On 5/16/06, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care about the implementation details, but if it requires
kernel support, then yes.
How should the kernel (or any other implementation) know which script
requires which python version without the scripts declaring it?
Via
On 5/16/06, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/16/06, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care about the implementation details, but if it requires
kernel support, then yes.
How should the kernel
On 5/16/06, Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
That depends on the implementation but I don't think it's not solvable.
There's a bunch of claims from people who have worked on
multiarch-related problems for a few years. You seem to think those
claims are bogus
On 5/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/14/06, Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux kernel requires a full path for #! scripts. This makes
One option would be to improve the Linux kernel. :)
And make
On 5/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to install multiple versions is some use to multiarch, but
could also be used for other things, such if two packages provide the
same binary (git for example).
Or to install multiple 'version 'numbers' of the same package.
On 5/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:19:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
I so far haven't seen any compelling arguments for multiarchifying the
whole archive including all of */bin.
Personnally I
On 5/15/06, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Dim 14 Mai 2006 21:11, Olaf van der Spek a écrit :
- Why would you want to have both types installed simultaneously
anyway?
For libraries the answer is simple, but multiarch applications
simply don't seem useful to me
On 5/15/06, Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
On Monday 15 May 2006 14:15, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
this is a dream. This also need that the application is able to deal
with the fact that it has configuration for the 32 and 64 bits version
coexisting cleanly.
True
On 5/15/06, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would you see many binaries installed from the user point of
view? with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For example because one user would like to have the absolute latest
version of a certain package
On 5/13/06, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be total insanity. Just think about the number of scripts
with #!/usr/bin/python in it that would have to be changed. And how
Shouldn't
On 5/14/06, Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Linux kernel requires a full path for #! scripts. This makes
One option would be to improve the Linux kernel. :)
And make scripts incompatible with any other unix kernel?
No and that's not what I said. I'm quite sure there is a
On 5/14/06, Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/14/06, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/13/06, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sense if one considers a #! program to be something that should have
predictable behavior no matter what the user happens
On 5/13/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be total insanity. Just think about the number of scripts
with #!/usr/bin/python in it that would have to be changed. And how
Shouldn't such hard-coded paths be avoided in the long term (anyway)?
would you even change them
On 5/11/06, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Why would that not fly?
Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed at
the same time.
/usr/share/foo/bar can't point to two different files at the same
On 3/9/06, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
to NMU's.
yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart and others [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
multiarch. This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple different
binary targets on the same system, for example running both i386-linux-gnu and
On 5/10/06, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
installed at the same time?
For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
I think that's
On 5/10/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's just that I'm quite concerned about the precendent this creates. Up
until now, people have abandoned packages when other people felt the
packages in question where poorly maintained. I remember the case of the
Sometimes they have
On 5/10/06, Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it also allow multiple versions of the same package to be
installed at the same time?
For example, multiple minor versions or multiple major versions?
Read the papers listed in the wiki. The short answer is no, same as it is
today with
On 5/10/06, Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about improving transparent decompression somehow?
well... unification via mailcap is nice, but as I mentioned before it
would be trickier to make it work from firefox (it assumes all .gz files
Good solutions aren't always trivial.
On 5/9/06, Yaroslav Halchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* dh_compress doesn't compress some other files based on extension
including .zip files. PDF (to my knowledge) uses zip internally to
compress the document. So why PDF should be gzipped if .zip not?
Probably because .zip is compressed
On 5/3/06, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to see the effects of compiling programs with -Os, I tried to get
the sources for firefox 1.5 from testing (which is what I use by
default) and compiled it with -Os, instead of -O2. The program was much
more responsive, with less use of swap
On 4/28/06, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
Examples
On 4/27/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:43:02AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
wrote:
Just what are the rules for someone to have commit access?
None, it is the full decision of the project admin, and i believe what
happened here is that one
Hi again,
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
Examples are:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267477
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288615
Hi,
Does anyone know whether Philipp Matthias Hahn is MIA?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/19/06, Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:19:58AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Does anyone know whether Philipp Matthias Hahn is MIA?
