux-kernel-headers, ltrace, makedev, mozilla, strace and
util-linux to teach their config scripts/files et al. about the
Hi,
* Debian-armeb Porting Team ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050922 14:26]:
On 9/21/05, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These criteria do _not_ control addition of an architecture to unstable,
but rather apply to architectures which the ftp-masters have accepted
into unstable
* Ingo Juergensmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050921 14:54]:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:41:13PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
| * Developer availability: The architecture must have a
|developer-available (i.e. debian.org) machine that contains the
|usual development chroots (at least
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050921 15:25]:
Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 23:41 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
For that reason, we discussed in multiple meetings, together with porters,
ftp-masters and other people more than once how the criteria should
look. Also, there was more
* Ingo Juergensmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050921 15:28]:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 03:19:16PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Ingo Juergensmann]
Although it was discussed several times, I have still no idea how those
users should be counted?
Two ideas.
- Get them to install
* Ingo Juergensmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050921 16:53]:
What about such ports like m32r? Some embedded devices might run that port,
but the user doesn't even know about which arch he's using nor that he's
using Debian and certainly not that he is intended to give a hey, i'm using
that port
Hi all,
It has been discussed for a while already. While we have release
criteria for packages, up until now we don't have any for the
architectures. However, decisions made about an architecture affect
both our users (and developers) and the release cycle much more than
decisions about an
* Michael Vogt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050910 15:57]:
I'm happy to tell you that apt is able to use those index files
now. Robert Lemmen and I implmeneted the needed support.
you might be interessted that secure-testing.debian.net has now native
support for index diffs (even though only very
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050909 10:01]:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Looks like its entire chain is ready, so now you need a hint. Ask
debian-release to do this:
the page on excuses was speaking of an hint...
what is it ?
choice 1) a plain
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050908 13:39]:
(maybe I do not properly understand how the transition unstable - testing
goes , but...)
my packages from source libprinterconf, see
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libprinterconf
are waiting for snmpkit to go into testing;
* Paolo Pantaleo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050907 13:55]:
I have spent some time to write the bash completion for apt-file command.
I have written a pair of email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i didn't get any
response. Now i want to submit a patch for bash_completion file that
add the apt-file support.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:00:43 +0200
Source: netpbm-free
Binary: libnetpbm10-dev netpbm libnetpbm9 libnetpbm9-dev libnetpbm10
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:10.0-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andreas Barth [EMAIL
-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libxclass0-dev - C++ GUI toolkit for X
libxclass0c2 - C++ GUI toolkit for X
xclass-common - common components for C++ GUI toolkit for X
Closes: 297838
Changes:
xclass (0.8.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* builds
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050829 20:39]:
Oh, this seems to imply that security bugs must be tagged sarge
manually, otherwise the bug will soon disappear from the radar
screen. 8-(
Is it acceptable if this tag is set by non-maintainers?
yes.
Cheers,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi all,
we currently have a couple (or rather: way too many) transitions already
ongoing. Please, don't upload shlib bumps or lib renamings unless
required by one of these transitions.
glibc 2.3.5
===
This is the transition that blocks almost all packages from reaching
testing.
Hi,
(that I answer to this mail is just pure Chance - it's meant at you
both, and I might have answered to another mail equally well :)
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050827 10:46]:
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 10:34 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Thijs Kinkhorst:
unverifiable grave
Hi,
[full cite left for d-ds usage]
* Stephane Chauveau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050825 01:16]:
I was profiling the memory usage of libgtk when discovered something
very strange.
As you may know, shared memory are usually mapped in 2 different memory
segments.
The first segment containing
Hi,
* GOTO Masanori ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050824 10:38]:
At Sun, 21 Aug 2005 03:58:24 +0200,
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
- must be a developer-accessible debian.org machine for the
architecture
Does this part mean developer-accessible machine is always usable for
all debian developers?
