Martin Schulze wrote:
not to mention the time spent by the DSA/buildd admins and the security
Thanks for asking the security team how much work it is to support 11
architectures. Err... Huh? I wasn't asked? Uh?
However, to clarify this for the readers who aren't involved in
security
Steve Langasek wrote:
First, the news for sarge. As mentioned in the last release team
update[1], deploying the testing-security queues has been held up
pending some infrastructure enhancements, without which
ftp-master.debian.org cannot handle the load of the added wanna-build
queues for
Marek Habersack wrote:
It's just a simple question/request. Would it be possible to include
custom headers in the messages sent to debian-devel-changes that would
contain the package name, version and distribution, like so:
X-Debian-Package: foo
X-Debian-PackageVersion: 1.2.3-1
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.14.1851 +0100]:
We need help by competent developers who work on apt 0.6 with the goal
to get it supported properly and eventually enter sid and sarge.
Thank you, Joey!
For the record, I am too strung up right
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
You still need to deal with key revocation and a new key being needed,
anyway. Yearly changes will not make it more difficult, it will make sure
those codepaths are tested (and used at least once an year).
I can understand that in an
Moin,
We need help by competent developers who work on apt 0.6 with the goal
to get it supported properly and eventually enter sid and sarge.
There is a good chance the release will happen before the issues with
apt 0.6 are resolved, so this may be a task that cannot address sarge
in time but
Christian Perrier wrote:
During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
being probably a virus scanning software and such similar
Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
PS: If you are in rush, I or javi should be able to add you as a pserver
access
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Please get it. Having DOC in CVS makes easier for proofreader to
correct things. For me, I initially got patches. But after a while, I
developed mutual trust with few people. They start fixing it with write
access sometimes later. But they always ask significant changes
Steve Langasek wrote:
There is one case in which users can be bitten by this: when using apt-get
dist-upgrade to sarge, so when documenting the woody-sarge upgrade, it
should
be at least mentioned that the user can run into this and should first
upgrade apt to solve this problem.
The
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
All other packages have their script sniplets in /usr/share/package,
e.g. devscripts, debhelper, debian-cd, ...
You forget to notice one thing, these are debian specific. The gettext.sh
script, however, is meant to be used by just . gettext.sh by random
third party
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
You wouldn't need to change every script - you just need to move
gettext.sh to /usr/share/gettext/scripts and create /usr/bin/gettext.sh
with the content Sean suggested.
Which buys us what?
This new gettext.sh would still be a non-executable script snippet
Florian Weimer wrote:
Would debian-admin or the security team like to act as a contact for
such problems (i.e. potential compromise of Debian infrastructure)?
Perhaps http://www.debian.org/security/ could be updated accordingly?
Anything but a non-public list/forum/whatever would be fine and
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
beginning of 2006?
The release date for a Debian release is not set by a calendar
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
a sentence would not mean anything.
I can understand something like Debian releases when it's ready, but
many people have to work together. Maybe it's better to say: a package
releases when it's ready,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:03:02 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.01-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:44:43 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:26:11 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.70-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
martin f krafft wrote:
On all my Debian systems, /var/log seems like a big pile of dumps
without much consistency. Especially, while 0640:root:adm seems to
be a commonly accepted guideline, proggies like aptitude,
scrollkeeper, X, xdm, fontconfig, and many others basically just
dump their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:06:33 +0100
Source: mailto
Binary: mailto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 18:06:17 +0100
Source: mailto
Binary: mailto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 09:53:31 +0100
Source: mailto
Binary: mailto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Anyway the solution seems to be overengineered for the problem at
hand. I have yet to decide whether
* I'll close the bugreport with request denied
Please don't do that but tag it wontfix instead if you won't fix this
bug report.
Regards,
Joey
--
Open source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:16:14 +0100
Source: mailto
Binary: mailto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Andreas Tille wrote:
I failed in ending this thread when I posted
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/12/msg00016.html
instead I caused two trolls making even more noise.
I hope all you people are aware that you are causing a new duelling banjo
case and helping out Google to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:17:02 +0100
Source: newmail
Binary: newmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 10:13:01 +0100
Source: mailto
Binary: mailto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
viewcvs- Viewing CVS Repositories via HTTP
viewcvs-query - Viewing CVS (viewcvs-query.cgi)
Changes:
viewcvs (0.9.2+cvs.1.0.dev.2004.07.28-1.2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team
* Corrected code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:12:10 +0100
Source: rlpr
Binary: rlpr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.02-8.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Brian Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
at http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi the hosts raptor and trex are listed
as s390 developer machines. I wanted to build the package phylip which has
to be builded manually because it is in non-free.
$ ssh -i ~/.ssh/my_key [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Haber wrote:
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely,
to get as much testing as possible? (Like: general debian-announce, press
contacts, ...)
No. Why should it?
Because it was widely announced to
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to
collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of
a packager easier.
