Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:10:54AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
So, does anybody still see reasons to continue supporting a standalone
/usr?
There had been lots of responses to that.
Yes, the most repeated argument has been mount /usr via NFS.
Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:48:58AM +0200]:
Hi,
I recently converted a few quilt using local packages to the new 3.0
(quilt) format. Additionaly those packages are kept in an RCS
(mercurial here). Now the problem is: How to version
-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de
Description:
ia32-apt-get - Apt-get and dpkg wrapper for on-the-fly ia32-libs conversion
ia32-archive - Create a local archive of converted i386 debs for amd64 and ia64
ia32-libs-tools - Tools for converting
Hi,
I recently converted a few quilt using local packages to the new 3.0
(quilt) format. Additionaly those packages are kept in an RCS
(mercurial here). Now the problem is: How to version control them?
The new format allows one to just edit the source and build it. No
creation of patches
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes:
On Mon Apr 06 08:55, Frans Pop wrote:
This is a heads up mail for the D-I team.
I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
discussed on d-devel, especially since it impacts more than just D-I. I
suspect there are
Joerg Jaspert jo...@ganneff.de disait :
we just added two new architectures to the Debian archive. Everybody
please welcome
kfreebsd-i386 AKA GNU/kFreeBSD i386
kfreebsd-amd64 AKA GNU/kFreeBSD amd64
Hi Joerg,
What should be done with amd64-libs and ia32-libs now? Can we add
those
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org (01/04/2009):
Although I admit that schroot is a neat tool to deal with that, it is
overkill in the case of wine, and much too complex for users that would
be interested to use wine: one of the public that can be
Michael Bramer gr...@deb-support.de writes:
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb:
Andreas Tille til...@rki.de writes:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Michael Bramer wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb:
I think the idea of using the Description-md5sum is that in most cases
the md5sum remains identical
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
Currently the size makes regular uploads too costly imho. And the
security team is still not supporting ia32-libs. I even did prepare an
security upload for etch last year that they only had to sponsor but
never heard back from the team.
With my
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow [Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:33:32 +0200]:
Mark Hymers has talked about providing a mechanism to ensure source
packages stay on the pool when other stuff has been built
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes:
On Mon Mar 30 17:20, Roger Leigh wrote:
With multiarch, it's a different story, but we aren't quite there yet.
Multiarch is definitely the right way to handle this and I think we
should were possible be putting effort into that and not hacks.
I
Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org writes:
[Goswin von Brederlow]
Currently ia32-libs source builds one ia32-libs.deb. Not split up per
binary package it contains.
Yes but I thought we were talking about changing that, so that it
builds ia32-libc6, ia32-libssl0.9.8, etc. That is how I
Andreas Tille til...@rki.de writes:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Michael Bramer wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb:
I think the idea of using the Description-md5sum is that in most cases
the md5sum remains identical for many versions. If you use the
packages actual version then every upload
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
Hi,
On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Doesn't this do what you want?
Depends: pdns-backend-ldap | bind9, pdns-recursor | bind9
sure, that works and thats what I'm doing now. But it's ugly and redudant and
potentially
EricSingleton set...@gmail.com writes:
On Mar 24, 4:00 am, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, set...@gmail.com wrote:
I preferDebian4.0 because I feel it is more stable than 5.0.
Please define more stable.
What are the problems which you have observed? Did you
Andreas Tille til...@rki.de writes:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Michael Bramer wrote:
if we like to remove the long description from the package file, we
must change apt in some way and use some other rules for select the
right description (a new 'Description-md5sum' or the Version-Nr)
I'd call
ftpmaster: Please comment on the last section concerning DAK behaviour.
Hi,
before Lenny ftpmaster asked us (ia32-libs maintainers) to do
something about the mess that is ia32-libs. Specifically that it is a
HUGE source duplication and a security nightmare. Unfortunaetly there
wasn't enough time
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow [Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:33:32 +0200]:
Hello, [-mentors only Bcc'ed to drop it from the discussion]
Executive summary: concerns about ia32-apt-get raised, lesser hack
proposed for comments.
before Lenny ftpmaster asked us
Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org writes:
Goswin von Brederlow, le Mon 30 Mar 2009 14:33:32 +0200, a écrit :
Ia32-apt-get provides wrappers for dpkg.deb and apt-get that allow
installing deb packages from an i386 repository (or local file)
directly.
Mmm, couldn't there be any
Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org writes:
[Adeodato Simó]
Mark Hymers has talked about providing a mechanism to ensure source
packages stay on the pool when other stuff has been built from them (eg.
kernel module packages). With this, ia32-libs could become a small
source package containing
Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com writes:
Hello Goswin et al,
IMHO, the things you are talking about are quite nice. They way it
works sounds to me a little complex, that it is very close to the idea
of crosscompiling, as the *right way*, as opposed to accumulate dirty
hacks and
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
It seems to me that you are indeed close, but with the exception of
this required include in all our debian/rules, which will be a PITA to
achieve.
