Package: www.debian.org
[ reporting this as a bug ]
Heya,
Filippo Rusconi discovered the .svg of the Debian logo is not loadable
in (some versions of) Inkscape. With the help of Jakub Wilk, the .svg
has been fixed and it's attached to this mail. Can you please update the
published ve
s fine in Inkscape,
The Gimp, Iceweasel and... GNU Emacs!
Maybe the folks at debian-...@lists.debian.org might want to give it a
test and replace the old file with this one? Anyhow I now have my
Debian logo for my slides!
Thanks all for helping with this issue.
Cheers,
Filippo
--
Filippo Rus
* Jakub Wilk , 2013-01-24, 17:48:
here's how to fix the SVG:
1) apt-get install libxml2-utils sgml-data
2) xmllint --noent openlogo.svg > openlogo-fixed.svg
(Yes it's "noent", not to be confused with "nonet".)
3) Optionally, remove the DTD declaration from the resulting file.
The last two step
* Filippo Rusconi , 2013-01-24, 17:13:
Investigating a bit, I found that
http://www.adobe.com/AdobeSVGViewerExtensions/3.0/
gives a 404 in my browser. This url is at line 18 of the file.
Same for
http://www.adobe.com/Extensibility/1.0/
That's not a problem. Namespace names are only compared
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:35 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
>> fails to load in the much-respected SVG-based graphics editor Inkscape
>> (which I use daily and which works fine also for svg files not
>> produced by itself).
> In mine
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 17:08 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> $ sha1sum openlogo.svg
> f958ec1c5eaf8c8507e6830852292081fca1 openlogo.svg
>
> could you confirm this on a file that you have
>
> wget http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo.svg
Funny:
inkscape openlogo.svg
=> fails
inkscape http
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> thanks for bothering :-)
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:35 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > > fails to load in the much-respected SVG-ba
Hello Stefano,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > We may want to make sure that this file loads fine in Free Software
> > graphics svg-based programs and maybe convert it to either a more
> > ge
Hello Chris,
thanks for bothering :-)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:51:43PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:35 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> > fails to load in the much-respected SVG-based graphics editor Inkscape
> > (which I use daily and which works fine also f
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> We may want to make sure that this file loads fine in Free Software
> graphics svg-based programs and maybe convert it to either a more
> generic svg file, or at least something free (Inkscape might be a good
> candidate for this).
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:35 +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> fails to load in the much-respected SVG-based graphics editor Inkscape
> (which I use daily and which works fine also for svg files not
> produced by itself).
In mine it loads, version 0.48.3.1-1.3.
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Greetings, Fellow Debianists,
>
> this is not actually a bug report but something that might concern us
> all as a matter of Free Software use inside the Debian project:
>
> The Debian logo file at http://ww
Greetings, Fellow Debianists,
this is not actually a bug report but something that might concern us
all as a matter of Free Software use inside the Debian project:
The Debian logo file at http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo.svg
fails to load in the much-respected SVG-based graphics editor
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:18:18PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future...
For the record, while I don't dislike the "e = modern swirl" idea, the
font (typeface?) of the rest of the letters is just awful for a logo
(because it'
> This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future...
For the record, while I don't dislike the "e = modern swirl" idea, the
font (typeface?) of the rest of the letters is just awful for a logo
(because it's one of the common ones whose name I don't kno
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I do think so that its a really nice picture , but one of my suggestion is
> can't you create "e" in Circle/Spiral way.
> that is my personal opinion ,your work is extremely good.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:39
Hi,
I do think so that its a really nice picture , but one of my suggestion is
can't you create "e" in Circle/Spiral way.
that is my personal opinion ,your work is extremely good.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a very nice picture, but I guess may
It's a very nice picture, but I guess maybe it would belong more to
somewhere like DebianArt [1] than to this mailing list.
Greetings,
Miry
[1] http://www.debianart.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:44:42 József Makay wrote:
> This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future...
Very cool looking!
--
Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
signature.asc
Description: This is a
This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future...
<>
e for
more information on the font (referenced in Alfi's mail below).
> or google for "debian logo font" :
> first match was a msg from Alfi:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/08/msg00261.html
A ressembling free (as in beer) TTF font can be found here:
<http://www.
Ok, last mail:
searching the lists: the logo was created by Raul M. Silva.
http://www.debian.org/News/1999/19990826
Maybe you could ask him, if he can create a Debian-Med logo for you.
