On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:11:15AM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:57:40AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > PyGBase.cpp: In member function 'nsresult
> > PyG_Base::InvokeNativeGetViaPolicy(const char*, PyObject**)':
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:30:14PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'd like to setup a pbuilder or sbuild (preferably pbuilder, but I'm
> not sure it's possible) in the way I understand experimental buildds
> are setup: to only pull experimental software wh
tag 381662 + help
thanks
Hi,
xulrunner is failing to build on alpha, and with both escher and goedel
being locked down, I have no access to an alpha machine to at least
understand the issue.
The error itself is
make[5]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/extensions/python/xpcom
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
> installer's
> defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
>
> I first thought of this when I noticed the change in the defa
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:16:30PM -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Really, I think that getting patches in darcs from people that are using
> > > "darcs send" is not only easier for me as a maintainer, but also ea
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:23:46PM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add a -dbg package to exim4. However, I doubt that
> dh_strip is doing the right thing here.
>
> The Debian exim4 source package builds a number of binary packages.
> Two of them are exim4-da
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:29:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > So yes, please re-add the dependency on libxml2-dev for the time being.
>
> > We're still not so much in a r
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:44:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > A number of app
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > A number of applications currently fail to build with something like:
>
> > | sparc-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/ots ots.o ../src/.libs/libo
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 04:39:24AM +0200, David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 06:32:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > This really seems like something that while they may, very occasionally,
> > > be required, are mostly unnecessary and
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:27:16PM +0200, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 22, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Instead of moving libpcre and making it quasi-essential, why not
> > slightly modify grep so that it can dlopen libp
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:25:25PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:11:59PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >On 2006-01-29 Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Package: libpcre3
> >>Version: 6.4-1.1
> >>Severity: wishlist
> >
> >>It woul
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:50:27PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Another thing that is a bit annoying is that the LICENSE file in the
> > upstream tarball is the MPL license text. It'd be better for everyone if
> > they'd make it clear that everything in the tarball, except ex
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 06:49:52PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Last time I checked (and it was after Gerv's post), the relicensing changes
>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:58:13PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Some examples and test files are licensed under Mozilla-sample-code.
>
> Uh, is that actually a license?
Yes it is:
BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK
Version: Mozilla-sample-code 1.0
Copyright (c) 2002 Netscape Commu
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 10:10:29AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I checked (and it was after Gerv's post), the relicensing changes
> were still not applied to the MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH. Things seem to have
> changed, but that needs some checking. I to
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:18:27AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:47:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > * Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:49:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might not be impossible to have it in etch (and would be preferable,
> since upstream will stop support of Firefox 2 6 months after release
> of Firefox 3, which is itself due Q1 2007).
... and wh
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:47:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase
> > > is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:40:57PM +0200, Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many thanks to the KDE developers for removing the similar blurb that
> they used to have. They did it nicely, and in a way that others could
> follow.
... which is... ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:09:43AM -0700, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:38 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:57:54AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > Kevin Bube wrote:
> > > > What about switching to dvdrtools? I think this project wa
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:29:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Marc Haber:
>
> > The machine in Question is a P3 with 1200 MHz. What's making the
> > process slow is the turnaround time for the http requests, as observed
> > multiple times in this thread alone.
>
> Then
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:25:39PM -0300, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:38:56PM +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> currently "libgnutls-config --libs"' output looks like this,
> -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -L/usr/lib -ltasn1 -lgcrypt -lgpg-error
> listing both direct (-lgnutls) and indirect dependencies. - Its output
> can
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Rolf Kutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Quoting Graham Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 01:52:58PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> >
> > I think the more important thing to realize is that the reason we have
> > -doc packages i
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Probably the biggest reason why I
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's nice that people spend extra time in taking care of the packages
> of others, for example when they upload a NMU to fix serious or
> important issues, however this is not always desired or re
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > Anyways, there would be a problem with python native extensions linked
> > against libpython. They would get the shlib dependencies on python2.x
> > packages.
&
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 08:17:17AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:49:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > - The current pythonX.Y-foo packages having modules in the python
> >library path are col
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:49:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - The current pythonX.Y-foo packages having modules in the python
>library path are collapsed into one package python-foo. Binary
>independent modules are made available for the python versions
>curr
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:00:12AM +0200, Marc Dequènes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In the past some mistakes were done in debhelper too, even if i don't
> recall a specific case to mention.
Probably because a change in debhelper is done with a change of
compatibility level. And you still can u
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:46:06AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-07 02:20]:
> > > We did pick two
wrong code may be generated.