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:11:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
Given that the problems are quite
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:36:17PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Note that apt-cross and ia32-apt-get can be used
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:40:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
If you want to get some more multiarch ennemies, this is clearly the way
to go.
The alternate method is to post a list to debian-devel,
Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk writes:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:36 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Note that libc6 and libc6-i386/amd64 will neccessarily always conflict
due to the dynamic linker
Really? I thought the i386 dynamic linker was /lib/ld-linux.so.2 and the
64 bit one
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
1) How to specify an arch in sources.list?
Don't. Specify it in apt.conf
Suggestion:
deb [arch=i386,amd64] http://ftp.debian.org sid main
APT::Arches i386,amd64
Or something.
What if one
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
not before. This is after it has already killed multiarch for 2
stable releases. If we don't get things moving in parallel it will
never be ready
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes:
This one time, at band camp, Goswin von Brederlow said:
1) How to specify an arch in sources.list?
Don't. Specify it in apt.conf
Suggestion:
deb
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
And by the way. We had basic multiarch support before sarge. This is
not before. This is after
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:29:08PM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:21:44PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
I think it would be very helpful if somebody could summarize why a
multiarch system is useful, except for the obvious case
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 15 mars 2009 à 01:30 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Say you have acrobat reader installed which depend on ia32-libs-gtk.
You also have libgtk2.0 (i386) installed with a newer version that
breaks acrobat reader (like it did last year
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:55:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Clint Adams
| It may be time to change packages installing files to
| /emul/ia32-linux (which violates the
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
3. dpkg-buildpackage is probably the wrong place to put this solution
in.
Why?
The fact that dpkg-buildpackage's setting the variables is not
easily configurable, and presents to make as
Hi,
over the weekend I did some work on multiarch again and did notice
some new and old problems when adding more libraries to my test set.
Given that the problems are quite easily detectable I'm considering
scanning all packages for their occurance and reporting bugs for them.
In detail I'm
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:55:36AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 15 mars 2009 à 01:30 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Say you have acrobat reader installed which depend on ia32-libs-gtk
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:55:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Clint Adams
| It may be time
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 12:11 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Example: libgtk2.0-0 contains /etc/gtk-2.0/im-multipress.conf
For this I want to file bugs (on top of violations of the MUST
directive) requesting that either the conffile is split
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Mar 16, Simon Richter s...@debian.org wrote:
Well, it would get i386/amd64 in line with sparc/sparc64, powerpc/powerpc64
and s390/s390x. That would allow us to get rid of a lot of specianl cases,
including the hack for libc6-386.
I don't see
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:36:17PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
One of the goal of multiarch is to avoid having
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:05:42PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Taken together, this guarantees the newer libs would always be found before
the older libs, so there's no need to do extra special-casing for those
libs
that were previously
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:03:06AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
What transitional issues is that going to cause us if and when
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org writes:
It may be time to change packages installing files to
/emul/ia32-linux (which violates the FHS) to use
/usr/lib32 instead.
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO.
It is high time to change to the multiarch dir. For that gcc needs to
be fixed first so compiling 32bit
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:50:23PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Could we pretty please use the multiarch paths here if we start moving
stuff around? We're going to need to patch
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Clint Adams
| It may be time to change packages installing files to
| /emul/ia32-linux (which violates the FHS) to use
| /usr/lib32 instead.
Could we pretty please use the
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
However, there is another issue here - if the device is multi-user,
most login managers cannot cope with a touchscreen keyboard. gpe-login
is one that can, gdm cannot.
Having touchscreen keyboard support in X is good as long as the user
can log into
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:03:06AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
What transitional issues is that going to cause us if and when multiarch
becomes generally available, if biarch packages start using the path now?
libfoo i386 then needs Replaces
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes:
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
how to had new services in /etc/services database?
Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that.
Hmm. Reading your and dato
Roberto C. Sánchez robe...@connexer.com writes:
[My apologies in advance for the cross-posting.]
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Daniel Wallin wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
So, I've been trying to build the Debian package with the latest from
the 0.8 branch on github. It
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes:
What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a
user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but
does not have a standard port number.)
Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping
/etc/inetd.conf to
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes:
I am wondering which is of more use to the end users as well: I
can always get the sources of the package I have already on my disk
from Debian, but getting the latest munged source seems more useful to
me.
Full ACK. The way to get the
Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de writes:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:52:16PM +1000, James Westby wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:07 +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
And how do you store that in a VCS if a second tarball includes files
that actually overwrite files of the main orig tarball. At
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Mar 09, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
I think TopGit is the right solution to this.