I'm sure all packagers have wondered about brain-dead upstream developers
who
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
N+0 days
Official security support for sarge begins
Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely,
to get as much testing as possible? (Like: general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:10:03 +0100
Source: sysklogd
Binary: sysklogd klogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 15:59:13 +0100
Source: dhcpdump
Binary: dhcpdump
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:10:38 +0100
Source: dhcping
Binary: dhcping
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:56:51 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.70-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Graham Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:10:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
scripts and not logrotate.
Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
Martin Godisch wrote:
Who can tell me, where the debian-private list archives can be found?
Looks like they moved somewhere...
Did the mailing list footer change while we were not paying attention?
Mine still says:
Please respect the privacy of this mailing list.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
The five missing files are not on ftp://security.debian.org/
but the diff.gz and dsc are still there.
ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/b/bind9/bind9_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz
Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
scripts and not logrotate.
Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
uses savelog.
Because it uses its own scripts, its rather tricky to configure. Eg its
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i'm forwarding this to debian devel for people's attention because
it would appear that debian has lost a quite large opportunity -
by not having selinux available.
I thought Russell Coker put a lot of effort in having SELinux ready
with Debian as well.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Martin and *,
Am 2004-10-24 11:24:26, schrieb Martin Schulze:
Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update
==
An up-to-date version is at http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r3/.
For some
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
It may sound a bit radical, but core points have been mentioned in the
thread already. I suggest to do it in a more radical way:
- unstable lockdown in the freeze
- drop Testing and concentrate
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:14:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:23:48 +0900, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And why not, instead of freezing unstable, make it build against
testing, when er try to freeze testing ?
Libraries. If
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Is there really a developer out there that doesn't do even the most
rudimentary VC by keeping copies of all the source packages he has
uploaded/worked on ?
FWIW: I've heard so...
Regards,
Joey
--
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. --
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:53:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Err... experimental ABI changes are for experimental. Confirmed ABI
and API changes are for unstable (or whatever you want to call the
development branch). We must not hide those changes from the future
Jérôme Marant wrote:
It's too bad that interesting discussions take place in blogs rather
than in Debian mailing lists, especially for those who don't blog
but would like to participate.
Logbooks are suited for a lot, but not for discussions. They're more
suited for experiences, statements
Jan Niehusmann wrote:
Question to the security team: What's holding back security support for
sarge? (This is not a complaint - I'm just curious)
It still (as written on -project one or two weeks ago) lacks the
infrastructure as in a working buildd network that processes the
target
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 22 octobre 2004 à 11:26 +0200, Martin Schulze a écrit :
It still (as written on -project one or two weeks ago) lacks the
infrastructure as in a working buildd network that processes the
target ``testing-security''. This is something that two people
Florian Weimer wrote:
Can volatile receive critical updates which are usually not applied to
stable because backports are not available for some reason?
Are you speaking about mozilla? ;)
Mozilla, GnuPG, and maybe even PHP 4, depending on sarge's lifetime.
Other complex packages can
John Hasler wrote:
This also might include working on a sort of security team for v.d.o (I
think both jobs should actually be combined in v.d.o).
v.d.o. should be supported by the Debian security team. I don't think it
is worth doing if it can't be. One way to help make sure Debian
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041011 18:30]:
The goal should be that I, as a user, can add volatile to my
sources.list and periodically do an apt-get upgrade - without risking
to suddenly have my web browser updated to a new major release where
it starts
Moin,
a recent upgrade of the Z/VM of the S/390 machine Millenux hosts and
which runs the Debian S/390 buildd (debian01.zseries.org) caused the
old kernel to run without the network interface. In order to get
networking running again a new 64bit kernel was required.
Unfortunately this changed
the ftp-masters releasing 3.0r3. They have the
final power to accept a package or not. If you want to comment on
this list, please send a mail to Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Last updated 2004/10/08 12:28 MET
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about its friends.
Please always Cc
a package or not. If you want to comment on
this list, please send a mail to Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Last updated 2004/09/25 03:27 MET
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about its friends.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the
final power to accept a package or not. If you want to comment on
this list, please send a mail to Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Last updated 2004/09/03 06:54 MET
--
WARNING: Do not execute! This call violates patent DE10108564.
http://www.elug.de/projekte/patent-party/patente/DE10108564
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:45:37 +0200
Source: dbview
Binary: dbview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:06:17 +0200
Source: cvs-mailcommit
Binary: cvs-mailcommit
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 07:05:15 +0200
Source: cvs-mailcommit
Binary: cvs-mailcommit
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.19-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:05:06 +0200
Source: dtaus
Binary: dtaus
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:28:49 +0200
Source: sysklogd
Binary: sysklogd klogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:57:48 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.67-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:52:51 +0200
Source: cvs-mailcommit
Binary: cvs-mailcommit
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:17:22 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.67-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Due to the most recent Linux kernel vulnerability that was disclosed
today, Debian admins had to restrict all hosts temporarily in order to
install a corrected kernel.