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:26:13 +0100:
I'm very busy at the moment (univertity work), had deveral hardware
failures and had
On 4/19/06, Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder what very soon now (tm) means. :)
I assume NMUs can be done (on the mytop package)?
You can always NMU any package when you think it is necessary. We have
a procedure for that :)
I think it's necessary for net-tools, but others
On 3/30/06, Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 18:15, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 28, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about restarting syslog (or it's equivalent) after relocating the
old /dev? glibc already has infrastructure for restarting
On 3/28/06, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:15:27PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Harder than it looks. There are multiple syslog daemons, how can the
package know which one is installed and needs to be restarted?
are there really that many syslog daemons (my
On 3/20/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 03:39:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
So what do you people suggest in such cases:
1) Intel 1000MT NIC sucks, throw it away ?
2) Unh! Why don't you change to Debian Unstable ?
3) Buddy!
On 3/19/06, Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-19 08:06]:
The question is if the problems with the patches and the reason for not
applying it will be commented, thus giving the author a chance to modify it,
or change his approach to fixing the
On 3/19/06, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Sven Luther]
I am not saying that there needs to be an immediate response, or all
patches need to be applied, but i believe that it is elementary
politeness from a package maintainer, to at least aknowledge a patch
or bug report
On 3/15/06, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
On 3/13/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
else.
The mirror split is a
On 3/11/06, Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
Is there any reason not to add an explicit declaration (in any case)?
function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal. gcc-4.0 emits the
warning to let the programmer
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
to NMU's.
yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again: there are bugs open for
net-tools where help is requested, I would
On 2/22/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, so one would put in foo.postrm:
rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /usr/local/lib/foo
That's not sufficient, because /usr/local may be mounted ro, and
therefore the command may fail
Hi Debian developers,
Does any of you know about the status of Apache2?
I've send the message below to listed email address and I've asked at
IRC but I haven't received any response.
Hi Apache2 maintainers,
I've noticed there are a lot of bugs, see
On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi Debian developers,
Does any of you know about the status of Apache2?
It works flawlessly on several places where I have deployed it.
I've send the message below to listed email address and I've asked
On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 1/21/06, Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
[..]
A lot of those bugs are quite old and some appear to be trivial to
fix, but they don't have a single response from you.
Could you
On 1/12/06, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Florian Weimer]
What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
Why is specifying the consequences of doing a bad job with maintaining
ones debian packages threatening?
IMHO it
On 12/30/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:03:39PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 12/30/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 1/6/06, Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, January 6, 2006 17:03, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Could you please respond to this issue?
Hello Olaf,
Could you please stop this? You've been asking about this for many times
I'd prefer to, but that doesn't look like
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
to NMU's.
yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again: there are bugs open for
net-tools where help is requested, I would
On 1/5/06, Nicolas François [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How Debian users can know there is a new version in experimental?
There are some messages in debian-devel, or blogs on planet, but not all
users or developers are reading them.
Is there a command that can display the list of packages I'm
On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Bernd?
I dont like the prposed solution, i am
On 12/27/05, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
57.000 US$/month / 10 US$/GB = 5700 GB/month
5700 GB/month / 30,4 days / 24 h / 3600 sec = 2,22 MByte/second
2,22 MByte/Second ~ 28 MBit
12.6 bit/byte?
Because we do not get 34 MBit and we have not a netload
of 100% 24/7 the price per
On 12/21/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you paying 10 $/gb?
Heck yes, you can't get it that cheap unless you have no SLA (or one
of those insulting SLAs that come with residential service, claiming
that it doesn't have to work at all). And you can't get that at all on
a
On 12/21/05, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uncompressor file.tar.whatever | tar -x
$ uncompressor
-bash: uncompressor: command not found
This solution doesn't look usable in scripts and user have to use a
more complex syntax.
On 12/21/05, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who need PARALELISM and who has a bandwidth of more then 8 MBit?
I have 10240kBit downstream and get way less from security.debian.org.
Especialy when there is a security release of X or latex.
But parallel downloads won't solve
On 12/19/05, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:27:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Steinar H. Gunderson:
My comments are about the same as on IRC:
- Disk space is cheap, bandwidth is cheap.