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050824 15:52]:
On 8/24/05, Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Wouldn't that at least catch the non-platform-specific bugs?
They are usually caught fairly quickly. The problem here is what to
do in the cases where nobody cares enough about
* Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050823 00:18]:
[John Hasler]
Make it 98% of the packages buildable on the accepted port with the
highest build percentage.
That's not fair either, unless you require all packages to be autobuilt
(which is a thread we don't need to duplicate now).
Hi,
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050823 03:32]:
On the other hand I feel that a port with even 80% of all packages
available can be very very usefull. Even a port without any X can be
usefull if that lack of software is intentional and not just inability
to build something.
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050823 22:24]:
Doing a count yourself you can get 10% divergence from the buildd.d.o
stats depending what you count exactly.
So before any line should be drawn someone should define a correct
counting method and generate at least a month worth of
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050823 22:58]:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is out of date since it does not explain ~ yet. Maybe, if you have
the time and since you just looked at the matter closely anyway, you
could draw up a few lines and send a patch?
I'm
* Riku Voipio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 00:07]:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:54:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Peter 'p2' De Schrijver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050821 22:39]:
- must have a working, tested installer
Trivial. debootstrap does that.
How do you boot the system
* Peter 'p2' De Schrijver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 10:44]:
How do you boot to a system to run debian-installer when there is no
bios or bootloader on the system yet?
Just take a look at the existing Debian ports, and you see that it's ok
to use a bios that's part of the hardware.
* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 11:36]:
I understand that the amd64 port has to be recompiled for the
final inclusion into the official archive because the current amd64
packages have not been built by DDs. But currently more than 10% of
the unmodified source packages from
* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 12:56]:
On 05-Aug-22 11:48, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 11:36]:
I understand that the amd64 port has to be recompiled for the
final inclusion into the official archive because the current amd64
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 12:35]:
On 8/22/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular, we invariably run into arch-specific problems every time
a new version of a toolchain package is uploaded to unstable. Some may
remember that the new glibc/gcc blocked
* Ingo Juergensmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 10:42]:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:58:24AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
4. The requirement that any port has to have 5 developers support it,
and be able to demonstrate that there are (at least) 50 users.
How should this demonstration
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 17:01]:
On 8/22/05, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 12:35]:
On 8/22/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular, we invariably run into arch-specific problems every time
* Gunnar Wolf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050822 18:01]:
Huh? Would an off-the-shelf old 1.5GHz P4 lag behind a top-of-the-line
m68k or ARM?
If you manage to put enough ram in the current arm: Definitly yes. Last
time when I was about to buy me a new machine, the only reason why I
didn't buy an
Hi,
* Peter 'p2' De Schrijver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050821 22:39]:
Some comments :
- must include basic UNIX functionality
Whatever that may mean
there are processes. there is dns name resolution. there is networking.
there is chroot. etc. Just really basic things (and, of course, none of
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050813 13:40]:
Le vendredi 12 août 2005 à 18:32 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
1. The system warns that the bug tracking system contains patches,
but there aren't any bugs with patches except one bug that has
been closed for a
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050813 19:08]:
Looking at the file you indicated I see :
dn: cn=258977,dc=current,dc=bugs,dc=debian,dc=org
objectClass: debbugsBug
debbugsID: 258977
debbugsSubmitter: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debbugsDate: 1089640983
debbugsPackage: icu
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050813 20:30]:
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050813 19:29]:
Le samedi 13 août 2005 à 19:11 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
I see debbugsDone and yet all available versions have the bug. I'm
lost as to what open/done means in any case
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050813 19:29]:
Le samedi 13 août 2005 à 19:11 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
I see debbugsDone and yet all available versions have the bug. I'm
lost as to what open/done means in any case. :-)
Hm, it could be that my logic has a flaw here. I
Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
mgetty - Smart Modem getty replacement
mgetty-docs - Documentation Package for mgetty
mgetty-fax - Faxing tools for mgetty
mgetty-pvftools - Programs for listening and manipulating pvf and rmd files
mgetty
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]:
Is this a bug in Björns script, or in the new versioned BTS, or in
katie's code?