The vulnerability was disclosed by iSEC today and is described here:
http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0015-msfilter.txt
Most
Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update
==
An up-to-date version is at http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r3/.
I am preparing the third revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody) and will infrequently send reports
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r3
=
An up-to-date version is at http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r3/.
I am preparing the third revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody) and will infrequently send reports so people can
actually comment on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:18:54 +0200
Source: sysklogd
Binary: sysklogd klogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:50:41 +0200
Source: pam-pgsql
Binary: libpam-pgsql
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.2-7.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Joerg Wendland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
An up-to-date version is at http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r3/.
I am preparing the third revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody) and will infrequently send reports so people can
actually comment on it and intervene whenever this is required.
If you disagree with one bit or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:08:51 +0100
Source: metamail
Binary: metamail
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 2.7-45.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:01:08 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.65-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:04:21 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.63-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:47:01 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.62-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:18:10 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.60-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:54:27 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.61-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Steve Langasek wrote:
If I understood you correctly, you want me to remove these packages:
ttf-kochi-mincho
ttf-kochi-mincho-naga10
ttf-xwatanabe-mincho
watanabe-vfont
ttf-xtt-wadalab-gothic (source ttf-xtt)
ttf-xtt-watanabe-mincho (source ttf-xtt)
from the stable distribution
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2
=
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r2/.
I am preparing the second revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody). This is most probably the last report before
the update can be
Kenshi Muto wrote:
At Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:59:24 +0100,
Martin Schulze wrote:
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2
=
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r2/.
I am preparing the second revision of the current stable
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2
=
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r2/.
I am preparing the second revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (woody) which will probably be released soon. This
report is to allow
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hello,
Does anybody know a way to find a mail sent to the BTS with a specific
Message-ID? Neither google nor lists.d.o. nor gmane.org archive
debian-bugs-(rc|dist).
See ~debian/lists/debian-bugs-dist/ on master.
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes,
Mark Johnson wrote:
Hi All,
I'm updating the docbook-simple package from V1.0cr2 to V1.0. Since
1.0cr2 1.0, I'm not sure how to handle the situation.
Policy the Developers Reference imply that I upload V1.0 and file a
bug against ftp.debian.org to have V1.0CR2 removed from the
archive.
Mathieu Roy wrote:
Why do you always assume being facing idiots?
I guess the answer would be experience... No, I'm only guessing,
not knowing...
People knows all about placebo effect, but do you have any evidence
that there is nothing more than placebo effect?
If you can't provide evidence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:20:08 +0100
Source: thttpd
Binary: thttpd-util thttpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.23beta1-2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris G. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Moin!
We have been offered to maintain a booth at COMDEX this November in
Las Vegas (Nov 17th - 20th) and give a talk about Debian. Alex Perry
thankfully agreed to deliver the talk but there are not enough people
to staff a booth. Two people would be needed at least.
COMDEX is provinding a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:51:34 +0200
Source: sysklogd
Binary: klogd sysklogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:34:31 +0200
Source: sysklogd
Binary: sysklogd klogd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If I report segmentation fault in ls, I--as a user of ls, not a
developer--couldn't care less about why it was segfaulting or how the
bug was fixed; I only care that it's been fixed. If a developer wants
to spend their limited time researching how the bug was
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:18:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.08.31.0013 +0200]:
If you want two different versions of documentation, they need to
be named differently. Alternatively, you can just split the
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-31 10:24]:
. Updated deprecation information on getipnodebyname(3) (closes
Bug#183112, Bug#176709, Bug#157746, Bug#152780)
You're missing a colon after closes.
Eeeks. fixed.
Regards,
Joey
--
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:22:54 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.60-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 20:59:25 +0200
Source: dbview
Binary: dbview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Moin!
I've received several requests to update woody in order to make it
compliant with the LSB (which version btw.?), including one from the
DPL. Hence, it may be worth discussing the possibility.
Below are several tasks where YOUR HELP is required.
According to Anthony we need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:35:50 +0200
Source: uucpsend
Binary: uucpsend
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:51:38 +0200
Source: dpkg-multicd
Binary: dpkg-multicd
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Chris de Vidal wrote:
Volunteers needed!
http://debtoo.org
I guess you haven't read
Benchmarking Debian's Performance. Indranath Neogy tried to
[35]discover what kind of gains the source based nature of Gentoo
might give it over Debian and Mandrake. The tests included timing how
long it took
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:15:56 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.58-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:25 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.60-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Sander Smeenk wrote:
I'm about to close 95153, 133049, 158040, 16, 170580, 173331, 176223,
135603, 161659, 165107, 165135, 165351, 171190, 172529, 173663, 174506,
174508, 174509, 192401, 193544, 101725, 122689, 159575, 165126, 182280,
and 189780 with a nice message telling that the bug was
201 - 300 of 769 matches
Mail list logo