(http://www.silva.com / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
I try to put this information on wiki.debian.net, if I manage
Joerg Friedrich schrieb am Donnerstag, 07. Juli 2005 um 16:17:39 +0200:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianLogo
> or google for "debian logo font" :
> first match was a msg from Alfi:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/08/msg00261.html
btw. the i-dot seems to be manua
d in our Logo
>
> http://www.debian.org/logos/ ?
>
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianLogo
or google for "debian logo font" :
first match was a msg from Alfi:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/08/msg00261.html
--
Jörg Friedrich
There are only 10 types of people:
Those who
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Richard Atterer wrote:
Do you only need the Debian logo in your TeX document? Then a far more
promising plan is to embed the PostScript version of the logo as a picture.
No, as I said I want to have the String "Debian-Med" and I need the "M".
I could bui
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:46:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Does anybody know whether there is a TeX font which is equal or at least
> very similar to the font used in our Logo
I've never seen a Debian-ish TeX font.
Do you only need the Debian logo in your TeX document? Then
Hi,
it's surely off topic here but I don't know which is the relevant list ...
Does anybody know whether there is a TeX font which is equal or at least
very similar to the font used in our Logo
http://www.debian.org/logos/ ?
I would need to scale the Debian text and add a "-Med" behind
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 15:18 +0100, Hanspeter Kunz wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 18:01 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > In the process of completion of my book (http://debianbook.info),
> > I have one more question. Unfortunately, I am on a shitty GSM link
> > right now and the av
: Photography of shells aligned to form the Debian logo
> > A photography that consists of shells aligned to form the
> > Debian logo.
>
> A package for a single background is a remarkably stupid idea. This
> should go in desktop-base.
Hello Colin,
Can you put only th
.mine.nu/jakub/
> * License : Artistic License
> Description : Photography of shells aligned to form the Debian logo
> A photography that consists of shells aligned to form the
> Debian logo.
A package for a single background is a remarkably stupid idea. This
should go in
ligned to form the Debian logo
A photography that consists of shells aligned to form the
Debian logo.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux ibook 2.4.23-ben1 #7 Sat Dec 27 11:20:38 CET 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response, but here is a possible answer to the
> second part of the question from a semiotic perspective. Although the
> question was what the swirl /tries/ to symbolize, it may be of some
> interest what it a
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 18:01 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> In the process of completion of my book (http://debianbook.info),
> I have one more question. Unfortunately, I am on a shitty GSM link
> right now and the available (crippled) means of research have not
> been able to produce an answer to
Hello.
I've influenced by Mr. Craig Small's and created yet another Debian logo
buttons. (csmall's are at http://www.debian.org/~csmall/).
I put mine at http://www.debian.org/~kitame/
How about this?
Thanks.
--
Takuo Kitame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> Speaking of the open use logo, was it intentional or an unintentional
> artifact of the conversion from EPS to xfig that changed the shape of the
> letters and the logo itself?
Unintentional, I think.
I have .ps files with the correct shapes, and have sent them to the web
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> Previously Frederic CELLA wrote:
> > can i send to them ? (this one the fisrt page of www.debian.org)
>
> The webpage has a postscript version of the logo iirc. This should make
> it trivial for them to produce a 300dpi logo (or whatever other
> resolution they desire)
Previously Frederic CELLA wrote:
> can i send to them ? (this one the fisrt page of www.debian.org)
The webpage has a postscript version of the logo iirc. This should make
it trivial for them to produce a 300dpi logo (or whatever other
resolution they desire).
Wichert.
--
==
* "Frederic" == Frederic CELLA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frederic> They publish next week a magazine. they need 300DPI DEBIAN
Frederic> LOGO. can i send to them ? (this one the fisrt page of
Frederic> www.debian.org)
Check out http://www.debian.org/logos/. They can use the open use
logo, the p
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 12:59:40 +, Frederic CELLA wrote:
> They publish next week a magazine. they need 300DPI DEBIAN LOGO.
At http://www.debian.org/logos/ you can find the logos as xfig source and as
postscript. (Use ghostscript to produce the logo in your favourite bitmap
format at y
They publish next week a magazine. they need 300DPI DEBIAN LOGO.
can i send to them ? (this one the fisrt page of www.debian.org)
if problem email to me. if not. i sen d to them this friday.
bst regards.