Is it plausible to use a branch-per-patch solution for packages
containing 30-60 patches?
--
ciao,
Marco
From the space and git point of view that is
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009, James Westby wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 17:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
There's nothing to specify here, dpkg-source uses all additional tarballs
that match the regexp (exactly like it identifies the .orig tarball
Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de writes:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:09:34AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
If you're trying to recreate the tarball from a set of files, this doesn't
work as well, but that also has other problems (it doesn't give you a
reproducible tarball). I suspect that if
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes:
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, Michael Biebl wrote:
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown information field 'Format' in input data
in
general section of control info file
Should I file a bug against dpkg-dev for that?
And another minor
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue Mar 03 11:07, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The rules of the GPL end at work limit and neither libc nor
libschily or libscg are part of the work mkisofs. For this reason,
there is no
Brett Parker idu...@sommitrealweird.co.uk writes:
On 03 Mar 15:41, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:09:29PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
You are uninformed: libc on Linux is under LGPL and the LGPL is as
incompatible to GPL as
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
...
As a hint: the work mkisofs is the plain files that can be found in the
sub-directory mkisofs in the cdrtools source tree. Other
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes:
Hey folks,
I'm looking at my local mirror (slowly) update at the moment, and I've
got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really useful
to anybody? I can't imagine that more than a handful of users ever
install (to pick an example) the
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
As said, license compatibility needs to be discussed separately. If you
like
to allow to publish binaries from GPLd
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au writes:
If libschilly met the criteria for being a System Library then it
probably have been packaged for use by other programs. If you want to
make a case for including libschilly as a System Library then please
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
As said, license compatibility needs to be discussed separately. If you like
to allow to publish binaries from GPLd programs for _any_ OS that does not
come with a GPLd libc, you need to allow (*) to link _any_ GPLd program
Bill Unruh un...@physics.ubc.ca writes:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Memnon Anon gegendosenflei...@gmail.com writes:
But, on the other hand, please do not try to stress that the debian
fork is as good as Schillings. It is not necessary, the
non-free argument is enough
Memnon Anon gegendosenflei...@gmail.com writes:
But! From a user-only perspective:
Do I think that the software Joerg Schilling provides is superior?
Yes.
I've tried it back when Debian still had a cdrecord and that, on
request by Joerg Schilling, did not include the dvd burning patch. One
Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net writes:
I wish I had at least a STM-1 at home, I would you send you all 300
coredumps since the release weekend of Lenny...
I have over 16 GByte of coredumps: OpenOffice, Iceweasel, mutt, pidgin,
FvwmForm, mimedecode, gimp, mc, ...
Since
Kari Pahula k...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:21:42AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Such a requirement unfortunately still won't mean that Lintian can use
that option to do a check of debian/rules. As long as make is willing to
run such code, we can't just rely on a Policy
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Le Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:51:14PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Does âbuild reproducibilityâ mean something to you?
Hi Cyril,
Build reproduciblitity means to me that two instances package built in the
same
environment should be
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:39:59PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
If we can ever settle on a suitable implementation, I would expect the
savings of both human and CPU cycles to be sizeable, and worth the effort.
If the problem is limited to local
Brett Parker idu...@sommitrealweird.co.uk writes:
On 26 Feb 15:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
It seems that you are spreding FUD. Everybody who is interested in working
CD/DVD creating uses the original software. There are nearly 100 Bug Reports
against the fork in the bug tracking systems from
Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org writes:
Kalle Kivimaa kil...@debian.org writes:
If you feel that the SFLC's opinion is wrong, you are of course free
to provide us with competent legal advice countering SFLC's opinion.
opinions can only be proven right or wrong in court. It seems that
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:16:53PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe we need a mass bug filing for programs not using 64bit file
offsets.
I think that would be appropriate. At this point, I can't see a
valid reason for any package
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net writes:
On 02/09/2009 08:04 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/09/2009 12:28 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
If jed can deal with files that large, sure. But if it expects to be
able to load
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@ieee.org writes:
On Wed, Feb 18 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:14:49AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
This is a heads up for a major change in kernel-package, the
tool to create user packaged kernel images and headers; which
Giacomo Catenazzi c...@cateee.net writes:
Standards should be most frozen as possible. I don't find a lot of
think that need to be added.
What about cross compile and multiarch paths?
The old lib32/lib64 dirs currently mentioned in the FHS are just not
covering enough cases and are misleading
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Kari Pahula wrote:
Currently, Debian Policy doesn't match with the current practice in
section 7.7.
The Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep fields must be
satisfied when any of the following targets is invoked:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
Overview of available CD/DVD/Blu-ray images for Lenny
-
Architecture-specific images:
* businesscard CD
* network install (netinst) CD
* full CD (650MB) images, users can now choose between:
-
Hi,
I run reprepro to create a local mirror for lenny, lenny-security and
sid. Since I have it setup to put all 3 into a common pool I noticed
the following:
Lenny:
--
Package: uw-imap
Version: 7:2007b~dfsg-3
Files:
b52118669abf422f766d14e3e2d69daa 1608456 uw-imap_2007b~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
José Luis Tallón jltal...@adv-solutions.net writes:
Nico Golde wrote:
Yes.
I see two possibilities here, one option is to get
8:2007b~dfsg-1 unblocked and let this migrate to lenny
(there is some weird SONAME change though) or to reupload a
+lenny2 version to testing-security again.
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Magnus Holmgren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Game executables should be installed in /usr/games, but what about game
servers that are designed to be long-running (in contrast to ones that just
manage a single game) and to run as a system daemon,
/debian/changelog
--- dpkg-1.14.23/debian/changelog 2008-09-09 16:17:35.0 +0200
+++ dpkg-1.14.24/debian/changelog 2008-09-09 15:06:29.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dpkg (1.14.24) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Goswin von Brederlow ]
+ * Add /usr/bin/dpkg-vendor script
+ * Update /usr/share
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
Hi,
Before I read your mail, I thought that it was not possible,
Francisco Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I believed buildd.debian.org was meant to build only binary-arch packages.
But in recent build logs of the zeroc-ice package:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=zeroc-ice;ver=3.3.0-4
I found buildd tried to build a binary-indep package
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:30:44PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 09:27 + schrieb Jörg Sommer:
recently, I've installed a new system with a minimal configuration. Then
I've imported my old package selection with dpkg
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Matthew Johnson]
Or at least didn't block testing migration. I'm happy if porters decide
my package isn't for them, as long as it doesn't stop it being for
anyone else either...
I agree. Perhaps a new rule should be introduced, that when a
Vincent Danjean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Olivier Berger wrote:
Le mercredi 06 août 2008 à 08:14 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Say, couldn't there be some automatic checks so we users don't encounter
# apt-get dist-upgrade
ERR: trying to overwrite `some file, which is also in package
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Matthew Johnson]
Or at least didn't block testing migration. I'm happy if porters decide
my package isn't for them, as long as it doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:05:50 +0200
Source: ia32-libs-tools
Binary: ia32-libs-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian ia32-libs Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Goswin von
PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ia32-apt-get - Apt-get and dpkg wrapper for on-the-fly ia32-libs conversion
ia32-archive - Create a local archive of converted i386 debs for amd64 and ia64
ia32-libs-tools - Tools for converting i386 debs for amd64 and ia64
PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
ia32-apt-get - Apt-get and dpkg wrapper for on-the-fly ia32-libs conversion
ia32-archive - Create a local archive of converted i386 debs for amd64 and ia64
ia32-libs-tools - Tools for converting i386 debs for amd64 and ia64
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Kushal Koolwal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And therefore I was thinking if Debian Project is planning to natively
support these?
I noticed this page being created on the wiki recently:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianAcerOne
Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:10:30PM +0200]:
I don't think that any of the alternatives are valid candidates yet:
- Linux-Vserver, OpenVZ: clearly not the same use case.
- Virtualbox, qemu: poor performance under some workloads
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision, but
whether we'll support one specific technology, for
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
If you do build-depends on gcc-multilib and g++-multilib, it should fix
this problem.
As I said it fixes the build problem - but now I have a package with a
not working executable. I guess it is also a
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Neil Williams
| Just a thought - why use /usr/lib/$ARCH and /usr/include/$ARCH at all
| when it would (IMHO) be simpler to use /usr/$TRIPLET/ and put the entire
| package under that, as we
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
working on dpkg reminded me that I wanted to propose a better
diversion and alternatives handling for debian packages. Currently
they have to be manually added and removed in the maintainer
scripts. This method is prone
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:44 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:03:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So if we allow multiple packages to be installed at the same time which
divert
James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:03:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
So if we allow multiple packages to be installed at the same time which
divert the same file, then I think we have another case for wanting to
continue supporting an optional diversion target
Nikita Youshchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello.
To fix #486693, I need to apply a patch that changes #define'd macro in an
exported library header.
The pattern is:
extern int foo(char *param1, int param2);
#define bar(param) foo(param, expr(param))
and changed thing is expr(param)
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: type-handling
Well, that's the good-old type-handling, something we hoped we wouldn't
need in 2008 anymore.
Michael
I thought so too but I can't find any of the type-handling magic for
install time depends in dpkg. Only the buildtime stuff
901 - 1000 of 2345 matches
Mail list logo