> > These warnings can be found in 1600 packages [4]; they are:
> > [4] http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/pointer/
>
> Here is a list of maintainers and their packages which exhibit such
> warnings:
>
> Mike Hommey
> xulrunner 1.8.0.1-11
Wh
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:51:02PM +0300, Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > It'd be easier to take your claim into account if you actually brought
> > better facts than "I don't like it" or "stupid tools give fal
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:32:34PM +0200, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:05:31AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > It flags alarms, it is obscure, and generally it is bad form to have hidden
> > files anywhere but under user homes anyway. T
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:47:10AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> more and more packages use hidden files in /usr. I see this as an error.
> But before making a bug report for such packages I wish to ask if this
> is intended or really a bug? Some of the files are in
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:48:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Then there's the issue of tracing who did an actual upload into the real
> > world. A name on a GPG key is not, by any means, a
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:12:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hm, that used to be a "magic" combination that would let dpkg do the
> > right thing.
>
> I've heard this stated before, but if it was ever true, it's definitely not
> the case with apt (or with britney), and
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:26:41PM +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> also sprach Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.29.2122 +0200]:
> > I think the usual way is to provide the dummy binary package
> > immediately from the new source package and file a bug for removal
>
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:32:06PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:07 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > > * Package name: mod-bt
> >
> > I suggest to name your package (you can name just binary package, bu
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:16:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The KSP was cracked, People signed a key without ever looking
> at proper, official ID. You can try and save face by calling it
> whatever you want, but that does not change the reality.
Manoj, how
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:21:33PM -0300, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Continuing on the goal of optimizing boot time, quite a number of
> seconds (specially in old machines) can be saved by not running depmod
> at boot time.
(...)
> It looks like it's quite safe to stop runnin
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:34:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On W
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> hi,
>
> > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for e
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This tool lists every BTS bug that is forwarded to a remote Bug
> Tracker. If it knows how to get a Status and possibly a Resolution (if
> the Status is a closing Status), it gets them, and:
> * sets upstrea
Sven,
When will you learn you don't have to reply to every single message in a
thread ? Frank's and my message were the exact same. Why do you feel you
have to answer twice to the same thing ?
And please stop this "Friendly" signature, it's pathetic and actually
sounds stupid.
Mike
On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:07:36PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was going to fi
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to fix it, maybe it would have been fixed already, but no,
> the d-i team decided this otherwise.
You can't *commit*, but you still can send patches, can't you ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:49:29PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missing
> >
&
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:46:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as some might have noticed the Debian archive is missing
>
> /debian/pool/main/f/firefox/firefox_1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2.orig.tar.gz
>
> The missing file has a sideeffect for the debian-amd64 archive be
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:29:06PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > We would still need a way to reset the set of keyword of this
> > > email when the maintainer changes.
> >
> > Or have sim
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 09:38:53AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > - when the maintainer changes, we logically need to unsubcribe the
> > > previous. So this must be recorded somewhere. (it's n
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:43:07AM +0200, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you have not noticed yet, the latest udev release by default
> automatically generates rules to have persistent names for network
> interfaces.
>
> I am inclined to agree with the bug reporter, but I want to do
; > subscribing to the PTS to get those even for packages where I'm the only
> > > maintainer.
>
> I subscribe to debian-devel-changes for that. :-)
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > ... and maintainers should be subscribed to that by default.
>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No, this has never been the case. The maintainer gets the bug reports
> > from the BTS directly and the PTS is useful for people who are not the
> > maintainer but
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:22:14PM +0300, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * Christian Marillat:
> > >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:17:50AM +0900, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Any particular reason for not just using xpdf?
> >
> > Evince have more resources and combine with the Xfce interface.
> > In the reality I would like
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:51:03PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
> > Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > That much is easy, but how do you turn a process ID into a script that
> > > can be invoke
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]:
> > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works -
> > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play
> > > some
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:56:36AM +, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]:
> > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is
> > possible considering the buildd infrastructure
Hi fellow developpers,
I'm considering building xulrunner with debugging symbols enabled (and
putting them in a separate -dbg package), but if I recall correctly,
it has been disabled from firefox and mozilla builds because of the time
and disk space required (something like 2GB) that could be a b
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:03:13PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> assume the following scenario:
>
> - Source package foo creates binary packages libfoo1 and libfoo-dev
> - source package foo2 creates binary packages libfoo2 and libfoo2-dev
>
> Since both versions are
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 ? 16:39 +0100, Amaya a ?crit :
> > > but when will we try to solve some of the real problems we have
> >
> > Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
> > b
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:36:12PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I have recently received a patch which allows the blkid library to
> properly handle device mapper partitions. The problem is in order to do
> this, I have to link in libdevmapper, and by extension libselinux
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:22:57PM +0800, Tetralet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Tetralet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: gcin
> Version : 1.1.7
> Upstream Author : Edward Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:51:51AM +0100, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> #include
> * Mike Hommey [Sun, Feb 19 2006, 11:07:33AM]:
>
> > I checked all these 141 packages (see attachment).