Frederic.
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 02:33:11AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I indeed asked around on irc a bit if people were interested in this and
> you said you we were to help out, but you never answered my question why
> you would make a good choice. So I didn't know about your background in
> publish
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Not to sound put off by this, just wondering on what criteria you
> selected the team. Considering I offered to help, and the fact that I
> have a strong background in desktop publishing and web design (strong,
> as in 8 years working experience) I would have thought
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 07:40:28PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > * Nils Lohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * James Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, these guys are obvious... Nils has done a *great* job at getting
lots of Debian press releases out there, and James is our webmaster.
--
David Welt
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 10:02:18PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> After getting a few volunteers and asking a few other people I present
> to you the Debian logo-team, who will select the best logos for your
> voting pleasure:
>
> * Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
After getting a few volunteers and asking a few other people I present
to you the Debian logo-team, who will select the best logos for your
voting pleasure:
* Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Teemu Hukkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Nils Lohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry, this probably belongs on -devel... I'll post it there too. About
the design, I personally like the penguin for Debian GNU/Linux, have
something similar for Hurd (meaning a red profile of a GNU head or
something) and something different (maybe plain nice graphical text?
There was a nic
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 10:33:30AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > You've forgotten something. The military act as if they are above any
> > laws. (If they cared about obeying laws, they would be disarming nuclear
> > weapons under their international treaty obligations)
>
> On the contrary.
Andrew writes:
> You've forgotten something. The military act as if they are above any
> laws. (If they cared about obeying laws, they would be disarming nuclear
> weapons under their international treaty obligations)
On the contrary. The "military", at least in the US and the UK, act in
ac
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> I just got word back from Sven Riedel, the guy in charge of organizing
> gimp contests. He was happy with our request, and was willing to organize
> the whole thing. The contest will start in februari, after the current
> contest (dreams) ends. Det
I just got word back from Sven Riedel, the guy in charge of organizing
gimp contests. He was happy with our request, and was willing to organize
the whole thing. The contest will start in februari, after the current
contest (dreams) ends. Details and submissions will be at the usual
site: http://c
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 07:26:19AM -, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> Avery Pennarun wrote:
> >What if someone gets hold of the Linux kernel and uses it to guide nuclear
> >missiles? (Well, at least they have to share their changes with us :))
>
> Only if they distribute the control systems :>
You'v
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 03:37:57AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> to either of these animals. We have our own message, too. We are
> constructors. We take the work of thousands of people and put them together.
> Shouldn't this be reflected by the logo, too?
You mean like a penguin wearing a har
All:
Please pardon my non-developer comment, but one thing about the license has
bothered me for a while, and I've seen no else bring it up:
Do we really want to limit the maximum size of an entity that can display
the license?
Points 2, 3, & 4 of the license state, roughly, that yo
Jonathan P Tomer wrote:
> is the name debian a registered trademark?
I think so.
> if it is, wouldn't it be sensible to do the same for the logo?
I agree. I think trademarking the logo will allow us to prevent misuse and
at the same time allow us to give it a DFSG-free copyright.
--
see shy jo
James A. Treacy writes:
> Even with the existing license (and a valid expiry date) I have probably
> handled 20 requests for use of the logo in the last 6 months.
Doesn't seem like many considering that the present license encourages
requests. Do you really think that forty people a year would en
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 10:35:50PM -0600, Andrew G . Feinberg wrote:
> > Larry Ewing and Tux. You don't see him writing a license, do you?
> The picture of Tux is licensed freely for any use as long as Larry
> Ewing is mentioned. Don't know about modification, t
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 06:20:49PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>
> Or don't license it: just use it on Debian stuff and grant individual
> licenses on a case by case basis. I doubt that you will be swamped by all
> the requests.
>
I'm glad to see you volunteer to take respond to requests that come
Andrew G . Feinberg writes:
> Why in the world do we need to license something as trivial as a _logo_?
I wrote:
> We don't.
Darren Benham writes:
> Of course we do. Otherwise we'd have to grant permission to every
> tom-dick-harry that wanted to use it in any way-shape-form.
I meant, of course,
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 02:32:27PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> The existence of a recurring discussion usually indicates an unsolved
> problem. A vote might or might not resolve the underlying issue.
>
Let's hope that there is enough interest generated that we actually do
solve the problem.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24-Jan-99 John Hasler wrote:
> Andrew G . Feinberg writes:
>> Why in the world do we need to license something as trivial as a _logo_?
