Be advised that at approximatly 00:00:00 UTC, the ballot for the proposal
to change our Social Contract will be issued.
One person mentioned not understanding my last email so here's the
executive summary: Changing the Social Contract and DFSG has the same
requirments for changing the
: Christian Steigies
N: Christoph Baumann
N: Christoph Lameter
N: Christoph Martin
N: Christophe Le Bars
N: Christopher Lawrence
N: Craig Brozefsky
N: Craig Sanders
N: Craig Small
N: Dale Martin
N: Dale Scheetz
N: Dan Jacobowitz
N: Dan Nguyen
N: Daniel Martin
N: Daniel Patterson
N: Darren Benham
N: Darren
Then close some bugs :)
No, seriously, that's how it's created but as long as we don't start ignoring
bugs, we'll never see or 9 bugs in a single directory.
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:46:07PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
I'm currently working on a tool that automatically fetches all
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:19:56PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
No, seriously, that's how it's created but as long as we don't start
ignoring
bugs, we'll never see or 9 bugs in a single directory.
Yeah, but the entire reason behind
What do you think?
- Forwarded message from Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 21/09, Darren Benham wrote:
| And do what... there are going to be keys that aren't in the debian keyring..
Non-developpers should not be allowed to *manipulate* bugs IMO.
- End forwarded message
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 06:23:27PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
Of course not, but only the package maintainer is supposed to close bugs on
her package. Even other Debian developers should use the fixed state.
Unless somebody's changed something while I wasn't looking, Debian accepts
The BTS should check pgp signatures?
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:49:44PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Joseph Carter wrote:
Essentially, it does exactly what people like me have been complaining it
didn't do: IGNORE the MIME/PGP/whatever crap and just read the message.
That
I thought some of you might be interested in a few changes that have been
made to the BTS software...
In the new software, the X-Debian-CC was changed to X-Debbugs-CC (more
general) and it appears to be working.
Some of the perl scripts have been made -w clean.
A column was added to
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
With an alias so that X-Debian-CC still works?
Not guarenteed... It's not in the upstream package so I'd have to remeber to
put it in every time I upgrade..
Some of the perl scripts have been made -w clean.
and `use strict;'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 45417 emacs19
Bug#45417: general: Lines referring to package remain in /etc/suid.conf after
purging
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `emacs19'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren
.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29
.
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
We can ask the new project leader to issue the permission and ask for the link
when the election is through ;)
On 29-Jan-99 Ben Collins wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 09:51:51AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
On 29-Jan-99 Brian Ristuccia wrote:
In order to protect our trademark, we'd either
.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian
.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS
on the final
contestant logos.
- --
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y
Debian Free Software Guidelines
---
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darren Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
draft version 2.5.2 25
through the make system
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
be interpreted to
extend to other identifiers besides name or number (such as icon used
in a GUI to identify the software, or a logo affiliated with the
software)?
No, the first refers to using the author's name (such as Buddha Buck or Darren
Benham). The second refers to the name of the software
://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian
of the one proposal will be offered
(and the current DFSG, too).
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren
://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian
://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ
.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24-Jan-99 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Darren Benham wrote:
The current license? Are you sure? It needs to be rewritten if for no
other
reason but to remove the expiration date.
Okay, so I should have read the license before posting
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL
way-shape-form.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS
://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ
...
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ
---
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darren Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
draft version 2.4.1 18 January 1999
Copyright Notice
copyright ©1999 Anthony Towns Darren Benham
This document
GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X
.
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL
://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* KC7YAQ
.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L
?
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L
you,
Darren Benham
Project Secretary
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w
files in News/1997 (19971125.wml)
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham
it in contrib or non-free :( Mine won't port.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* * E? W+++$ N
- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b DI+++ D
packages, include both in one
package or just drop the non-gui?
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren
]
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L
*
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++*
* * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE
How about ship Hamm with 2.0.33 as setup but include what's necessary for
2.0.34 the way Bo has 2.0.29 but includes the stuff for 2.0.30
--
http://benham.net/index.html
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++ P+++$ L++ E?
57 matches
Mail list logo