Britney is version-tracking agnostic currently. (Though that's one of
the issues I want to work on this weekend.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* kamaraju kusumanchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]:
I was just wondering if there are any efforts currently undergoing to
make this a reality? or has the idea been just dropped? What is
preventing its implementation?
Currently, even the daily dinstall is creating pain to us, as spohr
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
You can do that only if those old debconf
* Anthony DeRobertis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050804 11:55]:
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
It was an advertisement for a recruiting party. That's commercial by
any definition.
Which is wholy irrelevant, because Debian's mailing list policy
prohibits UBE, not UCE. See:
* Miles Bader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050804 13:54]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which is wholy irrelevant, because Debian's mailing list policy
prohibits UBE, not UCE. See:
In that case, the description needs to be fixed.
Why?
Because the intent is obviously to forbid any
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050804 18:48]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Miles Bader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050804 13:54]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which is wholy irrelevant, because Debian's mailing list policy
prohibits UBE, not UCE. See
* Nigel Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050802 05:31]:
Also: say that if an AM/DAM does not process x applications a month
(reasonably fair amount (say 5) and allow for vaccations/sickness etc)
then they may face removal
I don't know if you've every worked as AM, but if you have other duties
in
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050802 12:19]:
And why is approval by DAM not equal to account creation? It seems to me
that the account creation step could be fully automated: checking the box
approved by DAM could trigger an insert into the LDAP database thereby
creating the account.
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050802 13:41]:
And even then, appearently the DAM works like this: I approve person X,
let's check his box, but I'll add the account at some point later on (this
takes weeks on average). When you check the box you might add the account
aswell when you're
* Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:20]:
I'm not sure if any additional AMs are necessary -- there is a
sufficient quantity of them to cover all current DD applicants...
We would need more good AMs, we have too few.
Cheers,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Neil McGovern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 14:02]:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:20]:
I'm not sure if any additional AMs are necessary -- there is a
sufficient quantity of them to cover all current DD
Hi,
* Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 15:21]:
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-01 15:16]:
* Neil McGovern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 14:02]:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:20]:
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
we currently have almost 800 RC bugs in etch due to small glitches that
started to make code FTBFS with the new gcc version.
It is urgently necessary that maintainers start to fix their own
packages, and that whoever has some time at their
Hi,
libdb4.1 should be removed from Debian soon. The following packages
still use it (but could move forward to the more recent db4.2 or db4.3
package):
arla
kerberos4kth-servers
vacation
libedataserver1.2-4
libroken16-kerberos4kth
kerberos4kth-kdc
libapache-mod-witch
libotp0-kerberos4kth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:15:13 +0200
Source: yudit
Binary: yudit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7.6-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Radovan GarabÃk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
db2-doc- Berkeley v2 Database Documentation [html txt ps]
libdb2 - The Berkeley database routines (run-time files)
libdb2-dbg - The Berkeley database routines (debugging libraries)
libdb2-dev - The Berkeley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:56:22 +0200
Source: cadaver
Binary: cadaver
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.22.2-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 12:58:31 +0200
Source: cheesetracker
Binary: cheesetracker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth
-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
snd- Sound file editor
snd-doc- Sound file editor (documentation)
snd-gtk- Sound file editor (GTK+ user interface)
snd-gtk-alsa - Sound file editor (GTK+ user interface)
Closes: 317219
Changes:
snd (7.8-1.1) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:38:42 +0200
Source: specimen
Binary: specimen
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.5-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduardo Marcel Macan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:56:28 +0200
Source: zynaddsubfx
Binary: zynaddsubfx
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.1-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduardo Marcel Macan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas Barth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:45:04 +0200
Source: spiralsynthmodular
Binary: spiralsynthmodular
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.2a-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andreas
-By: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libxclass0-dev - C++ GUI toolkit for X
libxclass0c2 - C++ GUI toolkit for X
xclass-common - common components for C++ GUI toolkit for X
Changes:
xclass (0.8.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* c++-abi-transition
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050728 22:39]:
on request of Ryan Murray I stopped the bugs2ldap-gateway on
bugs.debian.org. I'll move that gateway to some other host as soon as I
have time. At least the following services are broken by that:
- the wnpp bug list
- bts.turmzimmer.net
Hi,
on request of Ryan Murray I stopped the bugs2ldap-gateway on
bugs.debian.org. I'll move that gateway to some other host as soon as I
have time. At least the following services are broken by that:
- the wnpp bug list
- bts.turmzimmer.net
I am sorry for that. I'll follow up as soon as this
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050726 09:26]:
On 7/26/05, Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 18:20 -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
It's been saying that ncurses is only 3 days old for the past four
days. Any idea what's up?