Depends. Decent IP service costs a few EUR per
On 12/18/05, Roberto Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the biggest problem is really updates. Packages like
XFree86 (no X.org) and Openoffice.org are *huge*. A simple security
update to one of those packages causes all subordinate binary packages
to get a version bump. That
On 12/18/05, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
I've run some scripts to find out the size of binary pakcages in debian
and how theycould be made smaller, here's the results:
My comments are about the same as on IRC:
On 12/18/05, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:56:10PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Why would this be huge?
Why is it that hard to plugin another codec?
You'd have to rewrite about every single tool in the world handling .debs,
make up a transition
On 12/18/05, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:23:56PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Why would that stop working if you switch compression schemes?
I guess tar is coded to use gzip with -z and bzip2 with -j, but why is
there no generic way to add
On 12/18/05, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:15:31PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I guess what I'm asking is, why are tar and other applications using
gzip instead of a generic library that handles all
compression/decompression and can be easily
On 11/29/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
and a lot even without a single response
On 12/14/05, Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1]: As I write this 79 NEW packages, 85 total.
With only four entries more than a month old I think it's doing fine,
especially compared to other maintainers/teams that have bugs open
months or years.
On 12/14/05, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Likewise for mozilla-firefox-adblock (2 months), new version of tidy (1
month), xplc (1 month), cvsconnect (1 month), cvssuck (1 month), libmpd (1
month); if there's something wrong with each of these packages, the
packager should know by
On 13 Dec 2005 15:56:00 +0100, Claus Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
That's not true. Suppose you've only got 3 users. If each user
connects to one (different) mirror, he gets 1/1 of that mirror's
bandwidth. If each user connects to each
On 12/13/05, Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assume a situation where mirror bandwidth is the limiting factor, and
imagine a world with 3 mirrors. Say that during a certain time of the
day 600 users each minute start to download updated x.org packages.
Either they can do their
On 12/12/05, Ivan Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I read the proposal, it is about downloading _different_
files from different mirrors - if you have 25 packages to get for your
'apt-get update' operation, download 5 packages from each of 5
different servers, with one connection
On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Example: (/etc/apt/sources.list)
deb http://ftp.en.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
in this case the stable packages will be ONLY downloaded from first server
from
On 12/5/05, Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Example: (/etc/apt/sources.list)
deb http://ftp.en.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
deb http
On 12/4/05, A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ops
turns out that in both cases they where using a pre-release, namely,
.disk/info contains
Debian GNU/Linux testing Sarge - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-1
(20041121)
Apparently that wasn't obvious.
Shouldn't it be made more clear what
On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
It has 88 bugs:
Serious policy violations - outstanding (1 bug)
Important bugs - outstanding (8 bugs)
Normal bugs - outstanding (38 bugs)
Minor bugs - outstanding (9 bugs
On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
and a lot even without a single response.
This is not true.
What part isn't?
Stop bothering me
On 11/25/05, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, using the signature on the .changes to verify the .debs
independent from the archive at some later date is a nice side-benefit, but
one which suffers from the same key-lifetime issues as in-deb signatures,
What exactly is this key
On 11/23/05, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the archive, 525 out of 283283 .deb's are dpkg-sig'd (0.19%). There
are 8 distinct keys used for those 525 .deb's, seven of which correspond
to DD's[1].
So, most of the DD's do not care about security at all. Why does
Debian have a
On 11/23/05, John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek writes:
Security is more than package signatures.
What is your specific proposal?
I don't have one. But I don't see how that's relevant.
On 11/15/05, Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
to call Azureus.
On 11/11/05, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering that James' reluctance to do the work he has volunteered
to do is a recurring issue in the Debian project, and that this issue
has not yet been addressed by the new DPL who was elected in the hope
that he would try solving some of
On 11/10/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Josselin Mouette]
I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
to be accepted in the past.
It's the first line of defense against people uploading things that
don't build, wasting various infrastructure
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I'm afraid I have to ask the same question again (three
On 11/10/05, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any chance you could get quoting right? this message is totally
unreadable.
Maybe it's caused by lack of support for UTF-8?