>
> We don't.
Of course we do. Otherwise we'd have to grant permission to every
tom-dick-harry that wanted to use it in a
> On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 11:44:06PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > We shouldn't license our logo by any license that does not comply with the
> > DFSG. To do so would be hypocritical.
> >
> Not true. It's the Debian Free SOFTWARE Guidelines. A logo is not software.
> It may well be that we want a l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
is the name debian a registered trademark?
if it is, wouldn't it be sensible to do the same for the logo?
- --p.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNqt2MUJhnFR90XSjAQHeFAf9EULUklt0QfjI2DAbrPK2
James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope that you are not trying to argue that there is no difference
> between a program and a logo. This is clearly ridiculous.
That's not my point. However, the definition of "software" is broad
enough to cover both, and the use of that particular wor
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 01:42:30PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 11:44:06PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > We shouldn't license our logo by any license that does not comply
> > > with the DFSG. To do so would be hypocritical.
>
> James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 11:44:06PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > We shouldn't license our logo by any license that does not comply
> > with the DFSG. To do so would be hypocritical.
James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not true. It's the Debian Free SOFTWARE Guidelines.
You're trying to ma
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 10:35:50PM -0600, Andrew G . Feinberg wrote:
> Why in the world do we need to license something as trivial as a
> _logo_?
Because if we don't, nobody has the right to make copies of it and
display it publically. It's the same reason as with software.
> as a normal person
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 11:44:06PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Robert Woodcock wrote:
> > "You are licensed to use and distribute modified versions of this logo to
> > refer to or advertise debian."
> >
> > Note that this fails DFSG point #6. I believe this was the original intent.
>
> We shouldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24-Jan-99 Avery Pennarun wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 07:48:00PM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
>> > Debian is a free project to distribute a free OS. It should have a free
>> > logo. FREE
Andrew G . Feinberg writes:
> Why in the world do we need to license something as trivial as a _logo_?
We don't.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you ca
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> "You are licensed to use and distribute modified versions of this logo to
> refer to or advertise debian."
>
> Note that this fails DFSG point #6. I believe this was the original intent.
We shouldn't license our logo by any license that does not comply with the
DFSG. To d
Avery Pennarun wrote:
>What if someone gets hold of the Linux kernel and uses it to guide nuclear
>missiles? (Well, at least they have to share their changes with us :))
Only if they distribute the control systems :>
>Seriously, slander is slander, and it's rude, and people will know it when
>th
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 07:48:00PM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Debian is a free project to distribute a free OS. It should have a free
> > logo. FREE THE LOGO!! FREE THE LOGO!! :-)
>
> And what if some anti-debian people ge
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999 00:52:12 +0100, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Wichert> [1 ] For the Nth
Wichert> time our logo license has expired. It might be a good idea
Wichert> to finally finalize the license instead of just extending
Wichert> its lifetime every couple of mon
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 02:55:56AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Agreed. Shall we move the logo license discussion to debian-legal and
> rewrite it there?
Explain:
Why in the world do we need to license something as trivial as a
_logo_? I havent been a developer for a long time, but it
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 02:54:14AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > * It is a penguin (even if some think it's a chicken). A penguin is already
> > the Linux logo, are we only capable of plagiarism, or are we up to the
> > task
> > and have an identi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24-Jan-99 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Darren Benham wrote:
>> The current license? Are you sure? It needs to be rewritten if for no
>> other
>> reason but to remove the expiration date.
>
> Okay, so I should have read the license before posting th
Previously Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> * It is a penguin (even if some think it's a chicken). A penguin is already
> the Linux logo, are we only capable of plagiarism, or are we up to the task
> and have an identity of our own?
Heh, nobody seems to be able to spot that :)
> * A penguin is submi
Previously Chris Waters wrote:
> Debian is a free project to distribute a free OS. It should have a free
> logo. FREE THE LOGO!! FREE THE LOGO!! :-)
Agreed. Shall we move the logo license discussion to debian-legal and
rewrite it there?
Wichert.
--
==
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
>
>On 23-Jan-99 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the current
>> license.
>>
>
>The current license? Are you sure? It needs to be rewritten if for no other
>reason but to remove the expiration date.
Note t
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Chris Waters wrote:
>Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
>> I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the current
>> license.