Well, ftp-master is down, so
* Stig Sandbeck Mathisen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050719 09:31]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be better if there would be some configureable option in
lsb-base.
,
| Angry Fruit Salad?
|
| [yes] [no]
`
configuration option like in set style = plain in
/etc
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050718 20:17]:
On Jul 18, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to configure this to not create masses of processes and
confusing the user with colors?
You can write your own package which conflicts+provides lsb-base and
implements
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050718 17:21]:
The BTS records that bug #NN was fixed in 1.1-sarge1 and 1.3, and
let's say the bug was found in version 1.1. Since it has the changelogs
(it gets these from ftp-master), it can build up a tree of which package
versions are based on which
* Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050714 02:21]:
texi2html's behavior changed recently: if it is invoked with
-split=chapter, old versions place the HTML files in the same
directory as the documentation source, whereas new versions place the
generated files in a subdirectory.
After I'd
* Eduard Bloch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050708 17:10]:
Debian 4.0 for etch, 4.1 for etch stable release 1, 4.2 for etch stable
release 2, 4.2a for etch stable release 2 with a minor CD mastering fix
(for example), etc.pp.
Well, Woody was 3.0, Sarge was 3.1, so the logical next number would be
3.11
Hi,
* Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050710 15:15]:
I think that's grossly unfair. There is nothing in debian-release's
description to give any hint that it is not a discussion list.
Thanks for your hint. This is fixed now.
Cheers,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Kevin Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050707 12:33]:
With the recent article from Zdnet, does Debian need a press officer or
www.debian.org/press? If harm is done to the reputation to the Debian
organization by word or deed, should there be someone to respond to
this?
We have a press office, and
Hi, All,
there are some release policy changes for etch:
One change was quite automatic with the so called editorial changes to
the social contract - it is now required that all content in main and
contrib is DFSG-free. This mail is not a call for mass bug filing - please
see Frank's mail about
* Margarita Manterola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 16:45]:
On 6/23/05, Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a better solution to this?
I think that there have been proposals for a new header that
accomplishes what you want,
Well, a new header would be nice, of course. But
* Petri Latvala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050624 17:57]:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:30:08PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:21 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to depend
on foo. foo-data does not provide
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050626 08:59]:
In any case, since you're the maintainer of the package, the decision is
ultimately yours -- see the Debian Constitution, §3.1, point 1. In other
words, you /are/ empowered to accept or reject this deal; and although I
would prefer that you
* Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050622 11:22]:
On Monday 20 June 2005 21:45, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, the major problem now are the @packages.debian.org addresses, I
have ~20 of them and most days they account for 1/3 to 1/2 of all the
spam I receive (and almost
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 16:50]:
* Andreas Barth [Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:54:29 +0200]:
The packages.d.o-addresses are a really useful tool for contacting
multiple maintainers e.g. for transitions. They were quite helpful
during e.g. the release of sarge.