> > There are 12 MSWord files out of 1022 .doc/.doc.gz files.
>
&
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
> > > The availability to do this is enough even if there a
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
> The availability to do this is enough even if there are other
> (possibly better) ways to do the same. One free driver _in_ Debian and
> the package should stay in main.
>
> But does the cipe-source build or ship the windows driver f
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:41:55PM -0500, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Josselin,
> I have read many descriptions that made no sense to me and it was
> mentioned that you either know what the jargon/terms are because they
> are in your area of expertise or else if you dont know the ter
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le samedi 21 janvier 2006 à 21:52 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:21:34PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Python is t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:58:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gst-fluendo-mp3
> Version : 0.10.0
> Upstream Author : Jan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Right. The everything that you'd expect to go in to /usr/bin and /usr/lib
> will install there, at least as far as Xorg goes. An example of that is
> that the new xterm package installs to /usr/bin rather than /us
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:21:34PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Python is the "official" language of Ubuntu. If we want to merge work
> they're doing (Anthony Towns mentioned their work on boot speed, for
> example) it's a good idea to structure our Python like theirs is. This
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:45:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
> * for changes that are likely to be useful in Debian or generally, submit
>the change upstream, by filing a bug with a minimal patch included to
>bugs.debian.org, or by the appropriate mechanism further upstream.
s/or/and/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:35:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
> If you've got more information than is in the bug report, that's fine; add
> it to the bug report, and do whatever else is appropriate to fix the problem.
>
> Closing reports without fixing real bugs isn't "fine", but there's no
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:34:07PM +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Well, no, but the fact that it's a longstanding release-critical bug, with
> > > no maintainer response, means that it does warrant NMUer
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:31:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:47:52AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > There have been 2 NMUs on libxml2 in a week and I never got a message
> > beforehand. Now I wonder if th
There have been 2 NMUs on libxml2 in a week and I never got a message
beforehand. Now I wonder if that practice has disappeared somehow.
I admit I've not spent enough time for libxml2 recently, but still, I
wouldn't have been bothered by some poking beforehand.
Moreover, I'm not exactly sure the
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
> > guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 20:43 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > THAT is cool.
> >
> > FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
> &g
> > Yes, sonames can be more or less arbitrary strings. You can certainly use
> > sonames with "debian" in them with a fairly high degree of confidence that
> > upstream won't collide with them.
>
> THAT is cool.
FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
basic sonam
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > So my idea is the following :
> > > > - First, I want to provide the libs with a correct soname. It won'
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:52:03PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:47:47PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
> > xulrunner, which is ought to be the central
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 11:12:22AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at all the bugs for gdm and the bugs you reopened were tagged
> as upstream and/or fixed-upstream.
And as the bug reporter, you never get the message that says that the
bug has been tagged. *That* c
reopen 276871 309224 258934 327464 261979 290916 304027 314449
thanks
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:03:08AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #276871: Date shown in gdm is correctly localized, but only for a m
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:43:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > >> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know
> > >> it can be unstable but...) and the update includes grep where
> > >> no open critical bug was seen. After Boot the syste
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:41:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:00:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:06:29PM +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > (...)
> >
- Forwarded message from Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BTS version tracking
To: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>&g
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:40:41PM -0500, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
> > leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really res
Hello,
I'm about to remove the libxslt1 package, which has been created a long
time ago for backward compatibility, when upstream did screw up ABI and
removed support for the libxsltbreakpoint library.
Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
leaves a libxslt1.1 package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ieee80211-source
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : James P. Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ieee80211.sf.net/
* License : GPL v2
Description
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:18:25AM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050403 14:55]:
> > I think he's talking about mirrored Packages files being updated before
> > all the packages get mirrored and/or arch all package
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 02:28:36PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > It seems there are only minimal checks, so developers can unwittingly
> > upload broken packages.
>
> Any numbers where you can proof your claim? Developers are req
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:26:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: nvu
> Version : 0.90
> Upstream Author : Linspire, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : htt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ext3rminator
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://glandium.org/debian/repository/experimental/
* License : GPL
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource busy
> ERROR: Removing 'vis82cxxx': Device or resource busy
> pivot_root: No such file or directory
> /sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:46:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Considering you're talking about solutions that require updates to
> kernel-image packages *anyway*, why has no one suggested adding the
> necessary blacklist entries to these packages? Far better than removing
701 - 800 of 874 matches
Mail list logo