>
>I very much dislike the current license. I'm a debian developer, I'd
>like to put the debian logo on my
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:21:37PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Debian is a free project to distribute a free OS. It should have a free
> logo. FREE THE LOGO!! FREE THE LOGO!! :-)
And what if some anti-debian people get ahold of the logo and use it for
evil purposes?
--
Stephen Crowley
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the current
>license.
I think this is a good idea. If this proposal needs to be seconded,
consider this my "seconded!".
If it needs to be seconded somewhere else (debian-vote?) i'll do so
there :)
Previously Darren Benham wrote:
> The current license? Are you sure? It needs to be rewritten if for no other
> reason but to remove the expiration date.
Okay, so I should have read the license before posting that :). Should
we change anything besides removing the expiration date? So far nobody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 23-Jan-99 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the current
> license.
>
The current license? Are you sure? It needs to be rewritten if for no other
reason but to remove the expiration date.
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I propose that we vote on accepting both the logo and the current
> license.
I very much dislike the current license. I'm a debian developer, I'd
like to put the debian logo on my home page, but I do *not* necessarily
want to devote half or more of
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 12:52:12AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> There has also been mention of people wanting a different logo. I think
> we should stick to our current logo for several reasons though:
>
> * it is a good logo: it's easily recognizable, simple to draw, scales
> good and
For the Nth time our logo license has expired. It might be a good idea
to finally finalize the license instead of just extending its lifetime
every couple of months.
There has also been mention of people wanting a different logo. I think
we should stick to our current logo for several reasons tho
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 11:59:31PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > Ideally, we need a version of the logo that can be reproduced in one
> > or two colors. That way it can go directly on a CD or be printed
> > inexpensively. Full-color printing can be rather expensive.
>
> And it should s
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 12:25:07PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > >
> > > I would prefer a new logo, too. We shouldn't draw it.
> > > We should run a gimp contest. They produced the Gnome logo, and th
> Ideally, we need a version of the logo that can be reproduced in one
> or two colors. That way it can go directly on a CD or be printed
> inexpensively. Full-color printing can be rather expensive.
And it should scale well, from fairly large to quite small. This means
lines and *simple* curve
On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 02:43:05AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I would prefer a new logo, too. We shouldn't draw it.
> We should run a gimp contest. They produced the Gnome logo, and there are
> artists as well as designer. They'll come up with a good, inspiring logo,
> I'm sure. We should vot
On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 12:25:07PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > I would prefer a new logo, too. We shouldn't draw it.
> > We should run a gimp contest. They produced the Gnome logo, and there are
> > artists as well as designer. They'll come up
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> >
> > I'd prefer a new logo as well (with no offense intended toward the kind
> > person who created the current one!)
>
> I would prefer a new logo, too. We shouldn't draw it.
> We shoul
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Jeff Noxon wrote:
>
> I'd prefer a new logo as well (with no offense intended toward the kind
> person who created the current one!)
>
> But I can't draw, so I guess I should shut up. :-)
I would prefer a new logo, too. We shouldn't draw it.
We should r
duct, such as a book or a set
> of web pages, at least half of the content matter must be
> related to the Distribution.
> 3.3. In the case of a service, at least one half of the practice of
> the service must be related to the use of the Distribution.
I think
ebian' or any other marketing slogan
containing the name Debian, when approved should *require* "The Debian
Logo" appear on all product materials that meet the criterion "contains
Debian".
> * What about hardware manufacturers who preinstall Debian ? Do we
> just let the
On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Then if we want to change the licence we publish version 2 instead,
> leaving version 1 available but stating that it is no longer
> available. Users of the logo have to go and check each year that the
These last two sentences are a little wacky. You mean
James A.Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Another person has requested use of the Debian logo. As most people
> are pretty happy with the license I added a clause saying the logo is
> usable under the current license
> (http://www.debian.org/logos/logo.html. Update should reach ther
Another person has requested use of the Debian logo. As most people
are pretty happy with the license I added a clause saying the logo
is usable under the current license (http://www.debian.org/logos/logo.html.
Update should reach there soon) until 31 January 1998 and told him he could
use it
I have converted our new logo into a transparent GIF, if anyone is
interested. It looks pretty decent and is nice for light colored
backgrounds. It can be found at the bottom of my web page:
http://thomppj.student.okstate.edu/~thomppj/
- Paul J Thompson
-
100 matches
Mail list logo