There are plans
* Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 18:04]:
On Thursday 23 June 2005 21:54, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The packages.d.o-addresses are a really useful tool for contacting
multiple maintainers e.g. for transitions. They were quite helpful
during e.g. the release of sarge
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 19:31]:
On Jun 23, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that
both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address
requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 18:27]:
Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers:
- toolchain transition
- xorg
- sorting out docs-in-main vs. the DFSG
- SCC; amd64 as an official arch
So SCC is now a fact, not a proposal anymore?
I hope you remember well that SCC=ports.d.o
* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 18:32]:
aurelien == Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aurelien Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers: - toolchain transition - xorg - sorting out
docs-in-main vs. the DFSG - SCC; amd64 as an official arch
aurelien
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050617 17:08]:
Le Ven 17 Juin 2005 14:13, Steve Greenland a crit :
On 17-Jun-05, 01:41 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the delay it creates. [...] but for our @debian.org addresses ...
that sucks, I often rely on the fact that
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050617 17:34]:
I perfectly understand what SMTP is, and I perfectly *don't*
understand why having a 30 minutes delay or even a 2 or 3 hours
delay in some conditions is tolerable.
Come one. We're speaking on additional 5 minutes on the first
* Jonas Meurer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 12:48]:
all we can discuss are principles, not particular situations. if we
decide how to behave in every particular situation, we will have very
inconsistent licences, copyrights, whatsoever in the archive.
Fine. And we also agree that the basis for
* Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 10:59]:
The name TrustedSomething implies that the Something in question
isn't secure. That's what got told to them, and they were asked to
change their name. It's all in the -project archives.
Very different from the Mozilla situation.
Nice
* Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 11:01]:
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about Galeon and the others Gecko-based browsers ?
Non issue.
Nearly all organizations care about internal standards. If the
organization policy for web browsers is Firefox, every
* Humberto Massa Guimarães ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 14:07]:
Not really, because the DFSG is not supposed to apply to trademarks.
This is the center of Wouter's and Marco's argument, IMHO. But I don't
see anything in the DFSG restricting it to copyrights or excluding
trademarks or
* Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 15:11]:
[Marco d'Itri]
Not really, because the DFSG is not supposed to apply to trademarks.
[Peter Samuelson]
I'm curious to know where you got that impression. I just reread the
DFSG and it makes no mention of copyrights, trademarks or
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 15:33]:
Le mercredi 15 juin 2005 à 13:27 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
Fine. And we also agree that the basis for that is the DFSG? If so,
where does the DFSG speak about trademarks at all?
The license of firefox is DFSG free
* Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050615 18:23]:
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Anyone who gets firefox from Debian has the same rights under the
trademark license: either they ask the Mozilla Foundation whether they
adhere to their standards, or they rename the thing.
* Sebastian Ley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050611 12:17]:
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 07:43 schrieb Steve Langasek:
I'm also not really convinced that a 12-month release cycle is actually a
good idea at this point -- in terms of either setting believable
expectations, or what users of stable
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050608 03:35]:
- alpha: one buildd, able to keep up with current package volume; no spare
buildd due to the principal candidate being inexplicably unbootable now
(oh yeah, btw, the primary failed and was off-line for a day, a week
before release);
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050607 02:01]:
any progress on making libselinux1 a Required package?
the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
on this one thing happening.
no libselinux1=Required, no debian/selinux [all dependent packages
e.g.
* Peter 'p2' De Schrijver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050607 10:51]:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That sounds retarded in an age where a 200GB HD cost less then 100
Euro...
Regarding storage:
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050531 08:58]:
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But setting up autobuilders doesn't require a new infrastructure
Hi,
Well, just in case it wasn't obvious to everyone from looking at the
release-critical bug stats, we should probably come out and say it: the
the count of release critical issues affecting sarge is still going
down, but it's not yet down to zero, which means no release this
weekend.
But we
501 - 600 of 959 matches
Mail list logo