On 11/8/05, Alex Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that we have limited resources.
How is that relevant?
On 11/1/05, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:56:44PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
In my opinion this is not a bug (except if the package is crucial for
the system to work and be reachable, like ssh) - the local admin simply
has to review the changes to
ma, 2005-10-31 kello 22:03 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
kirjoitti:
I would like developers to review and provide feedback for that section,
specially in form of patches. I'm considering doing a bug hunt for:
Typically this means that the configuration files are owned by group, belong
On 10/31/05, Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This brings up an issue that is bothering me as a user since a long
time. Whenever I change a config file, I have to take care and examine
changes of the config file in its pacakge. Because most times those
provide some enhancments (e.g.
Hi.
Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
Examples are:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267477
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288615
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289868
On 10/25/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I'm afraid I have to ask the same question again (three months later).
What's the status of this package
On 10/27/05, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now, a new gcc-4.0 bumped the shlibdeps for libstdc++ -- and worse,
depends on new binutils and new glibc. This will undoubtedly mean that either
forced package breakages, significant numbers of package removals, or months
more of
On 10/26/05, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peńa
wrote:
That really depends on the daemon itself don't you think? There's a number
of
daemons that don't create any file at all or, if they do, are created
only
On 10/24/05, Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I'm afraid I have to ask the same question again (three months later).
What's the status of this package in general and my patch in particular?
There was some discussion
On 8/2/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What's the maintenance status of the net-tools package?
It has 88 bugs:
Serious policy violations - outstanding (1 bug)
Important bugs - outstanding (8 bugs)
Normal bugs - outstanding (38 bugs)
Minor bugs - outstanding (9 bugs
On 10/21/05, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could not care less about hurd or kFreeBSD, sorry.
But I care a lot about having a working and up to date iputils package
for my Linux systems, and I do not want Debian to fork it unless there
Is a portable version required to be not working
On 10/20/05, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proper fix would be to enumerate all IP addresses of all network
interfaces and select one that has an appropriate name. Unfortunately
this is non-trivial and highly OS-dependent, although the libdumbnet1
package provides a
On 10/20/05, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:16:40PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Wouldn't the proper fix be to not use source address based authentication?
This is not authentication. INN just need a string to uniquely identify
a host. Using a FQDN is OK
On 10/18/05, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Frank Küster]
Shouldn't NMU's without the maintainers approval be restricted to RC
and maybe important bugs?
Well, assuming we want as many bugs as possible fixed before the
release, and not only RC bugs, I believe NMUs should be
On 10/18/05, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] please don't file an rc bug against my package for my having mentioned
this... i've recently adopted it and would like to see the 30 some odd
bugfixes make it into testing.
Isn't it possible to tell the BTS the RC bug also applies to
On 10/16/05, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Such a tool would be very nice, and not just because of the cruft they
leave behind -- many packages currently support SSL connections; some
automatically generate a
On 10/17/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the patch,
and if I reply I don't have time right now, okay to NMU that if you
like then it's fine (and in fact it is going to be
On 10/15/05, Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
There aren't that many good reasons for having one cert per service
anyway
...except that if you have a certificate
On 10/15/05, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 10/15/05, Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can't know all the names that people will use to refer to your
server, so this is one of the cases where you have to do stuff manually
anyway.
AFAIK
On 10/6/05, Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2005 12:45, Henning Makholm wrote:
I notice that the newest upload of pstoedit has reverted the C++
transition name change; instead of libpstoedit0c2 sid now contains
libpstoedit0, as in sarge.
This is, IMHO,
On 9/23/05, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:59:52PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:47:58PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
..warning: connect to mysql server foobar: Access denied for user
'whoever'@'localhost.localdomain' (using
On 9/23/05, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:07:54PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 9/23/05, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears like MySQL does that. It seems to check the IP address of the
connecting client to find the permissions
On 9/13/05, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Olaf van der Spek]
I thought that if the interface matches the user can link whatever
he wants, because he doesn't (re)distribute the results.
[Steve Langasek]
There isn't universal agreement on this point, and it's never
201 - 300 of 423 matches
Mail list logo
